The secret war being waged by Brighton's ‘insurgent' bin men
Slashed tyres, death threats and a cache of weapons. It sounds like the opening scene of a gangland crime thriller – but it is actually part of a decades-long war over Brighton's bins.
The row has boiled over in the last 18 months, with council bosses accusing a group of insurgent refuse workers of 'bully boy tactics' in a 'toxic' environment in which they claim culprits are protected by the GMB union.
Vehicles at the Brighton and Hove city council-run waste disposal site have been repeatedly 'sabotaged', according to a May 15 council report, with the council claiming wires were cut on at least two.
It's a plot reminiscent of the Sopranos, in which the fictional mob boss Tony Soprano runs a waste management business as a cover for his mafia earnings.
The chaos has left locals with no idea whether their waste will be taken, with haphazard collections leaving weeks of rubbish piling up.
When The Telegraph visited the coastal East Sussex city in May, six weeks worth of discarded bottles and four worth of recycling had been left untouched.
In one troubled area, Patcham, resident John Ellis, 65, said problems with collections had been 'on and off over the last 15 years'.
Gesturing to a pile of rubbish outside his front door, he said: 'The collections, especially for recycling, are really poor, and it's quite dangerous because we have glass bottles out on the streets as well.
'If you go further into the city, there's a real problem, because the seagulls will come down, especially if it's a plastic bin bag, and hack the bags open to find any food that's left over… it makes a real mess. We're all paying our council tax, of course.'
Across Brighton, the number of missed bin collections more than doubled from 573 to 1,369 between December 2024 and April 2025, rising by 140 per cent over the past six months.
Rubbish is meant to be collected every Wednesday for residents in Patcham, with recycling picked up every second Thursday.
This month, the council blamed a missed collection on 'a problem with the vehicle'.
A spokesman added: 'This meant that they were delayed and unable to complete the round.'
It was not confirmed whether the lorry was the target of sabotage.
Meanwhile, the Labour-run council has announced a 4.99 per cent rise in council tax bills this year – the maximum increase allowed without a referendum.
It would take take the average band D council tax bill to £2,455, more than £200 a month higher than the previous year.
The latest round of delayed collections followed years of disorder at the bin depot.
A cache of knives, nunchucks, baseball bats and a samurai sword was found in 2023 at the Hollingdean bin depot in the north of the city, inside an office.
A subsequent three-month investigation ordered by the council, and carried out by Aileen McColgan KC, found instances of bullying, intimidation, racism, sexism and homophobia across the site.
One witness said the environment was 'like Animal Farm', George Orwell's 1945 satirical novella featuring farm animals revolting against their farmer owner.
And the investigation alleged many problems at the depot stemmed from the trade union members' 'pecking order'.
The longest-serving lorry drivers were at the 'top table', and therefore protected by the union, while others were left to fend for themselves, witnesses claimed.
Some members threatened to stab other binmen, and brought weapons into the depot to show them to staff, while others sexually harassed female staff and managers, the 2023 report claimed.
In the wake of the investigation, 40 workers left the depot.
Since then, council bosses have invested nearly a million pounds, along with £3.875 million into a new food waste collection. In a rebrand, it changed its name from 'City Clean' to 'Environmental Services'.
Yet two years later, council bosses have reported more acts of sabotage – including the slashing of disciplinary managers' tyres, alongside 'ongoing intimidatory acts both in the workplace and at managers' homes'.
A death threat was made against a manager at the site as recently as January this year.
Staff members are still suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, according to the report published in May this year.
It added: 'The council is determined to deliver a waste collection service that the city can be proud of and is taking actions in all areas of the service to address deep-rooted issues that have existed for many decades.'
At the beginning of this month, council leader Bella Sankey claimed the reason for missed bin collections across Brighton was ongoing insurgence at the depot.
She said: 'We will not be held to ransom any more in this city by this small group of individuals. We are on it, we are working with the police, there are investigations going on. They know who they are and they're not going to get away with it any longer.'
She told The Telegraph the 2023 insurgents were 'either GMB Sussex branch reps, or said to have been protected by GMB Sussex branch reps within the council'.
