
‘Will have nothing to do with Raj': Congress on Thackeray cousins' possible alliance
MUMBAI: The rapprochement between the Thackeray cousins has led to a decision from a Shiv Sena (UBT) alliance partner. The Congress' Maharashtra in-charge Ramesh Chennithala on Monday said that the party would have no truck with Raj Thackeray because of his stand against North Indians. (HT Photo)
The issue was discussed at a meeting in New Delhi on Monday to discuss the party's stand for the upcoming local body elections. The meeting was chaired by Chennithala, and all senior leaders from the state Congress were present.
'The leaders voiced their concern over the growing bonhomie between the Shiv Sena (UBT) and MNS, following which Chennithala told them it was not in their hands, but if the Thackerays went in for an alliance, the Congress would take its own decision,' said a senior leader privy to the development.
Chennithala's statement has put a question mark on the future of the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA). A three-party coalition comprising the Shiv Sena, Congress and NCP, the MVA was formed in 2019 after the Sena decided to snap ties with the BJP. The three parties contested the last Lok Sabha and assembly elections together.
After Uddhav and Raj decided to hold a joint protest against the state government for making Hindi a third language in state schools, the Congress chose not to join the protest despite opposing the decision.
Meanwhile, the Congress will also decide whether to go solo or contest the BMC elections as an alliance. 'We will take a final decision after holding a meeting of the political advisory committee of the party in Mumbai on July 5,' said Chennithala, admitting that Congress workers wanted to go solo. 'The local body elections are for workers, and obviously they want them to be contested without any alliance,' he stated.
The party leadership is of the view that going solo is necessary to safeguard the party's organisational interests, given that its position is getting weaker with every passing year. A decision in this regard was taken at a meeting held in New Delhi on May 13 where all the senior leaders from Mumbai were present, Congress insiders revealed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
34 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Shiv Sena (UBT) to mark July 5 as 'Marathi Vijay Diwas', hold a rally: Raut
Days after the Maharashtra government withdrew orders on three-language policy in schools, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Tuesday said they will hold a rally on July 5 to observe it as "Marathi Vijay Diwas". He also asked the BJP-led Mahayuti government to stop misleading people of the state, in reference to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis ' claim that Uddhav Thackeray, as the then CM, had accepted recommendations of the Dr Raghunath Mashelkar committee to introduce a three-language policy from class 1 to 12 and set up a committee on the policy implementation. Raut urged the government to produce and publicly burn any government resolution (GR) allegedly issued under the previous Thackeray-led Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government. "Let them bring that GR, and burn it if it exists," Raut told reporters, slamming the BJP for "forcibly imposing" Hindi on Marathi-speaking students. "We have opposed the BJP government's resolution which was indirectly enforcing Hindi as the third language from class 1. They are in power now, not us. We will provide them space (to burn) if they come up with that GR," he said sarcastically. The Rajya Sabha member also said the July 5 rally in Mumbai will be marked as "Marathi Vijay Diwas" to assert the strength and pride of the Marathi-speaking population. "The rally will demonstrate the might of Marathi people against this Hindi imposition. We've shown Delhi that 'tiger abhi zinda hai' (tiger is still alive)," the Sena (UBT) leader said in a defiant tone. He said both Shiv Sena (UBT) head Uddhav Thackeray and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray will attend the event. "There should be no doubt about the Thackeray brothers coming together. We have also invited other political parties and people to join the programme," Raut said. "We have finalised the broader outline. The rally will begin around noon (on July 5)," he added. Invoking Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray's legacy, Raut said, "Balasaheb taught us to hit the sin, not the sinner. This fight is not against any one individual but against policies that are anti-Maharashtra." Targeting the BJP, Raut further said, "Every time they try to suppress the Marathi people, we bounce back with even more strength. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Devendra Fadnavis must realise this isn't a mute Maharashtra they're dealing with." Facing mounting opposition to the introduction of Hindi language in Maharashtra schools from classes 1 to 5, the state cabinet on Sunday decided to withdraw two GRs (government orders) on the implementation of the three-language policy. Immediately after the announcement, the MNS and the Shiv Sena (UBT) said the protest march planned on July 5 against the GRs has been cancelled. However, Uddhav Thackeray said a programme will take place on July 5 to celebrate the unity of the Marathi manoos. Meanwhile, asked about Congress likely to contest the coming civic elections in the state independently, Raut said it is a national party and has every right to contest the local body polls separately. The MVA, comprising the Shiv Sena (UBT), Congress and Sharad Pawar's NCP (SP), was primarily formed for the Lok Sabha and assembly elections, he said.


