logo
‘State of Tobacco' report: State, federal lawmakers must adopt policies to save lives

‘State of Tobacco' report: State, federal lawmakers must adopt policies to save lives

Yahoo30-01-2025

A new report from the American Lung Association has identified Pennsylvania as one of the worst states at preventing and controlling tobacco use.
In a new report called the 'State of Tobacco Control 2025,' the ALA claims the tobacco industry is taking aggressive action at both the state and federal levels to protect its profits at the expense of the country's health. The association urges lawmakers to adopt 'proven' and effective tobacco control policies to save lives, citing tobacco use as the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S.
The annual report assigns letter grades (A through F) for each U.S. state regarding different facets of tobacco prevention. Pennsylvania received the following grades:
* Funding for state tobacco prevention programs — Grade F
* Strength of smoke-free workplace laws — Grade D
* Level of state tobacco taxes — Grade F
* Coverage and access to services to quit tobacco — Grade D
* Ending the sale of all flavored tobacco products — Grade F
The American Lung Association urges state lawmakers to prioritize preserving funding for comprehensive tobacco prevention and control programs and to 'close the loopholes in Pennsylvania's Clean Indoor Act and end the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including menthol, to reduce the overwhelming human and financial burden of tobacco use.'
The tobacco industry has taken 'increasingly aggressive actions to addict a new generation to tobacco and hinder proven public policies to prevent and reduce tobacco use,' said Elizabeth Hensil, Advocacy Director for Pennsylvania and West Virginia at the American Lung Association. 'Here in Pennsylvania, we are seeing tobacco industry lobbyists at the local level working to stop or weaken proven tobacco control policies. The tobacco industry is also introducing new products that appeal to youth, like e-cigarettes that mimic smartphones, kid-friendly flavors and flavored nicotine pouches that are heavily marketed by social media influencers.'
Despite receiving nearly $1.34 billion from tobacco settlement payments, tobacco taxes and other state funding, Pennsylvania funds tobacco control efforts at only 14.8% of the level recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to the association.
The report noted that at the state level, the industry has sought to protect specific tobacco products from taxation, and supported legislation that would result in state governments pursuing penalties against smaller competitors that sell e-cigarette products illegally in the U.S.
Lawmakers must 'resist these tobacco industry efforts and continue to pass proven policies to prevent and reduce tobacco use,' the ALA said.
The association also noted several 'major disappointments' at the federal level, the most significant being former President Joe Biden's failure to finalize the U.S. Food and Drug Administration rules that would end the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars.
The report said that menthol flavoring has been falsely marketed as being a healthier alternative to non-menthol tobacco products. This has resulted in increased use of menthol cigarettes, contributing to higher rates of tobacco-related death and disease as well as tobacco-related health disparities, the report states.
Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., killing 490,000 people each year, according to the ALA.
The 2025 'State of Tobacco Control' report graded the federal government in five areas:
* Federal Government Regulation of Tobacco Products — Grade C
* Federal Coverage of Quit Smoking Treatments — Grade D
* Level of Federal Tobacco Taxes — Grade F
* Federal Mass Media Campaigns to Prevent and Reduce Tobacco Use — Grade A
* Federal Minimum Age of Sale for Tobacco Products to 21 — Grade A
The report urges Congress to provide additional funding to the FDA so it can enforce against and remove all illegal e-cigarettes the tobacco industry has introduced to the market.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People with Covid-like symptoms took almost a year before feeling like themselves again, researchers say
People with Covid-like symptoms took almost a year before feeling like themselves again, researchers say

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

People with Covid-like symptoms took almost a year before feeling like themselves again, researchers say

