Kansas COGE seeks ideas ‘about ideas' on government efficiency. I have some thoughts.
Lawmakers at the Kansas statehouse at Topeka have started their own government efficiency committee. (Max McCoy/Kansas Reflector)
Enthralled by the disruptive power of Trump's DOGE team as it stamps Godzilla-like on the federal government to make it smaller, the GOP-controlled Kansas Senate has created its own version.
The Sunflower edition, called COGE — Committee on Governmental Efficiency — doesn't have a mad tech oligarch as its head or platoons of teenage ninja hackers with monikers like 'Big Balls' to inspect your state tax return. But what COGE lacks in testicular fortitude it makes up for in rhyming with DOGE, and that's really the point.
Kansas is one of several red states to launch their own interpretations of DOGE, all conceived in the belief that waste is rampant and dedicated to the proposition that social programs must be trimmed.
Kansas COGE has a web portal to field suggestions on where the committee should look to find government waste.
'The purpose of this portal is to receive ideas from the public about ideas to make Kansas government more efficient and effective,' the webpage says, oblivious that the first place it should cut is the redundancy of 'ideas' in the sentence. 'Please submit ideas where you believe government could be improved to better serve the public.'
OK then!
'The committee will review those ideas as it deliberates and considers legislation.' See above regarding 'ideas.'
Let's go!
But wait, there is some information required first.
Below the introductory 'ideas' paragraph there's a form that requires your name, age range, and address (including city, zip and county). Your age and email are optional. There's a text box that will accept 3,500 characters, or about 575 words. That's just more than a single-spaced page of text. There's also a warning not to include personally identifiable information, such as your Social Security number (never mind about your name and address) and a caution that submissions are public documents subject to the Kansas Open Records Act.
OK, I'm ready to play!
Kansas could save millions by stopping fishing expeditions for voter fraud, which is nearly nonexistent. In 2021, Kansas paid $1.9 million in fees and expenses to settle a five-year battle over then-Secretary of State Kris Kobach's unconstitutional requirements for voting, based on his unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud.
Efforts to restrict voting impact voters of color the most, according to an analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice. Voter fraud is also extremely rare, according to the League of Women Voters, with the odds of being struck by lightning being greater than the occurrence of fraud.
Kobach, who is now Kansas attorney general, joined with eight other state attorneys general in suing the Biden administration in 2024 to stop voter registration efforts.
Stop the rush to privatize government. One example of a multimillion dollar headache was the privatization of child welfare in Kansas, a move initiated by Gov. Bill Graves and embraced in 2013 by Gov. Sam Brownback. The contractors collect payments and provide other services on behalf of the Kansas Department for Children and Families.
'The privatized system in Kansas for handling child support payments to 140,000 children suffers from Byzantine complexity perplexing to employees and the public,' the Reflector's Tim Carpenter reported in 2020, 'a laissez-faire approach to the enforcement of support orders, and a computer network that should be a candidate for the scrap heap.'
More than $800 million in child support had gone unpaid.
As of September 2024, DCF had made some improvements but still lagged on performance goals outlined in an agreement to settle a 2018 lawsuit over child services, according to a progress report. The department divides the state into six regions handled by private case managers. Despite the disheartening report, Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat, told the Topeka Capital-Journal she was not ready to give up on privatization.
In 2023, lobbyists spent $807,806 on lawmakers, mostly for food and drink, according to the latest annual report by the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission. While legislators routinely defend the practice of accepting food and gifts from lobbyists by saying they can't be bought for the price of a meal, the reality is that lobbyists have far more influence than the average Kansan.
Consider the lobbying blitz that resulted in the legalization of sports betting.
A 2022 New York Times investigation described how lawmakers were treated to cigars, booze, and a private party in the runup to passage of the gambling law, which some lawmakers described as 'terrible' for Kansas.
Beginning last year, the names of lobbyists or other requesters are now required on Kansas House bills, in addition to its number and the official sponsor. While this transparency is welcome, lobbyists still have a remarkable degree of access — and influence over — lawmakers. That influence can result in terrible legislation, like the sports betting law, that cuts sweetheart deals for already rich proponents.
These are just three examples, but I'm sure readers can come up with many more. But instead of focusing on these kinds of issues, which either involve the disenfranchisement of swaths of Kansas voters or catering to powerful business interests, the Kansas COGE has instead concentrated on small potatoes issues that conform to red state ideas of government waste.
Take for example Senate Bill 85, which would direct DCF to search for families attempting to exploit the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, or SNAP. The federal government covers 100% of SNAP benefits, while administrative costs are shared by the state. About 200,000 Kansans receive the benefits.