News18
41 minutes ago
- News18
After Maharashtra U-Turn, Karnataka CM Says State Will Stick To Two-Language Formula In Schools
The chief minister's remarks come at a time when debates over language policies in schools are resurfacing across states. Just days after Maharashtra paused its three-language policy for primary schools, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Tuesday made it clear that his government supports a two-language formula for school education. Speaking to reporters in Mysuru, Siddaramaiah said, 'We are for the two-language policy. My government is committed to it." The chief minister's remarks come at a time when debates over language policies in schools are resurfacing across states. Karnataka's stance signals a firm preference for limiting the medium of instruction to two languages, aligning with the state's longstanding approach to school education. The BJP-led Maharashtra government recently withdrew two government resolutions that aimed to introduce Hindi as a mandatory third language for students from Classes 1 to 5. This rollback reignited debates over language policies in schools across several states. In Karnataka's state board schools, the current structure requires students to learn two languages up to Class 5. From Class 6 onwards, Hindi is introduced as a third language. By Class 8, students are given the flexibility to choose their first language from Kannada, English, or Sanskrit. If a student selects Sanskrit as their first language, then Kannada becomes compulsory as the third language. Despite the National Education Policy (NEP) recommending a three-language formula nationwide, Karnataka has officially rejected it and is in the process of drafting its own state-specific language policy. The state Congress has openly backed the decision to drop the mandatory inclusion of Hindi, arguing that students should be encouraged to embrace regional languages instead. In a post on X, the party stated, 'South India's linguistic diversity is a vibrant tapestry, weaving together languages like Kannada, Kodava, Tulu, Konkani, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and many others. However, mandating Hindi as a third language in schools, especially in non-Hindi-speaking states like Karnataka, creates discord." This growing resistance reflects broader concerns about imposing a one-size-fits-all language policy on a linguistically diverse region.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
It is govt and assembly speaker's responsibility to appoint LoP: Sena (UBT) MLA
Mumbai, Shiv Sena legislator Bhaskar Jadhav on Tuesday said the responsibility of appointing the leader of opposition in the Maharashtra assembly lies jointly with the state government and the speaker. It is govt and assembly speaker's responsibility to appoint LoP: Sena (UBT) MLA The Sena , led by former state chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, is neither ignorant nor unaware of the procedural norms, Jadhav told reporters in the Vidhan Bhavan premises here. Jadhav's name has been recommended by the Shiv Sena for the LoP post, a cabinet-level position. Notably, Sena MP Sanjay Raut had said that in the past, the post of LoP was given to opposition parties even as they had not won 10 per cent of the seats at that time. The combined strength of the opposition parties in the 288-member state assembly is nearly 50, he pointed out. The Shiv Sena has the strength of 20, Raut had said, claiming that even if the strength of MLAs is less, there is no law or provision in the Constitution which says the House should function without the LoP. Jadhav said, "There is no technical hurdle left in appointing the leader of opposition. The government cannot simply wash its hands off by pointing fingers at the speaker. When such a crucial constitutional post is vacant, both the government and the speaker must act." The Sena MLA said he possesses written communication from the Vidhan Bhavan administration confirming that a specific numerical strength is not a prerequisite for staking claim to the position. "Within the Maha Vikas Aghadi , the Shiv Sena has the highest number of MLAs. Our allies have also endorsed my candidature. The ball is now in the court of the government and the speaker," he said. "This is the third consecutive session of the state legislature, and yet there is no leader of opposition in the assembly. This delay is not only unjustified but raises questions about the government's intent," Jadhav claimed. He said his party has complied with all formalities and expectations and claimed the continued delay would amount to undermining the opposition's constitutional role in the House. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.