&w=3840&q=100)
Donald Trump's new travel ban takes effect: Here's what we know so far
A new travel ban issued by US President Donald Trump takes effect today. The ban, signed under Executive Order 14161 on January 20, 2025, bars citizens from 12 countries — including Afghanistan, Haiti, and Iran — from entering the United States. According to AFP, the ban especially impacts refugees and immigrants.
Trump's administration says the move aims to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors', citing national security concerns such as visa overstays and potential terrorist threats. The ban will take effect at 9.31 pm (IST) on Monday.
The full entry ban applies to Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.
Trump also imposed partial travel restrictions on seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.
What does a US travel ban mean?
A travel ban is a government measure that prevents people from certain countries or regions from entering a country. Under President Trump's 2025 policy, the United States introduced a ban that fully blocks citizens of 12 countries — including Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, and Somalia — from entering the country, no matter the reason for their visit.
These bans are generally put in place for national security reasons, such as high rates of people overstaying visas, poor screening practices by foreign governments, or fears that travellers from those countries might pose a threat. The Trump administration pointed to these security issues as the reason for the 2025 ban, arguing that it was needed to keep Americans safe from possible risks posed by visitors from these countries.
Reasons cited for travel ban
The administration says countries included in the ban either face severe crises, have strained relations with the US, or lack 'competent' authorities to process passports and vet travelers. Trump cited an attack on Jewish protestors in Colorado by a man who allegedly overstayed his visa as a reason for tightening entry requirements.
'[The attack] underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted,' Trump said. He added that Iran is listed because it is a 'state sponsor of terrorism', while other countries have high visa overstay rates or inadequate screening systems.
Exceptions and legal challenges
Although the ban covers a wide range of travelers, there are some exceptions:
-Journalists, students, workers, and lecturers with valid offers or employment contracts in the US
-Infants, adopted children, and those needing urgent medical treatment
-Travelers with essential business or professional commitments in the US
-Permanent residents of Canada applying for a visa from within Canada
-Athletes participating in the 2026 World Cup or the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics
-Diplomats
The ban has sparked criticism from human rights groups, politicians, and advocacy organizations. UN rights chief Volker Turk said, 'The broad and sweeping nature of the new travel ban raises concerns from the perspective of international law.'
Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari, who is Iranian-American, also spoke out: 'I know the pain that Trump's cruel and xenophobic travel bans inflict because my family has felt it firsthand. We will fight this ban with everything we have.'
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Democracy Forward filed a class action lawsuit, JGG vs Trump, seeking to block the policy in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The Venezuelan government also condemned the ban as unjust.
Looking ahead: More countries next?
While the ban does not affect existing visa holders, new applicants from the listed countries face tough restrictions. US officials have warned that new countries could be added 'as threats emerge around the world'.
Sectors such as healthcare, STEM, and education may face challenges as the ban limits the arrival of foreign workers. As the policy takes effect, advocacy groups and affected families continue to fight its impact in court and in their communities.
[With agency inputs]

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump backs arrest threat against California Governor Newsom: ‘I would do it if I were Tom'
US President Donald Trump escalated his feud with California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday (June 9), suggesting that Newsom should be arrested after publicly daring Border Czar, Tom Homan, to do so. Speaking briefly to reporters after landing at the White House, Trump responded to Newsom's defiant remarks made during a TV interview. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Homan. 'I like Gavin Newsom… he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent.' The remarks come days after Newsom challenged Homan on MSNBC, saying: 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me… So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' Newsom's comments were a direct response to Homan's warning that state officials who interfere with federal immigration operations could face felony charges. Tensions between California and federal authorities have intensified following a surge in immigration raids in Los Angeles. Homan, speaking earlier with NBC News, warned that local leaders obstructing immigration enforcement could be prosecuted. 'You cross that line, it's a felony,' Homan said. 'It's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.' He also made it clear that federal agents would not back down from operations in Los Angeles, regardless of resistance from state or city officials. In a Truth Social post, Trump doubled down on his criticism of Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, sarcastically suggesting they should be thanking him instead of pushing back against federal action. 'The very incompetent 'Governor,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR,'' Trump wrote. 'Instead, they choose to lie… by saying that we weren't needed, and that these are 'peaceful protests.' Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction tells you all you have to know.' This latest clash underscores the deepening divide between federal and California state officials over immigration policy and public safety. Newsom and Bass have condemned the use of National Guard troops to quell protests against anti-ICE immigration raids, warning it could escalate tensions in an already volatile environment. Governor Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass have both criticised the deployment of over 2,000 National Guard troops authorised by Trump in response to the protests, warning it could escalate violence rather than restore order. In a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Newsom requested the federal troops be returned to state control, emphasising that 'State and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources and safeguard life and property.' Protests escalated across Los Angeles and San Francisco over the weekend after President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops without California Governor Gavin Newsom's request — a rare move that ignited political tensions and street chaos. Around 300 National Guard troops were sent to Los Angeles to protect federal buildings. Trump defended the move, saying, 'We're gonna have troops everywhere.' On Truth Social, he added, 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' California leaders slammed the deployment. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty,' said Governor Newsom. LA Mayor Karen Bass accused Trump of pursuing 'another agenda — this isn't about public safety.' Protesters shut down the 101 Freeway, set Waymo cars on fire, and clashed with law enforcement. Police used tear gas and rubber bullets. 'We were not notified in advance of the raids,' said LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, who confirmed arrests and violent flare-ups. Calling the unrest 'migrant riots,' Trump declared, 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free.' He directed federal agencies to coordinate a crackdown and urged more troops: 'Don't let these thugs get away with this.' Similar protests erupted in San Francisco, where 60 people were arrested and three officers injured. 'Violence — especially against SFPD officers — will never be tolerated,' the department said. With Marines placed on standby and cities reeling from the clashes, California faces an intensifying standoff between federal authority and state leaders.


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
NATO chief calls for 'quantum leap' in defence and says Russia could attack in 5 years
NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance said Monday, warning that Moscow could be ready to attack it within five years. Secretary-General Mark Rutte said during a visit to London that he expects the 32 NATO members to agree to a big hike in military spending at a summit in the Netherlands this month. Speaking at the Chatham House think tank, Rutte said Russia is outpacing the far bigger NATO in producing ammunition, and the alliance must take a "quantum leap" in collective defense. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo "Wishful thinking will not keep us safe," Rutte said. "We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance." Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on "defense-related expenditure" such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. Live Events At the moment, 22 of the 32 members meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target, which was set in 2014. Rutte said he expects all to reach 2% by the end of this year. The new target would meet a demand by U.S. President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte said he agreed that "America has carried too much of the burden for too long." Rutte said NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. "We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies," he said. "Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years," Rutte added. "We are all on the eastern flank now." Rutte also held talks Monday with Prime Minister Keir Starmer and praised the U.K.'s commitment to increase defense spending as "very good stuff." Starmer has pledged to boost military spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become "a battle-ready, armor-clad nation." The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
3rd Ocean Conference: UN calls for global action to protect oceans and marine biodiversity in high seas
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres (Image credit: AP) New Delhi: Calling for an end to ocean plunder, the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday said the ocean is the ultimate shared resource, but the world is failing it. "The deep sea cannot become the wild west. We live in an age of turmoil, but the resolve I see here gives me hope... we can move from plunder to protection," said Guterres, as he opened the third UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, where over 150 countries, including India, are participating to find ways to protect the oceans from over-exploitation, pollution, and biodiversity loss. India is represented there by a team of scientists led by Union minister of earth sciences Jitendra Singh. One of the summit's core objectives is to help bring into force the landmark High Seas Treaty adopted in 2023 to safeguard life in international waters through long-term protection of marine biodiversity in the high seas. Sixty ratifications are required for the treaty to become a legally binding international law. The conference is expected to bring enough countries on board as 50 countries have, so far, already submitted their ratifications and 15 more have formally committed to joining them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Samsun: Yeni İşitme Cihazları Emeklileri Hayrete Düşürdü Best Hearing Aids Undo 'This means that the political agreement has been reached, which allows us to say that this [Treaty] will be properly implemented,' said French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country is co-hosting the summit alongside Costa Rica. Macron, while addressing the opening session of the conference, made an urgent call for multilateral mobilisation to save the oceans. Insisting that the fate of the seas cannot be left to markets or opinion, he said, "The first response is therefore multilateralism... If the earth is warming, the ocean is boiling. The climate, like biodiversity, is not a matter of opinion; it is a matter of scientifically established facts.' Singh, while speaking on the sidelines, said that the challenges of the ocean concerns need to be addressed collectively because nearly 70% of the earth's surface is occupied by oceans and the oceans know no political or geographical boundaries. The good and bad effects emanating from the oceans affect humanity, regardless of nationality or the country, he added.