Ban for woman who kept ill dogs in squalid home
A woman who kept seven dogs in filthy training cages and with untreated eye and ear infections has been banned from keeping animals for four years.
The dogs, which included English bull terriers, French bulldogs, Lhasa Apsos and a pug, were found living in mud and faeces at Nicola Newton-Smith's home in Sheffield.
The 33-year-old, of Deerlands Avenue, Parson Cross, said the care of the animals had "gotten on top of her" and caring responsibilities for her partner had left her "spinning too many plates".
She pleaded guilty to several animal cruelty charges at Sheffield Crown Court earlier this month and in addition to the ban, was given a 12-month community order.
Newton-Smith was ordered to carry out 15 rehabilitation activity requirement days and told to pay £240 in cost.
RSPCA inspectors visited her home on 18 September 2023 and found the kitchen floor covered in mud and faeces and the area in and around the dogs' cages filthy.
Another training cage in a similar condition to the ones in the lounge was also seen in a cluttered bedroom.
Inspector Leanne Booth said the conditions at the property were "unacceptable and not appropriate for humans or animals alike".
"The dogs' most basic needs were not being met and they were spending their lives in dirty cages with no stimulation and nowhere dry or comfortable to rest," Ms Booth said.
Six out of the seven dogs had untreated infections, the court was told, and one female Lhasa Apso weighed 2.7kg (4.85 pounds), with a vet concluding it had been deprived of sufficient food "for at least a number of weeks".
In mitigation the court was told that Newton-Smith was "emotionally very attached" to the dogs and not someone who had set out to harm them.
She had poor mental health and was the sole carer for her partner, her solicitor said, with the situation gradually deteriorating when more dogs arrived at the house from "well-meaning people".
According to the RSPCA, all of the dogs have since made a good recovery and have been rehomed.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Ban for woman who left pets to starve in squalor
Ban for woman who left starved puppy in crate
RSPCA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling
By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear an appeal by Alabama officials of a judicial decision that a man convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled - a finding that spared him from the death penalty - as they press ahead with the Republican-governed state's bid to execute him. A lower court ruled that Joseph Clifton Smith is intellectually disabled based on its analysis of his IQ test scores and expert testimony. Under a 2002 Supreme Court precedent, executing an intellectually disabled person violates the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which starts in October. Smith, now 54, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of a man named Durk Van Dam in Alabama's Mobile County. Smith fatally beat the man with a hammer and saw in order to steal his boots, some tools and $140, according to evidence in the case. The victim's body was found in his mud-bound Ford Ranger truck in an isolated, wooded area. The Supreme Court's 2002 precedent in a case called Atkins v. Virginia barred executing intellectually disabled people. President Donald Trump's administration backed Alabama's appeal in the case. At issue in Smith's case is whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in assessing a death row inmate's intellectual disability. Like many states, conservative-leaning Alabama considers evidence of IQ test scores of 70 or below as part of the standard for determining intellectual disability. Supreme Court rulings in 2014 and 2017 allowed courts to consider IQ score ranges that are close to 70 along with other evidence of intellectual disability, such as testimony of "adaptive deficits." Smith had five IQ test scores, the lowest of which was 72. A federal judge noted that Smith's score could be as low as 69, given the standard of error of plus or minus three points. The judge then found that Smith had significant deficits from an early age in social and interpersonal skills, independent living and academics. The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's conclusions in 2023, setting aside Smith's death sentence. This prompted Alabama officials to file their first of two appeals to the Supreme Court in the case. In November, the justices threw out the 11th Circuit's decision, saying that the lower court's evaluation of Smith's IQ scores can be read two ways, and requires clarification. Ten days later, the 11th Circuit issued an opinion clarifying that its evaluation was based on "a holistic approach to multiple IQ scores" that also considered additional relevant evidence, including expert testimony. This prompted a second appeal by Alabama officials to the Supreme Court. Alabama in its filing to the Supreme Court argued that the lower courts in the case applied the wrong legal standard in establishing Smith's intellectual disability and urged the justices to take up the appeal to provide clarity on the issue. Friday's action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia McCabe. It is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top U.S. judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in determining death penalty
Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in determining death penalty The Justice Department said lower courts are confused about how to evaluate multiple IQ tests when determining if a criminal can be executed. