logo
UK requests return to EU's freedom of movement

UK requests return to EU's freedom of movement

Independent15-05-2025

The government is seeking to rejoin the EU 's pet passport scheme as part of its Brexit reset talks, The Independent understands.
Hundreds of thousands of British travellers took their pets on holiday to the EU every year before the UK left the pet passport scheme at the end of the Brexit transition period in January 2021.
Now, British travellers must microchip their pets, vaccinate them against rabies, and obtain an animal health certificate – which can cost up to £200.
The UK's Brexit reset negotiators have pushed for British cats and dogs to regain freedom of movement within the bloc, as first reported by The Telegraph.
In order to obtain the agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) regulations and re-enter the pet passport programme, the government is expected to give in to EU demands for a long-term agreement on fish.
A government source told The Independent: 'Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.'
Brexit has disrupted closely linked supply chains in the food and farming sector that once relied on shared EU rules, according to the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy.
Before leaving the EU, the UK benefitted from strong regulatory alignment that made trade much easier. Now, the UK is treated as a 'third country', creating new rules and barriers for British businesses trading with the EU.
The think tank said the EU has brought in tougher rules in areas like pesticides and hazardous substances—rules the UK has not followed. However, it noted that the UK has introduced higher animal welfare standards than the EU.
The government has previously said it is seeking to negotiate an SPS agreement to 'prevent unnecessary border checks and help tackle the cost of food'.
The EU pet passport is a simple, one-time document that is valid for life, as long as rabies vaccinations are up to date.
According to the existing regulations, owners who want to travel to the EU must get an animal health certificate from a veterinarian no more than ten days before departure.
A dog is only eligible for that if it receives tapeworm treatment one to five days before departure.
In addition to being required to have a rabies vaccination, dogs, cats, and ferrets must wait at least three weeks following the initial dose before travelling on vacation with their owners.
It comes as prime minister Sir Keir Starmer will host the president of the European Council, Antonio Costa, and the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, on Monday. It is expected a reset deal will be announced then.
However, The Independent understands the negotiations have encountered some last-minute problems with EU member states angry that a draft communique presented to them by the commission does not include big enough concessions from the UK on fishing and student fees.
EU states also appear to be pressing for Britain to accept the authority of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), according to the Financial Times.
The deal with the EU could also include alignment to EU rules and regulations to ease trade barriers and a youth mobility scheme for 18 to 40-year-olds based on the one the UK has with countries like Australia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years
Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years

Public sector employment has surged to the highest level in 14 years as Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil a £300bn spending spree this week. Almost 6.2m people were employed in the public sector in March, official figures show, 35,000 more than a year earlier. This is the highest number of public sector employees since December 2011. The figures from the Office for National Statistics came ahead of Ms Reeves's spending review on Wednesday, which is expected to offer big increases to defence and health while squeezing other departments. The Chancellor has raised departmental spending by nearly £400bn since Labour won the election. It comes as economists have warned more tax rises are 'inevitable' in autumn. The figures from the ONS also show that the number of civil servants is the highest since 2006, at 550,000, rising by 6,000 from a year earlier. This helped to push the total figure of central government workers to a record high of 4m, up by 93,000 from a year ago. The ONS said the rise was driven by the NHS, the Civil Service and some local authority schools becoming academies, which changes how their staff are classified in the numbers. While public sector hiring surged, the jobs downturn across the economy deepened as firms grappled with big tax and minimum wage hikes. The number of vacancies fell from 760,000 on average across February to April to 736,000 for the three months to May.

Reeves forced into U-turn over pensioner fuel payments
Reeves forced into U-turn over pensioner fuel payments

Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Times

Reeves forced into U-turn over pensioner fuel payments

The U-turn, when it came, was even bigger than expected. Rachel Reeves decided to clear the decks before the spending review by announcing that nine million pensioners would receive winter fuel payments this winter. It was a move born of political ­necessity and that has little fiscal logic. When the chancellor announced that she was stripping ten million pensioners of the winter fuel allowance next year, she argued that it was fundamental to restoring economic stability. 'This is not a decision I wanted to make,' she said. 'Nor is it one that I ­expected to make. But these are the necessary and urgent decisions I must make. It is the responsible thing to do to fix the foundations of our economy and bring back economic stability.' On Tuesday, economists point out that the fiscal circumstances are, if anything, significantly worse. The reversal means that a policy ­intended to save £1.5 billion will now save only £50 million this year, at the expense of huge reserves of public goodwill and political capital. It will ­only add to pressure on the already ­ailing public finances. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the decision meant there would have to be tax rises or more cuts to welfare in the autumn budget. 'To suggest the fiscal situation has got a lot better flies in the face of reality,' he said. 'If they are saying this means there will not be any additional borrowing then it follows, as sure as night follows day, that this will mean they will need to raise the equivalent of an additional amount of tax.' It also means that Reeves has crossed another line. She had insisted that she would never make an unfunded ­spending pledge, arguing that to do so would be 'desperate and reckless'. That is exactly what she has now done, and the detail of how the about-turn will be paid for will be confirmed in the autumn budget. After the announcement on Monday, Reeves found herself trying to argue that she had been right in scrapping the universal payments in the first place while simultaneously trying to justify the change in position. It was not an easy circle to square. The decision was the result of a ­recognition in both No 10 and No 11 that cutting the allowance had been a ­mistake, although Reeves would not ­acknowledge that on Monday. During the local elections in May, ­Labour activists found the issue of ­winter fuel coming up again and again on the doorstep. Polling found that the decision was one of the main reasons voters deserted the party, whether they moved to Reform UK or to the Greens. • What to expect in Rachel Reeves's spend, spend, spending review Discussion about a reversal began in No 10 almost immediately, but was ­denied for weeks by the government. By the time Sir Keir Starmer was ­confronted over the 'toxic' policy by a succession of angry MPs at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party three weeks ago, it was clear that the position was beginning to shift. However, concern that there was a lack of detail about what would replace the previous policy quickly made clear that the government could not wait long before setting out a replacement. Ministers were determined to introduce a means test to avoid paying 'a few hundred pounds to millionaires', and officials struggled to graft one on to ageing computer systems in the ­Department for Work and Pensions. Eventually, it became clear that HM Revenue & Customs would have to be used, clawing payments back from wealthier pensioners through the tax system. This meant that a wish to base payments on household incomes had to be abandoned, as the system assesses only individual incomes. Ministers picked a relatively high ­income, covering three quarters of ­pensioners, to make sure that no older people in poverty would lose out even at the cost of hundreds of millions of pounds. Theoretically, this means that the pensioner partner of a millionaire will receive a winter fuel payment of £100 if they have an income below £35,000 themselves, but ministers ­decided that this was a price worth ­paying for a rapid solution. For ministers who have spent months defending hugely unpopular cuts, there has been frustration about how much political capital was wasted for such tiny sums of money. • Rachel Reeves's winter fuel cut reversal is a sign of desperation Much of the blame is being pinned on Reeves. It was she who chose to press ahead with a cut long recommended by Treasury advisers but rejected as politically toxic by a succession of previous chancellors. Starmer nodded the decision through, however, despite the clear risk of a severe political backlash. He is said to have been surprised by the scale of the reaction. Ministers will be hoping that the turnaround is enough to quell public anger, which led Labour to slump in the polls. Sharon Graham, head of the Unite union, one of Labour's biggest donors, put it bluntly. 'While this is an important step forward, questions will be asked about how this disastrous ­decision was made in the first place — the damage may not easily be ­reversed,' she said. 'Leadership is about choices and the choice to pit workers against pensioners was simply wrong.'

Donald Trump ignores Britain as he claims US won Second World War
Donald Trump ignores Britain as he claims US won Second World War

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Donald Trump ignores Britain as he claims US won Second World War

Donald Trump appeared to ignore Britain as he claimed the United States 'won World War II.' While responding to a question about his military parade on Flag Day on Monday (9 June), he began recounting conversations he had with various world leaders celebrating VE Day. He gave some credit to Russia, claiming they lost '51 million people ' - most estimates put it at between 22 and 25 million people - and repeated his false claim that Adolf Hitler gave a speech at he Eiffel Tower while minimising the French effort. But there was no mention of Britain's contribution - despite Trump having a bust of wartime leader Winston Churchill in the Oval Office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store