Myanmar quake: Scramble to find survivors as death toll hits 1,644
The death toll from the Myanmar earthquake has climbed to at least 1,644, with over 3,400 injured, the Myanmar Now news outlet reported on Saturday, citing the ruling military junta.
According to reports, many more are feared to be trapped under the rubble of collapsed buildings in the South-Asian country.
The 7.7-magnitude earthquake hit central Myanmar on Friday and it was followed minutes later by a 6.7-magnitude. There were numerous other aftershocks.
The epicentre of the strongest quake was near Mandalay, the second-largest city in Myanmar with a population of 1.6 million.
Tremors were also felt in Thailand, China and Vietnam.
There are fears that the final death toll can rise by several thousand more due to the proximity of populated areas and the vulnerability of many structures.
Thousands of people are reportedly sleeping outdoors, either because their homes were damaged or out of fear of further quakes.
According to Myanmar Now, the quake caused the air traffic control tower at the international airport in the capital Naypyitaw to collapse.
At least six people were killed, the outlet reported, citing its own sources. Airport operations had been suspended, it said. The toppled tower was visible on satellite images from Planet Labs PBC.
According to reports, a hospital also collapsed in the eastern state of Shan. No details were initially known.
International organizations such as the Red Cross have reported widespread damage, difficult rescue effort conditions and also warned that critical dams on the Irrawaddy River could be at risk of collapsing.
Getting information about the situation in Myanmar has been difficult as the country has been in political turmoil since a military junta seized power in a 2021 coup.
Millions of people have been displaced by the ongoing fighting in the volatile region.
A rescue team member told dpa that the military often interrupts the internet connection in many places due to the conflict.
Deaths in Thailand but signs of life in rubble
In Thailand, three people are confirmed dead, but media reported that 10 bodies had been recovered. At least 101 people are missing in Bangkok alone.
Rescue workers in the Thai capital have found signs of life beneath the rubble of an unfinished high-rise building that collapsed due to the massive earthquake, Thai media reported on Saturday.
Some 15 people are trapped under the debris in groups of three to seven, several media outlets reported, citing authorities.
Rescue teams are trying to bring them water and food, said Suriyachai Rawiwan, director of the national disaster relief organization, according to radio station Thai PBS.
Some of the survivors are trapped several metres below the surface.
"We have about 72 hours to help them because that is the approximate time a person can survive without water and food," Rawiwan said.
It is still unclear exactly how many people are buried under the remains of the 30-storey tower block, which was under construction when it collapsed on Friday.
People were waiting outside the site for news of their relatives, but the police asked the public to avoid gathering at the building so as not to hinder rescue work which involves heavy equipment.
Thai officials warned of the risk of aftershocks.
The Thai Meteorological Department recorded further tremors a day after the severe quake.
However, most of the 77 earth tremors measured mainly occurred in Myanmar, were far weaker and were sometimes barely noticeable, the department said.
Injuries, damage in southern China
Injuries and damage to buildings were also reported from the Chinese province of Yunnan.
China, one of isolated Myanmar's few allies, sent a small disaster relief team with specialist equipment across the border to Myanmar, according to state media reports.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry promised further aid and the equivalent of around $13.7 million in support funds.
Chinese President Xi Jinping sent a message of sympathy to Burmese military junta leader Min Aung Hlaing.
International teams arrive in Myanmar
Other international teams also began reaching Myanmar on Saturday to help with rescue efforts.
Russian state news agency TASS reported Moscow sent two planes carrying 120 personnel and supplies.
An Indian Air Force plane also landed in the city of Yangon with 15 tons of tents, blankets, bedding, generators and medicines, the Foreign Ministry in New Delhi posted on X on Saturday.
The shipment was accompanied by a group of search and rescue teams as well as a medical team.
Malaysia's Foreign Ministry said the country would also send teams to support relief efforts.
