Quarantine for 78 as hundreds of measles close contacts identified
Hundreds of close contacts of the measles case in Auckland have been contacted by Health New Zealand over the past week, in an attempt to contain the risk of the virus spreading in the city.
On May 11, Health NZ announced that it had identified a measles case in Auckland which was linked to overseas travel. The case was first confirmed on May 10.
Measles is highly contagious and up to 90% of non-immune people (those who have not been vaccinated or have not already had it) will be infected if they are exposed to the virus.
About 80% of New Zealanders are immune — well below the 95% coverage needed to prevent an outbreak.
Health NZ said it had reached out to 286 close contacts since, and 78 of those people are in quarantine as a precautionary measure.
So far, 19 of the close contacts are waiting for blood test results to confirm their measles immunity status.
Health NZ said it had offered and encouraged MMR vaccinations to anyone identified in the process as non-immune.
The agency said it had delivered 50 food packages to people in quarantine who could not access food.
Health NZ has confirmed 17 exposure events across Auckland — most of which took place on Fullers360 ferry sailings between Auckland CBD, Devonport, Rangitoto and Half Moon Bay on May 5.
Other locations include a CBD carpark on Customs St, Unichem pharmacy in New Lynn, a Pak'nSave supermarket in Mt Albert, and a Woolworths supermarket in Kelston.
The national clinical director of protection at the National Public Health Service, Dr Susan Jack, said their staff had been making phone calls, sending texts and emails, and in some cases door-knocking to follow up on close contacts.
She said the virus was highly contagious and an infected person can infect as many as 12 to 18 other people on average.
"Our teams have focussed on moving as quickly as possible to reduce the spread," she said.
Jack said anyone identified as non-immune during the contact tracing process have been asked to quarantine.
"Vaccination with two doses of the MMR vaccine remains the absolute best protection against becoming seriously unwell with measles.
"The vaccine is 99% effective after two doses and for most people there's no risk in having an extra dose if it's needed. Now is the time for you and your whānau to check if you're protected against measles, and to get immunised if you're not, or if you're unsure."
She said it was especially important for infants and young children, and adults who were born or lived in New Zealand between 1969 and 2004 (now aged between 21 and 56), who may not be fully protected, to check their immunisation status.
Jack also encouraged anyone planning to travel internationally to make sure they were vaccinated against measles — given the risks over outbreaks in many countries.
rnz.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Health Reforms Raise Fears Of Two-Tier System And Workforce Shortages
Moves by Health NZ to outsource elective operations to the private hospital sector increase the risk of a two-tier health system and will worsen the medical workforce shortage, a leading medical college has warned. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) is one of the largest specialist medical colleges in Australia and New Zealand and the region's leading authority on anaesthesia, pain medicine and perioperative medicine. Dr Graham Roper, chair of ANZCA's New Zealand National Committee, says the outsourcing plans will negatively affect the training of anaesthetists, who are critical for operations to proceed, and see existing specialists move from public hospitals to the private sector. 'Trainees' practical experience will be impacted, with a loss of exposure to outsourced clinical cases, and skewed amounts of urgent and complex work. It will take longer for trainees to get their required experience, delaying their entry into the workforce. Anaesthesia training will become less desirable, threatening the ability to produce much-needed specialists. 'Anaesthetists are a central part of both the hospital and the surgical team – without them, operations simply can't go ahead.' Dr Roper says the changes will lead to public system specialists facing a large amount of complex and urgent patients, requiring the highest level of care with extended hours of work. This would lead to specialists choosing to move to the private sector, further increasing the strain on the public system. He is also questioning the ability of some private facilities to provide the required level of care and training opportunities. 'Not all private facilities are set up to deliver the same level of clinical care as the public system. Private providers do not take on the same complexity of work in the same volumes as the public system, and may not provide high-dependency care, intensive care, acute pain services, pre-admission clinics and access to urgent investigations. Any significant complications during or after surgery will see the patient transferred to the public system for ongoing care. 'Many private facilities do not have on-site medical cover overnight and have a limited ability to respond to medical emergencies,' Dr Roper says. 'Our Māori and Pacific peoples, with increased complexity of health needs, are unlikely to benefit from this outsourcing model. In addition, our rural and remote communities may not be well served with this change. 'People living in rural areas are not always close to a private provider, can have transport difficulties, and lose family and whānau support if they have to travel long distances for surgery.' Dr Roper says ANZCA is willing to be involved in finding solutions to the unmet need of elective surgery across Aotearoa New Zealand. 'The provision of high-quality safe and equitable care for our community remains the core aim of our profession and the New Zealand public should expect that access to anaesthesia and surgery is future-proofed.'
