logo
The national gallery ‘masterpiece' that's 91% likely to be a fake

The national gallery ‘masterpiece' that's 91% likely to be a fake

Yahoo26-02-2025

On the second floor of the National Gallery hangs a prized painting that, when it changed hands in 1980, was bought for a record sum. The original Samson and Delilah was painted by the 17th century Flemish master Peter Paul Rubens around 1609; it was a commission from his close friend and patron Nicolaas II Rockox, the mayor of Antwerp, to hang above his fireplace. It is now seemingly in pride of place in the gallery on Trafalgar Square in London. However, some art historians argue this is not a long-lost Rubens masterpiece at all – contending instead that it is an extraordinarily expensive fake.
The question of its authenticity is one of the great unsolved mysteries of the art world. Around 1641, the painting disappeared, before mysteriously resurfacing in Paris nearly three centuries later, in 1929. A German scholar named Ludwig Burchard – now discredited as he was found to have misattributed works for commercial gain – declared it was the real deal, the missing Rubens' masterpiece that had been lost to history. Then, in 1980, the National Gallery purchased the piece in an auction at Christie's for £2.5 million (a bargain by today's standards, but at that time, a record-breaking price).
It depicts the Biblical story of Samson and Delilah, in which Samson's hair is cut to reduce his superhuman strength. Some critics argue that just as Samson is betrayed by his Philistine lover as he lies sleeping in her lap, the National Gallery blindly handed over a record-breaking sum of public money for a facsimile.
This week, the debate over the painting's authenticity has been reignited ahead of the publication of a book on the subject with the no-nonsense title NG6461: The Fake Rubens. For its author, the Greek painter and art historian Euphrosyne Doxiadis, this is the culmination of a career's worth of research on the mystery of the Rubens' authenticity.
In 1992, when Doxiadis was a mature student at the Wimbledon School of Art, she visited the National Gallery and was immediately struck by the colour and craftsmanship of the painting, which she believes is inconsistent with Rubens' other work, such as The Raising of the Cross, which dates from 1610/11. Doxiadis, along with two fellow students, submitted a report to the Gallery setting out what they claimed was evidence that the prized painting is a copy. The arguments contained in it have persisted to this day. 'The execution seemed crude, the colour unsubtle and uncharacteristic of Rubens' palette,' the report said. 'The tonal values were incorrect in relation to the light sources. The handling of the paint was very crude, the draughtsmanship was poor and there was weakness in the depiction of textures.'
There were whispers from then on. Those who question the painting's authenticity have built on these arguments. The painting that hangs in the National Gallery differs from eyewitness reproductions from the period, they say. It is deeply unusual for the artist – although many scholars contest this – and too garishly coloured, they argue. There are five soldiers in the doorway, rather than three, as shown in contemporaneous reproductions such as a c.1613 engraving made by the Dutch printmaker Jacob Matham. One is even staring directly at the viewer. Could this even be a hint as to the identity of its creator? And what happened to Samson's left foot which, in the painting hung in the Gallery, has no toes? They appear in a Frans Francken the Younger's painting Supper at the House of Burgomaster Rockox, showing Ruben's work hanging in the spot its owner intended.
In a 1997 article for the Sunday Times, art critic Waldemar Januszczak came to a strident conclusion on the painting's origins. 'The one thing all we doubters agree on is that the painting bought by the gallery for a staggering sum in 1980 is not by Rubens,' he wrote. He has since, reportedly, changed his mind. The same year, tired of deflecting questions on the subject, the National Gallery issued a press release hoping to offer evidence of the painting's legitimacy: 'Every technical test carried out to date has yielded results consistent with the date of about 1609 and the attribution to Rubens.' To settle the score once and for all, perhaps, the Gallery said it would host a public debate on the subject – a debate that never took place.
Speculation bubbled under the surface for decades until, in 2021, an authentication test conducted by a Swiss company called Art Recognition seemed to prove once and for all that the painting is fake. It used AI analysis to compare Samson and Delilah with other Rubens' paintings and concluded that it was 91 per cent likely to be a copy. Dr Carina Popovici, who carried out the study, said at the time: 'The results are quite astonishing… Every patch, every single square, came out as fake, with more than 90 per cent probability.' There is even a campaign group founded by Doxiadis, called 'In Rubens' Name,' which is calling for the National Gallery to apologise and 'admit an honest mistake'.
Doxiadis, now 78, said that on that fateful visit to the National Gallery, she knew something was wrong with the painting 'at first glance'. So much so, in fact, that she has dedicated her career to proving the Rubens scholars – who almost unanimously believe it is authentic – wrong. She has even alleged that, at a dinner party in Athens, a former National Gallery trustee told her he wanted 'the truth' about the artwork to come out.
'It has been a long time – 40 years – since I first saw the fake painting,' she says. 'There is a famous art historian called Max Jakob Friedländer, who said the first impression is the most important, and I believe in first impressions when you are someone who's trained to see.' She is emphatic: 'Everything is wrong about [the painting.] It's bad technique, bad colour. It is artless – there's no craftsmanship.'
But it is not just the National Gallery who refuses to challenge the orthodoxy on the subject, she argues. The Rubenianum, a centre and archive dedicated to the study of Rubens located within the Rubenshuis in Antwerp, has always maintained that the Gallery's Samson and Delilah 'is the lost Rubens… even though there is no proof whatsoever,' according to Doxiadis. To entertain any other possibility would be impossible, as 'Rubens is for Belgium what the Acropolis is for Greece.'
Many scholars, however, disagree entirely, regarding this recurrent debate as less of a mystery and more of a 'storm in a teacup'. '[Doxiadis] – who, by the way, has mostly published on ancient Greco-Roman artwork rather than the 17th century – had a hunch the quality of the picture wasn't good enough, but I think there are some misunderstandings about the painting,' says Dr Adam Busiakiewicz, an art historian who specialises in the Old Masters. 'It was made at a specific point in his career when he had spent a lot of time in Italy,' he adds, and his style had been influenced by the great Renaissance works he saw on his travels. For one, he says, 'the comparisons that are made between [Rubens other] paintings are comparing paintings made decades apart.'
'He's an artist that changes his style throughout his career… Art historians who specialise in paintings like Rubens' can track these changes. I would also say that when you work for an auction house like I have, when you start to see paintings en masse, you understand that copies have a dead quality that is nothing like a masterpiece. It's very easy to spot a 20th century copy – the pigments will feel different, and you don't see any of that here,' he continues. It is, without a shadow of doubt, 'a 17th century painting.'
A spokesman for the National Gallery said: 'Samson and Delilah has long been accepted by leading Rubens scholars as a masterpiece by Peter Paul Rubens. Painted on wood panel in oil shortly after his return to Antwerp in 1608 and demonstrating all that the artist had learned in Italy, it is a work of the highest aesthetic quality. A technical examination of the picture was presented in an article in the National Gallery's Technical Bulletin in 1983. The findings remain valid.'
If Doxiadis' theory – a blunder of this magnitude at the highest echelons of the British art world regarding one of the world's most revered artists and most valuable paintings – was proved true, the repercussions would be seismic.
More likely, though, is that its authenticity – or not – will remain a subject of debate, if not just a riveting story. Doxiadis herself is a mystery – a whistleblower regarded by much of the art establishment as a heretic. As confident as she may be, Busiakiewicz argues that Samson and Delilah could be in no one except Rubens' hand. 'It is a really stonking great picture,' he says. 'The textures, the sumptuous drapery, the muscular back – no one except Rubens could have painted that.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bruce Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning
Bruce Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning

