
Indiana's betting big on data centers, but will Hoosiers end up footing the bill?
Patricia Fullen, 76, didn't turn on her air conditioning all summer. She couldn't afford the electric bill with it on.
Instead, she used floor and ceiling fans to cool the house. Guests didn't want to come over because it was so stuffy. Friends made fun of her for refusing to turn it on.
Fullen lives off her social security check and income from working part-time at the Jay C Store near where she lives in Georgetown, Indiana, a small town near the Kentucky border and right next to the site of Clark County's Meta data center.
The data center in Clark County is one of more than 20 proposed or under construction in Indiana, drawn by the state's generous tax incentives. These hulking steel complexes process, store and disseminate data, a mission critical to support the nation's growing technological infrastructure, but they also demand more power than Indiana can provide — at least without significant, often costly, upgrades for the grid.
But since the cost of grid upgrades can be passed onto residential customers, regular Hoosiers like Fullen may end up with bigger bills simply so data centers can get power — regardless of their ability to pay.
'People are going to have to make a choice,' Fullen said, 'Am I going to be able to afford to live?'
The majority of planned data centers in Indiana haven't publicly released information on how much energy they expect to need, making it challenging for the public and advocates to track the total impact of these centers.
Still, an IndyStar analysis, based on the information that is public, finds Indiana faces an uphill battle to connect proposed data centers to the grid. The anticipated energy needs for just nine data centers account for more than half of Indiana utilities' electricity capacity in 2023, based on data compiled by the U.S. Energy Information Administration and Citizen's Action Coalition.
That percentage shrinks when considering independent power producers, which are other potential sources of electricity for data centers, but it still represents a significant portion of Indiana's capacity.
Bottom line: Indiana's total electric industry capacity likely would not be enough to power the data centers on top of peak demand, according to 2021 demand data, the most recent available.
'We're talking massive, unprecedented increase in electricity consumption that we just have no recent experience with in Indiana,' said Ben Inskeep, director of the consumer advocacy organization Citizen's Action Coalition.
For example, the state's most energy intensive incoming data center project, according to public data, would require one-million-homes worth of power at a whopping 2,250 MW. That center, an Amazon endeavor currently under construction in New Carlisle, would help power AI startup Anthropic.
With so many unknowns, the true cost of powering data centers is a mystery even to experts in utility forecasting.
Timothy Phillips, the lead analyst for Purdue's State Utility Forecasting Group, said the organization's 2023 forecast — which already projects a decline in electricity resources — did not account for data centers. The group is currently working on an updated forecast for 2025 that will include data centers, which require so much electricity that they cannot be fed into the models but instead must be added on.
The little public data available, most tucked away in regulatory proceedings or utility presentations, all tell a similar story: Indiana needs to start generating more electricity if it wants to support data centers.
'But if you take the biggest numbers they were talking about, you would be talking about over 100% increase in energy required for the state,' Phillips said.
Generating enough new electricity for the data centers quickly enough could be challenging. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission proceedings are slow. But data centers can be built within a year or two, presenting a problem for utilities that need quick approvals of grid upgrades so they can quickly bring centers online.
As utilities wait for approval on new power plants and transmission lines, they may prevent other large economic development projects from advancing.
'These data centers, because they are just guzzling up all of the existing infrastructure and natural resources available," Inskeep said, "it's actually creating a problem of preventing other types of economic development from coming to our state."
River Ridge Commerce Center, a manufacturing and business park in Clark County, testified in IURC proceedings last year that it may have to pause efforts to attract new economic development projects because Duke Energy did not have the capacity following its contract with a Meta data center. Instead, Duke Energy told River Ridge that most current and prospective companies in the area would need to wait four to five years for grid upgrades in order to get power.
Though utilities like Duke Energy may lose out on other large customers if they fail to adequately prepare, data centers offer money-making opportunities that are hard to refuse.
'For example, a utility that's making $1 billion a year in revenue, if they just add one or two data center customers they double that revenue in a short amount of time,' Inskeep said.
