logo
Content of US-Russia talks in Riyadh 'will definitely not be published,' Kremlin says

Content of US-Russia talks in Riyadh 'will definitely not be published,' Kremlin says

Yahoo25-03-2025

The content of the U.S.-Russia talks in Riyadh will not be made public, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on March 25, state-owned media outlet TASS reported.
"We are talking about technical negotiations. These negotiations are immersed in details, so, of course, the content of these negotiations will definitely not be published. This is not to be expected," the spokesperson said.
Peskov added that the results of the consultations had been relayed to Moscow and Washington and are currently under review.
His remarks came after 12 hours of U.S.-Russia negotiations on March 24. A new round of U.S.-Ukraine talks took place on March 25, following an initial meeting on March 23.
The negotiations are part of U.S. President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire and a broader peace agreement in Ukraine.
The U.S. initially planned to meet with both Ukraine and Russia on the same day, but President Volodymyr Zelensky later announced that Kyiv's delegation would meet with U.S. officials on March 23, a day before the U.S.-Russia talks.
Peskov confirmed on March 24 that the Black Sea Initiative was a key topic in the U.S.-Russia talks in Riyadh. Similar agreements existed under the 2022 Black Sea Grain Initiative, brokered by the U.N. and Turkey.
Despite the ongoing war, this initiative allowed Ukraine to export agricultural products via the Black Sea. The deal, which helped stabilize global food prices, collapsed in July 2023 when Moscow withdrew.
Since then, Russian forces have repeatedly targeted Ukrainian port infrastructure.
A Russian ballistic missile struck Odesa's port on March 1, damaging facilities and a Panamanian-flagged civilian ship. Several other foreign vessels have been hit, including in October 2024, when multiple ships sustained damage in separate Russian strikes.
According to Reuters, the U.S. delegation in Riyadh was led by Andrew Peek, a senior director at the National Security Council, and Michael Anton, a senior State Department official.
The Russian delegation included Grigory Karasin, the chairman of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs, and Sergei Beseda, an adviser to FSB director Alexander Bortnikov.
Karasin later described the talks as proceeding in a "creative way," saying the U.S. and Russian delegations "understand each other's views," as quoted by Russian state news agency Interfax.
The negotiations come amid concerns that Moscow is deliberately stalling peace efforts to strengthen its position. The Kremlin claimed last week that it had ordered a 30-day halt to strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure following a phone call between Trump and Putin.
Kyiv also supported a mutual halt on energy strikes but later accused Russia of continuing attacks on civilian targets.
The U.S. and Ukraine initially backed a broader 30-day ceasefire that would include halting ground operations, but Russia rejected the proposal unless it included conditions that would undermine Ukraine's defense capabilities, such as suspending foreign military support.
Read also: Ukraine US begin new round of talks in Riyadh, media reports
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mideast Power Plays in India and Pakistan
Mideast Power Plays in India and Pakistan

Wall Street Journal

time17 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Mideast Power Plays in India and Pakistan

Israeli weapons played an important role in last month's conflict between India and Pakistan, highlighting the flourishing India-Israel defense partnership. Israel unequivocally backed New Delhi, and the accuracy of India's Israeli-made weapons contrasted with the ineffectiveness of Pakistan's Turkish-made drones, which appear to have done little damage to Indian targets. Nitin Gokhale, a prominent Indian national-security analyst, says in a phone interview that Israeli drones, including the precision-guided Palm 400, Harop suicide drone and radar-destroying Harpy, performed well during the conflict. According to Mr. Gokhale, the Indian military is also pleased with its French fighter jets, Russian missile defense and the co-developed BrahMos missile, U.S. surveillance aircraft, and the indigenously developed Akash air-defense missile. How did Israel become a major arms supplier to India, the world's second-largest arms importer behind Ukraine? By developing a reputation in New Delhi for dependability in a crunch. Many Israeli weapons are on the cutting edge of technology that India seeks. And Israeli defense firms work closely with local counterparts. Israel Aerospace Industries has several joint ventures with Indian companies and set up an Indian subsidiary. Israel's Elbit Systems collaborates with Bharat Forge to make artillery and mortar systems and with Adani Defence & Aerospace to make drones. For India, cooperation with Israel diversifies its supply chain and expands its access to high-tech weapons. For Israel, access to the Indian market expands its defense-industrial base. The India-Israel partnership also benefits the U.S., whose own weapons sales to India have grown significantly over the past 25 years. India's turn toward American allies draws New Delhi closer to the West and reduces its dependence on Russian weapons.