The measure, which came out of COGE, would require $11 million to implement and require the hiring of 110 additional state employees, according to a fiscal note attached to the bill.
'I have huge concerns with this bill,' said Sen. Cindy Holscher, an Overland Park Democrat, as quoted by the Reflector. 'We'd be reverifying information that has already been verified. We are supposed to be working in the name of government efficiency, and this makes government bigger and adds more red tape.'
It all comes down to one's definition of 'efficiency.'
For COGE, as with the rest of the GOP-controlled Legislature, efficiency appears to be anything that promotes business or advances the MAGA agenda, or ideally both. What is in the best interests of the poorest of Kansans doesn't enter into it, because COGE and DOGE and MAGA don't serve them.
With the bill that would add millions in state costs to police food stamps, there's also the Reagan-era stereotype of the welfare queen. While no assistance program is free from the potential for abuse, Ronald Reagan used the conservative trope of urban poor people of color as freeloaders and con artists as part of his 1976 presidential campaign. The message was that government, and government programs, were the problem.
DOGE expands on this by declaring government not just the problem, but the enemy. It assumes government is a business, rife with waste, run by lazy workers, and that only the world's richest man can clean things up. But government isn't a business. Those who think so deeply misunderstand democracy. While tools of business can benefit government, the purpose of government is to provide for the safety and welfare of all people, not just the rich.
Unlike the shadowy DOGE initiative, in which billionaire and uber Trump donor Elon Musk is/is not an employee or leader of the quasi-governmental group, Kansas COGE is an actual committee with identifiable members. It's a creation of the legislative branch, not the executive. The chair is Wichita Republican Sen. Renee Erickson, who back in 2021 presided over a two-day Legislative hearing featuring COVID-19 conspiracy theories and anti-vaccine rhetoric. Remember when misinformation about the pandemic seemed our greatest threat? That was just practice.
DOGE and its state copycats are now after their real goal, which is to shrink government and cut services in the name of 'efficiency.' Somehow, their kind of efficiency always ends up promoting the interests of the rich at the expense of just about everyone else. Just consider what gutting the U.S. Agency for International Development did to Kansas farmers — and the starving people in Africa and elsewhere who depended on the food aid. These programs aren't charities; they are a primary means of spreading American goodwill and democratic influence around the globe.
As DOGE operatives have been installed in some of the most important of federal agencies — the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Defense, the Social Security Administration, to name just three — there has been a marked lack of transparency in what was done and why. In preparation for the DOGE assault, Trump fired 18 inspectors general, the top agency watchdogs. Since then, thousands of federal workers have been laid off, according to the Associated Press, some in critical roles at the National Nuclear Security Administration.
It's difficult to tell from the outside what's really going on at these agencies, especially since the layoffs have been chaotic and the information about what access DOGE operatives have to sensitive information on government servers has conflicted. What do Big Balls and his colleagues really have access to at the U.S. Cybersecurity Agency?
But there's another malodorous smell wafting from DOGE, apart from the reckless layoffs and video game flop sweat. It's the sniff of a one-party system installing itself in the machinery of the federal government, in the same way political officers were installed on Soviet-era submarines to ensure loyalty and strict adherence to political ideology.
Remember 'The Hunt for Red October'? Tom Clancy, who spent years researching, accurately described the system in the 1984 novel. The story was based on a real event, and if you've seen the 1990 movie, the bit of dialogue you're most likely to recall is the disillusioned political officer, played by Sam Neill, imagining what his life in America would be like.
But I doubt anybody in DOGE is dreaming of living in Montana, marrying a round American woman, and driving from state to state with no papers, as did the fictional Capt. Borodin.
The oppressors seldom do.
And yes, they are oppressors; anybody who is responsible for gutting the jobs of thousands of hardworking federal employees is as much an oppressor as Musk or Trump.
The latest news on the DOGE front is that Trump is considering sending Americans $5,000 payments from the 'savings' found. It would be a cheap and desperate attempt to stem the tide of public disapproval, but it might work. Enough Americans were gullible enough to elect Trump. Why wouldn't they trade what remained of democracy for a few bucks?
In the end, DOGE and COGE and all the other -OGES in the rest of the states aren't about efficiency but ideology. The introduction to the Kansas COGE portal may have had it right in the first place.
It's all about ideas about ideas, not the real thing.