The European Commission said on Friday it was activating the Copernicus satellite service to better assess the effects of the earthquake.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
In Latin America, Brazil Is Missing in Action
Brazil once aspired to be South America's natural leader. Today, despite renewed global visibility under President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the country's regional presence has quietly diminished. In Latin America, Brazil is no longer a protagonist. Instead, it is retreating into the background, leaving a vacuum that others are increasingly eager to fill. A pivotal opportunity to reverse this trend is approaching. In 2025, Brazil will host the United Nations COP30 Climate Change Conference in Belem, which Lula hopes to use as a platform to reassert Brazil's leadership not only globally, but also regionally. With the start of a new electoral cycle in 2026 signaling political uncertainty ahead at home, COP30 may be Lula's last major chance to reconnect Brazil with its neighbors in a meaningful way. It will be crucial for Brazil to ensure the high-profile summit yields more concrete commitments than the underwhelming final declaration from Brazil's recent rotating presidency of the G20, which ended in November 2024, and recent summits of the Mercosur trade bloc of Southern Cone nations. Lula's return to power in January 2023 was met with high expectations, both inside and outside Brazil. After four years of erratic and isolationist foreign policy under former President Jair Bolsonaro, Lula promised a return to multilateralism, regional integration and South-South cooperation. His first year in office saw ambitious gestures: renewed participation in the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, or CELAC, founded in 2010 to promote regional dialogue; proposals to revitalize the Union of South American Nations, or Unasur, launched in 2008 during Lula's first stint as president to advance political and economic coordination; and symbolic visits to Argentina and Uruguay. Brazil also assumed the G20 rotating presidency in late 2023 and launched preparations for COP30, positioning itself once again as a central voice in climate diplomacy. But while these efforts have put Brazil back in the global spotlight, in South America they have rung hollow, in part because Lula has not followed through on his rhetoric of leadership with impactful policies. On Venezuela, for instance, Brazil has adopted a cautious approach, refraining from playing a meaningful role in mediating the country's ongoing political and humanitarian crisis. Instead, Lula has sought to normalize relations with the government of President Nicolas Maduro, focusing on trade and energy integration. But this stance has been criticized as tone-deaf to human rights concerns and regional democratic norms, while leaving a diplomatic void that Colombia and Mexico have attempted to fill, each with its own approach. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. Brazil's attempt to draw closer to Colombia under President Gustavo Petro, with whom Lula shares ideological affinities, has also yielded limited results. The two leftist leaders have emphasized bilateral cooperation on environmental and regional issues, but the relationship has faced friction, as well as political headwinds in Bogota. Petro, who also has ambitions to act as a regional leader, has been weakened at home by his struggles to consolidate control over the executive branch and inability to implement key domestic reforms. This has complicated Brazil's effort to partner with Colombia in articulating joint strategies for protection of the Amazon rainforest, peace-building and regional integration. Meanwhile, Brazil's relationship with Argentina under far-right libertarian President Javier Milei remains politically tense but economically intertwined. Milei has attacked Lula personally and boycotted summits, but trade between the two countries continues and institutional ties within Mercosur endure. But while the bloc, founded in 1991 to promote regional trade integration among Southern Cone nations, remains a central economic framework, its political coordination is weaker than in the past. More broadly, Brazil has shown limited initiative in strengthening or redesigning Mercosur and other regional organizations. CELAC and UNASUR remain adrift, with weak institutionalization and fragmented political will. While Lula has expressed rhetorical support for both, Brazil has not offered sustained leadership to make them effective. A clear example came in May 2023, when Brazil hosted a summit of South American