Florida Wildlife officials to propose bear hunt this week
State wildlife officials next week will hear a proposal to create an annual 'limited-entry' black bear hunt, with a December hunting period the first in more than a decade.
A summary of the proposal was posted online Wednesday in advance of a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission meeting next week at the College of Central Florida in Ocala.
'Managing (bear) population growth is important to balance species numbers with suitable habitat and maintain a healthy population,' according to the summary by Hunting and Game Management Director Morgan Richardson.
The proposal would allow the first hunt since October 2015 to run from the first Saturday in December through the last Sunday in December, with future hunts held each year between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31. In 2015, 304 bears were killed in two days after permits were distributed to anyone who paid. The new proposal includes issuing permits through a random draw.
The number of permits would be based on factors such as female bear survival and mortality data that would include prior year 'hunting success rates.' Hunting would be allowed within what are known as 'bear management units' that have at least 200 bears.
Bear hunting has long been a controversial issue in Florida. Supporters say, in part, a hunt could help better manage bear populations as the animals interact with humans. They also point to a voter-approved ballot measure in November that enshrined hunting and fishing rights in the state Constitution.
Opponents have argued that hunting doesn't reduce human-bear interactions and say the state should use non-lethal options to address bear populations.
They say unsecured trash continues to be a lure for bears on residential and commercial properties. The commission on Friday confirmed an 89-year old Collier County man was the first recorded fatal victim of a bear attack in Florida.
The state has recorded 42 incidents since the 1970s of wild bears making physical contact with people.
Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
California sues Justice Dept. over demand that school districts ban trans athletes
California sued the U.S. Justice Department on Monday over its demand last week that local school districts ban transgender youth from competing in sports, arguing the federal agency had overstepped its authority in violation of both state and federal law. The 'pre-enforcement' lawsuit was filed 'in anticipation of imminent legal retaliation against California's school systems' for not complying with the agency's directive by its Monday deadline, said California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta's office, which is handling the litigation. 'The President and his Administration are demanding that California school districts break the law and violate the Constitution — or face legal retaliation. They're demanding that our schools discriminate against the students in their care and deny their constitutionally protected rights,' Bonta said in a statement. 'As we've proven time and again in court, just because the President disagrees with a law, that doesn't make it any less of one.' The lawsuit comes a week after Assistant Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon, a Trump appointee and head of the federal Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, sent a letter to school districts across California warning them that they faced potential 'legal liability' if they did not 'certify in writing' by Monday that they will break with California Interscholastic Federation rules and state law to ban transgender athletes from competition in their districts. Dhillon argued that allowing transgender athletes to compete 'would deprive girls of athletic opportunities and benefits based solely on their biological sex,' in violation of the U.S. Constitution. State Supt. of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond responded last week by saying in his own letter to schools that Dhillon's warning carried no legal weight and that school districts were still obligated to follow state law, which requires transgender athletes be allowed to compete on teams based on their gender identity. 'The DOJ assertions are not in themselves law, and the letter by itself cannot be an enforcement mechanism,' Thurmond wrote. Bonta's lawsuit asks a federal court in Northern California to uphold the constitutionality of California's antidiscrimination laws protecting transgender athletes, and to bar the Trump administration from withholding funds or taking other retaliatory actions against school districts that refuse to abide by the Trump directive. The lawsuit falls along one of the fastest growing legal and political fault lines in America: Does the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment — the Constitution's oft-cited guarantee against discrimination — protect transgender rights or undermine them? Dhillon, other members of the Trump administration and anti-transgender activists nationwide have argued that the inclusion of transgender girls in youth sports amounts to illegal discrimination against cisgender girls. Bonta's office and other LGBTQ+ advocates argue that the exclusion of transgender girls is what constitutes illegal discrimination — and that courts, including the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which governs California and much of the American West, have agreed. While Dhillon 'purports that compliance with the Equal Protection Clause requires the categorical exclusion of transgender girls from girls' sports, as courts have previously upheld, just the opposite is true: the Equal Protection Clause forbids such policies of total exclusion, as does California law,' Bonta's office said. State law that allows transgender students to participate in sports consistent with their identity 'is squarely within the State's authority to ensure all students are afforded the benefits of an inclusive school environment, including participation in school sports, and to prevent the serious harms that transgender students would suffer from a discriminatory, exclusionary policy.' Polls have shown that Americans generally support transgender rights, but also that a majority oppose transgender girls competing in youth sports. Many prominent advocates for excluding transgender girls from sports praised Dhillon's actions last week as a bold move to protect cisgender girls from unfair competition. Sonja Shaw, a Trump supporter who is president of the Chino Valley Unified Board of Education, has called on California school systems to adopt resolutions in support of the Trump administration order. 'The stakes couldn't be higher,' Shaw said last week. 