UK may restrict students from countries most likely to claim asylum, World News
LONDON — The British government may restrict visa applications from students living in countries that are considered most likely to claim asylum in a move designed to bring down annual net migration, a government official said.
The move comes after Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour Party was punished in local elections in England last week by voters angry over issues, including illegal immigration.
The government is expected next week to publish a policy document, known as a white paper, which will set out how the government plans to reduce net migration, which reached 728,000 people in the year to June last year.
"Our upcoming Immigration White Paper will set out a comprehensive plan to restore order to our broken immigration system," the Home Office said in a statement.
High levels of legal migration have long dominated Britain's political conversation and were one of the major drivers for the Brexit referendum in 2016.
Out of the 108,000 people who claimed asylum in Britain last year, 16,000 had student visas, government data shows. The government does not provide a breakdown of the nationalities of those who had student visas, who went on to claim asylum.
But the government said people from Pakistan, Nigeria and Sri Lanka were the most likely to claim asylum in Britain after arriving on a work, student, or a visitor visa.
In the aftermath of the party's poor local election results last week, some Labour members of parliament urged the government to do more to take a more decisive approach on issues such as bringing down net migration.
Jo White, who represents a group of lawmakers in previously Labour heartlands known as the "Red Wall", said the government should stop "pussyfooting around".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
India PM Modi opens strategic railway in contested ‘crown jewel' Kashmir
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on June 6 opened a strategic railway line to Kashmir he called 'the crown jewel of India'. PHOTO: EPA-EFE SRINAGAR - Prime Minister Narendra Modi made his first visit to Kashmir on June 6 since a conflict with arch-rival Pakistan, opening a strategic railway line to the contested region he called 'the crown jewel of India'. Mr Modi launched a string of projects worth billions of dollars for the divided Muslim-majority territory, the centre of bitter rivalry between India and Pakistan since their independence from British rule in 1947. Nuclear-armed India and Pakistan fought a four-day conflict in May, their worst standoff since 1999, before a ceasefire was agreed on May 10. 'Pakistan will never forget... its shameful loss,' the Hindu nationalist premier told crowds a month since India launched strikes on its neighbour after an attack on tourists in Kashmir. 'Friends, today's event is a grand festival of India's unity and firm resolve,' Mr Modi said after striding across the soaring bridge to formally launch it for rail traffic. 'This is a symbol and celebration of rising India,' he said of the Chenab Bridge which connects two mountains. New Delhi calls the Chenab span the 'world's highest railway arch bridge', sitting 359m above a river. While several road and pipeline bridges are higher, Guinness World Records confirmed that Chenab trumps the previous highest railway bridge, the Najiehe in China. 'Our troubles' Mr Modi said the railway was 'an extraordinary feat of architecture' that 'will improve connectivity' by providing the first rail link from the Indian plains up to mountainous Kashmir. With 36 tunnels and 943 bridges, the new railway runs for 272km and connects Udhampur, Srinagar and Baramulla. It is expected to halve the travel time between the town of Katra in the Hindu-majority Jammu region and Srinagar, the main city in Kashmir, to around three hours. The new route will facilitate the movement of people and goods, as well as troops, that was previously possible only via treacherous mountain roads and by air. Mr Modi's Hindu nationalist government revoked Kashmir's limited autonomy and took the state under direct rule in 2019. Pakistan's foreign ministry in a statement said India's 'claims of development... ring hollow against the backdrop of an unprecedented military presence, suppression of fundamental freedoms, arbitrary arrests, and a concerted effort to alter the region's demography'. Around 150 people protested against the project on the outskirts of Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir. 'We want to tell India that building bridges and laying roads in the name of development will not make the people of Kashmir give up their demand for freedom,' said Mr Azir Ahmad Ghazali, who organised the rally attended by Kashmiris who fled unrest on the Indian side in the 1990s. 'In clear and unequivocal terms, we want to say to the Indian government that the people of Kashmir have never accepted India's forced rule.' More than 70 people were killed in missile, drone and artillery fire during last month's conflict. The fighting was triggered by an April 22 attack on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi accused Pakistan of backing, a charge denied by Islamabad. Rebel groups in Indian-run Kashmir have waged an insurgency for 35 years demanding independence for the territory or its merger with Pakistan. Mr Modi also announced further government financial support for families whose relatives were killed, or whose homes were damaged, during the brief conflict –- mainly in shelling along the heavily militarised de facto border with Pakistan, known as the Line of Control. 'Their troubles are our troubles,' Mr Modi said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Britain faces ‘extraordinary' threat from Russian and Iranian plots, official warns
A police officer stands guard outside the Old Bailey criminal court in London on May 30. PHOTO: AFP LONDON – In a room at the Old Bailey courthouse in London, six men went on trial this week over an arson attack on a business that was shipping satellite equipment to Ukraine. Down the hall, a separate hearing involved an alleged plot to inflict 'serious violence' on Iranian journalists working in Britain. And in May, six Bulgarians were sentenced to prison for being part of a Russian spy ring operating from a guesthouse on England's east coast. These disparate cases underscore how Britain has become the locale for a web of foreign espionage operations. For Britain's top adviser on state threats and terrorism, they offer a stark backdrop to his warning that Russia and Iran are 'exploiting divisions in the West' to recruit agents via social media. The adviser, Jonathan Hall, cannot discuss active criminal cases because of England's strict reporting laws. But in an interview with The New York Times, he said attempts by Russia and Iran to carry out hostile acts on British soil were creating an 'extraordinary' level of threat, albeit one that may be harder for the public to grasp than that from terrorism. 