Max McCoy is an award-winning author and journalist. Through its opinion section, the Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
How Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case became a political flashpoint
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case started quietly, boiling down to a clerical error that moved him up on a list to land on a deportation flight destined to El Salvador in March. And then a court filing from the Trump Justice Department acknowledging the mistake brought it to the national forefront – culminating in a fraught legal battle and heated political debate. On Friday, the Trump administration announced that Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who had resided in Maryland until he was mistakenly deported to his home country, landed in the United States, and was facing criminal charges. It was an extraordinary development in a case that's come to define the president's hardline immigration policies and a striking about-face from the Trump administration, which had maintained he would not return to the US. At the start of the legal battle, nearly three months ago, both sides agreed that Abrego Garcia's deportation to El Salvador – and subsequent imprisonment in the country's notorious mega-prison – was a mistake. In 2019, an immigration judge granted Abrego Garcia withholding of removal, meaning he couldn't be removed to El Salvador over fear of persecution. A senior Immigration and Customs Enforcement official called his removal an 'administrative error' in a March court declaration, appearing to mark the first time the administration had conceded an error over the controversial flights to El Salvador that resulted in the detention of hundreds of migrants in the CECOT prison. But then, Trump administration officials publicly abandoned that position and called Abrego Garcia 'a terrorist,' because they allege he is a member of MS-13, which the US has designated as a terrorist organization. His attorneys and family maintain that he was not a member of MS-13 and have argued that he is still entitled to due process. Here's how Abrego Garcia's case played out over the last few months. Abrego Garcia, who came to the United States illegally in 2012, first had an encounter with immigration authorities in 2019 after an arrest. At the time, the government similarly argued that Abrego Garcia was a gang member while he made the case that he feared a possible return to El Salvador. The immigration judge presiding over the case sided with Abrego Garcia and ruled that he may not be deported back to El Salvador. Years later, on March 12, 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement pulled over Abrego Garcia and arrested him, which came as the Trump administration continued its aggressive crackdown on immigration. Abrego Garcia was then mistakenly put on a deportation flight three days later and sent to CECOT. It took the Trump administration weeks to concede that it mistakenly deported the Maryland father to El Salvador 'because of an administrative error.' But while doing acknowledging the mistake, the administration said in court filings on March 31 that it could not return him because he was in Salvadoran custody. Later that week, Judge Paula Xinis of the US District Court in Maryland ordered the Trump administration to return Abrego Garcia to the US, kicking off a monthslong legal battle in which the Trump administration has argued that courts cannot intervene in the foreign policy decision-making of the United States. In her April 4 order, Xinis gave a deadline of April 7 to bring back Abrego Garcia but the Supreme Court paused the deadline. Days later, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration must 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return but stopped short of requiring the government to return him. In recent weeks, Xinis has accused the Trump administration of repeated stonewalling and intentional noncompliance with its obligation to produce information related to how it has been facilitating Abrego Garcia's return. President Donald Trump, in an interview with ABC News in April, acknowledged that he could secure Abrego Garcia's return, contradicting previous remarks made by him and his his top aides who said the US did not have the ability to return Abrego Garcia because he was in the custody of a foreign government. When asked by ABC's Terry Moran why he can't just pick up the phone and secure Abrego Garcia's return, Trump said: 'And if he were the gentleman that you say he is, I would do that. But he is not.' The president went on to accuse Abrego Garcia of being a MS-13 member, pointing to his tattoos, which experts say are not by themselves proof he's a gang member. And just days later, the White House and El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele made clear during an Oval Office meeting that Abrego Garcia would not be returned to the US. Democratic lawmakers have been critical of how the Trump administration handled the Abrego Garcia case and continued to call for him to be brought back. One Democratic senator, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, flew down to El Salvador to meet with his constituent. After initially not being allowed to meet him, Van Hollen had a sit down with Abrego Garcia on April 17 and in a press conference a day later, the senator said Abrego Garcia told him he was traumatized. 