Senate version of Trump agenda cuts more from Medicaid: GOP aides
The Senate's version of a bill to enact President Trump's agenda goes further than a House-passed bill to reduce Medicaid spending, according to GOP aides familiar with the legislation.
GOP aides say it will go further to tighten Medicaid eligibility requirements and to restrict states from using health care provider taxes to draw down more federal Medicaid funding.
'It's still f'd up,' said a GOP aide about the Senate's Medicaid legislation, which does nothing to alleviate the concerns of several Senate Republicans who raised objections to the Medicaid language in the House-passed bill.
At least four Republican senators have publicly raised concerns that Medicaid spending cuts passed by the House could hurt their constituents: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Josh Hawley (R), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska).
Senate GOP leaders can afford to lose only three votes and still pass the party-line bill.
A broad range of GOP senators, including Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Sens. Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mike Lee (Utah) and Rick Scott (Fla.) had called for more deficit reduction in the bill, which is expected to spend roughly $150 billion on border security and immigration enforcement and increase defense spending by another $150 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Flattery or Discipline? The Difficult Task of Managing Trump.
Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada began by wishing President Trump a happy birthday. He emphasized the importance of U.S. leadership in the Group of 7 alliance, which is meeting in Alberta, Canada. But after seven minutes of questioning by journalists during which Mr. Trump complained about Russia's absence at the summit and attacked Democrats over immigration policies, the host of the summit had heard enough. He took a step forward and into the center of the frame and effectively stopped the questioning, preventing the American president from saying more. With war raging in the Middle East and U.S. tariffs hammering his own country's economy as well as global trade, Mr. Carney was intent on limiting the chances of a Trump-related derailment of the gathering. 'If you don't mind, I'm going to exercise my role, if you will, as G7 chair, since we have a few more minutes with the president and his team and then we actually have to start the meeting to address some of these big issues,' Mr. Carney said. 'So, merci beaucoup.' With that, the press was rapidly escorted out of the room. The brief moment at the start of the gathering provided a window into a daunting challenge for world leaders entering the summit: Just what is the best way to manage Mr. Trump on the global stage? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax and spending bill by July 4
Top Senate Republicans are running into some resistance from several key senators about the details of President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' potentially complicating plans to deliver that package by their own July 4 deadline. Hours after unveiling central tenets of the Senate GOP's measure, at least one GOP senator – conservative Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin – said he is currently opposed to the bill, saying it doesn't do enough to control US spending. He added there's 'no way' the bill can be fixed in time to pass by July 4. 'Not by July 4th. No way. We haven't had the discussions we need,' Johnson said. Two more GOP senators were noncommittal on the bill but raised issues with one major piece of it – a crackdown on the so-called provider tax that some states rely on to help fund their Medicaid programs. Those included Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine. Hawley said he was taken 'completely off-guard' by the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of Trump's bill. 'This is a major departure from the House framework. This took me totally by surprise,' Hawley told reporters after he stepped out of a meeting on the bill with his fellow Republican senators. Collins confirmed to reporters that she also has problems with the provider tax, but declined to go into the details of the bill. Asked if she had been consulted throughout the process and had been listened to, she said: 'Sometimes yes and sometimes no.' And it's not just those three: Sen. Rick Scott of Florida wouldn't say he is a yes, signaling he wants to see even more reforms to Medicaid. And Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, too, was noncommittal, saying, 'I'm still reading.' The early reactions from those senators previews a tricky battle ahead for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who can afford to lose only three GOP votes on Trump's final tax and spending bill. Thune and his leadership team must satisfy their hard-right members, like Johnson and Scott, without losing equally vocal Republicans like Hawley, who has vowed to tank any bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. GOP leaders are racing to put their bill on the floor next week, eager to deliver Trump a win on tax breaks, spending cuts and additional military money, particularly as he faces a quickly escalating international crisis in the Middle East. But multiple rank-and-file Republicans are eager to make their own changes to Trump's bill, aware that the giant policy measure may be their only chance to get their own priorities passed. Ultimately, GOP leaders are betting that there aren't enough Republicans in their chamber willing to defy Trump and that they will get the votes they need, even if it takes more time. 'Everybody's got an opinion, and I think it's gonna be that way right up until we vote,' Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota told reporters.
Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
"She's missing stuff": Norton's colleagues see signs of decline
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) has long been a formidable presence in the halls of Congress despite her non-voting status. Now at 88 years old, some of her colleagues tell Axios that presence has diminished considerably. Why it matters: Lawmakers said Norton has been much less involved recently at critical moments for the District, as President Trump and his allies in Congress threaten overturning the city's laws and squeeze its budget. One House Democrat who knows Norton's work from the Oversight Committee told Axios that during efforts to pass D.C. statehood in 2020 and 2021, she "wasn't talking to many people." The lawmaker described a similar dynamic earlier this year when Congress passed a measure that unexpectedly forced D.C. to cut $1.1 billion from its budget. "There was a time when she lobbied her colleagues to explain D.C.'s positions," they said. "She doesn't do that anymore." The big picture: While she possesses a robust staff, Norton herself keeps public appearances to a minimum. On rare occasions Norton has talked to reporters this year, her staff twice walked back her answers. Last week Norton staffers hedged after she told reporters she planned to run for a 19th term next year. Mayor Muriel Bowser has ramped up her Hill lobbying in recent years on issues like statehood and revamping RFK Stadium. Norton's floor time dropped from 44 days between 2019 to 2020 to just 18 days from 2023 to 2024. She's spoken a handful of times so far this year. What she's saying: "Last Congress I successfully blocked nearly all of the 100+ federal legislative attacks on D.C," Norton told Axios in a statement, touting getting the statehood bill passed twice in the House. Norton said her office "was on the phone with Republican leadership within minutes" about the D.C. budget issue, adding she has "publicly highlighted this injustice nearly 70 times since then ... and I have no plans to stop until the bill is passed." "D.C. residents have embraced me as their 'Warrior on the Hill,' where I've been privileged to have a long and successful tenure defending D.C. residents." What we're hearing: "She's missing stuff," a senior House Democrat said of Norton's apparent decline, telling Axios that Democratic leadership's deliberations about her potential reelection bid are "delicate." A third House Democrat said their own observation of Norton from working with her on a committee is that she essentially goes through the motions and little else: "She shows up to committee, she reads the speech." "All of that is true," said a fourth House Democrat. "She reads what her staff puts in front of her. She can't say anything she's not reading. That's a staff-driven office now, just like you saw in the Senate with Feinstein," referencing the late California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein. The other side: Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), the acting ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, said Norton has been "more visible than I've seen most members" as the panel has considered D.C.-related bills. "From my own observation, I think she's trying to work her tail off, to be honest with you," Lynch said of Norton. "I see a very productive member." State of play: Norton publicly maintains she is still considering a reelection bid as D.C. Council members publicly express concerns about her running. "Through thoughtful discussions with my friends, family, and closest advisors, I'm still considering my options for the next election cycle," she said in her statement on Monday. Between the lines: Many House Democrats declined to weigh in on whether Norton should run — largely because they haven't spoken with her. "I don't know that I'm ready to bury [her] yet," said D.C.-area Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.). "We just haven't had conversations about it one way or the other — I haven't anyway." Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told Axios: "I haven't seen her in a little bit, so I haven't had a chance to hear what she has to say."
