logo
Milwaukee losing another federal lifeline. Impact will be swift and devastating.

Milwaukee losing another federal lifeline. Impact will be swift and devastating.

Yahoo15-04-2025

On April 1, the Trump administration fired the entire federal staff responsible for administering the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, a $4.1 billion program that helps millions of families afford heat and electricity. Starting today We Energies, the most profitable monopoly utility in the state of Wisconsin, will end its winter shutoff moratorium.
Amidst a manufactured crisis at the federal level, our utilities will soon start cutting off power for tens of thousands of working-class residents at the very same time that emergency relief services lose all capacity to respond. For reference, in 2023, the federal program restored or prevented nearly 85,000 disconnections across the state.
This means that thousands of Milwaukeeans will face imminent (and entirely avoidable) blackouts, while $378 million in federal relief sits untouched – a ruthless efficiency that requires exceedingly small sacrifice from those with obscene political influence and concentrated wealth, and that exacts life-altering consequences from those of us with neither.
Opinion: Married women could face new obstacles to vote. This is what conservatives want.
We ought to call this what it so clearly is: a coordinated assault on the poor because of their poverty. Congress allocated the money. Hard-working families need the help. Instead, political sabotage by multi-billionaires in the federal executive branch and profit-maximizing imperatives of multi-billion-dollar investor-owned utility have cast literal darkness across our neighborhoods – conditions that, as study after study confirms, increase winter mortality, worsen respiratory illness, destabilize housing and break apart families.
Abandonment and punishment rarely, if ever, generate wholeness or healing. When the former happen simultaneously, the odds shrink to zero that the latter can ever emerge peacefully. What arises in the organized absence of safety or care are the very social phenomena – poverty, eviction, homelessness and so-called lawlessness – that then justify the further marginalization and increased criminalization of those abandoned by the state and punished by private corporations.
In Wisconsin, the state not only allows We Energies to punish the poor in this way, but it actively enables it through relaxed regulation, guaranteed profit structures and a Public Service Commission that has so far refused to enforce meaningful accountability in true service to the public.
Opinion: Changes to Social Security would cost average Wisconsin resident $7,000 a year
Energy insecurity doesn't just dim the lights – it shortens lifespans. And in We Energies' service territory, it compounds the racialized energy burden that already forces Black and brown households to pay a disproportionate share of their income to keep the heat on.
Meanwhile, the very institutions tasked with ensuring public well-being continue to collapse around us. Last year, the Social Development Commission – once a vital anchor in the heart of Lindsay Heights – closed its doors. Whatever the stated reasons, the outcome remains the same: another critical site of support in a historically divested neighborhood disappeared, reinforcing a broader pattern of systemic retreat in the places that need the most investment.
That same pattern plays out now, as federal agencies dissolve essential energy assistance programs under the guise of efficiency, while our Public Service Commission stalls on the very solution it already agreed was necessary. In 2022, the Commission directed We Energies to work with Walnut Way and other rate case intervenors to co-develop an alternative low-income assistance program in response to Wisconsin's affordability crisis and racialized disparities in energy burden.
The community's clear demand: a Percentage of Income Payment Program that would cap energy bills at 2% of household income. Nearly two and a half years later, the need has only grown more urgent – yet the PSC has failed to act. As disconnections resume and federal help evaporates, that failure now puts thousands of lives at risk.
Opinion: Wisconsin Republicans keep trotting out Milwaukee vote trope as built-in excuse
As a society, we cannot normalize a government that abandons us under the myth that we've somehow been given too much, nor accept a utility that punishes us for not having enough. We cannot treat disconnection, displacement or death as the price of policy inertia. We must name what's happening, resist it and build something that reflects our values of dignity, justice and love.
At Walnut Way, a community-based organization in its 25th year of supporting the residents of Lindsay Heights, we organize, invest and build. Our efforts, from installing solar panels and rain barrels to raising awareness about the energy burden and organizing for structural change, offer a roadmap for community-rooted infrastructure that meets energy needs, keeps people housed and creates local jobs. We're not waiting on a bailout. We're building the alternative.
We must stop managing the fallout of abandonment and start confronting the systems that produce it. We don't need nonprofits to patch holes in a sinking ship – we need public institutions to be accountable to the people they were built to serve. And we need them to follow the lead of those already doing the work.
The safety net didn't break. The state is cutting it, and the corporations are pulling the threads. And now the lives of our elders, our children and our communities hang in the balance. So yes – we mend. But we do more than repair what was never designed to hold us. We build something stronger, rooted in care, in justice, and in our refusal to abandon each other. Not just to survive the storm, but to weatherproof the future for all of us.
Bryan Rogers is the Environmental Justice Director at Walnut Way and leads the Environmental Justice and Infrastructure Initiative, a statewide formation advancing energy justice and community-led solutions to environmental racism and systemic disinvestment.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Poor people will suffer from coordinated assault on poverty | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Guatemalan man deported to Mexico returns to US after court orders Trump administration to do so
Guatemalan man deported to Mexico returns to US after court orders Trump administration to do so

