logo
This initiative would end Colorado's wolf releases. Many rancher groups don't support it.

This initiative would end Colorado's wolf releases. Many rancher groups don't support it.

Yahoo18-04-2025

First, there was a citizen initiative to reintroduce wolves into Colorado that narrowly passed. Then there were two new proposed citizen initiatives to repeal wolf reintroduction. Now there is one.
Got all of that?
Confused?
Let's start here. Proposition 114 was passed by voters 51% to 49% in 2020 to reintroduce wolves. The new measure is Ballot Initiative 13, which calls for repealing what voters approved in 2020 by putting an end to the reintroduction effort.
But wait, there's more.
It gets more perplexing when you consider the initiative to end wolf reintroduction resulted in strange bedfellows: Many Western Slope ranchers and wolf advocates are both in opposition of Ballot Initiative 13.
Ballot Initiative 13 is proposed by the group Colorado Advocates for Smart Wolf Policy.
The initiative simply reads: "Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statues ending any further reintroductions of gray wolves by December 31, 2026?"
In an April 17 email, Colorado Advocates for Smart Wolf Policy said it will immediately start collecting signatures to secure the initiative on the November 2026 ballot. The group has until Aug. 27 to secure around 125,000 valid signatures to get the initiative on the November 2026 ballot.
The same group filed another citizen initiative, 35, that was challenged on the basis it violated the single topic requirement of proposed citizen initiatives. The State Title Board sided with the challenge and terminated the initiative April 16.
The failed initiative called for ending wolf reintroduction by Dec. 31, 2026, as well as removing "nongame" from the definition of wolf, adding livestock guard and herding animals as livestock for the purposes of compensation for losses caused by a wolf and prohibiting the importation of wolves into Colorado.
Stan Vanderwerf, one of two designated representatives of proposed Ballot Initiative 13, said the measure is needed to establish a law that definitively ends wolf reintroduction at a certain point.
The state wolf recovery plan calls for the reintroduction of 10 to 15 wolves over three to four years with the goal of having an established, sustained minimum population of 150 to 200 wolves.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife released 10 wolves captured in Oregon in Grand and Summit counties in December of 2023 and released 15 wolves captured in British Columbia in Eagle and Pitkin counties in January. Three of the Oregon wolves have died and two of the British Columbia wolves have died.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife said it is monitoring 26 wolves, including members of the former North Park pack and the Copper Creek pack, which includes five grown pups. The agency has confirmed at least two other uncollared wolves in the state.
Vanderwerf said the state's recovery plan doesn't include a definitive end date and can be changed at any time.
He added that wolf advocates aligned with Gov. Jared Polis could press for wolf reintroductions to continue past the deadline his initiative defines if wolves migrate out of Colorado, some die in the state and others continue to be killed after wandering into Wyoming.
"There is a risk relying on the management plan," Vanderwerf told the Coloradoan.
Vanderwerf pointed out the need for the initiative given the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission in January rejected a petition from 26 livestock groups to pause the reintroduction of wolves until Colorado Parks and Wildlife had fully implemented programs to reduce wolf-livestock conflicts.
"Had the commission put a pause on reintroduction, we wouldn't be having this discussion," Vanderwerf said. "We can't rely on the commission or state legislature to stop reintroduction. This measure with the force of law absolutely puts a stop to wolf reintroduction."
Opposition of proposed Ballot Initiative 13 by a coalition of ranchers, hunting advocates and western county commissions and wolf advocates is an alignment unheard of in the state.
That coalition includes the Colorado Cattlemen's Association, various stockgrowers associations, commissioners from Western Slope counties and organizations representing business interests on the Western Slope.
Reasons for their opposition center on concerns the measure will fail and create a political and social backlash and undermine current processes working to address wolf-livestock conflicts.
The coalition also believes the genie is out of the bottle since two wolf releases have taken place and at least one more round of releases will likely occur before the vote on the initiative, if it secures enough signatures to be placed on the November 2026 ballot.
There also has been concern among the coalition that Colorado Advocates for Smart Wolf Policy supporters did not adequately reach out to them for their thoughts concerning the initiatives, something Vanderwerf said is not totally accurate.
Merrit Linke is a Grand County rancher, county commissioner and member of the Middle Park Stockgrowers Association, the latter two of which are among the coalition groups opposing the initiative.
"I see value in shutting off reintroductions by the end of 2026, but in the meantime we have bigger problems on the ground that need the resources to address now, so I'm not sure the ballot measure does us any good," Linke told the Coloradoan, noting he was speaking on behalf of himself and not the coalition.
He said a footnote to the state budget that includes threatening further state general fund revenue for the wolf program if wolf-livestock conflicts are not appropriately addressed and a federal bill to delist wolves might be more effective than the initiative.
"Those have bigger teeth than the ballot measure," Linke said.
Rob Edward is president and co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Wolf Project, which spearheaded the successful passage of Proposition 114.
Edward said he sees the initiative to end wolf reintroduction as a waste of time and money.
"This is pernicious on its face," Edward told the Coloradoan. "Let's get on with actually doing what Proposition 114 was passed to do and that is to recover wolves and help bring back the complement of native carnivores."
This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Colorado ranchers, wolf advocates both oppose Ballot Initiative 13