Of the latest report, she added: 'Over the last 18 months, as we have continued taking the necessary action to change this culture, we have seen direct sabotage of vehicles, threats to life, intimidation and a continuation of the same bully boy tactics. This includes a depot manager's car tyres being slashed.'
Gavin Davies, GMB regional secretary, told The Telegraph: 'It's GMB's view that council leaders are seeking to blame a two-year-old report for failures in service rollout, which have worsened since the report, not improved.'
He added that the blame 'needs to lie with the council leadership'.
He said a key issue was the 'millions owed to women employees who have been systematically underpaid over many years', adding: 'It's frustrating our attempts to work with the council on issues such as equal pay keep falling on deaf ears.'
Now many locals are losing patience. Outside 62-year-old Alastair Kerr's home, a month's worth of rubbish awaited collection when The Telegraph visited on May 19.
'When all of us are paying increasing amounts of council tax, it does feel a bit like a kick in the teeth to leave you without any explanation or even an apology,' said the actor, who has lived in Brighton since 2008.
'The council is not easy to communicate with, and you feel like you've been kept at arm's length.'
Peter Goodman, 78, a resident in north Brighton whose recycling has remained uncollected for more than a month, has looked out of his window at an overflowing black bin and a pile of boxes each morning.
'If it gets beyond this, I may actually have to take some over to the tip myself,' he said.
Allister McNair, a conservative councillor for Patcham and Hollingbury, blamed Labour for the problems. 'It doesn't seem to be getting better – the problem seems to be coming back,' he told The Telegraph.
Accusing council bosses of 'taking their eye off the ball', he asked: 'When's the end in sight?'
Mark Earthey, an independent councillor for Rottingdean and West Saltdean, said roads in his ward were sometimes missed for eight weeks at a time.
'I have residents who are partially sighted, or have mobility issues. They've been falling over rubbish and uncollected bins,' he said.
'People can't even get in and out of their own homes because of bins in the road or pathways. It's been total meltdown.'
Sussex Police confirmed it was investigating a series of reported offences linked to a Brighton and Hove council depot in Hollingdean.
A spokesman said the reported offences, which span a period from 2023 to 2025, included criminal damage, possession of offensive weapons, harassment, arson, and further serious offences.
All the incidents reported to Sussex Police remain under continual review and were forming part of a wider investigation that remains ongoing, he added.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Can Matheus Cunha and Liam Delap signings boost Chelsea, Manchester United's top four odds?
For more stories like this, click here to follow The Athletic's sports betting section and have them added to your feed. Legendary American basketball coach John Wooden once said, 'Never mistake activity for achievement.' Wooden spent his time coaching players who dribbled with their hands instead of their feet in the 1970s. That means it's unlikely his famous quote was directed at the transfer strategies of Manchester United and Chelsea. Advertisement In acquiring Matheus Cunha and Liam Delap, each club appears to be doing something. Whether early transfer window activity indicates edging closer to securing silverware or a place in the top four next year is another story. At the very least, it represents hope around the Blues' 2/1 and their Manchester counterparts' 5/1 top four odds. Delap and Cunha also share another similarity; their numbers don't tell the whole story of their value to each club. Let's dive deeper into the metrics. Let's not beat around the bush: Ipswich Town were objectively bad this past season. The Tractor Boys' minus-1.01 expected goal (xG) differential per 90 minutes ranked 17th in the league — nearly triple the difference of Wolves in 16th. When attackers like Delap play substantial minutes for a side this dreadful, it raises questions whether their statistics accurately reflect their abilities. At 22 years old, Delap is just about to enter his prime. Considering that context, however, his underlying numbers are, well, not great: Chelsea's incumbent striker, Nicolas Jackson, has his weaknesses, particularly around his finishing, but there's no denying his surface numbers supercede Delap. Jackson's 0.50 non-penalty xG per 90 mark is nearly double Delap's 0.27. While some forwards could make up for that gap with their contributions to build-up play or chance-creation in the final third, the former Tractor Boy doesn't do either of those things. The only thing Delap does better than Jackson is dribble past opposing defenders. For Delap's inclusion to make a significant shift in Chelsea's prospects, his underwhelming numbers have to be a by-product of Ipswich's shortcomings. The Tractor Boys only averaged 40 per cent possession during the 2024-25 season. Kieran McKenna's side also