&w=3840&q=100)
CIA backs Trump, says US strikes 'severely damaged' Iranian nuclear sites
CIA Director John Ratcliffe has said that key nuclear sites in Iran have been destroyed. However, he fell short of giving more details on whether the country's nuclear programme has been eliminated entirely read more
A satellite image shows damage to the tunnel entrances of the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Research Centre, following US airstrikes amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Isfahan, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuters
The head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has said that the US strikes on Iran 'severely damaged' its nuclear facilities and set them back by years, as a leaked intelligence report creates ruckus about the extent of destruction caused by the attacks, angering President Donald Trump.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe has said that key nuclear sites in Iran have been destroyed. However, he fell short of giving more details on whether the country's nuclear programme has been eliminated entirely.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Refresh for updates
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Putin to skip BRICS summit in Brazil over ICC arrest warrant
Russian President Vladimir Putin will not attend the upcoming BRICS summit in Brazil, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed on Wednesday, citing an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) over alleged war crimes in Ukraine. 'This is related to certain difficulties in the context of the ICC's demands,' Ushakov said, according to Reuters. 'In that context, the Brazilian government could not take a clear position that would allow our president to participate in this meeting.' The summit, scheduled for July 6–7 in Rio de Janeiro, will see Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov represent Russia in person. Putin is expected to join the proceedings via video link. The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Putin in March 2023, accusing him of illegally deporting hundreds of Ukrainian children following Russia's 2022 invasion. While the Kremlin has dismissed the allegations and called the warrant null and void, the legal risks remain for Putin when visiting ICC member states like Brazil. As a signatory to the Rome Statute, Brazil is obliged to detain any individual wanted by the ICC who enters its territory. This is not the first time Putin has opted out of international summits due to the ICC warrant. He skipped the 2023 BRICS summit in South Africa under similar circumstances and sent Lavrov instead. He also missed the G20 summit in Brazil in November 2024, reported The Kyiv Independent. In a rare exception, Putin visited Mongolia in September 2024 — despite its ICC membership. Media reports suggest Chinese President Xi Jinping may also skip the BRICS summit this year. (With inputs from Reuters, The Kyiv Independent, The Moscow Times)
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Uranium...': CIA Makes Big Reveal On Iranian Nuclear Sites After U.S. Intel Shocks Trump
CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed that recent U.S. airstrikes inflicted severe and long-term damage on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, aligning with President Donald Trump's claim that the strikes were devastating. Speaking from the NATO summit, Trump dismissed earlier intelligence assessments as incomplete and promised the release of evidence supporting his version. Israeli sources and U.S. officials echoed the president's claims, suggesting Iran's nuclear program has been set back by years. Meanwhile, Iran acknowledged damage but denied total destruction. Questions remain about the fate of enriched uranium stockpiles, and international monitors have lost access due to the ongoing conflict.#CIA #trump #israelirannuclearwar #israelirannuclearsite #iranretaliatorystrikes #ayatollahalikhameneitrump Read More
The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Donald Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday (June 26, 2025) as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday (June 24, 2025) and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Mr. Trump decides to strike Iran again. Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorised the attacks. Iran-Israel conflict LIVE updates 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said on Tuesday (June 24, 2025) that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday (June 27, 2025). CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday (June 26, 2025). Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Mr. Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Mr. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorised to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday (June 25, 2025), Ms. Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Ms. Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Mr. Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. Most Republicans have staunchly defended Mr. Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Mr. Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for US involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Mr. Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Mr. Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear programme'.