Did you have Covid-like symptoms? It may take nine months or even longer to start feeling like yourself again. Researchers at UCLA found that 20 percent of patients with those symptoms continued experiencing suboptimal quality of life for nearly a year after infection. Whereas, physical well-being returned after only three months. "We have newly recognized the difference in recovery with respect to mental vs. physical well-being after a COVID infection," Lauren Wisk, an assistant professor of medicine at UCLA, said in a statement. "The findings showed that health care professionals need to pay more attention to their patients' mental well-being after a Covid infection and provide more resources that will help improve their mental health, in addition to their physical health,' she added. Wisk was one of the lead authors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded study that was published Tuesday in the journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases. The study compared people who sought treatment for Covid-like symptoms. Of those, 75 percent tested positive for the virus. The rest were negative. Of the 4,700 participants who experienced the symptoms between mid-December 2020 and late August 2022, the people who were positive for Covid were statistically likelier to return to optimal health-related quality-of-life than their Covid-negative counterparts in the year following the infection. The authors said the findings suggest that health authorities may have previously underestimated the long-term effects of non-Covid infections on a patient's well-being. To reach these conclusions, researchers analyzed responses from nearly 1,100 Covid-positive patients and 317 Covid-negative negative patients, assessing aspects including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social participation, sleep disturbance, pain interference and cognitive function. They found that approximately one in five of those who were part of the study remained in poor overall quality of life, with a high likelihood of self-reporting long Covid for up to a year after initial infection. 'In this large, geographically diverse study of individuals with 12 months of follow-up after Covid-19-like illness, a substantial proportion of participants continued to report poor [overall quality of life], whether or not the inciting acute symptoms were due to SARS-CoV-2 or another illness,' they said. Mental well-being recovered gradually, with significant improvements manifesting between six and nine months after infection, researchers found. The authors said further research was needed, noting that it remains unclear which conditions the symptomatic Covid-negative patients were suffering from and that Covid tests can yield both false-positive and false-negative results. The common cold, allergies, flu and Covid share many similar symptoms. "Future research should focus on how to improve the treatment models of care for patients who continue to experience Covid-19 symptoms and their impact on patients' quality of life, especially as one in five patients may continue to suffer over a year after their initial infection, which likely reflects long Covid," Wisk said.

Data on sexual orientation and gender is critical to public health – without it, health crises continue unnoticed
Data on sexual orientation and gender is critical to public health – without it, health crises continue unnoticed

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Data on sexual orientation and gender is critical to public health – without it, health crises continue unnoticed

As part of the Trump administration's efforts aimed at stopping diversity, equity and inclusion, the government has been restricting how it monitors public health. Along with cuts to federally funded research, the administration has targeted public health efforts to gather information about sexual orientation and gender identity. In the early days of the second Trump administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention took down data and documents that included sexual orientation and gender identity from its webpages. For example, data codebooks for the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were replaced with versions that deleted gender identity variables. The Trump administration also ordered the CDC to delete gender identity from the National Violent Death Reporting System, the world's largest database for informing prevention of homicide and suicide deaths. For many people, sexual orientation and gender identity may seem private and personal. So why is personal information necessary for public health? Decades of research have shown that health problems affect some groups more than others. As someone who has studied differences in health outcomes for over 15 years, I know that one of the largest health disparities for LGBTQ+ people is suicide risk. Without data on sexual orientation and gender identity, public health cannot do the work to sound the alarm on and address issues that affect not just specific communities, but society as a whole. Health is determined by the interplay of several factors, including a person's genetics, environment and personal life. Of these types of health information, data on personal lives can be the most difficult to collect because researchers must rely on people to voluntarily share this information with them. But details about people's everyday lives are critical to understanding their health. Consider veteran status. Without information that identifies which Americans are military veterans, the U.S. would never have known that the rate of suicide deaths among veterans is several times higher than that of the general population. Identifying this problem encouraged efforts to reduce suicide among veterans and military service personnel. Studying the rates of different conditions occurring in different groups of people is a vital role of public health monitoring. First, rates can set off alarm bells. When people are counted, it becomes easier to pick up a problem that needs to be addressed. Second, rates can be a benchmark. Once the extent of a health problem is known, researchers can develop and test interventions. They can then determine if rates of that health problem decreased, stayed the same or increased after the intervention. My team reviewed available research on how sexual orientation and gender identity are related to differences in mortality. The results were grim. Of the 49 studies we analyzed, the vast majority documented greater rates of death from all causes for LGBTQ+ people compared with people who aren't LGBTQ+. Results were worse for suicide: Nearly all studies reported that suicide deaths were more frequent among LGBTQ+ people. A great deal of other research supports this finding. Without data on sexual orientation and gender identity, these issues are erased. Higher death rates among LGBTQ+ people affect everyone, not just people in the LGBTQ+ community. And when suicide is a major driver of these death rates, the costs increase. There are societal costs. Deaths from suicide result in lost productivity and medical services that cost the U.S. an estimated $484 billion per year. There are also human costs. Research suggests that for every suicide death, about 135 people are directly affected by the loss, experiencing grief, sadness and anger. President Donald Trump's targeting of research on sexual orientation and gender identity comes at a time when more Americans than ever – an estimated 24.4 million adults – identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. That's more than the entire population of Florida. LGBTQ+ people live in every state in the country, where they work as teachers, executives, janitors, nurses, mechanics, artists and every other profession or role that help sustain American communities. LGBTQ+ people are someone's family members, and they are raising families of their own. LGBTQ+ people also pay taxes to the government, which are partly spent on monitoring the nation's health. Stopping data collection of sexual orientation and gender identity does not protect women, or anyone else, as the Trump administration claims. Rather, it serves to weaken American public health. I believe counting all Americans is the path to a stronger, healthier nation because public health can then do its duty of detecting when a community needs help. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: John R. Blosnich, University of Southern California Read more: Anti-LGBTQ+ policies harm the health of not only LGBTQ+ people, but all Americans Trans youth are significantly more likely to attempt suicide when gender dysphoria is met with conversion therapy than with hormone treatment RFK Jr's shakeup of vaccine advisory committee raises worries about scientific integrity of health recommendations John R. Blosnich receives funding from the National Institutes of Health. He is affiliated with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), however all time and effort into writing this piece was done outside of his work with the VA. The opinions expressed are those of Dr. Blosnich and do not necessarily represent those of his institution, funders, or any affiliations.

