
Sir Alan Bates given ‘take it or leave it' offer of less than half his Post Office Horizon claim
Sir Alan Bates, who led the 20-year campaign for justice for post office operators over the Horizon scandal, has revealed he has been handed a 'take it or leave it' compensation offer of less than half his original claim.
The 70-year-old, who was knighted last year, has accused the government of presiding over a 'quasi kangaroo court' system for the compensation.
More than 900 post office operators were convicted of offences including fraud, false accounting and theft between 1999 and 2015 after the faulty Horizon IT system falsely showed that money was missing in branch accounts. The convictions were overturned by parliament last year.
Many are still awaiting damages despite the previous government announcing that those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000 payouts.
Bates has also accused the Department for Business and Trade, which administers the compensation schemes, of reneging on assurances given when they were set up and told the Sunday Times a promise they would be 'non-legalistic' had turned out to be 'worthless'.
He said he was given a final 'take it or leave it' offer, which amounted to 49.2% of his original claim after appealing and being referred to the scheme's independent reviewer, Sir Ross Cranston.
The campaigner is now calling for the creation of an independent body that would administer compensation schemes for public sector scandals but cautioned: 'I can already hear the sharpening of goose quills across Whitehall as the civil service prepares to snow politicians under with reasons it would not work.'
He added: 'The sub-postmaster compensation schemes have been turned into quasi-kangaroo courts in which the Department for Business and Trade sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goalposts as and when it chooses.
'Claims are, and have been, knocked back on the basis that legally you would not be able to make them, or that the parameters of the scheme do not extend to certain items.'
The group litigation order (GLO) scheme was set up to achieve redress for the 555 claimants who took the Post Office to the high court between 2017 and 2019.
Under the GLO, claimants can take a fixed sum of £75,000 or seek their own settlement.
If there are disputes in individual cases, they are referred to an independent panel for review.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Post office operators can also seek a final view from Cranston, a former high court judge, if they believe the panel has got it wrong.
A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: 'We pay tribute to all the postmasters who have suffered from this scandal, including Sir Alan for his tireless campaign for justice, and we have quadrupled the total amount paid to postmasters since entering government.
'We recognise there will be an absence of evidence given the length of time that has passed, and we therefore aim to give the benefit of the doubt to postmasters as far as possible. Anyone unhappy with their offer can have their case reviewed by a panel of experts, which is independent of the government.'
Earlier this week, it emerged that hundreds of former post office operators will be compensated by the Post Office after it accidentally leaked their names and addresses in June 2024.
The Post Office said individual payouts will be capped at £5,000, although higher claims may still be pursued.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
The Law Show Should killers be forced to attend sentencing hearings?
The Victims and Courts Bill is progressing through Parliament, and will force convicted criminals to attend their sentencing hearings. If criminals convicted of the most serious offences in England or Wales refuse to attend, or are disruptive in court, they will face an extra two years in prison. There are other sanctions too, including missing out on family visits. 'Reasonable force' can also be used to get criminals to attend. The families of three women killed in London - Sabina Nessa, Jan Mustafa and Zara Aleena - have been campaigning for a new law. In each case, the men who murdered their loved ones refused to come to their sentencing hearings. Their families are not alone; the mother of 9 year old Olivia Pratt-Korbel, who was fatally shot in August 2022, has also been calling for a change in the law. The man who murdered her daughter also refused to come to court to be sentenced. But will the changes improve the court system for the families of victims? Also on the programme: The first purely-AI legal service has been given the go ahead in England and Wales - what does it mean for the UK legal sector? And who gets the dog? Why all couples might want to consider a "pet-nup" in case they split up. Presenter: Joelle Grogan Producers: Ravi Naik and Charlotte Rowles Editor Tara McDermott Contributors Charlie Sherrard KC, criminal justice barrister and judge Claire Waxman, Victim's Commissioner for London Dr Giulia Gentile, Department of Law, University of Essex and expert on AI and digital regulation Samantha Woodham, barrister and co-founder of The Divorce Surgery.

Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Liberis builds AI underwriting agent
Embedded business finance platform Liberis has launched a proprietary AI underwriting agent built to boost accuracy and slash decision times. 0 Called Ada after programming pioneer Ada Lovelace, the agent is designed to eliminate repetitive manual tasks and accelerate funding decisions for businesses. It ingests and analyses financial, compliance, and digital footprint data in real-time, automatically surfaces key risk factors, trends, and anomalies to support human underwriters. Liberis has been using AI for years and 85% of its financing decisions are already automated. However, manual underwriters are used for more complex cases. In those scenarios, underwriting accounts for nearly half of application processing time. Ada tackles these inefficiencies by automating data analysis across multiple sources including open banking data, Companies House records, credit bureau information, and digital footprint indicators. This, projects the firm, will deliver a 50% reduction in manual decision time for complex cases, while improving accuracy by correcting for human bias and blind spots. "Ada's value goes far beyond just time savings. As humans, we all have biases and blind spots. Ada helps us uncover those. It flags what we might have missed and brings those risks to the surface, improves fairness, and helps us learn from past decisions," says Rob Straathof, CEO, Liberis.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Electric bike, pedestrian and car collision leaves teen dead and another seriously injured
A collision between an electric bike, a pedestrian and a car has left a teenager dead and another in hospital with serious injuries. Emergency services responded shortly after 4.50pm on Wednesday to reports of an accident on Staniforth Road in the Darnall area of Sheffield. A 16-year-old pedestrian was taken to hospital. Despite emergency treatment, he died as a result of his injuries. The boy's family has been informed and are being supported by specialist officers. An 18-year-old man, who was the rider of the electric bike, is also in hospital with serious injuries. It is reported that the car involved, a grey Audi, failed to stop at the scene. Police say an investigation into the collision is underway and a man and woman in their forties have been arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender. They remain in custody. Detective Chief Inspector Andy Knowles said: "We know that this incident will have caused significant concern in the local community, and tonight our thoughts are with the boys loved ones following this tragic incident. "Our investigation into what happened is continuing at pace and we currently have a scene in place on Staniforth Road as we continue to piece together the circumstances. "We are aware of speculation being shared online, as well as footage of the incident, and we ask members of the public to withhold from speculating or sharing footage which may cause distress to the boy's family. "If you have any footage, imagery or information that may assist our investigation then please share this with us - it may form an important part of our investigation."