
In a small Alaska town, Canada-U.S. tensions are upending a longstanding relationship
Chelsey and Dustin Stone were getting ready for another busy tourist season when they got the first call.
"He was pretty upset, rightfully so," said Dustin.
The couple runs a small, nine-room inn in Skagway, Alaska, called At The Whitehouse. In the winter, they have to shut a portion of the inn because the wind blows too hard.
The man on the phone was a guest from Whitehorse — 140 km from Skagway — and he was canceling his room and his trip to the town, because of the United States government's approach to Canada since U.S. President Donald Trump was elected, Chelsey recalled.
"He doesn't want to be here, and I said that's very valid, I understand and I'm so sorry. Please know that that's not how we feel … I really hope that someday you'll return to Skagway."
Some people in Whitehorse have directly indicated they will no longer be travelling to Skagway, or other Alaskan towns.
In a March letter to Skagway mayor Sam Bass, Yukon resident Karen McColl wrote that she's "breaking up with America, with Alaska, and with Skagway."
"I can't vote in America, but I can vote with my dollars," the letter reads.
Chelsey says the inn has had between 10 to 15 cancellations since Canadians started boycotting travel to the United States.
It's tough, she says, because they're just returning to normal after the pandemic, which their business barely survived. Now, businesses like theirs are particularly vulnerable to that downturn in travel.
"The financial hit sucks, but what really hurts is just watching our relationship with the Yukon break down in real time," said Dustin.
It's that relationship that some Alaskan politicians are looking to address with a resolution.
House Resolution 11, titled Recognizing and Honoring the Relationship Between Canada and Alaska, aims to make it clear that despite rhetoric from the south, in the North the connection between Alaska and Canada is sacred.
Relationship with ancient roots
Skagway sits along the Alaska panhandle, in the southern part of the state. The bulk of tourism comes from 1.2 million cruise ship passengers, according to the Alaska Travel Industry Association, that visit the town of around 1,100 in the warmer months.
But people from the Yukon often take the two-hour drive south to Skagway. They come for a change in scenery, or annual events like the Santa Train at Christmas or baseball in the spring.
People in Skagway regularly head to Whitehorse, too — to buy groceries at the bigger box stores, but also for dental and vet appointments.
That travel has ancient roots.
"Skagway is a really important entry point for coastal Tlingits to access inland Tlingits, and the Chilkoot Trail was a trading route between those groups," said Jaime Bricker, the region's tourism director and tribal president for Skagway Traditional Council.
During the goldrush, Skagway continued this connective tradition. Thousands traversed the Chilkoot Pass between Alaska and Yukon to seek their millions.
Bricker says that closeness between the two areas can make it feel like Yukon is, "an extension of family, in every way shape and form."
Government reaches out
The Town of Skagway assembly, the local government, has expressed their support to Canada in a letter sent to Ranj Pillai, the premier of Yukon. It outlined how much they value the relationship between the two regions. The letter was not signed by Bass, a move Dustin says sends the wrong message to their northern neighbours.
Not long after that letter was sent, Republican state Rep. Chuck Kopp's office introduced House Joint Resolution 11, legislation centered on the importance of maintaining not only the positive economic relations, but goodwill between the two regions.
According to the resolution, Alaska exports nearly $600 billion US in goods to Canada and imports about $750 million US from Canada each year. Additionally, more than 47 Canadian-owned companies operate in Alaska and employ 4,350 residents throughout the state.
"House Joint Resolution 11 is an unqualified affirmation of the strong bonds of friendship, shared history, mutual defense, and support that have bound our state to Canada over centuries … we are speaking to that relationship," said Kopp before an Alaska state works committee in March.
The resolution doesn't enact any laws — it's a symbolic gesture
On Wednesday, the resolution was moved to a third reading, with 4 dissenting votes out of 40 representatives. The state Senate is scheduled to put it to a vote on May 5.
Both Bass and Kopp declined interviews about the letter and resolution.
Residents speak out
Losing the connection between Alaska and the Yukon worries both Bricker and Dustin, the inn owner.