presidents to discuss regional integration: The meeting ended without concrete commitments, highlighting Brazil's inability to formulate a mutually acceptable shared agenda. This absence has not gone unnoticed, and already other leaders have begun to try to fill the vacuum. In parts of Central America and the Caribbean, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele has emerged as a regional pole of symbolic influence, particularly among younger audiences and digital elites. In addition to representing a model of open alignment with the United States, Bukele is perceived regionally as a success for his rare ability as an incumbent to retain public approval, in large part because he has reined in crime and insecurity, though that has come at the cost of trampled civil liberties and democratic erosion. In the Andes, Petro has taken high-profile stances on climate diplomacy and peace processes, positioning himself as a voice of moral authority, despite his political constraints. Even Mexico, traditionally more focused on North America, expanded its outreach to Central America and the Caribbean under former President Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador. And his successor, President Claudia Sheinbaum, has demonstrated a deft touch in managing relations with U.S. President Donald Trump, positioning her to play a leadership role in the regional response to Trump's trade and immigration agenda. None of these actors can replace Brazil, but their growing prominence underscores Lula's lack of active regional leadership. Domestically, several factors help explain Brazil's regional withdrawal. The country is deeply polarized and inwardly focused, as Lula navigates a fragmented Congress, tense civil-military relations and a decline in popular approval. According to a recent Quaest poll, 43 percent of Brazilians now view Lula's administration negatively, while only 26 percent express a positive opinion—the lowest approval level of his current mandate. Moreover, Itamaraty, as the country's Foreign Ministry is known, is understaffed and under-resourced. Many ambassadors appointed during Bolsonaro's term remain in place, limiting Lula's ability to steer diplomacy decisively. And in the face of Brazil's economic slowdown and pressing social demands, costly foreign policy ventures have become politically unattractive. This inward turn stands in sharp contrast to Brazil's global ambitions. Lula has worked to rebuild ties with the African Union, expand BRICS and offer Brazil's services as a mediator in the Russia-Ukraine war, all while holding the G20 presidency and preparing for COP30 in Belem. On the world stage, Brazil seeks to be seen as a champion of multipolarity and development. Yet its silence in its own neighborhood undermines this narrative. A country that aspires to speak for the Global South must first be able to lead in its immediate region. There are signs that Lula is aware of this contradiction. Recent efforts to re-engage with Bolivia, which is experiencing political upheaval in the run-up to a deeply divisive presidential election, and the decision to back regional energy corridors suggest a desire to regain some influence. But as Latin America becomes more multipolar and contested, regional leadership cannot be improvised or sporadic. It requires consistency, vision and presence. Brazil's quiet exit from regional leadership can still be reversed, but doing so will demand more than speeches and summits. It will require reimagining Brazil's role as a neighbor—and delivering on it before the clock runs out. The COP30 summit in Belem offers one last chance to articulate that vision with clarity and conviction. Possible initiatives Lula could push for at the summit include a regional pact for sustainable development in the Amazon, a joint strategy to combat environmental crime and a regional protocol to protect Indigenous peoples, especially those who have never or only recently had contact with outside populations. With Brazil set to enter another presidential election cycle in 2026, political attention will soon shift even more inward. Lula, who has expressed interest in seeking reelection, will increasingly focus on domestic challenges and electoral strategy, reducing the space and urgency for regional diplomacy. But time is running out, and if Brazil cannot reclaim regional influence in its own neighborhood, it may be left watching others fill the void. Sylvia Colombo is a journalist, author and historian specialized in Latin America. She is currently a columnist for Folha de The post In Latin America, Brazil Is Missing in Action appeared first on World Politics Review.
