Protesters in Florida demonstrate against proposed ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
Hundreds of people lined a Florida Everglades highway Saturday to protest the construction of an immigrant detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' as a steady stream of trucks carrying materials rolled by.
The facility is projected to cost about $450 million annually and was fast-tracked under emergency powers from Gov. Ron DeSantis (R). Part of the funding will come from a Federal Emergency Management Agency program that was used to house asylum seekers during the Biden administration.
The proposal from the Florida government also urged the Trump administration to waive some existing standards for detention centers. The state has estimated that as many as 5,000 immigration detention beds could be operational in the facility by July, mostly through temporary structures like heavy-duty tents and trailers.
Protesters on Saturday expressed a wide variety of reasons for opposing the detention center, from environmental degradation to concerns about immigration raids.
Native American leaders have also expressed concern over the construction for its proximity to traditional villages as well as ceremonial and burial grounds.
The center will be located on a rarely used remote airstrip outside Miami, which state officials have touted as allowing them to easily fly migrants in and out.
Despite opposition from local Miami leaders, the state took over the property under DeSantis's emergency powers from a 2023 executive order that declared immigration a state emergency.
'Governor DeSantis has insisted that the state of Florida, under his leadership, will facilitate the federal government in enforcing immigration law,' the governor's office said in a statement to The Hill earlier this week. 'Utilizing this space and/or others around the state, Florida will continue to lead in immigration enforcement.'
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands
HONG KONG -- Hong Kong pro-democracy political party League of Social Democrats announced on Sunday it had disbanded due to immense political pressure, the latest casualty in a years-long crackdown that has already quieted much of the city's once-vocal opposition. Following massive anti-government protests in 2019, many leading activists were prosecuted or jailed under a 2020 national security law imposed by Beijing. Dozens of civil society groups dissolved. Media outlets critical of the government shuttered. The League of Social Democrats was the only pro-democracy party that still staged small street protests from time to time and held street booth activities to carry on its advocacy despite the risks. Its chairperson, Chan Po-ying, said the disbandment decision was made after careful deliberation, especially taking into account the consequences to its members and comrades. Chan refused to elaborate on the pressure but said she was proud to say that the party had still contributed to the city's pro-democracy movement in these few years. 'We have stayed true to our original aspirations and haven't let down to the trust placed in us by those who went to prison," she said. 'While we are now forced to disband and feel an ache in our conscience, we have no other choice,' she said. Hong Kong, a former British colony, will mark the 28th anniversary of returning to Chinese rule on July 1. The city used to hold annual pro-democracy protests that day and other various demonstrations demanding better policies. But those were ceased after most organizing groups were disbanded and the leading activists were jailed. Critics say the drastic political changes under the security law reflect that the freedoms Beijing promised to keep intact in 1997 are shrinking. The Beijing and Hong Kong governments insist the law is necessary for the city's stability. A Chinese official overseeing Hong Kong affairs in 2023 said protests are not the only way for people to express their views, signaling Beijing's stance toward demonstrations in the city. In April, Hong Kong's biggest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, also voted to give its leadership the mandate to move toward a potential disbandment. Party veterans told The Associated Press that some members were warned of consequences if the party didn't shut down. A final vote is expected at a later date. Founded in 2006, the League of Social Democrats was a left-wing political party that opposed collusion between government and business, upheld the principle that people have a say and was firmly committed to the interests of underprivileged residents. It was widely known for its more aggressive tactics when fighting for change. Its members have thrown bananas, eggs and luncheon meat at officials or pro-Beijing lawmakers as a protest gesture. Its party platform said the group advocated non-violent resistance but would not avoid physical confrontations — a stance that set it apart from older, traditional pro-democracy groups. It once had three lawmakers in office. Its longest-serving lawmaker, Leung Kwok-hung — Chan's husband — was disqualified from the legislature due to his manner of taking his oath in office in 2017. On the streets, the group's activism led to the arrests and jailing of its members from time to time. Last year, Leung and prominent LGBTQ+ activist Jimmy Sham, a former party leader, were sentenced to nearly seven years and more than four years over their roles in an unofficial primary election under the sweeping security law. Sham was freed from prison last month. In recent years, the party has had limited political influence, no longer holding any seats in the legislature or local district councils. Even a bank ceased to provide bank account services to the group. But it continued to stage small protests from time to time, despite sometimes those activities leading to arrests. On June 12, Chan and other members were fined after being found guilty over their street booth activities. Undeterred by their convictions, they kept pressing on and protested against the ruling outside the court.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Five biggest f-bombs in political history
