Funeral row causes chaos for mourners of Zambia's ex-president
Arranging a funeral can be testing at the best of times - let alone for a former head of state. Amid that intense, initial stage of grief, loved ones must juggle cost, the wishes of the deceased and numerous other factors in order to throw a fitting send-off.
Add the clashing desires of a national government and its political opponents into the mix, and things become doubly complicated.
Edgar Lungu, who led Zambia from 2015 to 2021, died last Thursday. His death at the age of 68 has shocked Zambians - and there is genuine sense of grief with all radio stations playing gospel music for the man who had remained influential in Zambian politics despite being barred from contesting last year's election.
Zambia is officially a Christian country - and most people take their religion and periods of mourning seriously.
But a standoff between his family, the government and Lungu's political party, the Patriotic Front (PF), has left mourners confused about how exactly the former president should be honoured.
The government announced there would be a state funeral and declared that the official venue for mourning would be a lodge it owns in the capital, Lusaka, but the PF dismissed this plan, directing mourners to its headquarters instead.
As for Lungu's family, they have said they are not opposed to a state funeral, but have insisted on choosing who will preside over it, family lawyer Makebi Zulu has told the BBC.
Then there is the official book of condolence, in which mourners can pay tributes to Lungu. The government has set up an official book - at the lodge - but the PF has urged people to sign theirs instead - at their headquarters.
The government wanted to repatriate his body from South Africa last week - Lungu died there after receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness.
However, the PF and Lungu's family intervened, wanting to organise the safe passage of the ex-leader themselves.
"The state was saying, 'We are giving him full military honours, therefore we're taking over from here' - as if to say that 'you have no say over what happens,'" Mr Zulu said.
Plans for returning Lungu's remains are still unclear, though the family are now engaging with the government on this issue.
There has also been confusion over the "official" mourning period when all forms of entertainment like big football matches and concerts are stopped.
The government declared a seven-day national mourning period starting last Saturday, even though the PF announced one days earlier.
This chaos is, in short, a continuation of the tumultuous relationship between Lungu and his successor, President Hakainde Hichilema.
The pair are long-time rivals - in 2017, when Lungu was president, he had Hichilema locked up for over 100 days on treason charges after Hichilema's motorcade allegedly refused to give way for him.
It took the intervention of the Commonwealth for Hichilema to be released. Four years later, and after five attempts at the presidency, Hichilema defeated Lungu.
Now, the PF and the Lungu family's lawyer are accusing Hichilema's government of being partly responsible for the former president's death.
Lungu returned to frontline politics in 2023, frequently accusing Hichilema's government of victimising him and other PF members.
Now, after Lungu's death, his party allege that Lungu was banned from leaving the country for years and that if he had been allowed to travel to seek medical treatment sooner, he might still be alive.
The government has vehemently denied any responsibility for Lungu's death, with spokesperson Cornelius Mweetwa insisting that the ex-president was never prohibited from travelling.
Mr Mweetwa told the BBC that the PF was trying to use Lungu's death as a "springboard" for a "political comeback".
It is not the first time conflict has broken out following a Zambian leader's death.
In 2021, the family of Kenneth Kaunda, the country's first post-independence president, said he wanted to be laid to rest next to his wife and not at the site designated by the government.
Despite this, the government went ahead and buried Kaunda at Embassy Memorial Park in Lusaka.
"The High Court ruled that national interest takes precedence over individual or family preferences because there is a designated burial place for former presidents, and there is a designated set of protocol to handle those proceedings that are conducted by the state, not a political party," Mr Mweetwa said.
This argument - about the state's rights to a dead president's body - has played out numerous times across Africa.
In 2019, Robert Mugabe died almost two years after being unseated as Zimbabwe's president by his former right-hand man, Emmerson Mnangagwa.
Mugabe's family refused to allow him to be buried at the national Heroes' Acre, arguing that he had been betrayed by his former colleagues.
After a bitter feud, the man who had led Zimbabwe to independence was laid to rest after his state funeral in his home village.
But a legal row rumbles on over his burial site, with some still wanting him to be interred at Heroes' Acre, where a mausoleum has now been completed for him.
And loved ones rarely won such disputes. The relatives of Angola's José Eduardo dos Santos and various Ghanaian presidents have clashed with the government over post-death arrangements, but all eventually had to yield to the state.
In Lungu's case, the government has the constitution - the supreme law of the land - behind it, but the PF has significant clout as the former leader's long-time political home.
In an attempt to break the standoff, the government has sent envoys to South Africa to negotiate with Lungu's family, where a private memorial service was held at Pretoria's Sacred Heart Cathedral on Tuesday - organised by the PF.