More: AES Indiana seeks 13.5% rate hike to cover storm response, infrastructure and inflation
Proponents of data centers, however, argue that attracting data centers are good for Indiana, spurring innovation and economic development. They also point out how much our daily lives have become entangled with tech, making data center expansion efforts inevitable.
"Data centers make our economy and our current way of life possible," said Joseph Rompala, legislative director for Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc, which advocates for cost-effective, reliable energy for large companies.
Rompala said data center companies can foster efficiency in energy storage, generation and transmission tech. Though a data center doesn't require many employees on its own, those working to manage or provide support services to the center may spark a trickle out effect, Rompala said, where businesses hire more people to serve the needs of the data center employees.
Indiana's data center rush follows a long-term decline in a reliance on coal for electricity and a shift from being a net energy exporter to a net importer.
In the past decade net interstate imports for electricity have risen, making up 16% of total supply in 2023. Importing energy isn't always more expensive than generating it, but it can raise rates for consumers if utilities become too reliant on purchasing electricity to feed power-hungry data centers, losing their flexibility to choose whatever option is cheapest.
'The risk is whether you can get it and how high the price is going to be, because the price can get really high,' Phillips said.
The decline of coal appears to be driving the dip in electric utility supply while natural gas and renewable sources struggle to fully replace it. Instead, a new power source has taken center stage in Indiana: small modular reactors.
Though no SMRs are currently operational in the U.S., these compact nuclear power plants provide up to 300 MW of electricity with a smaller carbon footprint than gas or coal.
Indiana lawmakers recently passed legislation that would incentivize utilities to invest in SMRs, allowing them to recoup costs from all the customers they serve.
Inskeep and experts agreed it's unlikely Indiana will run out of power; instead, Inskeep said he believes consumers will end up paying the bulk of the cost for supplying data centers power.
'It's really unfair that people right now that can't afford to keep their homes and can't afford to pay their power bills, are now having increases on our bills in order to subsidize these data centers and the infrastructure they need to connect to the grid,' Inskeep said.
Residents are starting to push back against data centers coming to their own counties. In March, the Valparaiso mayor announced the city would stop exploring plans to allow a data center to purchase land after public outcry. In May, pushback among residents in Hancock County led a developer to withdraw a project that may have potentially housed a data center, though the developer plans to resubmit a zoning request.
Harvard electricity law fellow Eliza Martin, who coauthored a paper on the ways ratepayers are subsidizing data centers, said it's profitable for utilities to supply energy for data center customers because they need so much electricity. But huge investments can pose a risk for other ratepayers if data center deals fall through, Martin said.
'Indiana will have built all of this generation and all of this new infrastructure, and then you won't have the same customers to spread those costs about,' she said.
More: A massive data center is planned for Franklin Township, but many residents are concerned
Another emerging solution involves creating special requirements for large data centers in order to protect consumers.
In February, the IURC approved a settlement between data center companies and Indiana Michigan Power that would reduce the risk of costs being passed to ratepayers by having companies enter into long-term financial commitments.
But the settlement only applies to I&M, which is only one of five investor-owned utilities in Indiana.