The Spinoff
6 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The struggles of navigating infertility in New Zealand as a Muslim couple
Where secular New Zealanders make a straightforward medical decision, many Muslims contemplating IVF treatment lack support and care from both medical and religious experts. It was a nice Autumn afternoon half a decade ago when I met with a South Asian couple in their early 40s, who had been trying to have a baby. Let's call them Zainab and Ali. They came to New Zealand many years ago and now call it their home. They had been experiencing compromised fertility their entire married life and had seen a GP who then referred them to a specialist. That specialist suggested they try in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Zainab and Ali are one couple out of 23 Asian and 18 Muslim participants who we interviewed as part of our research project to learn and unpack the accessibility of assisted reproductive technologies(ARTs) in Aotearoa. All participants had experienced either primary (struggling to conceive) or secondary (struggling to conceive again) infertility. We interviewed them from 2019 to 2021 and during that period, some successfully had children. Others remain childless. For non-Muslim or non-religious patients, undergoing IVF is typically a straightforward process and is viewed as a purely medical intervention. However, for practising Muslims, undergoing IVF treatment is not a decision made on their own. They need to consult how Islamic law considers the suggested medical intervention, and interpretations vary among the Islamic scholars (Imams) and sects around this issue. For practising (Sunni) Muslims who follow Islam diligently, surrogacy, third-party donation or sex selection, which is possible through IVF and not via a natural pregnancy, are out of the question. For those who follow a different sect, those options may be permissible. Adhering to Islamic guidelines during IVF relates to ensuring the purity of lineage, the sanctity of marriage, and the nature of procreation. For some Muslims, IVF can be viewed as contradicting the natural order of creation, while others see it as a viable solution for treating their infertility. The issue of head coverings (jilbab/hijab) during treatment and the entire IVF process for Muslim women undergoing IVF was also another concern raised by our Muslim women participants during the interview. This, as well as the fact that they would be undergoing treatment in a secular-based fertility clinic, only increases uncertainty. As such, practicing Muslims often struggle to find appropriate support and religious guidance during fertility treatment. Within their own communities, two key barriers have emerged: Those seeking Islamic rulings on IVF – a commonly recommended fertility treatment – often encounter silence or rejection. Many local Imams, who are typically male, are not easily accessible to Muslim women. At the same time, questions about IVF are frequently dismissed as too sensitive or taboo, even by the broader community. Most participants in our research had been experiencing their fertility journey in a marginalised and isolated way. The isolation is not just in being childless: they are also left behind when it comes to accessing the religious /faith guidance they require when considering medical intervention. The ripple effect Caught between indifference from both spiritual leaders and clinicians, many participants said they withdrew from community life or delayed care. Others turned to YouTube fatwas (rulings on Islamic law) and global WhatsApp groups for guidance. One Muslim man spoke of doing his own research to find out if IVF was halal after being rejected by the local Imam. 'As we did not really get the answers [on IVF] from the local Imams, we then used YouTube of the Ustadz we knew from Indonesia. From him, he explained that IVF is halal as long as the egg and the sperm are from the married couple.' Melon*, an Indonesian woman who has been trying to conceive with her husband for 10 years without success, eventually reached out to her relatives in her home country through WhatsApp. She wasn't alone in using social media for support; Semangka and her husband Ahmad, who were advised to consider IVF, also connected with their Indonesian friends back home to seek clarity on the Islamic perspective. Abla*, an Indian woman in her 30s who had been trying to have her second child, did not even bother to consult or ask the local Imams, as she understood it too well that she would be rejected due to being a woman and also because of the topic. 