were last in touches and passes into the penalty area. Projecting what this signing means for the South Londoners means trying to determine whether Delap's numbers were underwhelming due to his own poor performance or because his team simply never had possession of the ball. Advertisement Even if the answer lies somewhere in the middle, it's hard to project Delap as the type of player that adds a ton of value to Chelsea's 22/1 title odds. The Blues' top four odds might be a different story. If Delap can prove to be an effective rotation player, then the 2/1 odds for the team to qualify for the Champions League next season seem like the better bet. Delap's numbers call into question his actual level of impact, but it's quite clear the kind of player Cunha is. The 26-year-old is a good, not great, winger whose market value rose thanks to a season buoyed by a fiery finishing streak. The Brazilian scored 15 goals off just 8.6 xG — a conversion rate that even Lionel Messi would be envious of. If the predictive strength of xG has taught us anything, it's that Cunha is headed toward a serious regression next season. Thankfully for United, he does bring a decent dose of playmaking. Cunha ranks in the 80th percentile of all attacking midfielders in expected assists and led Wolves in shot-creating actions last season. Yet even with that all-around production, there's no denying that his signing is simply a signing for the sake of change given the presence of Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho. Rashford almost exactly matches Cunha's production, while the 20-year-old Garnacho offers far more promise. Despite being six years his junior, the young Argentine matched Cunha's non-penalty xG of 0.30 this past season. The problem for United is that Garnacho and Rashford have had a series of run-ins with recent managers. Erik ten Hag and Ruben Amorim sought to find alternatives, and now the latter seems poised to push both players out of the club. At 8/15 odds to head to Barcelona, Rashford seems destined to leave Old Trafford. Garnacho's most likely destination is also outside of Manchester as Napoli (6/4) are currently the club favoured to secure his services. Advertisement As great as data is, it can't really measure the impact of someone like Cunha slotting into a starting XI match after match without high-profile spats with his manager. Professionalism and locker room cohesion may not matter as much as actually putting the ball in the back of the net, but those intangibles do matter. That said, United finished 12th in non-penalty xG differential last season. This was not an unlucky side needing some stability, it is a side in need of players who move the needle (Bruno Fernandes staying should also help). Cunha is a solid player and perhaps a better fit with Amorim, but those intangible factors aren't enough to make United's 5/1 top four odds any more enticing than they already are. Betting/Odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Matheus Cunha: David Rogers / Getty Images)


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Carbon Neutral Is Back And It Might Be Smarter Than Net Zero
LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 28: Zero emission branding is displayed on a Kia all electric British ... More Transport Police car is displayed during the Fully Charged Live UK at Farnborough International on April 28, 2023 in London, England. This year's show includes dozens of 'live sessions' and an exhibition of hundreds of companies, with electric vehicles of all shapes and sizes, and a large selection of home energy options (Photo by) Before net zero became the benchmark of corporate climate ambition, carbon neutrality led the way. In the 2000s and early 2010s, companies and governments pledged to measure emissions, offset what they couldn't reduce, and label themselves or their products accordingly. It offered a straightforward, near-term approach to climate responsibility. Over time, however, the label lost credibility—undermined by vague accounting, low-quality offsets, and limited transparency. As climate science advanced, net zero emerged as the more rigorous standard, requiring deep emissions cuts across entire value chains and limiting the role of offsets. Over the past decade, it has largely replaced carbon neutrality as the mark of serious climate leadership. But for many companies, net zero has become too complex, expensive, or misaligned with real-world operations—especially in a politically polarized environment where climate action can trigger backlash. Some are walking away from their goals; others are looking for a more practical, verifiable approach that allows progress without overpromising. That's prompting a renewed interest in carbon neutrality—this time with clearer standards and stronger intent. A March 2025 study found that over 40% of companies abandoned or stopped reporting on their climate goals. Even missed targets drove progress, but without enforcement, momentum is faltering. Now, companies are asking: is there a better way forward? One answer is the return of carbon neutrality, redefined through standards like ISO 14068-1. It