Until more progress can be made, Hoosiers like Patricia Fullen will plan to keep the AC off again this summer. The cost of essentials like food, gas and medicine is just too much, she said — she can no longer afford to be cool.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Contextual AI Is Vital For The Future Of Supply Chains
Theodore Krantz, Chief Executive Officer at There are two new norms. The first is AI. By 2028 alone, 33% of enterprise software applications will include agentic AI, and 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be autonomously decided for us. And the second norm to come to terms with is global supply chain risk. Our current landscape is challenging and involves complexity, volatility, extreme weather events, cybersecurity risks and geopolitical tensions. For global enterprises, the question isn't simply whether to adopt AI. It's how to do so in a way that transforms fragmented systems into intelligent, adaptive ecosystems. That's where the distinction between applied and contextual AI becomes critical. Let's start with what most people are familiar with: applied AI. These are targeted tools built to automate specific processes, forecasting demand, managing inventory and flagging compliance risks. They're great at solving isolated problems with structured inputs and predictable outputs. But applied AI has its limits. It doesn't always understand nuance, interconnected risks or the fast-moving variables that define today's global supply networks. In contrast, contextual AI is much different. It does more than merely process data. It understands the environment in which that data lives. It can synthesize the real-time signals from a diverse array of sources, such as, but not limited to, cyber threats, regulatory updates, geopolitical developments and even financial stress indicators. In this way, contextual AI provides more meaningful and strategic recommendations, and this difference is centered on being proactive versus reactive. Why Most AI Projects Fall Short Despite the excitement surrounding generative AI and large language models, many companies remain stuck in what I call the AI adoption gap. A staggering statistic from shows that 90% of Fortune 1000 companies have little to no visibility into their second- and third-tier suppliers. They might use AI in pockets, but they lack the visibility and context to orchestrate decisions at scale to drive true retention and ROI. This is a massive gap, especially when most catastrophic risks tend to lie beyond your tier-one relationships. So, why does this matter for AI? Because no matter how advanced your model is, it's only as effective as the data you feed it and the perspective you bring to interpreting that data. Good AI without context is like a GPS that doesn't update in real time: helpful but prone to failure when conditions shift. The Case For Contextual AI In Supply Chains What separates contextual AI is its ability to integrate internal enterprise data with external intelligence. It's important to take into consideration multiple data sources—some public, some proprietary—to map global supply chains and assess risk across multiple dimensions: cyber, financial, geopolitical, regulatory and ESG. And the real magic happens when we marry that external lens with customers' own data to mitigate risk proactively. Take the recent outage involving CrowdStrike and Microsoft as an example. According to our data, about 675,000 direct customer relationships were impacted, and without a contextual view, understanding not just who was directly affected but how those ripple effects propagated across sub-tiers, organizations would be left guessing where their vulnerabilities truly lie. Building Enterprise Trust In AI Contextual AI is really about better outcomes. But to get there, enterprises need more than technology; they need trust. That trust starts with transparency, human-in-the-loop design and rigorous validation. Don't treat AI as a "set it and forget it" solution. Companies must continuously refine their models with domain experts and customer feedback, integrating reinforcement learning with human validation. And increasingly, using clean rooms to ensure customers can safely combine their sensitive data with your company's market data without compromising privacy or compliance is vital. AI in supply chains must meet a higher bar than many consumer-facing applications. Our business involves protecting livelihoods, handling geopolitical exposure and ensuring regulatory alignment across jurisdictions. That's why trust, explainability and governance are foundational, and this is true especially when AI is involved. From Trial Projects To ROI-Based Business Transformation The end goal isn't to bolt AI onto your existing workflows; it's to rethink the workflows themselves. Applied AI may help you do what you already do more efficiently. Contextual AI helps you redefine what's possible. It allows you to spot weak signals before they become front-page headlines. Then, in turn, it adjusts in real time rather than after the fact and aligns decision-making across all sorts of systems, even fragmented ones. This transformation will take time. And it will also require a shift in mindset as well as a retooling of infrastructure, but the results will be significant. It will mean more resilient, responsive and stronger supply chains that will benefit all over time. As enterprise leaders, we must challenge ourselves not just to implement AI but to elevate it. And the real power of AI isn't in the code. It's in the context. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate careens towards Friday tax vote
Senate Republicans are steaming toward a Friday initial vote on their big tax cuts bill, despite having a metric ton of work to do to finish the package. It's not totally inconceivable that negotiations continue past the vote to proceed to the bill and into the final amendment of the vote-a-rama — what's called a 'wraparound amendment' representing the final deal. There's plenty of outstanding business: Republicans are still wrangling over the bill's potential effects on rural hospitals and the state and local tax deduction. Some Republicans want a rural hospital fund of about $10 billion; others want as much as $100 billion, according to two people familiar with the debate. The parliamentarian has knocked out proposals to shift SNAP spending to states and sell public land — and while Republicans are rewriting them, they haven't been litigated yet. Republicans also haven't quite figured out how to handle an effort to stop state-level AI regulation. Still, optimists exist: 'We're on track,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said after meeting with senators. Senate Republicans are facing an acute time crunch, as they scramble to rewrite the bill after parliamentary rulings. Consider the SNAP provision: The parliamentarian struck down the proposal to shift some SNAP cots to states and has not reviewed the latest version. Once it's rewritten, Democrats will get the opportunity to challenge it again, a Democratic aide said. There's no hint yet of a breakthrough on SALT, though Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., predicted one will come soon — and that House Republicans will be able to swallow what the Senate comes up with. 'My first responsibility is that we pass it in the Senate and at the same time we want a bill that can pass the House,' Mullin said. 'We're just going to make it, hopefully, easy enough' for them to pass it. At the moment, it looks like Republicans could finish the bill sometime on Saturday. And Senate Majority Leader John Thune is bracing for the possibility that there 'could be' more than just Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in opposition. 'We've got a lot of very independent-thinking senators who have reasons and things that they'd like to have in this bill that would make it stronger,' Thune said. 'When push comes to shove, you're looking at whether you're going to allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.'