Drone attacks are the new front in war. NATO is trying to catch up.
Drone attacks are the new front in war. NATO is trying to catch up.

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Drone attacks are the new front in war. NATO is trying to catch up.

'This is more than an isolated incident — it's a glimpse into the character of future conflict, where war won't be confined to neatly drawn front lines,' said James Patton Rogers, a drone warfare expert at Cornell University. He said the urgent question for NATO, after 'an impressive attack by Ukraine,' is to determine the vulnerabilities of its own air bases, bombers, and critical infrastructure. Before the Ukrainian barrage, Russia had intensified a near-daily deluge of long-range drones to attack military and civilian targets across Ukraine, demonstrating an ability to launch thousands of uncrewed aircraft as quickly as they are built, experts said. By comparison, defense manufacturers in the United States and Europe have struggled for more than three years to ramp up weapons production. Advertisement NATO knows it has much to learn. This year, NATO opened a joint training center with Ukrainian forces in Poland to share lessons from Russia's invasion. Ukraine's military is the largest (aside from Russia's) and most battled-tested in Europe, even if it is struggling to maintain territory in its border region. Advertisement At the same time, much of the military alliance is still focused on warfare of the past and unable to keep up with an unending stream of cyberattacks and other hybrid activity that threatens energy infrastructure, financial institutions, and government databases lying far beyond traditional front lines. China protects its aircraft with more than 3,000 hardened shelters, while the United States has exposed tarmacs 'and assumptions,' Simone Ledeen, a top Pentagon policy official during President Trump's first term, wrote on social media after Ukraine's broad drone attack. 'A well-timed swarm could blind us before we're airborne,' Ledeen wrote. The US military reported 350 drone sightings across about 100 military installations last year, General Gregory Guillot, the head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, told lawmakers in February. A new government review of Britain's defense capabilities, released this week, made clear that other alliance members are also aware of their vulnerabilities. If forced to fight in the next few years, the review said, Britain and its allies could find themselves battling adversaries with newer weapons and technology. It called for heavy investment in air and land drones, including stockpiling one-way attack drones — those that kill by smashing into their targets and exploding. 'Whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win,' the review noted. Both Russia and Ukraine have spent billions of dollars to build their respective drone fleets since the war began. Two years ago, Ukraine produced about 800,000 drones; this year it is projected to churn out more than 5 million, said Kateryna Bondar, a former adviser to Ukraine's government who is now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies research group in Washington. Among them are weapons known as 'missile drones' because they can purportedly fly as far as 1,800 miles. Advertisement Just last weekend, before the surprise attack on Russia, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine told allies he hoped to scale up his military's drone program with additional financial backing. 'Our operations show the impact that investment can have, especially in drones,' he said. Britain agreed, pledging Wednesday to help Ukraine procure 100,000 drones this year — 10 times more than initially planned. Russia, which is projected to spend more than 7 percent of its gross domestic product on defense this year, has saturated Ukraine's skies and overwhelmed its air defenses with more than 1,000 drones each week since March, experts say. Most of them are Geran-series drones — Russia's homegrown version of the Iranian-designed long-range Shahed attack aircraft — some of which cost as little as $20,000 to build. While far cheaper than, for example, a $1 million long-range Storm Shadow missile, the Geran drones are still likely costing Russia several millions of dollars each day. 'If they can launch hundreds of these a day, that means they have to manufacture hundreds of these a day as well,' said Samuel Bendett, an expert on Russian drones and other weapons at the Center for Naval Analysis. The uptick has coincided with cease-fire talks Trump is pushing as Russia seeks to seize more territory in Ukraine before any settlement is reached. It also aims to remind the world of Russia's enduring might — even if it still suffers setbacks like Ukraine's weekend strikes. Advertisement 'No one, really, in Europe is prepared to adequately handle this type of threat,' Bendett said. This article originally appeared in

Putin Vows to Take Revenge on Ukraine in Call With Trump
Putin Vows to Take Revenge on Ukraine in Call With Trump

Bloomberg

time18 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Putin Vows to Take Revenge on Ukraine in Call With Trump

Good morning. Vladimir Putin vows to strike back at Ukraine. Japan's ispace takes another shot at landing on the moon. And a Singapore company hopes to turn its new hospital in China into a hot spot for medical tourism. Listen to the day's top stories. Prospects of a US-brokered ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine took another hit, with Donald Trump saying Vladimir Putin warned that he would retaliate for Ukraine's shocking drone strike on Russian airfields. The pair also discussed Iran and the Russian president's potential involvement in nuclear talks. The call came as Putin rebuffed an offer from Volodymyr Zelenskiy for direct discussion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store