'He said he was not afraid of the other prisoners in his immediate cell but that he was traumatized by being at CECOT and fearful of many of the prisoners in other cell blocks who called out to him and taunted him in various ways,' Van Hollen said. Van Hollen added that Abrego Garcia was moved a week earlier from the maximum-security prison to another detention center where 'conditions are better.' The Trump administration slammed the senator's visit, claiming Democrats and the media painted an overly rosy picture of Abrego Garcia. Meanwhile, the administration continued to portray him as a violent and dangerous criminal, releasing previously unshared documents stemming from two interactions Abrego Garcia had with law enforcement and the courts system: a 2019 arrest that didn't lead to charges or a conviction, but did result in his detention by immigration officials, and a 2021 protective order his wife filed against him alleging domestic violence, which she later decided against pursuing further after she said the couple had resolved their issues. Sources told CNN in late April that Secretary of State Marco Rubio had been in touch with Bukele about the detention of Abrego Garcia. A US official told CNN the Trump administration was working closely with El Salvador and asked for Abrego Garcia's return but insisted that Bukele had made clear that he was not returning him to the US. In early May, Tennessee state law enforcement released a video of a November 2022 traffic stop involving Abrego Garcia – an incident that US officials argue supports their claims that Abrego Garcia was a member of MS-13 and involved in human trafficking. The video showed Abrego Garcia being stopped for speeding. When asked about other passengers in the car, Abrego Garcia tells the trooper he and the others are workers returning from a construction project in St. Louis, Missouri. When the trooper asked for his documents, Abrego Garcia explains in the video that his driver's license was expired and that he is waiting for immigration documents to renew it. He tells the officer the vehicle, which had a Texas license plate, belonged to his boss. The trooper then searches the car with a police canine. They do not appear to find anything suspicious, according to the video. Abrego Garcia was not detained during the stop and no charges were filed. Nearly three months after he was deported, Abrego Garcia on Friday returned to the US to face federal criminal charges. Abrego Garcia has been indicted on two criminal counts in the Middle District of Tennessee: conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal aliens for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal aliens for financial gain. Trump administration officials pointed to the charges as justifying their effort to remove Abrego Garcia from the United States. Meanwhile, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, an attorney for Abrego Garcia, accused the Trump administration of 'playing games' with the legal system and said his client should appear in immigration court, not criminal court. 'The government disappeared Kilmar to a foreign prison in violation of a court order. Now, after months of delay and secrecy, they're bringing him back, not to correct their error but to prosecute him. This shows that they were playing games with the court all along,' Sandoval-Moshenberg said in a statement to CNN. 'Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after. This is an abuse of power, not justice.' Abrego Garcia will be in custody for at least a week, followed by an arraignment and detention hearing, the Associated Press reported.


News24
25 minutes ago
- News24
Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies
YouTube channels and fake news websites are pumping out dozens of false stories about Sassa grants and jobs every month. These hoaxes prey on vulnerable recipients, spreading confusion, false hope or panic. Many are clearly fake, Andrew Thompson writes, but they have still managed to infiltrate public discourse and be widely shared. South Africa's social grant system is under digital siege. A flood of fake news targeting the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has spread across Facebook, YouTube and a network of low-quality, foreign-run websites. These stories are designed to mislead, confuse or panic grant recipients, often with the aim of generating clicks and ad revenue by preying on vulnerable beneficiaries. YouTube channels with tens of thousands of subscribers and some videos with hundreds of thousands of views have together uploaded hundreds of fake videos this year alone. They claim imminent changes to payouts, onerous new rules, or exciting bonuses. Dozens of websites posing as job boards or news sites have also published false notices about new jobs, grant amounts, pension cuts, and backlogged payments. Screengrab None of these channels have any connection to South African state institutions, yet they continue to reach large audiences and prompt real-world concern, forcing Sassa to issue repeated denials. In May, Sassa issued a media statement highlighting the extent of the problem and warning that it is 'concerned about the mushrooming and the rapid spread of fake news and disinformation targeting the Agency and its services almost daily'. It stressed that it has made no announcements about 'double grants', changes to pension rules, or automatic top-ups, which are among the most popular fake news stories that tend to gain traction. 'Furthermore, reports have been spreading like wildfire that Sassa has announced 'New Rules Could Affect Your Pension' from 10 June. The report has even gone further and announced various dates for different provinces. This is not an official announcement from Sassa,' the cautionary statement reads. How fake Sassa grant news spreads: volume, panic, and false hope The wave of Sassa disinformation in 2025 has followed two broad patterns, regardless of the medium or the outlet disseminating it, and the content is broadly split into two themes: fake job adverts and fake grant updates. The job advertisements regularly go viral. They claim that well-paid government positions requiring no experience are available and often direct users to deceptive forms or clickbait sites that mine data. These regularly appear as images on fake government letterheads that circulate widely on platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp and X. SASSA The fake grant updates employ a more familiar disinformation approach with a different motive. These mostly AI-generated false news articles report on increased or double payments, pension rule changes, or Sassa 'deadlines' that risk non-payment of grants. All are presented without basis, and often spill over from clearly fake websites into public discourse. Fake news websites and YouTube accounts repeatedly publish