"It's sad that our [federal] government has, you know, driven this wedge in between our communities," said Dustin.
But some Skagway residents don't have the same level of concern about Canadians deciding not to come for a visit.
Trish McGee, a longtime quilt shop owner who is now retired and living outside of Skagway, isn't concerned either.
"Fine, don't come," she said. McGee, a Republican, says people need to give Trump a chance. She says she doesn't dislike Canadians, but they don't make up the bulk of their tourist dollars.
"Everyone [around town] just needs tourist season to start ... and go to work."
Magnets, stickers in support
Still, many residents want to show Canadians they are missed.
"We love our Canadian friends," says Scott Logan, who's lived in Skagway for 54 years. He's got the magnets — small Canadian flags — to prove it.
He has driven around town sticking the magnets on the cars of friends who said they would like one.
"Canadian flags for your Canadian-friendly vehicle, to give you a hint of solidarity," said Logan.
The tourism office has made stickers — a heart with both the Alaskan and Yukon flags and "Friendship Beyond Borders" written across them — to show their love.
Bricker says some businesses in town are also showing solidarity by potentially offering discounts to Canadians this summer.
Concerned, but hopeful for a resolution
Dustin and Chelsey understand why Canadians might not want to make the trip right now.
"It's sort of weird to have been sucked into this larger conversation in this larger conflict now," said Dustin.
"It feels like we normally get to float above all of this because we're just the weirdos living out in the middle of nowhere who nobody thinks about."
For Bricker, she appreciates the Canadians who are making the journey to her hometown, but also understands why some Canadians won't make the trip.
"It makes me sick to my stomach that our friends and our family and our neighbours feel angst about what's going on in our countries," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Carney's ‘Canada Strong Pass' to come into effect on June 20
OTTAWA - The federal government is set to announce details of its promised 'Canada Strong Pass' next week and the tourism initiative is expected to take effect later this month. A Liberal government spokesperson told The Canadian Press that the pass will be available from June 20 until the end of August. During the recent federal election, Prime Minister Mark Carney promised to introduce a single pass that would give young people under 18 free seats on Via Rail when travelling with their parents, and free access to Canada's national galleries and museums. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The Liberal platform said the party would also introduce 'heavily discounted' access to museums and galleries for Canadians aged 18 to 24. Carney, who pitched the idea as a way to unite Canadians in the face of threats from the U.S., said his government also would reduce prices for camping in national parks for all Canadians from June to August. Carney said during the campaign that Canadians would have free access to national parks and historic sites during the summer. The spokesperson said those promises will all be covered by the 'Canada Strong Pass.' A spokesperson for Via Rail Canada said the national passenger rail service is 'proud' to support the plan as it encourages young Canadians and their families to discover the country. The government spokesperson said details of the initiative will be announced in the coming days. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW In 2017, Via Rail offered unlimited travel passes for youth during the month of July to celebrate Canada's 150th birthday. While the organization said it planned originally to make 1,867 passes available, it extended the offer due to high demand and more than 4,000 Canadians purchased passes. Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture Steven Guilbeault's director of communications said there has been an 'incredible show of unity' from Canadians since the beginning of the year. 'We look forward to delivering on our commitment to the Canada Strong Pass to make it even easier for Canadian families to choose Canada as they plan their summer travels,' Alisson Lévesque said. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.


Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers
OTTAWA — Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon rejected the Bloc Québécois' proposal to split Bill C-5 in two parts, so that the sections on lifting internal trade barriers and the fast-tracking of major projects can be studied separately. Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin said earlier this week it made little sense that the bill, in its current form, would be sent to the House of Commons committee on transport as it falls under the mandate of Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland. Normandin instead suggested dividing the bill to study the portions on free trade and labour mobility in one committee and the fast-tracking of major projects in the national interest in another. She said the free trade portion is 'rather consensual' and could go 'a bit faster,' whereas the major projects portion would warrant more scrutiny. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. On Wednesday, MacKinnon offered a resounding 'no' to the Bloc's proposition. 'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' he said. 'These projects have a certain urgency, as do interprovincial trade barriers that must fall,' he added. 'This is a very comprehensive bill. We understand that it's going to be debated, but it's something that we solicited and secured a mandate for.' Prime Minister Mark Carney said his intention is to see the bill passed before June 20 , when the House of Commons rises and MPs return to their ridings for the summer. 'It is a top priority for this government, and we will do everything to get it passed before the summer,' he said after C-5 was tabled on Friday. 'And if Parliament needs to sit longer, it should sit longer in order to get it passed. That's what Canadians expect.' MacKinnon said to date there is no consensus from other parties to sit into the summer. The part of the bill on lifting internal trade barriers would allow a good or service that meets provincial or territorial rules to have met federal requirements but also make it easier for workers to get a federal licence by recognizing provincial or territorial work authorizations. The second part, which is a bit more contentious, seeks to get projects deemed in the national interest — such as highways, pipelines, mines and nuclear facilities — built faster by having only one environmental assessment done and respecting federal conditions. On Wednesday, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) once more expressed concern the Liberals were 'ramming' through this bill without giving First Nations time to properly study the text. 'I keep hearing that they want to push through this legislation right to the end of this month, and I think that that's the wrong way to go,' said AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak during a press conference on Parliament Hill. Woodhouse Nepinak is expected to meet with Carney in July, presumably after the bill may have passed. She urged the government to slow down the process to allow meaningful consultation and study to occur with all the parties involved, including First Nations. 'Look, take the summer, take the time to listen to First Nations, take the time to listen to Canadians. And I think that'll make a more united country,' she said. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, on the other hand, is favourable to the fast-tracking of major projects like pipelines and dismissed the need for a consensus to move ahead. 'If you wait till everybody agrees on everything, nothing will happen. You're never going to get everybody to agree on every single project,' he told reporters on Monday. 'If the prime minister says he's going to wait until everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade,' he added. Woodhouse Nepinak said national chiefs before her were ignored in discussions on major projects, which caused civil unrest and lawsuits that slowed down the projects. 'Isn't it better to talk through things rather than always being in litigation?' she asked. 'It seems like First Nations always need to litigate, and then we get… results later.' 'Does Canada want to change that or not?' National Post calevesque@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .


Ottawa Citizen
4 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers
OTTAWA — Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon rejected the Bloc Québécois' proposal to split Bill C-5 in two parts, so that the sections on lifting internal trade barriers and the fast-tracking of major projects can be studied separately. Article content Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin said earlier this week it made little sense that the bill, in its current form, would be sent to the House of Commons committee on transport as it falls under the mandate of Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland. Article content Article content Article content Normandin instead suggested dividing the bill to study the portions on free trade and labour mobility in one committee and the fast-tracking of major projects in the national interest in another. She said the free trade portion is 'rather consensual' and could go 'a bit faster,' whereas the major projects portion would warrant more scrutiny. Article content Article content On Wednesday, MacKinnon offered a resounding 'no' to the Bloc's proposition. Article content 'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' he said. Article content 'These projects have a certain urgency, as do interprovincial trade barriers that must fall,' he added. 'This is a very comprehensive bill. We understand that it's going to be debated, but it's something that we solicited and secured a mandate for.' Article content Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney said his intention is to see the bill passed before June 20, when the House of Commons rises and MPs return to their ridings for the summer. Article content Article content 'It is a top priority for this government, and we will do everything to get it passed before the summer,' he said after C-5 was tabled on Friday. 'And if Parliament needs to sit longer, it should sit longer in order to get it passed. That's what Canadians expect.' Article content MacKinnon said to date there is no consensus from other parties to sit into the summer. Article content The part of the bill on lifting internal trade barriers would allow a good or service that meets provincial or territorial rules to have met federal requirements but also make it easier for workers to get a federal licence by recognizing provincial or territorial work authorizations. Article content The second part, which is a bit more contentious, seeks to get projects deemed in the national interest — such as highways, pipelines, mines and nuclear facilities — built faster by having only one environmental assessment done and respecting federal conditions.