'Terrorism is something that gets public attention,' Hall said, partly because of the 'death and destruction and mayhem' caused by attacks. State threats, he said, were 'much harder to conceptualise' for the public. Mr Hall's warnings, and those of other senior British officials, stand in sharp contrast to the United States, where President Donald Trump has said little about the efforts of Russia and Iran to destabilise American society, preferring instead to focus on diplomatic overtures to the two countries on issues like the war in Ukraine and Tehran's nuclear programme. Mr Trump's approach comes even as US authorities have tracked what they believe to be Iranian plots to assassinate the president – allegations that Iran denies – and former intelligence officials have spoken of Russian agents in Mexico who have tried to encourage illegal migration into the United States. In Britain, as in the United States, some of these cases may reach into high places. On June 6, a judge said that three defendants will stand trial in April over the fires at two properties and a vehicle linked to Prime Minister Keir Starmer. British news media has reported that the security services are investigating whether Russia may have been involved in the fires – an allegation the Russian government denies. Mr Hall acknowledged that some details from recent cases, including that of the six Bulgarians involved in the Russian spy ring operating out of the guesthouse in Great Yarmouth, could appear 'intrinsically funny.' 'But without being a killjoy, I think it risks missing the point about the risk posed by these individuals,' Mr Hall said. 'They were contemplating assassinating people and they clearly were able to get very close to their targets, so there's nothing comic about that.' The Bulgarians had been conducting surveillance on targets that included journalists, Russian dissidents and political figures. The ringleader discussed the possibility of kidnapping and killing an investigative reporter. The group was acting under the orders of Jan Marsalek, an Austrian fugitive and former businessperson whom the prosecution said was working on behalf of Russian intelligence. In another recent case, Daniel Khalife, a young British army soldier who had been spying for Iran, blew his cover by telephoning MI5 and fruitlessly offering his services as a double agent. After escaping from jail by strapping himself to the bottom of a van delivering food, Khalife was apprehended, tried and sentenced to 14 years in prison in February. For hostile states looking to recruit agents, Mr Hall said, 'It doesn't really matter if they have someone who bungles, because volume is enough, and I suppose it's inevitable, if you have a volume approach, that you'll pick up some bunglers and some people who go out to be very capable.' A lawyer and former prosecutor specialising in international crime and security, Mr Hall was appointed by the government in 2019 to review the effectiveness of Britain's terrorism laws, and in 2024, to additionally advise on state threats. In an official review published last month, Mr Hall called for the British government to create new legal powers allowing it to seize passports from suspected foreign agents, issue alerts over activity by foreign intelligence services and prosecute people for targeting victims overseas. He is not the only official sounding the alarm. In its most recent annual threat assessment, Britain's domestic intelligence agency, MI5, warned that Russia, Iran and China represented the biggest state threats to national security and were outsourcing espionage and sabotage operations designed to disrupt and destabilise Britain. Mr Ken McCallum, the director-general of MI5, said in October that Russian intelligence agents were on a mission 'to generate mayhem on British and European streets,' while Mr Richard Moore, the head of the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, said that Russian intelligence services had 'gone a bit feral.' The embassies of Russia and Iran in London did not respond to a request for comment on these recent cases. One of the most brazen recent foreign acts on British soil was a nerve-agent attack on a former Russian double agent, Sergei Skripal, in Salisbury, south-west of London, in 2018. The fallout prompted the British government to introduce new national security laws in 2023, which made foreign espionage, sabotage and influence criminal offenses. In February, Mr Hall met with officials from the Justice Department in Washington, to examine their handling of the threat from hostile states. He praised 'the US approach of just whatever works,' which uses a broad spectrum of federal and state legislation to disrupt plots. The most striking trend in recent years has been the use of organised crime groups by foreign powers, Mr Hall said. That is the result of waves of diplomatic expulsions that ejected intelligence officers from Britain, he said, which meant that states 'couldn't use intelligence officers under diplomatic cover to recruit and to coordinate plots.' Mr Hall said both Russia and Iran were paying local criminals to carry out acts of violence, espionage and intimidation on British soil. Such efforts have had mixed success, with the prosecution of the Bulgarian spies and others resulting in rare disclosures of spy tradecraft because of lapses in operational security. Russia and Iran, he warned, were also using the internet to find, influence and hire politically disaffected people in Britain and the United States, both of which suffer from degrees of polarisation. He noted that this was 'increasingly hard to combat' because of deeply targeted and personalised social media feeds: 'Every individual person gets a different feed, and we don't know what other people are seeing.' 'If you're an intelligence officer,' Mr Hall added, 'why would you not exploit divisions in the West and try to find some sort of cultural synergy between you and your target?' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Three Iranians in UK court accused of assisting Tehran spy service
LONDON - Three Iranian men appeared in court in London on Friday accused of assisting Iran's foreign intelligence service and plotting violence against journalists working for a British-based broadcaster critical of Tehran. The three men - Mostafa Sepahvand, 39, Farhad Javadi Manesh, 44, and Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori, 55, - have been charged with offences under Britain's National Security Act, brought in to give the authorities new powers to target threats from foreign states. They are accused of "engaging in conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service" between August 2024 and February this year, and police have said that it related to Iran. Sepahvand is also charged with carrying out surveillance in preparation to commit serious violence against a person, while Manesh and Noori were charged with surveillance with the intention that serious violent acts would be committed by others. The men appeared by videolink on Friday for a brief hearing at London's Old Bailey court during which their lawyers said all intended to plead not guilty to the charges. Prosecutors told a hearing last month that the allegations involved the targeting of journalists based in Britain connected with Iran International, a broadcaster critical of the Iranian government. They were remanded in custody until a formal plea hearing on September 26 and they are due to go on trial in October next year. The suspects were arrested last month on the same day counter-terrorism police detained five other men, including four Iranians, as part of a separate operation. Those men were later released without charge. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
