
Labour mayoral candidate on race to stop Reform – and ‘Doge Lincolnshire'
Labour can beat Reform UK by focusing relentlessly on the cost of living, the party's mayoral candidate for Greater Lincolnshire, who is taking on the Tory defector Andrea Jenkyns, has said.
Jason Stockwood, the former chair of Grimsby Town football club, is standing for Labour in the most high-profile mayoral race of the local elections.
Nigel Farage's party is hoping the mayoralty will be the centrepiece of its local election results if it wins its first mayoralty with Jenkyns, a former Tory MP who lost her seat and defected to Reform UK. The mayoralty is also being fought hard by the Conservatives, who would otherwise have been favourites.
Farage is to launch his party's local election campaign in Lincolnshire with Jenkyns, who has promised 'Doge Lincolnshire' to cut government waste – a reference to Elon Musk's 'department of government efficiency' in the US – and uses the slogan 'No to net zero madness'.
Labour's chances of gaining the seat are likely to be low. But Stockwood, a high-profile tech investor who has never had a career in politics, said that he also wanted to use he race as an opportunity to take on the 'nonsense' surrounding net zero denial and said it was a 'key dividing line'.
He said the national party could learn from his frontline fight against Reform by taking note of the distain that most voters were showing for all politicians – and talking more about costs and less about intangible economic growth.
Stockwood has been holding meetings with groups of voters attracted by Reform and said many had told them how angry they were at the status quo. He said one key conversation with a successful local businessman had struck him. 'He was saying: we need to blow it all up so we can rebuild it again. That is so dangerous,' Stockwood said. 'We're at a really precarious point in our politics and I was like, I've got to have a go, because the alternatives are really, really frightening.'
He said he had connected with many of the Reform voters because of their disillusionment with the state of the economy and politics.
'Most people, in my experience, just feel politically homeless and are fed up with the status quo. They see politics not working for them, being an elitist merry-go-round rather than people that are making their lives better,' he said.
'I've definitely calibrated my own view having had those conversations. We've had decades worth of flatlining real-terms salaries, a cost of living crisis, jobs going offshore, so we need to make sure we have people who are prepared to have that conversation.'
Stockwood said politics was often missing the human connection – whether it was politicians talking about artificial intelligence or economic growth.
'I think Labour are trying to do that, but not necessarily always communicating that as clearly, but it's really clear within Labour that it's key we are delivering tangible results that affect people, not just talking about growth,' he said.
'People don't understand the growth story, we know that is to enable us to do the social justice stuff that we all care about but people aren't translating that. We grow the economy so that we do the things we care about in public services. That isn't landing with people. We've got to bring that narrative alive.
'When you're talking about that, sci-fi and robotics and autonomous vehicles, people are saying, but I can't pay my rent. It just doesn't connect.'
Stockwood said that he would also be taking on Reform's argument about net zero – saying that Labour could win the debate on renewables as a boost for jobs and growth.
'I've worked around the world with global investors. Global investors aren't debating whether net zero is a thing or not. They're investing in it because they have returns on capital and the amount of jobs it's going to create. My argument is – you need a leader that understands that investors are ready to make the investment in our county,' he said.
'The nonsense of having people that are focused on net zero denial, the actual focus should be on their investment. If we have people who lead the region denying the economic opportunity that net zero is going to create, then that's really dangerous. We're going to miss out on a once in a 100 year opportunity. I think that's a key dividing line for me.'
Stockwood said it would be a tough race in a mayoral battle where the Tories have also traditionally been strong. The party is running the leader of North Lincolnshire council, Rob Waltham.
'This has always been known as the Tory county but the way our politics is going I just don't think those lines are as clear as they were historically,' Stockwood said.
'We won seats like Lincoln and Grimsby, the central part is historically very rural and Conservative, in the south there really has been a sense that people have been forgotten politically and that's where you see Reform winning in places like Boston and Skegness.'
Stockwood said he believed people would see the value in having someone from outside the political world in the role. 'There's not a tremendous amount of love for traditional politics,' he said.
'If you want something genuinely different, someone that's got a real plan and got real experience, then we've got that chance. I wasn't looking for a job, I'm not looking for a career in politics. This is my one and done career in politics. I'm going to come and try and do this. If I don't win, I'm not going to try and find another place to stand.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Assisted dying law faces crunch Commons vote as MPs switch sides
The outcome on Friday could see the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill either clear the House of Commons and move to the Lords, or fall completely. The relatively narrow majority of 55 from the historic yes vote in November means every vote will count on Friday. As an example, the Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted exactly the same way as they did in November, including those who abstained. A copy of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Jonathan Brady/PA) In what will be seen as a blow to the Bill, four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of the vote that they will switch sides to oppose the proposed new law. Labour's Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan wrote to fellow MPs to voice concerns about the safety of the proposed legislation. They branded it 'drastically weakened', citing the scrapping of the High Court Judge safeguard as a key reason. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted the replacement of High Court judge approval with the multidisciplinary panels is a strengthening of the legislation, incorporating wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater (Jonathan Brady/PA) Ahead of confirmation of the four vote-switchers, Ms Leadbeater acknowledged she expected 'some small movement in the middle' but that she did not 'anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded'. She insisted her Bill is 'the most robust piece of legislation in the world' and has argued dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives in a conversation which has seen support from high-profile figures including Dame Esther Rantzen. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Ms Leadbeater has warned it could be a decade before assisted dying legislation returns to Parliament if MPs vote to reject her Bill on Friday. A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the Bill remains high at 73% – unchanged from November. The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75% from 73% in November.


The Herald Scotland
21 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action
In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. US President Donald Trump (left) and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking to the media at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada (PA) Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' Earlier on Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had urged the US to step back from military action, saying there was a 'real risk of escalation'. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.


Powys County Times
26 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action
David Lammy will travel to Geneva on Friday for talks with the Iranian foreign minister and European allies as the UK presses for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran conflict. The Foreign Secretary is set to meet Abbas Araghchi alongside his counterparts from France, Germany and the EU as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran. In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' Earlier on Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had urged the US to step back from military action, saying there was a 'real risk of escalation'. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.