These states have the highest rates of dementia in the U.S., new study finds
These states have the highest rates of dementia in the U.S., new study finds

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

These states have the highest rates of dementia in the U.S., new study finds

Dementia affects more than 6 million Americans and accounts for more than 100,000 deaths each year, according to the National Institutes of Health. Further, researchers estimate that 42% of Americans over 55 will eventually develop dementia—and that an aging U.S. population could cause the number of new dementia cases per year to double by 2060. Now, researchers at the University of California San Francisco have identified the U.S. regions, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where dementia occurs most often. The large and comprehensive study, published in JAMA Neurology, examined data on more than 12.6 million veterans 65 and older enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration system; only 2% were women. Researchers found the highest incidence in the Southeast (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida) and the lowest in the Mid-Atlantic states (Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, New Jersey, Washington D.C.). Further, using the low Mid-Atlantic region for comparison, dementia incidence was: 25% higher in the Southeast (Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi) 23% higher in the Northwest (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington) 23% higher Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming) 18% higher in the South (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas) 13% in the Southwest (Arizona, California, Hawaiʻi, and Nevada) 12% higher in the South Atlantic (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida) 12% higher in the Midwest (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska) 7% higher in the Northeast (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and New York) 7% higher in the Great Lakes (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin) Regional variation may be influenced by several factors, the study notes, pointing to prior research which suggests demographic factors including sex, race, ethnicity, and education level impact the risk of dementia across populations. The prevalence and management of cardiovascular disease and related risk factors, known to increase risk of dementia and cognitive decline, vary across the country. 'Rurality of residence may also play a role,' wrote the researchers, 'with studies showing greater dementia and cognitive impairment among rural adults, possibly due to health care access or poverty.' The results, they add, 'underscore the influence of regionally patterned risk factors or diagnostic practices, highlighting the importance of tailored health care strategies, public health initiatives, and policy reforms.' The varied findings highlight the need for targeted health care planning, public health interventions, and policy development—as well as more research. 'Quality of education, early life conditions, and environmental exposures may be among those factors,' lead author Christina Dintica, PhD, said in a news release. But the next important step, she said, is to investigate the factors driving these differences. More on dementia: It's not just forgetfulness: 8 early warning signs of dementia Marriage has a surprising link to dementia risk, new study finds Paying attention to these 14 risk factors can reduce your risk of dementia, science says This story was originally featured on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store