logo
A lawsuit by inmates is challenging Tennessee's plans to resume executions. Here's how

A lawsuit by inmates is challenging Tennessee's plans to resume executions. Here's how

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Nine Tennessee death row inmates are suing the state over its push for a new round of lethal injections after an execution was abruptly called off in 2022 and a follow-up investigation found scores of missteps in several executions.
The lawsuit was filed March 14 in state court, nearly three months after officials announced a new lethal injection protocol using the single drug pentobarbital. The Tennessee Supreme Court recently agreed to schedule executions for four inmates with the first set for May.
The lawsuit argues that pain and suffering from executions using pentobarbital violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. They also contend that the Tennessee Department of Correction has failed to make changes to the execution process as the governor and an independent investigator recommended — or if it has, it has not told the public. Rather, the lawsuit claims, department officials wrote a new protocol with few specifics, making it harder to hold them accountable.
The attorney general's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit. A Correction spokesperson declined to comment on it.
Tennessee's lethal injection problem
Tennessee executions have been paused since 2022, when the state admitted it had not been following its most recent 2018 lethal injection protocol. Among other things, the Correction Department was not consistently testing the execution drugs for potency and purity. Tennessee's last execution was by electrocution in 2020.
An independent review of Tennessee's lethal injection practice, which GOP Gov. Bill Lee ordered while pausing executions, found none of the drugs prepared for the seven inmates executed since 2018 had been fully tested — including the canceled 2022 execution.
Later, the state attorney general's office conceded in court that two of the people most responsible for overseeing Tennessee's lethal injection drugs 'incorrectly testified' under oath that officials were testing the chemicals as required. Two department officials with execution-related duties were fired.
The new lawsuit says the Department of Correction has said nothing publicly about whether it has fixed some issues raised, despite telling a federal judge it would complete recommendations by the governor and the independent investigator, former U.S. Attorney Ed Stanton.
For instance, the governor directed the department to review and overhaul its execution training procedures. Stanton, meanwhile, recommended hiring someone full-time or as a consultant with a pharmaceutical background to offer guidance on the lethal injection protocol. Stanton also suggested hiring a full-time specialist for chemical testing standards, and storage of testing results and the chemicals themselves.
From three drugs to one
Tennessee is moving from a three-drug series to just one, the barbiturate pentobarbital. Fifteen states and the federal government have used pentobarbital in executions, and five others plan to, according to the nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center. Previously, Tennessee struggled to obtain the drug because pharmaceutical companies were hesitant to fuel executions. The state has not said publicly how it plans to obtain pentobarbital.
In prior lawsuits, attorneys for the Tennessee prisoners had argued pentobarbital was preferable to the three drugs — midazolam, vecuronium bromide and potassium chloride.
That's because U.S. Supreme Court precedent requires inmates challenging an execution method to detail a 'known and available alternative,' even if they also consider the alternative unconstitutional. They've named other alternatives, including the firing squad.
In the latest lawsuit, the attorneys argue that death by pentobarbital could feel like drowning or suffocation as the lungs fill with liquid.
The lawyers cite research released after their previous lawsuits. And they noted that the Department of Justice under then President Joe Biden raised concerns about pentobarbital's potential for causing 'unnecessary pain and suffering' during executions.
The U.S. Supreme Court has never struck down an execution method as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
The Founding Fathers and poison
The inmates' lawyers also harkened back to the Founding Fathers. They appear to be addressing a Supreme Court that has sometimes considered how issues were handled when the Constitution was drafted, including in a decision expanding gun rights.
While detailing historical views of poisonings, the attorneys argue the framers of the Constitution would have considered fatal poisoning to be a barbarous act.
Will the state's executions resume in May?
Whether executions resume in May could depend on another lawsuit in federal court.
That lawsuit challenged the older three-drug series and has been on hold since 2022 pending the state's lethal injection review and revision. Two plaintiff inmates struck an agreement with the state giving them 90 days to assess the new protocol and decide whether to amend their complaint to challenge it. It says the state must try to delay setting execution dates for the two inmates until the case goes through the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

M.L. Elrick wins Scripps Howard award for watchdog columns
M.L. Elrick wins Scripps Howard award for watchdog columns

