
EXCLUSIVE Here's the proof my uncles DID escape Alcatraz - and why Donald Trump should reconsider his plans to reopen it
A nephew of two Alcatraz robbers slammed Donald Trump for claiming no one has ever escaped the notorious California prison that he wants to reopen.
David Widner, 58, of Leesburg, Georgia, is convinced his uncles John and Clarence Anglin – one of the prison's most notorious escape stories – made it off the island alive, despite the US president claiming the lock-up joint was inescapable.
'That would be a lie,' David, a safety manager, exclusively told DailyMail.com. 'There have been several escapes and more than one where they don't know what happened to them.
'So they can't say it was unescapable, because it was.'
He says the FBI spent years questioning his family as agents investigated the theory they had fled to Mexico following the audacious 1962 jailbreak.
'If they really believed that my uncles didn't make it, they would have stopped looking for them,' he said.
'Still to this day, they have not stopped looking for them. So why would you be looking for someone you believe to be dead? It's still an open case, so why not close the case?'
This week, Trump vowed to reopen Alcatraz as he continues to crack down on violent criminals and illegal migrants.
John Anglin (left with a friend) made it to dry land with his brother Clarence and Frank Morris, his nephew is convinced. 'If they really believed that my uncles didn't make it, they would have stopped looking for them,' said David Widner.
In a post shared to Truth Social on Sunday night, Trump said: 'The reopening of ALCATRAZ will serve as a symbol of Law, Order, and JUSTICE.'
Trump has directed the Bureau of Prisons to work alongside the Department of Justice, FBI, and Homeland Security to 'reopen a substantially enlarged and rebuilt' Alcatraz.
He said the notorious facility, which once held famed gangster Al Capone, will 'house America's most ruthless and violent offenders.'
The order comes as Trump has repeatedly clashed with the courts as he tries to send accused gang members and illegal migrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador.
Maximum security Alcatraz, which was shut down in 1963, will provide Trump a workaround to those court orders barring him from carrying out the mass deportation scheme.
As the Republican gears up for this new venture, the question of whether the Anglin brothers and fellow inmate Frank Morris successfully escaped from Alcatraz still remains one of the biggest mysteries of the prison.
The convicted bank robbers spent six months using spoons and forks to dig holes in the walls surrounding the air vents in their cells.
On the night of the escape, they used painted papier-mâché heads topped with hair collected from the prison barber shop to fool the guards into thinking they were asleep in bed.
They squeezed through the hole and made their way from the prison roof to the water's edge carrying a makeshift raft crafted from 50 pilfered cotton raincoats.
The fugitives' bodies have never been found, but the FBI concluded in 1979 that all three must have drowned in the freezing, shark-infested waters surrounding the prison.
David, however, says the FBI's announcement was part of an elaborate cover-up, designed to protect the Federal Penitentiary's fearsome reputation.
A total of 36 prisoners made 14 escape attempts from Alcatraz in its 30-year history - making Trump's claims false.
Out of those, 23 were caught alive, six were shot and killed, and two are known to have drowned attempting the 1.25-mile swim to shore through brutal currents.
Five, including the Anglins, who were incarcerated there in 1957, and Morris, who had been an inmate there since 1960, are listed as 'missing and presumed drowned.'
The story of the June 11, 1962 escape was later turned into the 1979 film starring Clint Eastwood called Escape From Alcatraz.
Eastwood played bank robber Morris, who had an IQ of 133, putting him in the smartest two percent in the population.
They were thought to have escaped to Mexico and later Brazil after leaving the prison. This photo was believed to be them, but David said he has since learned who those men actually are.
David says his uncles were strong swimmers who would regularly bunk off school as kids to swim in the ocean off Tampa, Florida.
He can still recall his mother, Marie – who was raised with her 13 siblings in the nearby town of Ruskin – being quizzed by the FBI when he was a small boy.
But this week, when announcing his intention to reopen Alcatraz, Trump said: 'It represents something very strong, very powerful in terms of law and order. Our country needs law and order. Alcatraz is, I would say, the ultimate, right?
