logo
Chilling map reveals where 250m Americans would perish in a nuclear attack amid fears of WWIII

Chilling map reveals where 250m Americans would perish in a nuclear attack amid fears of WWIII

Daily Mail​3 days ago

Israel 's overnight attack on Iran 's nuclear facilities and missile factories has sparked fears that WWIII may be imminent.
While the White House played no direct role in the strike, President Donald Trump suggested that Iran had brought the attack on itself by resisting an ultimatum in talks to restrict its nuclear program.
While Iran does not possess such weapons yet, its allies Russia and China have more than 6,000 nuclear warheads combined.
Now, a map has resurfaced on online that illustrated the potential devastation of a large-scale nuclear attack on American soil.
It shows that nearly all major cities across the East Coast, Midwest, West Coast and South could be in the crosshairs, killing up to 250 million Americans, roughly 75 percent of the country's population.
Areas in California, much of the East Coast and large swaths of the Midwest would suffer severe radioactive fallout, forcing survivors to shelter in place for more than three weeks.
Only a few regions, including parts of West Texas, Nevada, Michigan, and Wisconsin, would avoid a direct blast, although even these areas would be profoundly affected by nuclear winter in the attack's aftermath.
The map was created using data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which models blast radius, fallout patterns, and radiation exposure based on detonation location and population density.
As well as densely populated cities, more than 100 military facilities would likely be prime targets, including sites that house Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) silos.
These silos are located in Montana, Colorado, Wyoming and North Dakota, and the map shows these regions would come under heavy attack.
Infrastructure such as power plants, transportation hubs, oil refineries and key communications centers would also be vulnerable if nuclear strikes were to take place.
Israel said Thursday evening it had no choice but to act against Iran before Tehran could develop a nuclear weapon.
The strikes hit more than 100 targets, including Iran's nuclear and military sites, and resulted in the deaths of several senior military figures.
On Friday, Trump warned Iran that further attacks would be 'even more brutal' if it failed to come to the negotiating table.
Russia condemned the attack, calling it unprovoked and a violation of the United Nations Charter.
Iran's ally, Russia, leads the world in nuclear warheads with about 5,580 in its arsenal, while the United States has 5,044. China's stockpile stands at 500 to 600 warheads.
The 2015 map, created by Halcyon Maps, a project that produces detailed maps on a range of topics, shows how fallout would rapidly spread across the country, turning targeted cities into danger zones and putting millions at risk of death from radiation.
It has since resurfaced this year amid growing military tensions worldwide.
Symptoms of radiation poisoning, depending on the dosage, can include nausea, fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea, skin damage, seizures and even coma. At high enough levels of exposure, these symptoms can manifest within minutes and become fatal.
Major metropolitan areas, including New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Houston, and Washington, DC, would likely be among the first to be hit.
That is because losing such cities would cripple the US economy, leadership and workforce.
Severe fallout would spread from Boston to New York City, Philadelphia and Chicago, engulfing millions of Americans in radioactive debris.
Hazardous areas are also expected along the California coast and near key military installations.
Surrounding these danger zones are medium-risk areas, where people would need to shelter in place for up to three weeks.
The map also illustrates how states like Georgia, Mississippi and Arkansas would suffer minimal fallout, suggesting residents there may not need to take protective measures.
The US has strategically positioned nuclear forces across the country that could become prime targets in a nuclear attack.
These sites include ICBM silos, naval and Air Force bases, and nuclear storage depots, all scattered across the nation.
Military targets are marked by red circles on the map, with the largest clusters located where the silos are based.
John Erath, the Senior Policy Director for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, told Newsweek: 'While those who live near military facilities, ICBM silos in the Midwest or submarine bases along the coasts might bear the most immediate and severe consequences of a nuclear attack, there's no question: Any nuclear war or weapons detonation would be bad for everyone.
'Nowhere is truly 'safe' from fallout and other consequences like contamination of food and water supplies and prolonged radiation exposure.'
Scientists have speculated that the 450 ICBM silos would serve as key targets in a nuclear attack due to their role in America's defense.
But the new map shows attacks could come from all directions, striking nearly 150 military sites across the country.
These targets include the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) in Colorado, the Pentagon, and naval bases in California and Washington.
Texas, California, and the Midwest show a high concentration of infrastructure targets, marked by yellow circles on the map.
The Mississippi River region also contains numerous infrastructure sites. likely to disrupt transport and commerce in the event of an attack.
Even if a global war is not on the horizon, the recent chaos on the world stage is a cause for concern, according to Dr John Schuessler, associate professor of international affairs at Texas A&M University.
'Americans are not wrong to worry about the United States getting dragged into wars where it is supporting one side against another,' Schuessler said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and other Republicans mock Democrats after Minnesota lawmaker killings
Trump and other Republicans mock Democrats after Minnesota lawmaker killings

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump and other Republicans mock Democrats after Minnesota lawmaker killings