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

M.L. Elrick wins Scripps Howard award for watchdog columns

Detroit Free Press columnist M.L. Elrick nabbed another national honor this June. The longtime investigative journalist won the Scripps Howard Journalism Award for excellence in opinion writing June 10 for his 'On Guard' columns. Named alongside Elrick and the Free Press was 'Eye On Michigan,' a nonprofit, independent student investigative reporting program that Elrick launched. Elrick, who previously won the Pulitzer Prize, 'exposes politicians and public officials who break the rules or fail to do their jobs, providing the public with crucial information they can't find elsewhere to make informed decisions,' according to a listing on the Scripps Howard Fund and Scripps Howard Foundation website. More from M.L. Elrick: Wayne judge candidate won't run on his record because it includes lies and beating women Among the work that earned Elrick his latest honor were pieces that laid bare the checkered past of a probate judge candidate, exposed a Monroe County commissioner planning to serve an elected term while in federal prison, and took on Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and then-state House Speaker Joe Tate, D-Detroit, amid the controversial lame duck session at the end of 2024. Elrick's work is a valuable service, said Nicole Avery Nichols, editor and vice president of the Free Press. More from M.L. Elrick: Poobahs favor Duggan while GOP candidates hope the Donald doesn't Trump their ambitions 'M.L.'s brand of accountability journalism is uniquely Free Press, holding the powerful to account on behalf of metro Detroiters,' she said, later adding: 'Equally exciting is that the collegiate journalists of 'Eye on Michigan,' have also been honored for their investigative work. "Coaching and inspiring the next generation of journalists is something that M.L., and the Free Press, is deeply committed to.' More from M.L. Elrick: It's debatable who won Detroit mayoral candidates' chin-wag on Mackinac Island The Scripps Howard Journalism Awards honor work "that spurs action' and teams 'that go the extra mile to expose previously undisclosed or misunderstood information,' according to its website. The fund named winners across 12 categories from nearly 600 entries nationwide. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: M.L. Elrick wins Scripps Howard award for watchdog columns

Measure before Gov. JB Pritzker would streamline firearms ID process for low-level gun offenders
Measure before Gov. JB Pritzker would streamline firearms ID process for low-level gun offenders

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Measure before Gov. JB Pritzker would streamline firearms ID process for low-level gun offenders