'But it's right now a museum, believe it or not. A lot of people go there. It housed the most violent criminals in the world and nobody ever escaped.'
David believes Trump isn't 'aware of my uncles' story and I would love to talk to him about that.'
'I would love to tell him that to reopen that prison would be a huge cost and you would lose all of the history because all of the cells – including my uncles' – would no longer be available for people to see.
'In my opinion, it would be cheaper to build an underground prison if he wants to keep them out of the public eye.
'To me, preserving the history would make more sense than turning it back into a prison.'
As for what he would tell the 47th president about his uncles is that they were stronger swimmers and 'water was the last deterrent.'
'They were a lot smarter than people gave them credit for and there's no doubt in my mind that they made it. It was not an inescapable prison,' he said. 'If you got out of that building, you have escaped Alcatraz.'
In 1992, a drug smuggler called Fred Brizzi, now deceased, claimed to have flown the Anglin brothers to Mexico a short time after their escape.
A photo later emerged that experts said showed the brothers standing next to a termite mound on a farm in Brazil.
Another twist came when it was leaked in 2018 that US authorities had been sitting on a letter reportedly written by John Anglin five years earlier.
The note was sent to police in San Francisco in 2013 and stated: 'My name is John Anglin. I escape [sic] from Alcatraz in June 1962 with my brother Clarence and Frank Morris.
'I'm 83 years old and in bad shape. I have cancer.
'Yes we all made it that night but barely! Frank passed away in October 2005. His grave is in Alexandria under another name. My brother died in 2011,' it read.
The prison is now a museum, as Trump referenced. The order comes as Trump has repeatedly clashed with the courts as he tries to send accused gang members and illegal migrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador
David wrote a book about Alcatraz his uncle's escape
'If you announce on TV that I will be promised to first go to jail for no more than a year and get medical attention, I will write back to let you know exactly where I am. This is no joke this is for real and honest truth.'
However, David doesn't believe his uncle is still alive.
'My mom is fixing to turn 90 so John would probably be 96. There are only two sisters left and all the brothers have passed away out of 14 kids, seven girls and seven boys,' he told DailyMail.com.
'So the chances of them still being alive at this age are very slim. My whole goal and mission was to get my mom to see her brother again but I don't think that will happen at this point.
As for where he believes his relatives were hiding? He doesn't believe they ever left Mexico.
'For a long time, I thought they ended up in South America, in Brazil. With recent research, I now don't believe they ever left Mexico once they made it over there,' he said.
'They had an older brother that they confided in 100 percent and he was in touch with them for 25 years after the escape. He made regular trips to Mexico to see old friends and he was questioned about that by the FBI.
'I have a picture of Uncle John standing next to his car in the 1950s and once I scanned it and zoomed in, I saw the tag on the front of his car was a Mexican tag. So they had ties to Mexico long before they committed the robbery and went to Alcatraz.
'There were some leads in Brazil and Brizzi came to the family with his elaborate story about running into them at a bar in Rio.
'My mom recorded that conversation and when I first heard it my reaction was: "I know he is lying." I could just tell,' he said.
Brizzi gave his mother some photographs that he claimed were 'taken while he was there, including two guys he had travelled down with.'
'He never said they were John and Clarence but we started looking at it and wondering whether it was them,' David told DailyMail.com.
'When the experts did their facial recognition and came back and said that it was highly likely to be them, then I really started believing it and I made myself believe it.
However, he later found out that the men in the photograph were not John and Clarence, but he's not quite ready to reveal their true identities.