requires verified emissions accounting, high-quality offsets, and annual action—prioritizing measurable impact today over distant 2050 goals. The ISO framework also enables credible product- or unit-level claims by requiring full life cycle emissions for each. This differentiation matters because it allows companies to credibly label specific products or business units as carbon neutral, even if full decarbonization is still underway—building trust, capacity, and momentum along the path to net zero. Net zero remains crucial for limiting global warming to 1.5°C. To limit warming to 1.5°C (if that's even a possibility), we need total, economy-wide emissions to fall sharply, with only minimal reliance on offsets. Net zero provides a planetary roadmap for systemic change—essential for governments, financial systems, and long-term innovation planning. At the company level however, rigid frameworks can backfire. The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), for example, requires a 4.2% annual reduction in absolute emissions, a challenge for fast-growing companies displacing higher-emission incumbents. Chris Hocknell, director at UK-based sustainability consultancy Eight Versa, sees this firsthand. 'A lot of companies have just hit the wall,' he said in an interview. 'They made a bold net-zero pledge, but once they crunched the numbers, they realized it might put them out of business.' He points out that companies growing lower-carbon alternatives—like green cement—may see emissions rise even while lowering sector-wide notes, "You're reducing the sector's overall footprint, but because your own emissions grow, you look like you're falling short. That nuance is completely lost in current net zero metrics.' In short, net zero makes sense for the world—but it doesn't always make sense for how companies grow. Hocknell argues that carbon neutrality offers more adaptability. The updated ISO standard mandates rigorous measurement, science-based reduction plans, and independent verification—but doesn't require fixed annual cuts. It also allows for the use of high-quality offsets, giving businesses space to act in volatile market conditions. For Hocknell, this flexibility isn't a flaw; it's a feature. 'We need a North Star, not a map,' he says. 'We need to know where we're going, but the route is never going to be straight. Carbon neutral gives companies the structure to act without boxing them into methodological rigidity that doesn't reflect how the real world works.' Data quality is another sticking point. Emissions models often rely on generic factors with wide uncertainty margins—sometimes 25–30%. One pharmaceutical company saw its reported footprint drop 50% after upgrading its data, without any actual operational change. This disconnect within the data can lead to performative strategies that prioritize compliance over impact. Hocknell points to practices like 'scope switching,' where companies move emissions from directly controlled sources (Scope 1 or 2) into supply chain emissions (Scope 3) by spinning off facilities or outsourcing production. On paper, emissions go down. In reality, little changes. But these accounting manoeuvres allow companies to claim progress and still meet arbitrary targets. Rather than being a loophole, high-quality offsets can provide a critical bridge, especially for hard-to-abate sectors like cement, aviation, and shipping. In these industries, rapid decarbonization isn't just unrealistic—it's structurally impossible in the short term. Credible offsets must start with additionality and measurable results. Nature-based solutions like regenerative agriculture not only sequester carbon but also enhance biodiversity, water retention, and farmer resilience—a 'triple win.' While top-tier offsets may cost more, they're still cheaper than the social cost of carbon—and deliver real impact. 'The best offsets cost more,' says Hocknell. 'But they deliver. And you can stand behind them.' It helps that the offset market itself has matured. After scandals involving questionable forest-based credits, the sector now emphasizes verifiable removals, community co-benefits, and third-party standards. Integrity is improving, and with it, confidence. This shift is already playing out. Apple recently defended its 'carbon neutral' label for the Series 9 Watch in court, supported by the Environmental Defense Fund. EDF highlighted the 80% emissions reduction achieved, with the remaining footprint offset using high-quality, nature-based credits. It wasn't just a defense of Apple, but rather it was a signal to the market that carbon neutrality, when backed by real reductions and verification, can be considered credible climate action. As Hocknell puts it, 'Net zero is conceptually elegant. But the business world doesn't run on elegant concepts. It runs on risk, margins, and uncertainty.' For companies trying to act amid imperfect data and dynamic pressures, carbon neutrality offers a structure to keep moving. That case is part of a broader trend. The EU's upcoming Green Claims Directive will ban unsubstantiated climate labels unless backed by rigorous evidence. Courts are also