On the final day of the spring legislative session, the Democrat-led Illinois General Assembly passed a measure intended to make it easier for people who have been arrested for carrying guns illegally to obtain a state firearm permit so they would be allowed to own firearms. The bipartisan bill marked a rare instance in which Democrats and Republicans largely agreed on a measure involving guns. Democrats have been criticized by the GOP for promoting measures that restrict the flow of guns to the point where they negatively affect law-abiding gun owners. But Democrats say this legislation, which awaits Gov. JB Pritzker's signature, encourages the legal ownership of firearms while still emphasizing accountability. 'Getting guns off the streets, yes, absolutely, to me that means stopping the flow of illegal weapons into our streets. That means keeping weapons out of the hands of people who wish to do harm,' said state Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Chicago Democrat who supports the bill. 'That doesn't mean preventing people from owning a tool that is used for both personal protection and sport.' The legislation applies to participants in diversion programs that serve as alternatives to prosecution. Cook County's Democratic state's attorney, Eileen O'Neill Burke, pushed legislators to expand the programs to include a more streamlined opportunity for their participants to obtain a firearm owner's identification, or FOID, card — the form required by the Illinois State Police for state residents to be allowed to legally own guns. The legislation would apply to people eligible for placement in the diversion programs and charged with gun crimes designated as Class 4 felonies, offenses that can carry one-to-three-year prison sentences but are the least severe level of felonies. Under the measure, a person charged with those low-level gun felonies would be able to apply for a FOID card once receiving a court order attesting to their completion of a diversion program, enabling the state police to perform a background check as part of the process of granting them the card. Once the felony case is officially dropped, the state police would grant that individual a FOID card if they pass the background check, the measure would allow. As it stands now, state police can't start the process for someone requesting a FOID card until their felony case is dropped, which may not be until well after the applicant completes the diversion program. The legislation is aimed at helping people like Shamyia Phillips, who was arrested in November 2023 on a felony gun charge. When police stopped her in a car that she said had been reported stolen, she had a handgun in her purse that she said she purchased legally in Texas, an open-carry state where she lived for a time. Unaware of Illinois' gun laws, she didn't have a FOID card or concealed carry license. 'It was just to protect me and my daughter,' said Phillips, a 26-year-old single mother. 'I wasn't using it to harm anyone or anything.' Unemployed at the time, Phillips said she entered a diversion program that helped her get a job and led to the charges being dropped. Seeking work in the security field, she plans to apply for a FOID card and concealed carry license. During a visit to the Tribune Editorial Board earlier this month, O'Neill Burke said one factor motivating the legislation was that during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were major delays for people applying for FOID cards through the state police. At the same time a lot of people acquired guns illegally because of fears stoked by a nationwide rise in violent crime. 'So, we were putting people in a catch-22,' said O'Neill Burke, who took office at the end of last year. 'Suddenly we had this large population of otherwise law-abiding people who are now charged with a Class 4 felony.' The solution, she said, is part of her office's balanced approach toward gun prosecutions: Prioritizing gun cases that involve the use of 'switches,' rapid-fire devices that can convert semiautomatic guns to fully automatic use, while at the same time ensuring that others entitled to have firearms are following the law. 'It's two very different approaches to gun crimes because they're treated very differently under the law,' O'Neill Burke said. 'The goal is to get as many people into compliance with the regulation as possible, while at the same time addressing the very real threat that automatic weapons pose.' More than 2.4 million Illinoisans have FOID cards. The state police has 20 employees processing FOID applications while additional employees handle applications for concealed carry licenses, which allow for a gun owner to carry a firearm outdoors. The state police said the same participants in diversion programming who may be eligible for a FOID may also acquire a CCL, though the qualifications are different. The state police said system improvements over the years have brought down processing times for new FOID applications to an average of about 12 days. During the pandemic, staffing ranged between 17 and 28 employees dedicated to FOID card application processing, in addition to temporary contractors, the state police said. In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, the state police processed 190,693 new FOID applications with an average processing time of 83 days, the state police said. The following year, 292,523 new FOID applications were processed. The final amendment of the diversion program legislation passed through the Senate by a 55-0 vote on May 31, the final scheduled day of session. The bill was approved in the House on May 23 by a vote of 97-11. When state Sen. Elgie Sims presented the final amendment on the Senate floor on May 31, he said there was a 'unique set of proponents to the bill.' In addition to the Cook County state's attorney's office, those proponents included the Cook County public defender's office, Illinois State's Attorneys Association, Illinois State Rifle Association and Gun Violence Prevention PAC. Sims, the bill's main Senate sponsor, said in an interview that the legislation is meant to help people caught up in the criminal justice system for nonviolent gun infractions so they don't get arrested again. 'We're trying to make sure that for somebody who might have a firearm in their possession, but they've gone through the process, they've taken the steps to atone for the mistake (so) that they are able to get their FOID card,' the Chicago Democrat said. 'It was to encourage people to be law-abiding gun owners.' Among other supporters of the bill was the Gun Violence Prevention PAC, which works to stem gun violence and illegal gun access. John Schmidt, an executive board member of the group, said there's room for a balanced approach within firearm policies to respect the rights of people wanting to own a gun legally. 'G-PAC works to keep illegal guns out of the hands of unqualified owners. But we have no trouble making common ground to support laws that enable people who successfully complete diversion programs to resume their right like other citizens to own lawful guns,' said Schmidt, a former U.S. associate attorney general. Republican legislators have long accused the Democratic majority of infringing on the Second Amendment right to bear arms through laws such as the 2023 assault weapons ban, which remains under court challenge. In the new gun bill, many GOP lawmakers supported the Democrats' legislative fix around diversion programming and FOID cards. Senate Republican leader John Curran, a former assistant Cook County state's attorney, agreed with Sims' rationale behind it. 'Ultimately, if someone's going to possess a gun again down the road, they should have a FOID in Illinois. It's the law of the land. So, we should encourage that behavior. This bill does,' said Curran, of Downers Grove. State Rep. John Cabello of Machesney Park was one of 11 House members to vote against the new legislation. A Republican who has worked as a police detective, he said he's been supportive of diversion programs but was skeptical of the Democrats' motivation for this legislation. 'What they're doing in Springfield, is they take baby steps to what their final goal is. What is their final goal? Is their final goal to make sure that we can't charge felons with possession of a (gun) any longer?' Cabello said. The legislation would apply to various diversion programs for people arrested on Class 4 felony gun charges, including Cook County prosecutors' first-time weapon offense program. People charged with such crimes are eligible for the diversion program only if they've gotten permission from a judge, with the consent of the state's attorney. O'Neill Burke's office said Cook County had roughly 2,800 Class 4 felony gun cases last year of which defendants in some 1,200 were put in gun diversion programs, most of them in the first-time weapon offense program. The program was initially established by the General Assembly in 2018 as a pilot and limited to defendants under 21, while also being part of a law allowing for penalty enhancements for certain people convicted of repeatedly carrying illegal firearms. But in the last several years, especially with the makeup of the General Assembly becoming more progressive, lawmakers let the penalty enhancement provisions expire, made the diversion program permanent and removed its age restriction. Participation in the program could last from six months to two years, according to the law, and to stay in the program, the defendant must not break any laws or use any guns or other weapons. The law doesn't allow someone in the program if they've been arrested for a felony gun crime that was committed during the commission of a violent offense; if they've been previously convicted or placed on probation or conditional discharge for any violent crime; if they've completed the program in the past; or if they have an existing order of protection issued against them. Cook County Public Defender Sharone R. Mitchell Jr. said the legislation's emphasis on obtaining FOID cards is an acknowledgement by the government that the people who often get in trouble for illegal gun possession are not dangerous criminals. But if they have a blemish on their record like a Class 4 felony, that could hurt their chances to get a job and potentially be deprived of other opportunities. But Mitchell says many people might not acquire FOID cards or CCLs for a host of reasons, including ignorance of the law or a criminal conviction from decades ago preventing them from owning a gun. 'People's baseline need is to keep themselves safe and some individuals have made the decision in our community that carrying a gun is their only path toward that safety,' he said. 'People are making really tough decisions based upon safety.' Mitchell couldn't say whether the new legislation would increase awareness for the public to obtain FOID cards but said his office is hopeful the law helps change how illegal gun possession offenses are treated in the criminal justice system. 'Our hope is that this law is a first step, but that we take a more informed and measured approach to all gun possession cases,' he said.