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump calls for death penalty for migrants who kill Americans Donald Trump vows to invoke the Alien Enemies Act while calling for the death penalty for migrants who kill Americans. WASHINGTON −More than two decades after the Supreme Court said inmates who are intellectually disabled can't be executed, the court will consider how to deal with multiple intelligence tests in evaluating close calls. The court on June 6 said it would take up the case of Alabama death row inmate Joseph Smith, who was convicted and sentenced to death for a brutal murder in 1997. Smith's IQ scores have ranged from 72 to 78. Because IQ tests have an error range, lower courts said Smith's IQ could be below 70, one of the factors for defining intellectual disability. But the state argues that when five test scores are all above 70, it's unlikely that Smith's IQ is 70 or below. The Justice Department similarly told the Supreme Court that some lower courts are confused about how to evaluate multiple IQ tests under Supreme Court rules for what counts as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. "That confusion prevents states from implementing lawful capital punishment," lawyers for the Justice Department wrote in a brief urging the court to get involved. Lawyers for Smith countered that the Supreme Court has previously said there's no precise math equation for determining an intellectual disability. Previously: Supreme Court orders new trial for Oklahoma death row inmate in closely watched case Supreme Court previously considered Smith's case This isn't the first time the high court has considered a request from Alabama to take up Smith's case. After sitting on the case for more than a year, the court in November ordered the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to clarify why it backed the trial judge's determination that Smith is intellectually disabled and can't be executed. Cruel and unusual? Supreme Court wants new ruling in case involving convicted murderer with low IQ In a brief opinion, the court said it couldn't tell if the appeals court used a holistic approach to weighing the evidence about Smith's disability or relied primarily on his lowest-possible IQ score. The justices noted that the Supreme Court hadn't previously said how courts should evaluate multiple IQ scores. In response, the appeals court said it considered the entire record. Other factors considered besides IQ tests In addition to IQ, other factors that define intellectual disability are 'significant or substantial deficits in adaptive behavior' and the onset of those qualities before age 18. 'Clinicians who attempt to diagnose whether an individual has significantly subaverage intellectual functioning do not limit themselves to IQ tests,' the appeals court wrote. Multiple IQ tests with similar results are not sufficient, the court said, because the test itself may be consistently flawed or improperly given. On death row for brutal 1997 murder Smith was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of Durk Van Dam, who received 35 blunt force injuries and wounds from a saw on his neck, shoulder and back. U.S. District Judge Callie V. S. Granade called the evaluation of Smith's mental functioning a 'close case' but wrote 'the evidence indicates that Smith's intelligence and adaptive functioning has been deficient throughout his life.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Queens dogs stolen after bizarre botched robbery
What started as a robbery caper in Queens quickly turned into a dognapping disaster, cops said. A desperate dog lover is trying to track down his precious purloined pooches days after an armed thieves tried to rob him and his friend on a Queens street, but ended up swiping the man's pets. The 31-year-old victim managed to get away from the would-be captors, but the suspects got hold of the victim's phone — and the keys to his apartment. Hours later, the crooks let themselves into the victim's home, and walked off with about $6,000 worth of clothes — and two French bulldogs, cops said. 'I was thinking I was going to die,' the dog owner, who wished not to be named, told the Daily News. Police have released surveillance images of the two crooks in the hopes that someone recognizes them. The thieves did not know either the dog owner or his friend, but were trying to maximize their score by forcing one victim to reach out to the other, a police source with knowledge of the case said. The ordeal began Saturday along Crane St., a small, one-block-long stretch in Long Island City, when the two suspects approached the dog owner's 27-year-old friend, who was on a bike, and forced him into a car at gunpoint, cops said. After punching him several times, the crooks took his iPhone and about $800, then used the phone to text the dog owner, who the bike rider was heading over to meet. A short time later, the unsuspecting dog owner appeared. He was also forced into the car, where he was beaten and robbed. But he managed to escape, just as one of the robbers was trying to bind him with zip ties, he recalled. 'I grabbed the gun and started punching and fighting one of them,' he said about his ordeal. 'The other guy jumped into the car and we were all fighting for the gun. They were screaming, 'Shoot him! Shoot him!'' The dog owner managed to get out of the car and run across the street. 'They panicked and sped off,' he said. 'I dropped my phone and my keys.' As for his friend, he said the robbers later pushed him out of the car in Bedford-Stuyvesant. The dog owner went to his sister's house to decompress after the robbery. But by the time he got home, he realized he had been robbed again, he said. The thieves managed to figure out that the dog owner lived on the block where the robbery occurred and took something far more valuable to him than his phone. They took his two best friends. The thieves pretended to be delivering food in the building to get past the doorman as they made their way up to his apartment. They left with the dogs shortly before their victim returned home, the victim said. 'We just missed each other by minutes. They were caught on video,' the dog owner said. No arrests have been made. 'I find it difficult to talk about them because it makes me want to cry,' he added. 'I feel like I failed my dogs, I haven't been able to eat because I think of my dogs not being fed.' Gone are Cookie Monster, a 4-year-old male bulldog, and Pinky, a 3-year-old female. Their owner has been posting pictures on local streets and all across social media. 'I've been doing as much as I can,' he said. 'I just want my kids back.' Cops recovered surveillance images of the two suspects. One is described as between 20 and 25, around 5-foot-8 and about 180 pounds. He was last seen wearing a Chicago Bulls cap, a black surgical mask and a black sweater. His partner is in his late 20s, around 6 feet tall and about 220 pounds. He was last seen wearing a gray baseball cap and a gray sweater. Anyone with information regarding their whereabouts is urged to call NYPD Crime Stoppers at (800) 577-TIPS. All calls will be kept confidential.