'I know who the two guys are and it's not them. I can't say who it is, that will be something that is coming out soon. One of them is still alive.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pete Hegseth's wild tantrum at media for 'overshadowing' Trump Iran strikes amid devastating leaks nukes weren't obliterated
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth went ballistic on reporters at a Pentagon press conference Thursday, lashing out at reports that U.S. airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were ineffective. The defense secretary was joined by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, to tout to reporters the 'historic success' of last weekend's B-2 bombing run. A fired-up Hegseth was also adamant that journalists in the Pentagon press corps are decidedly anti-Trump. 'You cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and blood,' he accused the press in the room. 'You have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.' 'Your people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful, it's irresponsible,' he charged. The press conference - a rarity for Hegseth - came within days of CNN reporting that the U.S. strikes would only set back Iran 's nuclear sites by a couple of months. The report cited seven individuals briefed on a battle damage assessment done by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) of the Iranian sites. It directly contradicted President Donald Trump and the defense secretary's claim that the sites were destroyed - and clearly enraged the administration. CIA Director John Ratcliffe asserted the strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear program, according to a New York Times report, a declaration that fell far short of the president's claims of total obliteration. When pressed on whether the strikes took out Iran's enriched uranium, Hegseth responded cagily. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' he explained without offering further evidence that the uranium was destroyed. He went on to lambaste CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times and other outlets that reported on the preliminary report completed by an intelligence agency within the Pentagon. Unnamed sources, who reportedly have seen the Defense Intelligence Agency report, say that the sites could be online within months. The centrifuges used to enrich uranium went undamaged and the country's stockpile of enriched uranium was possibly relocated ahead of the strikes, they said. The DIA assessment concluded with 'low confidence' that the site sustained 'moderate to severe' damage, Hegseth told reporters at NATO on Wednesday. The administration, Hegseth said Wednesday, believes it was 'far more likely severe and obliterated.' Hegseth also had a notable clash with his former Fox News colleague Jennifer Griffin, the outlet's Pentagon correspondent, during the briefing. Griffin, a veteran Pentagon reporter who's been with the channel for decades, asked Hegseth to clarify whether Iran's already enriched uranium was destroyed by the U.S. strikes. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' the Pentagon secretary responded cagily. Griffin then asked: 'That's not the question, though. It's about highly enriched uranium. Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow mountain, or some of it?' 'There were satellite photos that showed more than a dozen trucks there two days in advance? Are you certain none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?' 'Of course, we're watching every single aspect,' Hegseth responded before bizarrely turning on his old colleague. 'But Jennifer, you've been about the worst, the one who misrepresents the most intentionally what the President says.' The veteran Pentagon reporter immediately interjected, highlighting to Hegseth how she was the first journalist to reveal how the operation targeted the nuclear facility's ventilation shafts and more. 'I was the first to report about the ventilation shafts on Saturday night, and in fact, I was the first to describe the B-2 bombers, the refueling, the entire mission, with great accuracy,' the Fox News correspondent retorted. 'So I take issue with that,' she added.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Netanyahu agreed to end Gaza war after US strike on Iran
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu agreed on a rapid end to the war in Gaza during a phone call after the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, Israeli media has reported quoting a source 'familiar with the conversation'. The two leaders agreed that four Arab states, including the United Arab Emirates and Egypt , would jointly govern the strip in place of Hamas , Israel Hayom is reporting. Leaders of the Hamas terror group would be exiled and all hostages released, a source is said to have told the outlet. But it remains unclear how such a proposal would be implemented, with Hamas vowing it will not leave the territory and Arab states repeatedly asserting that they would not step into a governing role. Trump and Netanyahu held the call on Monday a day after US bombers hit nuclear targets in Iran , with a source reportedly describing the call as 'euphoric'. They were joined on the call