variations of similar videos and articles, many of which use text-to-speech tools and AI-generated thumbnails to appear convincing. The tone ranges from panic ('rules changing next week!') to false reassurance ('you can still claim your R7 000 today'). Most rely on sheer volume, hoping that one story or job advert will catch on and spread - as many already have. News24's Disinformation Desk has counted hundreds of fake news articles about Sassa currently online, and although many fade into obscurity, an increasing number are breaking through requiring official responses. Screengrab For now, the motive of these platforms appears to be financial gain. Most of the videos are hosted on monetised channels, and the websites link to Google Adwords accounts. If these get enough traction from panicked recipients, they will generate some revenue for the owners. Yet ironically, much of the vitality of this material reveals itself on platforms like WhatsApp without direct links to the source, which do not generate the website owners income but have the same impact on grant recipients. The majority of the Sassa disinformation that gains mainstream traction appears not to have an overt political motive or agenda, yet. Instead, it is riding on the wave of attention afforded by this vulnerable target market, many of whom are understandably deceived by the deluge. Rapid-fire Sassa debunks from the last few months alone News24's Disinformation Desk has identified hundreds of fake news stories and videos targeting Sassa recipients published in the last few months alone. Here are the most prominent examples, with their themes often emulated across other fake news sites: A viral post linking to a website called All Provinces Jobs claimed that 'South African government jobs 2025' were open for applications. The link leads to a fraudulent website not affiliated with any government department. Similar posts appeared on Facebook pages falsely advertising hiring opportunities through Sassa, often featuring job titles and closing dates to lend false credibility and create a sense of urgency. YouTube channels 'SASSA Benefits Updates' and 'Stimulus Sam' have released several dozen videos each about grant payments in South Africa, including that increased Sassa payments would be made in June 2025. The videos utilise text-to-speech narration featuring a vaguely South African accent and footage that is clearly created with generative AI. Both channels are entirely fake. A report hosted on the fake news website Debtcol Council claimed that 'new rules could affect your pension' from 10 June. Sassa has confirmed that this is also false. Another story on that website claimed application backlogs had been cleared, while yet another suggested a new top-up payment was in progress. All are fabricated. A website called Prabh Honda published a story about Sassa grant suspensions, which is entirely baseless and without truth. A piece on Rise Up WV, a website responsible for several prominent fake news items, stated that grant beneficiaries needed to reapply for doubled payments due to 'SASSA system updates'. There is no basis for this in any of Sassa's official communications. Why it matters - and how to protect yourself or family members Many of the intended recipients of these grants are older, economically vulnerable, and may not be experienced with digital literacy or fact-checking online. The combination of desperation and trust in anything that looks official makes this a fertile ground for exploitation via disinformation. These false reports don't just casually mislead - comments beneath even palpably false news items and videos indicate the confusion and desperation many experience about this topic. This fake news also distracts Sassa, which is already stretched in the payment grants, by forcing them to correct disinformation. To stay safe, advise family members of the following: Check only official Sassa channels: Information is reliably published on and Sassa's verified X and Facebook pages. Do not trust any information sent via WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger. Sassa does not communicate important information via forwarded messages. Never enter personal information into a form on a website claiming to offer Sassa job opportunities. Ignore YouTube channels with videos claiming to be the Department of Social Development or Sassa. Sassa's official YouTube page is not used to share news about grants. When in doubt, don't share: spreading false information, even with good intentions, can cause unnecessary panic.

26 minutes ago
US, Chinese officials to meet in London next week for new round of trade talks
WASHINGTON -- Senior U.S. administration officials will meet with a Chinese delegation on Monday in London for the next round of trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing, President Donald Trump said Friday. The meeting comes after a phone call between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, which the U.S. president described as a 'very positive' conversation as the two countries attempt to break an impasse over tariffs and global supplies of rare earth minerals. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the U.S. side in the trade talks. 'The meeting should go very well,' Trump wrote on his social media platform Friday afternoon. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One Friday, Trump said Xi had agreed to restart exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the U.S. which China had slowed, threatening a range of U.S. manufacturers that relied on the critical materials. The was no immediate confirmation from China. The Thursday conversation between Trump and Xi, who lead the world's two biggest economies, lasted about an hour and a half, according to the U.S. president. The Chinese foreign ministry has said Trump initiated the call. The ministry said Xi asked Trump to 'remove the negative measures' that the U.S. has taken against China. It also said that Trump said 'the U.S. loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America,' although his administration has vowed to revoke some of their visas.