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Another Colorado wolf dead, CPW watching 4 potential dens for pups
Another Colorado wolf dead, CPW watching 4 potential dens for pups

Yahoo

time03-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Another Colorado wolf dead, CPW watching 4 potential dens for pups

DENVER (KDVR) — Another wolf that was reintroduced to Colorado has died, and wildlife officials are continuing to monitor several potential dens where there may be new pups. Colorado Parks and Wildlife announced Monday that it received a mortality alert for the male gray wolf 2507 on May 31, and said the wolf died in northwest Colorado. Colorado Parks and Wildlife kills grey wolf in Pitkin County after attacks on livestock Because the species is federally listed under the Endangered Species Act, the death is being investigated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. CPW said the cause of death will be determined in a necropsy as part of the investigation. Further details about the death have not been released, but the agency said it is continuing to monitor wolf activity, including four potential dens. 'It is likely there are an unknown number of new pups that were born this year,' CPW said in a press release. The agency said it is working on plans for translocation efforts in the coming year so that the state's wolf population will continue to grow, leading to a self-sustaining population, in addition to the new pups. A total of six wolves that were relocated to the Centennial State have died so far this year. Last week, CPW announced that it had killed a gray wolf in Pitkin County after reports of chronic depredation despite livestock producers' non-lethal efforts to deter wolves from their animals. Last month, another gray wolf in northwest Colorado died. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Colorado Officials Euthanize ‘Chronic' Problem Wolf That Was Killing Livestock
Colorado Officials Euthanize ‘Chronic' Problem Wolf That Was Killing Livestock

Yahoo

time02-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Colorado Officials Euthanize ‘Chronic' Problem Wolf That Was Killing Livestock

The challenges associated with bringing gray wolves back to Colorado were illuminated yet again last week. On Thursday, state wildlife managers made what they called the 'very difficult' decision to kill a wolf that was preying on livestock on private land in Pitkin County, and which had previously been relocated from another county due to concerns around livestock depredations. The lethal removal took place the evening of May 29 on an unidentified cattle ranch. It was the first time that officials with Colorado Parks and Wildlife have killed a wolf since the voter-led reintroduction effort began in 2023. It was not, however, the first time that CPW has dealt with this particular wolf, which was identified in an agency news release as gray wolf 2405 and a member of the Copper Creek Pack. Read Next: The Wolf Pack Responsible for the Majority of Livestock Depredations in Colorado Will Be Relocated, Not Killed Officials explained that the young male wolf had met their definition of 'chronic depredation' after being linked to four such events in an eight-day period. They said those events occurred even with non-lethal deterrence measures in place. They pointed to 'clear and convincing evidence' that 2405 was responsible for three of the cows that were injured or killed on several different ranches in Pitkin County around Memorial Day weekend. 'The decision to take lethal management action was very difficult,' CPW director Jeff Davis said in a statement. 'Our wildlife biologists constructed a timeline of recent events that shows the depredation behavior met the conditions for chronic depredation that were defined earlier this year. We have great respect for these animals and take the removal of a wolf very seriously.'Davis went on to explain that the action was meant 'to discourage [the] other pack members' from preying on livestock. He said the agency would continue to monitor the behavior of those remaining pack mates 'to determine if behavior has changed,' but didn't specify what management actions might be taken based on that behavior in the future. It's also unclear based on CPW's timeline of events whether wolf 2405 was acting alone, or if other members of the pack were involved in the depredations as well. That timeline cites GPS collar data, which showed 'some wolves from the Copper Creek Pack were in the area' where the depredations took place on May 24 and 25. A CPW spokesperson did not give a specific answer when asked by OL whether this collar data might indicate that multiple wolves from the Copper Creek Pack were involved in the Pitkin County depredations in May. The spokesperson clarified that 2405 was 'a member of a pack determined to have met the definition of chronic depredation' and said CPW would post a full report with more information soon. '[This] is not something that we take lightly,' CPW wolf conservation program manager Eric Odell said in Friday's news release. 'Removal of animals early in the restoration process is a balance between managing populations of wolves, while also assisting landowners in resolving ongoing conflicts with wolves.' CPW also noted in Friday's announcement that it is currently monitoring four potential dens across the state, and that more pups will likely be born this spring. That should bring Colorado closer to its eventual goal of a self-sustaining gray wolf population, while at the same time giving wildlife managers more GPS-collared wolves to keep track of. There are currently 23 collared wolves roaming the state, and their movements are updated monthly in a map maintained by CPW. In many ways, the Copper Creek Pack has embodied how complicated and contentious Colorado's wolf restoration process has been. The pack was formed by two of the 10 wolves that were initially brought over from Oregon and released in Grand and Summit Counties back in December 2023. The mating pair established a den in Grand County that winter and gave birth to five pups the following spring. Read Next: Coloradans Who Oppose Wolf Reintroduction Can't Agree on How to Try Ending It Conflicts soon followed. Between April and July 2024, as wolf advocates celebrated the pack's formation, CPW confirmed multiple livestock depredations by the pack's two adult wolves. Ranchers in Grand County pleaded with both the state and the federal government to lethally remove the wolves, but their requests were denied. Although CPW's policy director told commissioners at one point that the adult pair had caused 'the main issues in depredation' among all the wolves that were relocated there from Oregon, the agency ultimately decided that killing the two breeding wolves would be 'irresponsible' and could hamper its larger recovery goals. CPW chose instead to capture and relocate the Copper Creek Pack in September. The male wolf died soon after capture, and one of the pups eluded officials, while the remaining four pups and the female were trapped and held at an undisclosed facility for several months. The five Copper Creek wolves were then re-released this last winter along with the 15 additional gray wolves that were translocated from British Columbia to Eagle and Pitkin Counties in January. At the time of the Copper Creek Pack's capture last fall, CPW acknowledged that relocation was not how it planned to handle those types of conflicts going forward. Ranchers, meanwhile, expressed their concerns that by relocating the wolves, wildlife managers were simply moving the problem instead of solving it. Read Next: Colorado Parks and Wildlife Releases Second Batch of Wolves Amid Threats, Rumors, and Growing Controversy 'By refusing to manage problem wolves, CPW has allowed livestock depredations to continue unchecked, while fostering a pack of depredating wolves,' read an August 2024 letter from the Colorado Cattlemen's Association to CPW director Jeff Davis. 'Pups from these problem wolves will be trained to 'hunt' and survive off livestock.'