President Trump made waves this week when he used the f-word while updating reporters on efforts to settle Iran's military conflict with Israel. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f‑‑‑ they're doing,' Trump told reporters as he departed the White House for a NATO summit on Monday as the Middle East rivals appeared to waffle on their temporary truce after the U.S. bombed Iran's key nuclear sites over the weekend. Trump isn't the first president to use the expletive, and former President Nixon left Americans wondering what words were uttered in the White House with the release of transcripts with the phrase '[EXPLETIVE DELETED]' throughout in 1974. The Hill reported in April that Democrats have been embracing the f-word more as they campaigned against Trump's policies, prompting a National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) spokesperson to accuse Democrats of being 'obsessed with saying 'f‑‑‑ing' and 'a‑‑' as the strategy to win back the voters that rejected them in 2024.' The Hill and GovPredict found in 2019 that the use of curse words from lawmakers on the social media site then-called Twitter dramatically increased in the first year of Trump's first term. Here are five of the most explosive f-bombs in recent politics: Trump's use of the f-word to describe Iran and Israel's attitudes toward their long-standing conflict and latest military strikes against each other was the first time that a president used the word intentionally on live television, though Trump said the word in a hot mic moment before addressing the nation about the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Jon Krosnick, a social psychologist at Stanford University who studies political communication and behaviors, told The Hill that Trump's use in the context of the Middle East conflict was 'very interesting and very revealing.' 'It was one sentence, but it was an important sentence,' Krosnick said. 'It was not carefully scripted — it was just something that came out.' 'This communicated that he's basically exasperated with the situation, but also that he is feeling confident that he can communicate in that way,' he added. Former President Biden, while he was vice president, was caught on a hot mic describing the Affordable Care Act as a 'big f—ing deal' during then-President Obama's signing ceremony for the legislation that's commonly known as Obamacare. The two joked about the f-word slip a decade later when then-President Biden invited Obama to the White House for an executive order signing event in 2022. 'Now, I'm gonna sign an executive order, and, Barack, let me remind you: It's a hot mic,' Biden said, eliciting laughs and applause from the crowd. Obama, when it was his turn to speak, joked that he was quoting a 'famous American' in describing the Biden's order as a 'pretty big deal.' During a photo-op on the Senate floor in 2004, then-Vice President Dick Cheney (R) reportedly told Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) to 'go f— himself.' The New York Times reported at the time that Leahy said he was 'kind of shocked to hear that kind of language on the floor.' Trump made a rare trek to Capitol Hill to pressure Republicans to pass his agenda-setting 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' in March, but word quickly spread that he warned members not to 'f‑‑‑ with Medicaid.' Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) said after the president's closed-door meeting with House Republicans that the members took his use of profanity lightheartedly. Trump described the gathering as 'a meeting of love.' 'That was love in that room. There was no shouting,' the president said. Then-President Kennedy reportedly told a general in 1963 that the Air Force spending thousands on first lady Jackie Kennedy's maternity suite at Otis Air Force Base was 'a f— up.' Then-President Lyndon Johnson (D) reportedly used the f-word in a warning to then-Greek ambassador to the U.S. Alexander Matsas in 1964. 'Fuck your parliament and your constitution,' Johnson reportedly told Matas, as quoted in a 1977 biography.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Russia launches the biggest aerial attack since the start of the war, Ukraine says
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Russia launched its biggest aerial attack against Ukraine overnight, a Ukrainian official said Sunday, part of an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the 3-year-old war. Russia fired a total of 537 aerial weapons at Ukraine, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. The onslaught was 'the most massive airstrike' on the country since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles, Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, told The Associated Press. The attack targeted several regions, including western Ukraine, far from the front line. Poland and allied countries scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace, the country's air force said. One person died in a drone strike in the Kherson region, Gov. Oleksandr Prokudin said, while another was killed when a drone hit a car in the Kharkiv region, according to its Gov. Oleh Syniehubov. Six people were wounded in Cherkasy, including a child, according to regional Gov. Ihor Taburets. In the far-western Lviv region, a large fire broke out at an industrial facility in the city of Drohobych following a drone attack that also cut electricity to parts of the city. Ukraine's air force said one of its F-16 warplanes supplied by its Western partners crashed after sustaining damage while shooting down air targets. The pilot died. The fresh attacks follow Russian President Vladimir Putin's comments Friday that Moscow is ready for a fresh round of direct peace talks in Istanbul. However, the war shows no signs of abating as U.S.-led international peace efforts have so far produced no breakthrough. Two recent rounds of talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul were brief and yielded no progress on reaching a settlement. Long-range drone strikes have been a hallmark of the war. The race by both sides to develop increasingly sophisticated and deadlier drones has turned the conflict into a testing ground for new weaponry. ___ Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at