Associated Press

time9 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Guatemalan man deported to Mexico returns to US after court orders Trump administration to do so

A Guatemalan man deported to Mexico, whom President Donald Trump's administration was working to bring back after a court order, landed in the United States on Wednesday, his attorneys confirmed. The man, identified in court documents by initials O.C.G., landed in California via a commercial flight and made contact with his legal team while waiting in line to go through U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said Trina Realmuto of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. 'We expect that he will be detained, but we don't know where yet,' she said in an email to The Associated Press. The Trump administration said in court filings last month that it was working to bring him back after he was deported to Mexico, despite his fears of being harmed there, days after a federal judge ordered the administration to facilitate his return. The U.S. Department of Justice didn't immediately respond to a request for comments and details from the AP. The man, who is gay, was protected from being returned to his home country under a U.S. immigration judge's order at the time. But the U.S. put him on a bus and sent him to Mexico instead, a removal that U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy found likely 'lacked any semblance of due process.' Mexico later returned him to Guatemala, where he was in hiding, according to court documents. In a court filing before his return, government lawyers said that a so-called significant public benefit parole packet had been approved. The designation allows people who aren't eligible to enter the U.S. to do so temporarily, often for reasons related to law enforcement or legal proceedings. An earlier court proceeding had determined that the man risked persecution or torture if returned to Guatemala. But he also feared returning to Mexico, where he says he was raped and extorted while seeking asylum in the U.S., according to court documents. 'As far as we know, it is the first time since January 20 that (Department of Homeland Security) has facilitated return following a district court order,' Realmuto said. The case is among a string of findings by federal courts against recent Trump administration deportations. Those have included other deportations to third countries and the erroneous deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadoran man who had lived in Maryland for roughly 14 years. The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. from a notorious Salvadoran prison, rejecting the White House's claim that it couldn't retrieve him after mistakenly deporting him. Both the White House and the El Salvadoran president have said they are powerless to return him.

Hakeem Jeffries calls Elon Musk's attacks on Trump-backed budget bill "the stone-cold reality"
Hakeem Jeffries calls Elon Musk's attacks on Trump-backed budget bill "the stone-cold reality"

CBS News

time9 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Hakeem Jeffries calls Elon Musk's attacks on Trump-backed budget bill "the stone-cold reality"

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, says he agrees with Elon Musk's characterization of President Trump's domestic policy bill as a "disgusting abomination," torching what he called a "Republican civil war" among GOP lawmakers in an interview with CBS News. "What Elon Musk said is the stone-cold reality," Jeffries said in an interview with "CBS Evening News" co-anchor Maurice DuBois of Mr. Trump's "big, beautiful bill" — which passed the House last month. "When you try to take away healthcare from more than 15 million Americans, that's a disgusting abomination," Jeffries said of the cuts to Medicaid included in the bill. "When you are endeavoring to rip food, literally, out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors with the largest cut to nutritional assistance in American history, that is a disgusting abomination. And it's certainly a disgusting abomination, when all of this is being done to provide massive tax breaks to their billionaire donors, and they're going to stick the American people with the bill and increase the debt by trillions of dollars." Musk's "disgusting abomination" comments came in a post on X Tuesday, calling the bill "outrageous" and "pork-filled." Musk and Jeffries' criticisms of the bill differ: Musk has attacked the legislation's price tag, while Jeffries has criticized its cuts to Medicaid and food stamp spending — though the Democratic leader has also pushed back on its cost. Musk previously criticized the bill last month, telling "CBS Sunday Morning" correspondent David Pogue he's "disappointed" by the bill's cost. His comments are striking because Musk was previously a key ally of President Trump, helping to lead the Trump administration's effort to reduce the size of the federal government. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has pushed back against Musk, defending the bill and calling his criticisms "flat wrong." Musk's criticisms come as Senate Republicans prepare to take up the domestic policy bill, which extends Mr. Trump's signature 2017 tax cuts, imposes work requirements on some Medicaid recipients, adds new restrictions to food stamps and boosts border spending. Some senators are pushing for changes — including a few who are skeptical of its changes to Medicaid. Any changes passed by the Senate will also need to be approved by the House. "What we see right now is a Republican civil war," Jeffries said. "Elon Musk is attacking the GOP tax scam, this reckless budget that's going to hurt everyday Americans. House Republicans are attacking Senate Republicans, Senate Republicans are attacking House Republicans." See more from the interview with Jeffries on the "CBS Evening News" Thursday.

Trump announces travel ban affecting a dozen countries set to go into effect Monday
Trump announces travel ban affecting a dozen countries set to go into effect Monday

Associated Press

time15 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Trump announces travel ban affecting a dozen countries set to go into effect Monday

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is resurrecting the travel ban policy from his first term, signing a proclamation Wednesday night preventing people from a dozen countries from entering the United States. The countries include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. In addition to the ban, which takes effect at 12:01 a.m. Monday, there will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. 'I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people,' Trump said in his proclamation. The list results from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the U.S. and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at ___ Amiri reported from the United Nations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store