Utah senator Mike Lee sounded like a lot of other Republican politicians after the fatal shootings of Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota this weekend. 'These hateful attacks have no place in Utah, Minnesota, or anywhere in America. Please join me in condemning this senseless violence, and praying for the victims and their families,' he wrote on Twitter/X. That was from his official account. On his personal X account, he posted a series of memes concerning the attacks that left former Minnesota state house speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark dead, and state senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette seriously injured. 'This is what happens When Marxists don't get their way,' Lee posted, along with a photo of the alleged gunman, who was arrested on Sunday. He followed that up by posting the photo and writing 'Nightmare on Waltz Street', an apparent misspelling of Tim Walz, the state's Democratic governor who became nationally known last year as Kamala Harris's running mate. Such was the split screen that played out among Republicans after the Saturday morning shootings, which were the latest in a wave of political violence across the United States that has most recently seen two assassination attempts targeting Donald Trump as he campaigned for president, a flamethrower attack on a rally for Israeli hostages in Colorado and a slew of threats targeting judges who have ruled against the US president. While many in the GOP condemned the attacks in Minnesota, others have used it as an opportunity to poke fun at their Democratic opponents, or suggest that they somehow instigated the violence. Experts warn it may be the latter statements that reach the bigger audience. 'I think there's no question that these messages are representative of the modern GOP more so than any stock thoughts and prayers tweet that a staffer puts up,' said Jon Lewis, a research fellow at George Washington University's Program on Extremism. Democrats have been unequivocal in condemning the shootings, as have Congress's top Republicans. 'Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it,' said House speaker, Mike Johnson. Senate majority leader, John Thune, said he was 'horrified at the events unfolding in Minnesota' and that 'political violence has no place in our nation'. Minnesota's Republican party condemned the shooting, as did the state's entire congressional delegation. But when it comes to Trump and his most vociferous allies on social media, the message is more mixed. Trump initially condemned the attacks, saying on Saturday: 'Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place!' But the following day, he struck a different tone, telling ABC News that the shooting was 'a terrible thing' but calling Walz 'a terrible governor' and 'a grossly incompetent person'. 'I may call him, I may call other people too,' he added. On Monday afternoon, Walz's office said Trump had not called. Meanwhile, on X, prominent rightwing figures were quick to promote conspiracy theories about what happened. Elon Musk, the erstwhile Trump sidekick who runs Tesla, shared a tweet from a pro-Trump account that read, in part: 'The left has become a full blown domestic terrorist organization.' 'The far left is murderously violent' Musk wrote in his reply, which Lee shared, adding: 'Fact check: TRUE'. Laura Loomer, the rightwing extremist who is said to have played a role in encouraging Trump to fire national security officials, alleged the suspect had ties to the 'No Kings' protests that took place nationwide on Saturday, and that Walz knew him. The spread of outlandish falsehoods and conspiracy theories on social media has been a hallmark of the atmosphere Trump has brought to US politics over the past decade, and Lewis believes the country is now at a point where such fabrications have more prominence than politicians' carefully written statements. 'The real problem now is that nothing matters, and I think that has been realized by the mainstream right in this country. There are no consequences for peddling disinformation or conspiracies,' he said. Robert Pape, director of the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats, said that the United States had entered an era of 'violent populism', and if Democrats and Republicans want to stop it, they need to issue joint statements speaking out against atrocities like what happened in Minnesota. 'You've got to start having some agreement here on negotiating these rules of the road, so to speak, because if each side continues to simply only accept unconditional surrender by the other, well, then just like in Ukraine, you're not going to end this thing very, very soon, and things will just escalate,' Pape said.

US Senate floats full phase-out of solar, wind energy tax credits by 2028
US Senate floats full phase-out of solar, wind energy tax credits by 2028

Reuters

time22 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Senate floats full phase-out of solar, wind energy tax credits by 2028

WASHINGTON, June 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate tax committee proposed a full phase-out of solar and wind energy tax credits by 2028, but extended the incentive to 2036 for Trump administration-favored hydropower, nuclear and geothermal energy, according to a draft bill circulated on Monday. The draft released by the committee chair, Republican Senator Mike Crapo, would begin phasing out tax credits enshrined by the Biden-era 2022 Inflation Reduction Act for solar and wind energy in 2026 by reducing the incentive to 60% of the credit's value and ending it by 2028. It would grant hydropower, nuclear and geothermal facilities 100% of the credit until 2033, and then phase it out to zero by 2036, according to the draft.

US Senate Republicans unveil proposed changes to Trump tax-cut bill
US Senate Republicans unveil proposed changes to Trump tax-cut bill

Reuters

time22 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Senate Republicans unveil proposed changes to Trump tax-cut bill

WASHINGTON, June 16 (Reuters) - Republicans who control the U.S. Senate Finance Committee unveiled changes to President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill on Monday that would make business-related tax breaks permanent while modifying Medicaid reforms and a new federal deduction for state and local taxes. The modified text of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act will now be debated by Senate Republicans as they try to move forward on an aggressive timeline to pass the legislation ahead of the July 4 U.S. holiday. The legislative text unveiled by the tax-writing committee is part of a larger set of modifications to the bill, which passed the Republican-controlled House of Representatives last month. A Senate-revised version of the original measure would need to be approved by the House before Trump could sign it into law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store