logo
How China's rare earths monopoly threatens Fortune 500 companies: ‘Its the biggest gun they have to our heads'

How China's rare earths monopoly threatens Fortune 500 companies: ‘Its the biggest gun they have to our heads'

Yahoo27-05-2025

When President Donald Trump targeted China with sky-high tariffs in April, it set up a showdown testing which country could better absorb the economic fallout. For the U.S., the fallout came in the form of fewer and more expensive imports and, for China, it has meant idle factories and a shortage of dollars. China, however, holds a trump card: a monopoly on a variety of rare earths, or minerals that are critical to key American industries—including the defense sector, which needs those materials to make cutting edge fighter jets like the F-35.
'It's the biggest gun they have to our heads,' says Evan Smith, CEO of Altana Technologies, which provides supply chain insights to a host of major companies. In the case of the F-35, the company recently created the following graphic, which shows how the planes rely on rare earths for everything from sensors to motors to thermal coating:
Smith describes the rare earths above, which have names like terbium and Yttrium, as 'the most important metals you've never heard of.' Though they may be obscure, they are essential not just for defense manufacturers like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman (makers of the F-35) but also tech firms like Apple and auto firms like Tesla.
In the current trade war, China has outright banned the export of these rare earths, but has introduced a licensing regime that is already introducing supply chain disruptions. Ordinarily, U.S. firms would turn to suppliers in other countries but the current system of rare earth production means nearly all of it occurs in China. This Altana graphic shows that, in most cases, the country is responsible for 90% or more of most of these key minerals:
According to a recent report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Department of Defense has been moving to build a domestic supply chain for rare earths—including by issuing grants to firms in California and Texas—but these facilities have yet to become fully operational. Meanwhile, countries like Japan and Australia are also looking to expand rare earth production but, for now, their output is nowhere near to offsetting China's de facto monopoly.
'Developing mining and processing capabilities requires a long-term effort, meaning the United States will be on the back foot for the foreseeable future,' the CSIS report notes.
All of this likely explains why President Trump appeared to blink first in the trade war standoff, lowering tariffs on China to 30% earlier this month. The trade war, though, is very much ongoing and as the two countries plot an endgame, China's rare earths monopoly is likely to mean it will maintain the upper hand.
Further reading: BP's chief U.S. economist worries China is winning the global energy war. Here's why
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I Literally Have Almost No Money'—MrBeast Shocks Fans by Borrowing Wedding Funds from His Mom
'I Literally Have Almost No Money'—MrBeast Shocks Fans by Borrowing Wedding Funds from His Mom

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'I Literally Have Almost No Money'—MrBeast Shocks Fans by Borrowing Wedding Funds from His Mom

Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast, recently surprised fans by revealing on X that he's borrowing money from his mother to pay for his upcoming wedding. The disclosure comes despite an estimated $1 billion net worth and a business empire reportedly valued at $5 billion, highlighting a paradox of the creator economy: being asset-rich but cash-poor. "I literally have almost no money," MrBeast said in a June 2 post on X.. "I've just been reinvesting everything into content and 'literally' had to borrow money from my mom to help with my wedding lol." Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. This comes as his businesses—collectively known as Beast Industries—were reported by Bloomberg in February to be raising funds at a $5 billion valuation. "I think this year we'll spend around a quarter of a billion on content," Donaldson continued. According to Business Insider, his business generated just under $500 million in revenue last year. This high spending is driven by projects like MrBeast's Feastables snack brand and the Amazon Prime Video series, "Beast Games," which require substantial upfront capital. The show awarded a $10 million prize to its first-season winner—making it one of the most expensive game shows ever produced, Forbes reported. Despite financial constraints, Donaldson and his fiancée, Thea Booysen, are opting for an intimate, low-key wedding. "This will definitely be more family and friends—definitely more private. I don't take much vacation because of how hard I work... It will be the ultimate way to take some time away and enjoy things," MrBeast told People. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Booysen echoed the sentiment, telling the New York Post that they were considering holding the wedding on an island, away from public attention, and described the event as "nice but certainly intimate," focused on close family and friends. Goldman Sachs estimates that the creator economy could reach $480 billion by 2027, powered by more than 50 million active creators. However, MrBeast's experience illustrates that building billion-dollar ventures may come at the cost of short-term personal liquidity. Donaldson said on the "The Diary of a CEO" podcast that while he may be a billionaire "on paper," he has "less than a million dollars" in his actual bank account. Read Next: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement —? Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'I Literally Have Almost No Money'—MrBeast Shocks Fans by Borrowing Wedding Funds from His Mom originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says

Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store