'I googled it. I didn't really consult any Islamic scholars. I also consulted some people in India [via social media] to learn if IVF was halal for Muslims.' While they proved that Muslims will make use of technology to reconcile their Islamic faith and their desire to parenthood, it also revealed something bigger. Migrant communities, often isolated, experienced structural discrimination in that they cannot access faith-based assisted reproductive technologies. Abla was once advised by her specialist to consider third-party reproduction (in other words, a donor). While the specialist may have intended to present all the options, Abla found this suggestion offensive to her faith, especially since she had made her (Sunni) Muslim identity known to health providers during the treatment. However, she chose to remain silent about her feelings, fearing that expressing her opinion might be perceived as 'rude' or 'asking too much'. For our Muslim research participants, New Zealand fertility clinics currently offer little in the way of faith-based or culturally responsive options for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). As a result, Muslim patients are often left to reconcile medical advice with their religious beliefs on their own. The same is true when they have to face miscarriage or failed insemination. While counselling treatment is offered, the service is secular which, for our participants, does not address their faith needs. While participants were appreciative of all the services and care given by health providers and the government, the lack of support from both religious and medical systems has left many Muslim women and couples feeling isolated and marginalised. What does it mean for Aotearoa? This isn't just a Muslim issue, it's about ensuring Aotearoa's healthcare and communities uplift all who call this land home. Some options: – Imams and doctors collaborating on faith-aware fertility guidelines. – Training programmes to help clinics navigate religious sensitivities. – Community-led initiatives normalising these conversations (this may need to involve the Muslim women organisations). With New Zealand's fertility rates declining and diversity growing, addressing these gaps isn't just compassionate, it's urgent. The country needs more inclusive, culturally aware healthcare and community support structures. Zainab and Ali finally underwent IVF in their home country after navigating the religious and financial aspects, which took a considerable amount of time. Because of the delayed care in Aotearoa, Zainab became too old (40) to apply for public funding for IVF treatment. If the religious guidance they needed had been available to them sooner, Zainab might still have been eligible for funding and been able to access the better medical treatment offered by fertility clinics in Aotearoa. A couple of years later, Zainab and Ali's last treatment in their home country was unsuccessful. They still wanted to try but Zainab was not getting any younger. As they expressed to me before we parted: 'Perhaps we are not blessed to be parents, and there is something better that God will provide to us.' This piece has been written and published as part of a Marsden research project, which investigates the accessibility of assisted reproduction technologies in Aotearoa. The project is led by associate professor Sharyn Graham Davies, who was previously at AUT and is now at Monash University in Australia.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Radiology Backlog Cleared At Taranaki Base Hospital
Hon Simeon Brown Minister of Health Health Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the clearance of a significant radiology backlog at Taranaki Base Hospital, calling it a practical outcome that puts patients first. 'In March, more than 6,000 x-ray reports were sitting unprocessed at Taranaki Base Hospital. That was causing unacceptable delays for patients needing diagnosis and treatment,' Mr Brown says. 'People in Taranaki deserve access to timely, high-quality healthcare – and that includes getting diagnostic results back quickly. With the backlog now cleared and all results referred back to GPs, patients are now receiving their results.' To address the backlog, Health New Zealand made full use of available public radiology resources and engaged private imaging providers to boost reporting capacity and return results directly to patients' GPs. 'This was a practical, solutions-focused response. By combining public capacity with private sector support, the backlog was cleared efficiently, and care has been sped up for thousands of people.' Outsourcing remains in place to manage ongoing demand and reduce the risk of future backlogs. 'Taranaki Base Hospital will continue to use private capacity where needed – an approach that is consistent with the Government's broader strategy to reduce waitlists across the health system. "Our focus on reducing waitlists has already resulted in more than 8,600 additional elective procedures being delivered through outsourcing. It's a clear example of how we can apply the same approach to diagnostics – using targeted outsourcing to deliver faster care. 'We are committed to practical improvements that reduce delays, support frontline services, and deliver better outcomes for patients. 'This result in Taranaki shows what can be achieved when we stay focused on what matters – making sure New Zealanders get the care they need, when they need it,' Mr Brown says.