This was attended by his widow and daughter and where it was announced to the congregation that the former president's body would not be flown home on Wednesday as had been expected.
So for those in Zambia, there is still no clear direction on how to send off the nation's sixth president.
'My son is a drug addict, please help' - the actor breaking a Zambian taboo
An ancient writing system confounding myths about Africa
Zambia president orders ministers to stop sleeping in cabinet
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers ask judge to sanction Trump administration
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia have asked a judge to put severe sanctions on the Trump administration, saying federal officials violated court orders to prove the steps they were taking to attempt to get the wrongfully deported man out of El Salvador for weeks, before he was returned to face criminal charges. It's the latest move in the court fight over Abrego Garcia and whether the Trump administration appropriately handled the political and legal maelstrom. Abrego Garcia's lawyers say the Trump administration's violations of the court have been 'egregious' because it repeatedly refused to provide any evidence around how it was complying with court orders. 'The Government did virtually nothing,' they said in a court filing late Wednesday night. 'Nearly sixty days, ten orders, three depositions, three discovery disputes, three motions for stay, two hearings, a week-long stay, and a failed appeal later, the Plaintiffs still have seen no evidence to suggest that the Defendants took any steps, much less 'all available steps,' to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the United States 'as soon as possible' so that his case could be handled as it would have been had he not been unlawfully deported,' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote. Documents the administration turned over to Abrego Garcia's team in recent weeks had largely been already in the public record, and assertions that the State Department was discussing his return with the Salvadoran government were vague, the lawyers added. Abrego Garcia was returned to the US last week to face new federal criminal charges that accuse him of trafficking undocumented migrants across states. He is currently in federal custody and has a court hearing set for Friday in Tennessee — where he is charged — so that he may enter a plea and for a judge to decide if he will remain behind bars in the US. But District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland had spent weeks before the indictment was unsealed demanding the Department of Homeland Security, Department of State and lawyers from the Department of Justice produce records and statements showing how the efforts were unfolding behind the scenes. 'The lengths the government has gone to resist discovery relating to these core questions raises a strong inference that the Government is trying to hide its conduct from the scrutiny of this Court, the Plaintiffs, and the public,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers wrote. 'What the Government improperly seeks to hide must be exposed for all to see.' Abrego Garcia's attorneys want Xinis to fine the government and some of its officials and either again order the administration to turn over documents or bring in a third-party 'special master' investigator to look at the administration's compliance with the court's orders. Abrego Garcia was mistakenly sent to the CECOT prison in El Salvador in March, despite a US immigration court order that said he could not be deported there for his own safety. Even President Donald Trump himself resisted stepping in, despite court orders that Abrego Garcia be returned and given due process. The case has become emblematic of the Trump administration's hasty attempts to send migrants out of the US without proper constitutionally-guaranteed proceedings. It's also among a small group of cases related to the hardline immigration approach where judges are now considering sanctions or even holding federal officials in contempt of court for failing to abide by judicial orders. Weeks ago Xinis told the Trump administration it must 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return and provide information about how it was doing so. She also ordered a handful of administration officials to sit for depositions. While those sworn interviews happened behind closed doors, the officials refused to answer many questions, citing privileges, Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote on Wednesday. 'More than 90 times, the Government instructed them not to answer on the basis of an asserted privilege,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers told the judge about the depositions. 'And when they did answer, the witnesses uniformly testified that they lacked personal knowledge of the very topics concerning which they had previously provided sworn declarations.' The lawyers also argue that the DHS' top attorney, acting general counsel Joseph Mazzara, may have given untruthful testimony. The Trump administration hasn't yet responded to the accusations made in court. CNN has also reached out to DHS for comment.


CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers ask judge to sanction Trump administration
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia have asked a judge to put severe sanctions on the Trump administration, saying federal officials violated court orders to prove the steps they were taking to attempt to get the wrongfully deported man out of El Salvador for weeks, before he was returned to face criminal charges. It's the latest move in the court fight over Abrego Garcia and whether the Trump administration appropriately handled the political and legal maelstrom. Abrego Garcia's lawyers say the Trump administration's violations of the court have been 'egregious' because it repeatedly refused to provide any evidence around how it was complying with court orders. 'The Government did virtually nothing,' they said in a court filing late Wednesday night. 'Nearly sixty days, ten orders, three depositions, three discovery disputes, three motions for stay, two hearings, a week-long stay, and a failed appeal later, the Plaintiffs still have seen no evidence to suggest that the Defendants took any steps, much less 'all available steps,' to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the United States 'as soon as possible' so that his case could be handled as it would have been had he not been unlawfully deported,' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote. Documents the administration turned over to Abrego Garcia's team in recent weeks had largely been already in the public record, and assertions that the State Department was discussing his return with the Salvadoran government were vague, the lawyers added. Abrego Garcia was returned to the US last week to face new federal criminal charges that accuse him of trafficking undocumented migrants across states. He is currently in federal custody and has a court hearing set for Friday in Tennessee — where he is charged — so that he may enter a plea and for a judge to decide if he will remain behind bars in the US. But District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland had spent weeks before the indictment was unsealed demanding the Department of Homeland Security, Department of State and lawyers from the Department of Justice produce records and statements showing how the efforts were unfolding behind the scenes. 'The lengths the government has gone to resist discovery relating to these core questions raises a strong inference that the Government is trying to hide its conduct from the scrutiny of this Court, the Plaintiffs, and the public,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers wrote. 'What the Government improperly seeks to hide must be exposed for all to see.' Abrego Garcia's attorneys want Xinis to fine the government and some of its officials and either again order the administration to turn over documents or bring in a third-party 'special master' investigator to look at the administration's compliance with the court's orders. Abrego Garcia was mistakenly sent to the CECOT prison in El Salvador in March, despite a US immigration court order that said he could not be deported there for his own safety. Even President Donald Trump himself resisted stepping in, despite court orders that Abrego Garcia be returned and given due process. The case has become emblematic of the Trump administration's hasty attempts to send migrants out of the US without proper constitutionally-guaranteed proceedings. It's also among a small group of cases related to the hardline immigration approach where judges are now considering sanctions or even holding federal officials in contempt of court for failing to abide by judicial orders. Weeks ago Xinis told the Trump administration it must 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return and provide information about how it was doing so. She also ordered a handful of administration officials to sit for depositions. While those sworn interviews happened behind closed doors, the officials refused to answer many questions, citing privileges, Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote on Wednesday. 'More than 90 times, the Government instructed them not to answer on the basis of an asserted privilege,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers told the judge about the depositions. 'And when they did answer, the witnesses uniformly testified that they lacked personal knowledge of the very topics concerning which they had previously provided sworn declarations.' The lawyers also argue that the DHS' top attorney, acting general counsel Joseph Mazzara, may have given untruthful testimony. The Trump administration hasn't yet responded to the accusations made in court. CNN has also reached out to DHS for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
We will do everything we can to save Alexander Dennis jobs, vows Swinney
The Scottish Government will do 'everything we can' to support jobs at bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis, the First Minister has said. The company announced on Wednesday it is proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year. Speaking at First Minister's Questions on Thursday, John Swinney said he is 'deeply concerned'. He told the chamber: 'This issue has been occupying a great deal of the focus and the attention of the Deputy First Minister and I and the UK Government ministers since we became aware of the situation over the last few weeks, and then ultimately to the decision that was announced yesterday.' He said his Government has 'supported' the manufacturer. But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China, while pointing to the order from Alexander Dennis of around 160 vehicles by the publicly-owned network in Greater Manchester. In Scotland, public service buses are procured by private operators, who then run them on routes across the country. Mr Swinney said state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis. He quoted a joint letter from the UK and Scottish governments, which pledged to 'work closely with Alexander Dennis at this challenging time'. He added: 'That's us indicating that we're keen to do everything we can to find a way through the Subsidy Control Act provisions, so the Government can continue to operate within the law, which we must do, but also, we can support manufacturing in Scotland, which is my priority.' Speaking to journalists after First Minister's Questions, Mr Swinney said the possibility of a furlough scheme for staff impacted by the announcement – as suggested by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray on Wednesday – is on the table. In the chamber, Mr Sarwar said: 'If John Swinney can't figure out a way to order buses in Scotland, I suggest he picks up the phone to (Greater Manchester Mayor) Andy Burnham and see how he managed to do it. 'Almost five times as many bus orders from Manchester.' Mr Sarwar's claim stems from the second phase of the Scottish Government's green bus initiative ScotZEB, which ordered 44 buses from Alexander Dennis. However, according to a press release from the time, 137 buses were ordered from the firm in the first phase, amounting to a total of 181. In a statement, Mr Burnham – who has visited the Falkirk site – said: 'Our iconic Bee Network buses are a bit of Scotland right here in Greater Manchester. 'We have over 160 Alexander Dennis buses criss-crossing our city-region every day – connecting our communities to opportunity. 'If Greater Manchester can invest in world-class Scottish bus manufacturing, then why can't the SNP Scottish Government?'