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Tough talk drags on in Cambodia-Thailand border standoff. But tensions appear to be easing
PHNOM PENH, Cambodia (AP) — Cambodia's defense ministry on Monday said that the country's troops haven't withdrawn from a patch of land whose ownership is hotly disputed by neighboring Thailand, but the declaration also echoed recent statements by both sides seeking a peaceful resolution to their competing border claims. Cambodian and Thai authorities engaged in saber-rattling last week, after an armed confrontation at the border on May 28 left one Cambodian soldier dead. The incident, which each side blamed on the other, reportedly took place in a relatively small 'no man's land' constituting territory along their border that both countries claim is theirs. A declaration by the Cambodian defense ministry on Monday had 'No Withdrawal of Troops' as its first principle. It said that 'Cambodian forces have not been withdrawn from any areas under Cambodian sovereignty where they have been stationed for an extended period.' The wording left unclear exactly which positions had been occupied for 'an extended period.' His statement also reaffirmed Cambodia's territorial claims covering not only the spot near Morakot village in Cambodia's northwestern province of Preah Vihear where the soldier was killed, but also three other pieces of disputed land. Cambodian Defense Minister Tea Seiha himself on Sunday had painted a slightly different picture, stating that Cambodia and Thai military leaders had met and decided to adjust the military forces of both sides to return to appropriate areas in order to reduce tension and confront each other on the border. His statement appeared to be in accord with what Thai Defense Minister Phumtham Wechayachai announced on Sunday, that both sides had withdrawn their forces to where they had been in 2024. That came after Thailand began shutting or limiting crossing hours at some of the numerous checkpoints along the countries' common border. The tough talk on both sides appeared aimed mostly at drumming up nationalist support among their own domestic audiences. In Thailand, the elected government of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has been attacked by right-wing nationalists who are longtime foes of her father, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Already last year, Paetongtarn's government was attacked on nationalist grounds for proposing to resume talks with Cambodia on demarcation of maritime territory believed to hold profitable hydrocarbon resources. There is a long history to disputes over border territory, leaving Thailand especially bitter. In 1962, the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, awarded to Cambodia the disputed territory on which stands the historic Preah Vihear temple. The ruling, which became a major irritant in bilateral relations, was reaffirmed in 2013. There had been serious though sporadic clashes there in 2011. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet last week vowed to take the cases of the four currently disputed areas to the court to determine ownership, even if Thailand didn't join in the appeal, in order 'to end this problem and extinguish it once and for all so that there is no further confusion.'
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Tough talk drags on in Cambodia-Thailand border standoff. But tensions appear to be easing
PHNOM PENH, Cambodia (AP) — Cambodia's defense ministry on Monday said that the country's troops haven't withdrawn from a patch of land whose ownership is hotly disputed by neighboring Thailand, but the declaration also echoed recent statements by both sides seeking a peaceful resolution to their competing border claims. Cambodian and Thai authorities engaged in saber-rattling last week, after an armed confrontation at the border on May 28 left one Cambodian soldier dead. The incident, which each side blamed on the other, reportedly took place in a relatively small 'no man's land' constituting territory along their border that both countries claim is theirs. A declaration by the Cambodian defense ministry on Monday had 'No Withdrawal of Troops' as its first principle. It said that 'Cambodian forces have not been withdrawn from any areas under Cambodian sovereignty where they have been stationed for an extended period.' The wording left unclear exactly which positions had been occupied for 'an extended period.' His statement also reaffirmed Cambodia's territorial claims covering not only the spot near Morakot village in Cambodia's northwestern province of Preah Vihear where the soldier was killed, but also three other pieces of disputed land. Cambodian Defense Minister Tea Seiha himself on Sunday had painted a slightly different picture, stating that Cambodia and Thai military leaders had met and decided to adjust the military forces of both sides to return to appropriate areas in order to reduce tension and confront each other on the border. His statement appeared to be in accord with what Thai Defense Minister Phumtham Wechayachai announced on Sunday, that both sides had withdrawn their forces to where they had been in 2024. That came after Thailand began shutting or limiting crossing hours at some of the numerous checkpoints along the countries' common border. The tough talk on both sides appeared aimed mostly at drumming up nationalist support among their own domestic audiences. In Thailand, the elected government of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has been attacked by right-wing nationalists who are longtime foes of her father, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Already last year, Paetongtarn's government was attacked on nationalist grounds for proposing to resume talks with Cambodia on demarcation of maritime territory believed to hold profitable hydrocarbon resources. There is a long history to disputes over border territory, leaving Thailand especially bitter. In 1962, the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, awarded to Cambodia the disputed territory on which stands the historic Preah Vihear temple. The ruling, which became a major irritant in bilateral relations, was reaffirmed in 2013. There had been serious though sporadic clashes there in 2011. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet last week vowed to take the cases of the four currently disputed areas to the court to determine ownership, even if Thailand didn't join in the appeal, in order 'to end this problem and extinguish it once and for all so that there is no further confusion.'