by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, according to the report. Under the agreement, Palestinians who wished to leave Gaza would be taken in by unnamed states, the men reportedly said, and Saudi Arabia and Syria would establish diplomatic ties with Israel. Israel in turn would express support for a future two-state solution on the condition that the Palestinian Authority bring in reforms, according to the report. The United States would recognise Israeli sovereignty over parts of the West Bank as part of the agreement, it also said. Israel Hayom reports that the 'ambitious' nature of the plan explains Trump's fury over Israel's planned retaliation against Iran for its 'minor' breach of the US-brokered ceasefire on Tuesday. Trump called the Israeli prime minister and warned him to 'stop the planes', reportedly telling him he did not understand why Netanyahu was 'disrupting' their agreed upon 'plan for peace' because of a 'small tactical incident'. The outlet also claims that Trump's post calling for an end to Netanyahu's trial was also linked to the plan. The Mail has contacted the White House for comment regarding the report. It comes as Trump has received praise from world leaders for his part in ending the 12-day conflict, with suggestions that the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities forced Tehran to the negotiating table. Among those who commended him was Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who spoke to reporters as he departed from the NATO summit. 'I told Trump that, referring to his efforts in the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the same level of effort is expected to help end the conflicts in Gaza as well as in the Russia-Ukraine war,' Erdogan said. In March, the US and Israel rejected an Arab plan for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, which was designed to allow the 2.1 million Palestinians living in the Strip to remain. The proposal was backed by Arab leaders at a summit in Cairo, and was drawn up as an alternative to Trump's suggestion for the US to take over Gaza and permanently resettle its population. Trump suggested that the US could 'own' Gaza and turn it into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'. His suggestion was deemed 'unacceptable' by the Arab League and sparked outrage across the world, with many condemning it as amounting to the forced displacement of Palestinians from their homes. 'This is against international law and, we have said this time and again, this is not a way to treat this man-made crisis,' Assistant Secretary General of the Arab League, Hossam Zaki, told the BBC. The UN estimates that more than 1.9 million people have been internally displaced in Gaza amid Israel's unrelenting bombardment of the territory, which has been ongoing for more than 600 days. The war in Gaza began when Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, killing nearly 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 others hostage into Gaza. In response, Israel launched a military campaign that has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians, according to local health authorities in Gaza. At least 118 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since Wednesday, local health authorities said, including some shot near an aid distribution point, the latest in a series of such incidents. Twenty hostages remain in captivity in Gaza, while Hamas is also holding the bodies of 30 who have died. Israel this afternoon announced that it has stopped aid entering Gaza for two days to prevent it being seized by Hamas. Images have been circulated of masked men on aid trucks. Clan leaders have said these individuals were protecting aid, and are not Hamas stealing it from civilians. Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer later told reporters that aid was still entering Gaza from the south, but did not specify whether any supplies were entering the north. A United Nations source said that all aid that was due to enter northern Gaza had been put on hold.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Army widow sues Boeing for husband's death in ‘uncrashworthy' Apache helicopter disaster
The widow of a U.S. Army aviator who died when his AH-64 Apache attack helicopter crashed on a training mission claims her husband would still be alive if Boeing had simply been honest about the chopper's purported ''enhanced' and 'unmatched' survivability features.' In a gut-wrenching product liability lawsuit obtained by The Independent, Kiara Sotelo Wayment accuses Boeing of overselling the Apache to the military as perfectly safe, when in fact it 'lack[s] adequate crashworthiness.' Specifically, Sotelo Wayment's complaint says whoever is in the forward gunner's position — where 32-year-old Warrant Officer 1 Stewart Duane Wayment was seated during the fateful 2023 exercise — becomes especially vulnerable in an accident. In the Apache, which is operated by a two-person crew, the pilot sits behind the gunner. '[T]he crash at issue was survivable, and the pilot in the back in fact survived,' the complaint continues. '[Wayment] perished because the Helicopter at issue and its components were defective and dangerous.' Among other things, the layout of the front cockpit is particularly dangerous in a frontal impact crash, according to Sotelo Wayment's complaint, which also places a portion of the blame for her husband's death on the Apache's seat belts and the flight helmet he was wearing. Attorney Joshua Haffner, who is representing Sotelo Wayment, said the front-seat issue came to light after a 'very elaborate process with the military to get access to the helicopter' in which Wayment went down. 