Pothole problems persist on I-70 near Deer Trail
Pothole problems persist on I-70 near Deer Trail

Yahoo

time31-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Pothole problems persist on I-70 near Deer Trail

DEER TRAIL, Colo. (KDVR) — A woman from Deer Trail is pleading with the state to fix potholes on Interstate 70 after she said her tires have been shredded three times due to the crumbling roadway. 'How many people have to get injured or die because the roads are not getting fixed? Until somebody takes us seriously?' Lucile Palmer said. Colorado Parks and Wildlife kills grey wolf in Pitkin County after attacks on livestock Palmer said potholes have been a major issue on her daily commute to Denver, where she works as an airport electrician, ever since she moved to Deer Trail in 2021. According to Palmer, she wrecked the tires and wheels on her vehicle in 2023, the tires on a different vehicle in 2024 and now needs to replace the tires and wheels on a third vehicle after hitting a pothole a few days ago. 'I hit a chunk of concrete that was at least a foot long. It was huge,' she said. 'Going the speed limit. I wasn't in a rush. I left early that morning, actually, and I just didn't have enough time to swerve over.' She has paid out thousands of dollars to repair each of the vehicles. 'The hole that's in…the rear driver wheel is so massive. Like it just split open,' Palmer said. The problem spot is on a bridge in the eastbound lanes of I-70 near the Peoria Road exit, about a mile west of Deer Trail. It's the same area where several other drivers reported damage to their vehicles back in February from a pothole so deep, the rebar was exposed. 'They did a whole bunch of patchwork where you got these black dots all over, and it's usually typically on the bridges, so they're like speckled, but then eventually they're just as bad. They end up getting soft and then they wash out,' Palmer said. According to the Colorado Department of Transportation, its road crews are constantly monitoring road conditions for damage. Problem spots are quickly patched with a material that is meant to be temporary until a permanent repair can be made. 'We have to keep up with these cars and maintenance, and we're not getting anything in return. Like, it seems like our tax dollars are not going toward anything,' Palmer said. A spokesperson also said recent rain and increased traffic may have damaged recently patched potholes or created new ones. Permanent repairs are scheduled to begin on I-70 near Deer Trail in the fall. However, Palmer said she believes if the potholes were closer to the metro area, they would have already been fixed. 'It's really frustrating. I'm really disappointed. I'm really disappointed in Arapahoe County, and I'm really disappointed in my state because I'm a native and I love this state, but, like, we get treated so terribly. It's not fair,' she said. Parker police use drone to find child who didn't return from playground Potholes can be reported to CDOT by calling their regional customer service lines. Drivers can also file a claim to be reimbursed for the costs to repair a vehicle damaged by potholes, although Palmer said her first two claims were unsuccessful. 'I get the runaround, and really, they say it's not something that they can fix,' she said. 'They didn't want to help me with my Miata. They didn't want to help me with my Berreta. So I just don't see the point.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store