Israeli strikes on Gaza kill at least 16 as war rages on after the opening of a new front with Iran
Israeli strikes on Gaza kill at least 16 as war rages on after the opening of a new front with Iran

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Israeli strikes on Gaza kill at least 16 as war rages on after the opening of a new front with Iran

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — At least 16 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes on the Gaza Strip overnight and into Saturday, according to local health officials. The 20-month war with Hamas has raged on even as Israel has opened a new front with heavy strikes on Iran that sparked retaliatory drone and missile attacks. Another 11 Palestinians were killed overnight near food distribution points run by an Israeli- and U.S.-supported humanitarian group in the latest of almost daily shootings near the sites since they opened last month. Palestinian witnesses say Israeli forces have fired on the crowds, while the military says it has only fired warning shots near people it describes as suspects who approached its forces. The military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the latest shootings. The sites are located in military zones that are off limits to independent media. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a private contractor that operates the sites, said they were closed Saturday. But witnesses said thousands had gathered near the sites anyway, desperate for food as Israel's blockade and military campaign have driven the territory to the brink of famine. The al-Awda Hospital said it received eight bodies and at least 125 wounded people from a shooting near a GHF site in central Gaza. Mohamed Abu Hussein, a resident of the built-up Bureij refugee camp nearby, said Israeli forces opened fire toward the crowd about a kilometer (half-mile) from the food distribution point. He said he saw several people fall to the ground as thousands ran away. In the southern city of Khan Younis, the Nasser Hospital said it received 16 dead, including five women, from multiple Israeli strikes late Friday and early Saturday. It said another three men were killed near two GHF aid sites in the southernmost city of Rafah, now a mostly uninhabited military zone. Israel and the United States say the new system is intended to replace a U.N.-run network that has distributed aid across Gaza through 20 months of war. They accuse Hamas of siphoning off the aid and reselling it to fund its militant activities. U.N. officials deny Hamas has diverted significant amounts of aid and say the new system is unable to meet mounting needs. They say the new system has militarized aid by allowing Israel to decide who has access and by forcing Palestinians to travel long distances or relocate again after waves of displacement. They say the U.N. has meanwhile struggled to deliver aid even after Israel eased its blockade last month because of military restrictions and rising lawlessness. Hamas, which is allied with Iran, sparked the war when its fighters led a rampage into southrn Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. They still hold 53 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead but does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in count. The offensive has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced 90% of the population of some 2 million Palestinians, leaving them almost entirely reliant on international aid. The war has drawn in Iran and its other allies across the region, igniting a chain of events that led to Israel's major strikes on Iran's nuclear and military facilities on Friday. ___ Magdy reported from Cairo. ___ Follow AP's war coverage at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store