Business Wire
36 minutes ago
- Business Wire
ZS expands partnership with Salesforce to help companies scale AI agents with Agentforce
EVANSTON, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ZS announced the continued expansion of its partnership with Salesforce to offer consulting and implementation services for Agentforce, Salesforce's digital labor platform. With a focus on AI to help companies solve commercialization and go-to-market challenges, ZS helps clients implement and manage evolving workforces in which humans and AI agents complement each other to drive business value in sectors including pharma, healthcare, medtech, travel and retail. By using ZS's services for Agentforce, clients are able to deploy and scale AI agents with a trusted, open and complete agent platform. These AI agents help drive tangible business outcomes while helping to ensure governance and compliance are built in from day one. 'Organizations need a new labor model that unlocks the full potential of humans with AI at work. ZS is a critical partner for identifying and developing specific use cases with our joint customers across industries, helping to ensure tailored and effective AI solutions for scaling digital labor,' said Phil Samenuk, SVP of Global Alliances & Channels and Outsourcing Service Providers, Salesforce. 'With Agentforce constantly evolving and expanding, ZS demonstrates the company's commitment to empowering customers to deliver success with Agentforce.' ZS has been at the forefront of innovation with Agentforce and has developed solutions and services to help clients quickly get up and running across multiple industries, including: Pharma and healthcare: ZS and Salesforce are redefining pharma's commercialization and go-to-market strategies by embedding AI into engagement workflows for sales representatives, medical science liaisons, key account managers and patient case managers. This streamlines operations, prioritizes interventions and delivers real-time insights that improve both healthcare provider and patient experiences. Medtech: ZS's services for Agentforce help track opportunities, plan and log sales calls, manage accounts and generate insights. A real-world example: AI agents are helping medtech companies manage product warranties, coordinate returns and streamline field service operations, all of which accelerate product support efforts. Travel and retail: Clients can engage with ZS to use Agentforce to leverage lead scoring, sales development, sales coaching, contract automation and service insights in an effort to increase personalization and productivity across the customer journey. 'ZS is committed to helping sales and marketing teams blend the human and digital touch to deliver growth and impact—and our Salesforce partnership is critical,' said Swati Gokhale, ZS principal for strategic alliances and investments. 'Agentforce opens up real opportunities for organizations to boost productivity, improve customer experiences and bring AI into day-to-day work in a meaningful way. With our deep industry knowledge and proven implementation expertise, we're helping clients move faster and smarter as they build and scale their digital workforce.' 'The real power of Agentforce lies in embedding AI agents into everyday workflows,' added Srihari Sarangan, a ZS principal focused on digital transformation in pharma. 'We're helping clients go beyond pilots to scale digital labor that augments real roles and drives measurable impact across the customer journey.' Salesforce, Agentforce and others are among the trademarks of Salesforce, inc. About ZS ZS is a management consulting and technology firm that partners with companies to improve life and how we live it. We transform ideas into impact by bringing together data, science, technology and human ingenuity to deliver better outcomes for all. Founded in 1983, ZS has more than 13,000 employees in over 35 offices worldwide. To learn more, visit or follow us on LinkedIn.