'I don't think these guys know how much more dangerous it is up there for them,' Haffner told The Independent. Two years later, Wayment's family remains 'devastated,' according to Haffner. 'It changed their life completely,' Haffner said. 'Stewart was a great guy.' Boeing said on Wednesday that the company 'does not comment on pending litigation.' In an email to The Independent, a spokesperson for co-defendant BAE Systems, which supplies the Apache's seating and safety harnesses, said 'we offer our deepest sympathies to the families impacted by this tragedy' but declined to comment further, citing ongoing litigation. A spokeswoman for helmet maker Elbit Systems, which is also named as a defendant in the suit, cited a 'standing policy where we don't comment on pending litigation.' The Army, which is not named as a defendant in the suit, also declined to comment to The Independent amid an active court case. On April 27, 2023, Wayment's Apache was among a group of 14 aircraft from the 1st Battalion, 25th Aviation Regiment flying back to Fort Wainwright in Fairbanks, Alaska after a two-week exercise at the Donnelly Training Area, about 80 miles away. Weather conditions that day were good and visibility was clear, the Army said. Roughly 48 minutes into the journey, near the town of Healy, Wayment's chopper and a second Apache were heading through a mountain pass, some 250 feet above the ground, when the two lost sight of each other, according to a 385-page report later released by the Army Combat Readiness Center. After one of the Apaches increased its airspeed, it hit the main rotor blades of the other, the report said. Both helicopters then slammed into the side of a mountain, killing Wayment, a father of three young boys, but not the pilot at the controls behind him. The two members of the flight crew in the second Apache, Chief Warrant Officer 3 Christopher Robert Eramo and Chief Warrant Officer 2 Kyle D. McKenna, also died in the collision. Broadly speaking, the AH-64 Apache 'is a dangerous and defective product with respect to the gunners seated in the front cockpit in a frontal impact crash,' states Sotelo Wayment's complaint, which was filed initially in state court in Arizona, where Boeing builds the Apache, and removed to Arizona federal court on June 12. For starters, the Apache's forward cockpit contains an Electronic Display and Control system, or 'TEDAC,' positioned directly in front of the gunner, according to the complaint. However, as the TEDAC lacks any sort of padding, it 'poses a significant risk of death or injury from a frontal impact,' the complaint alleges. It says the Apache's seats and safety harnesses, from BAE Systems, do not 'adequately restrain the head, causing neck and/or head injury on frontal impact.' Additionally, the lap belts pose an 'unreasonable risk of coming into the stomach causing injury, a process known as submarining,' which can cause all manner of extremely grim outcomes. Third, according to the complaint, the Elbit Systems helmet Wayment was wearing at the time was not designed to properly mitigate the effects of a crash. In all, Boeing, BAE Systems, and Elbit were 'negligent and provided a defective aircraft and components resulting in [Wayment's] death,' the complaint argues. Wayment, a Utah native, began his military career in the National Guard but later enlisted full-time in the Army, according to a fellow servicemember who knew him. To Wayment, his family 'was absolutely everything to him,' Samuel Malachowski told a local ABC affiliate shortly after the fatal incident. 'He looked forward to getting home to see them each day and being with them, spending time with them and making good memories,' Malachowski said. 'That was everything he lived for.' In 2024, the Army reported three Apache crashes over a span of just eight weeks. Earlier this month, a gunner assigned to the Army's 101st Combat Aviation Brigade at Fort Campbell, Kentucky was killed when the Apache he was co-piloting crashed during a routine training mission. Sotelo Wayment is seeking compensatory, general, and special damages from Boeing, BAE Systems, and Elbit over her husband's Apache crash, saying his death has deprived their family of his love, care, comfort, support, society, attention, services, consortium, companionship, assistance, protection, and affection, plus punitive damages, lawyers' fees, and court costs. GoFundMe campaign launched by a friend of Wayment's in the aftermath of his death raised a little over $42,000 of its $600,000 goal. The military, in most instances, is immune from lawsuits, according to Haffner. But, he said, 'when there is a dangerous product, there is an avenue for recovery.' 'We want our soldiers to be safe,' Haffner told The Independent. 'That's what this case is about.' The three companies have until July 3 to file their responses to Sotelo Wayment's complaint.