'Our daughters deserve safe, fair competition ... But radical policies are undermining that right, pushing boys into girls' sports and threatening their opportunities. We're not backing down.' Shaw, a candidate for state superintendent of public instruction, said other school systems could model these resolutions on one passed by her school district. A handful of the state's 1,000 school districts have passed such resolutions. The lawsuit's claim that retaliation from the Trump administration could be imminent for schools that do not comply with the administration's demands is not entirely speculative. It is based at least in part on repeated threats and actions the administration has already taken against states over its trans-inclusive sports policies. President Trump has said outright that he wants to cut federal funding to California over its laws allowing transgender athletes to compete in youth sports. The federal Justice Department has announced investigations into the state and the California Interscholastic Federation over its inclusive policies for transgender athletes. U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli in Los Angeles, a longtime ally of Dhillon and whose appointment has yet to be confirmed, recently threw his office's support behind a private lawsuit challenging the inclusion of a transgender athlete on the track and field team at Martin Luther King High School in Riverside. Dhillon issued her letter to California school districts after another transgender athlete from Jurupa Valley High School, 16-year-old AB Hernandez, won multiple medals at the state high school track and field championships despite President Trump demanding on social media that she not be allowed to compete. The letter came despite attempts by the state to appease concerns. After Trump's online threats, for example, the CIF updated its rules for transgender competitors. As a result, Hernandez was allowed to compete at the state finals in the girls' long jump, high jump and triple jump, but her qualifying did not result in the exclusion of any cisgender girl. In addition, while Hernandez was awarded several medals, those medals were also awarded to cisgender girls who otherwise would have claimed them had Hernandez not been competing — with the girls sharing those spots on the medal podiums. Supporters of the rule change said it eliminated concerns about cisgender girls losing opportunities to compete and win to transgender girls, but critics said the changes did not go far enough, and that transgender athletes needed to be fully banned from competition. Dhillon's letter demanding school districts certify that such bans were being implemented made no mention of the CIF's rule change.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘I would': Trump calls for arrest of California's Newsom amid lawsuit over National Guard in LA
President Donald Trump said he'd support having his border czar, Tom Homan arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom as tensions between the two leaders built beyond the boiling point on Monday, 'I would do it … I think it would be a great thing,' Trump said, according to USA TODAY, when he was asked whether Newsom, who's challenged the White House's decision to federalize National Guard personnel amid ongoing protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles. The Republican president also called Newsom 'grossly incompetent,' the newspaper reported. Newsom fired back on X: 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' Newsom filed suit against the White House on Monday over its decision to deploy the National Guard. California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the state's sovereignty was 'trampled' by President Donald Trump when he ordered National Guard troops to the immigration protests in Los Angeles, The Associated Press reported. Bonta announced plans Monday to sue the Trump administration. He said the lawsuit would ask the court 'to set aside the president's unlawful action federalizing the California National Guard.' In a post to X, Newsom asserted that 'this is a manufactured crisis,; and that Trump is ' creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. Constitution. 'The illegal order he signed could allow him to send the military into ANY STATE HE WISHES. Every governor -- red or blue -- should reject this outrageous overreach,' Newsom continued. 'There's a lot of hyperbole out there. This isn't that. This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism that threatens the foundation of our republic. We cannot let it stand.' Associated Press reports are included in this story. Mass. AG Campbell sues Trump admin over plan to distribute machine gun conversion tech Here are 10 NASA missions that could be grounded under Trump's 2026 budget 'I don't know if I want to do this anymore': leaked audio highlights turmoil among Dems Graffiti on tank in Trump's parade calls for hanging 2 well-known Americans 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal Judge Blocks Trump From Enforcing DEI and Anti-Trans Executive Orders
A federal judge on Monday blocked several of President Donald Trump's executive orders that have threatened federal funding to nonprofits that primarily service LGBTQ+ communities. District Judge Jon Tigar in Oakland, California, issued a preliminary injunction halting three of Trump's anti-DEI and anti-transgender executive orders. Nine nonprofits around the country, including the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, had sued the Trump administration, calling its actions unconstitutional. 'While the Executive requires some degree of freedom to implement its political agenda, it is still bound by the Constitution. And even in the context of federal subsidies, it cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities for disfavored treatment or suppress ideas that it does not like or has deemed dangerous,' Tigar wrote in the order. Hard-won queer rights are under attack. HuffPost remains committed to standing with the LGBTQ+ community. Support our work by The federal government therefore cannot withhold funding from grant recipients if they continue programs that promote diversity or service transgender people. The order will remain in effect nationwide while the case continues, and Trump administration's lawyers are likely to appeal. On Jan. 20, Trump's first day in office, he signed an executive order announcing the federal government would only recognize 'two sexes, male and female,' and barred the promotion of 'gender ideology,' a right-wing term used to refer to the existence of transgender people and their rights. Shortly after he also signed two orders directing agencies to terminate federal funding for all diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Almost immediately, nonprofit organizations saw that their contracts, totaling hundreds of thousands and, in some cases, millions of dollars in federal funding, were being canceled. On April 22, the Department of Justice informed FORGE, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit that provides training and support to crime victims, that it was terminating a $749,000 grant to update its toolkit to support transgender survivors of sexual assault. The very next day, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notified the Los Angeles LGBT Center, another plaintiff in the suit, that it was terminating a $1 million grant to study new strategies to mitigate the spread of sexually transmitted infections among all populations, but specifically including gay and bisexual men and transgender women, court documents show. 'All of [these organizations] have lost funding because they serve trans people and BIPOC people … For some of these groups, the amount of the budget they are losing is almost 50% of their budget. These are people who do things like give people their HIV meds, feed people, house people,' Kevin Jennings, the chief executive officer of Lambda Legal, an LGBTQ legal advocacy group, told HuffPost ahead of the order. 'So let's be really clear about what the bottom line of these cuts is. People will die. People don't have any place to live, don't have a place to live, adequate nutrition. We consider this a life and death lawsuit,' he added. Over the last six months, advocacy groups have sounded the alarms as Trump has leveraged executive orders to withhold federal funding from universities, nonprofits and medical institutions that specifically service people of color and transgender communities and to scrub federal websites that include data, research, history on those groups. Already, HIV advocates worry that the Trump administration's cuts to the CDC and termination of hundreds of federal research grants on treatment and prevention has reversed the momentum of the decadeslong fight to end the epidemic.