Boston Globe

time3 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Bruce Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning

Springsteen has made increasingly pointed and contentious public statements in recent concerts. He peppered Wednesday's performance with mentions of the American democracy's system of checks and balances designed to ward against authoritarianism. His short speeches — referencing recent headlines about immigration raids, the freezing of federal funds for universities and measles outbreaks — came between songs that were also captioned in German on large screens beside the stage. The set was flanked by an American flag on one side and a German flag on the other. Still, the Boss remained hopeful: 'The America that I've sung to you about for the past 50 years of my life is real. And regardless of its many faults, it's a great country with great people. And we will survive this moment.' Advertisement But last month in Manchester, he denounced Trump's politics during a concert, calling him an 'unfit president' leading a 'rogue government' of people who have 'no concern or idea for what it means to be deeply American.' Advertisement Springsteen is no stranger to Berlin. In July 1988, he became one of the first Western musicians to perform in East Germany, performing to a roaring crowd of 160,000 East Germans yearning for American rock 'n' roll and the freedom it represented to the youth living under the crumbling communist regime. 'I'm not here for or against any government. I've come to play rock 'n' roll for you in the hope that one day all the barriers will be torn down,' Springsteen said in German at the time, before launching into a cover of Bob Dylan's 'Chimes of Freedom.' An Associated Press news story from that period says 'fireworks streaked through the sky' and hundreds of people in the audience waved handmade American flags as they sang along to 'Born in the USA.' The Berlin Wall fell the following year, and some experts credit the concert for its part in fueling the protest movement that brought the end of the Communist government. Almost four decades later, Springsteen issued a stark warning: 'The America that I love, the America that I've sung to you about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous administration.' The rocker closed Wednesday's three-hour show with 'Chimes of Freedom.'