increasingly scrutinizing environmental claims—down to the assumptions behind individual offsets. As EDF warned in the Apple case, that risks silencing credible efforts along with the clear rules, there's a risk of a chilling effect: companies may stop communicating altogether, stalling both transparency and progress. Yet research suggests there's a better path. According to a report from the Anthesis Group, companies that combine carbon credits with broader net zero strategies are significantly more likely to include Scope 3 emissions and have validated science-based targets. Net zero may remain the ultimate destination but carbon neutrality, used as a milestone—not a mask—can help maintain momentum while laying the groundwork for deeper change. For businesses navigating rising costs, fragmented regulations, and mounting public scrutiny, one truth is becoming clear: what you call your climate strategy may be important, but how you build it matters far more. The resurgence of carbon neutrality isn't a retreat from net zero—it's a pragmatic step toward it. Used well, it enables companies to act now, communicate credibly, and adjust as data, regulation, and technology evolve. It's even arguable that climate targets should be seen as aspirations not absolutes, as best practice today may not be fit for purpose tomorrow. In a world of rising scrutiny, fragmented policy, and accelerating climate impacts, flexible, science-aligned frameworks like carbon neutrality may be not only acceptable but essential. What companies call their strategy matters—but how they build it matters far more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fullcast Acquires Commissionly to Deliver Complete Sales Performance Management Platform
Commissionly enhances Fullcast's RevOps platform with integrated sales commission management capabilities. SALT LAKE CITY, June 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Fullcast, the leading RevOps platform for end-to-end Go-to-Market (GTM) planning and execution, today announced its acquisition of Commissionly, a UK-based pioneer in cloud-based sales commission management. This acquisition marks a major step forward in Fullcast's mission to unify every aspect of GTM operations, transforming it from a leading RevOps solution into a comprehensive sales performance management platform. By integrating Commissionly's intuitive, automated commission tracking and compensation planning tools into Fullcast's RevOps platform, customers can now align sales performance and incentive structures directly with territory planning, quota setting and GTM execution. This eliminates the operational silos that often lead to misaligned incentives, payment delays and shadow accounting. "Adding Commissionly's powerful commission engine makes Fullcast the only platform where GTM planning and sales performance execution truly live in one place," said Fullcast CEO Ryan Westwood. "This acquisition enables our customers to motivate, reward and drive performance with complete visibility and trust." Commissionly has helped sales teams automate complex commission structures across industries. Its simple and intelligent cloud-based solutions are part of Fullcast's commitment to flexibility and scalability across growing Go-to-Market teams. "Joining Fullcast is a natural evolution of our mission to help sales teams succeed through transparency and automation," said Commissionly CEO Martin Baker. "Together, we can offer companies a seamless experience, from designing territories and setting quotas to managing commissions and rewarding top performers." As part of the acquisition, Commissionly's product and team will be integrated into the Fullcast suite of solutions, with continued investment in both platforms. Existing Commissionly customers will continue to receive full support and benefit from enhanced capabilities through the combined solution. "We're thrilled to bring Commissionly into Fullcast. This will make it easier for teams to connect planning with performance and actually get paid for the work they do, faster and more accurately," said Bala Balabaskaran, Cofounder and CTO of Fullcast. For more information or to request an interview, please contact Amy Cook at amy@ About Fullcast Fullcast is an AI-powered, end-to-end Sales Performance Management platform that empowers Go-to-Market teams to plan, execute and optimize revenue operations — from Plan to Pay. Designed by RevOps leaders for RevOps leaders, Fullcast unifies strategic planning and tactical execution across sales, operations, finance and customer success. The platform comprises three integrated modules: Fullcast Plan, which facilitates territory management, quota setting and capacity planning; Fullcast Perform, which automates lead routing and policy enforcement; and Fullcast Pay, which streamlines commissions management. With real-time CRM integration and AI-driven automation, Fullcast enables dynamic adjustments to GTM strategies, enhancing sales productivity and revenue growth. For more information, please visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Fullcast Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data