'Proud Dad' Billy Ray Cyrus Congratulates Daughter on Performance With Country Legend
'Proud Dad' Billy Ray Cyrus Congratulates Daughter on Performance With Country Legend

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Proud Dad' Billy Ray Cyrus Congratulates Daughter on Performance With Country Legend

'Proud Dad' Billy Ray Cyrus Congratulates Daughter on Performance With Country Legend originally appeared on Parade. Just in time for Father's Day, is sharing a 'proud dad' moment. The 'Achy Breaky Heart' singer took to Instagram on June 8 to celebrate a landmark performance by his daughter with country music legend . 🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 Along with a video of the performance, Billy Ray commented in the caption, 'O. M. G. !!! 😭🎤💥 Is it okay if a proud dad brags a little? CONGRATULATIONS @noahcyrus & @wynonnajudd — you rocked CMA Fest last night! What a powerful performance... Open up the door. When Love starts knocking !!!!! ❤️." Along with Billy Ray's post came a slew of comments, including some from fellow celebrities and one from Judd herself. 'I love your girl!!!!!!!!!!!! 🥹,' Wynonna wrote. '@wynonnajudd and i love you Miss Wynona 🖤🖤🖤,' Noah Cyrus responded. Billy Ray's new girlfriend, , weighed in by sharing, '❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️.' '@wynonnajudd I'm loving all this love and kindness on top of this beautiful talent 💓 so refreshing and beautiful ❤️ Wynonna you're such a gorgeous singer! I'm in awe! Stay blessed 🙏😇❤️,' wrote one fan. 'I love this Performance so much! ❤️‍🔥,' wrote a German-based Noah Cyrus fan account. 'Wowza! What an amazing performance. I really enjoyed watching it.❤️🙌 🔥👏,' another fan commented. '😍😍😍 Noah is becoming more gorgeous as she ages. Absolutely stunning! ❤️,' yet another fan Cyrus, 25, is the daughter of Billy Ray and . Although she's not quite as well known as her older sister Miley Cyrus, she's also appeared on TV and has been making music since she was a child. Her latest album, The Hardest Part, was released in 2022. Since then, she released the single 'How Far Will We Take It?' a duet with country star . She's also featured on and co-wrote the single 'My Fault' with included on his hit album Where I've Been, Isn't Where I'm Going. 'Proud Dad' Billy Ray Cyrus Congratulates Daughter on Performance With Country Legend first appeared on Parade on Jun 9, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

John Lennon's ‘smutty' love letter to future wife revealed
John Lennon's ‘smutty' love letter to future wife revealed

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

John Lennon's ‘smutty' love letter to future wife revealed

A 'smutty' love letter by John Lennon to his future wife – including his complaints about Paul McCartney's snoring – has emerged 63 years on. The Beatle, then aged just 21, wrote to art student Cynthia Powell telling her how much he missed her while the band were in the middle of their Hamburg stint in April 1962. The letter, written over five nights of concerts in the city, touched on various themes, including the sudden death of former bandmate Stuart Sutcliffe the week earlier. The note also featured an amusing moan from Lennon about McCartney's 'snoring' in the bunk bed above his. In the letter, signed by Lennon and written between April 19-24 1962, he wrote: 'Paul's leaping about on my head (he's in a bunk on top of me and he's snoring) ... Shurrup Mcarntey [sic]!' The musician then confides in Powell that he had avoided Astrid Kirchherr, Sutcliffe's German fiancee, because 'I would be so awkward'. He then shot down Cynthia's plan to move in with Dot Rhone, McCartney's girlfriend, as it would have caused a lack of privacy when he and Powell were in bed together. The letter said: 'I love love love you and I'm missing you like mad ... I wish I was on the way to your flat with the Sunday papers and chocies [sic] and a throbber.' 'I wonder why all the newspapers wrote about Stu … I haven't seen Astrid since the day we arrived. I've thought of going to see her but I would be so awkward.' It went on: 'I don't like the idea of Dot moving in permanently with you cause we would never be alone really ... imagine having her there all the time when we were in bed – and imagine Paul coming all the time. '...I love you, please wait for me and don't be sad and work hard, be a clever little Cyn Powell.' John and Cynthia, who was a year older than him, had been in a relationship for four years, having met at Liverpool College of Art. They married in August 1962 and had their son Julian in April 1963, weeks after 'Beatlemania' exploded with the release of the band's chart-topping first album Please Please Me. The pair divorced in 1968 and Powell later claimed Lennon had physically abused her throughout their relationship, including slapping her face in a fit of jealousy. The handwritten letter, described as one of the finest ever written by the singer, was sold by Powell to a Swedish collector in 1991 after she fell on hard times and needed to raise money. It then changed hands to the Swedish vendor in 1993. It will be on sale at Christie's auction with a £30,000 to £40,000 estimate. Thomas Venning, the head of books and manuscripts at Christie's, said: 'Reading the letter you get the sense of two young people in love, with no idea of what was going to happen to them, which makes it really compelling and historical. 'They are very unfiltered and you can hear him using his own voice. 'There are some smutty and funny bits and you sense his personality on the page, unlike his later letters which are more guarded and preachy. 'It provides an early insight into the Beatles from their time in Hamburg which was so important to their development as a band.' The sale takes place on July 9. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store