Maoists in statement blame Basvaraju caught alive & killed, say our leader was waiting for peace talks, got bullet
Raipur:
In one of the most successful security forces operation on Naxal front in Chhattisgarh, state forces had neutralized 28 Maoists, including the top most commander Basvaraju, last week.
Commenting on the encounter in a long press note, Maoists of Dandakaranya Special Zonal committee has blamed the govt for not paying heed to the repeated appeals for ceasefire and peace talks but killing a large number of cadres with huge force.
The Maoists revealed that there were 28 Maoists killed in Abujhmarh encounter, and the body of one cadre was taken by the Maoists while 27 bodies were recovered by the police.
In this encounter, from May 17 to 21, security forces had surrounded Maoists along with their senior most leader Basvaraju the general secretary of CPI (Maoists)- who carried reward of Rs 1 crore on his head in Chhattisgarh.
The latest statement by Vikalp, the spokesperson of Maoists, blames the govt of feeding its troops with supplies airdropped to them and for 60 hours, surrounded Maoists were left to live without any food or water. They have also blamed some of their cadres of ditching the movement and supporting security forces which they claim has made operation easier for police.
The press note said that in last six weeks, six of their people have surrendered before police and they helped security forces for this operation by revealing inside information of Maoist presence.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
These Laptops In Lurgan Are Selling Out Fast (Take A Look)
Laptop Clearance | Search Ads
Undo
The statement claims that their commander 'BR Dada' was persuaded by his colleagues to go away from that area but he was adamant not to leave his comrades, and he stayed there till he was caught alive and killed.
Maoist Vikalp claimed that in last 40 days, Maoists have not taken any armed action based on the suggestion of Basvaraju who wanted to create an amicable atmosphere for peace talks. He said, 'Out of the total of 35 people, 28 were neutralized and seven escaped alive.'
Police in its press note had claimed neutralizing 27 Maoists but this press note has mentioned one more casualty suffered by the banned outfit, whose body they managed to take away.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's ambition collides with law on sending migrants to dangerous countries
As the Trump administration ships migrants to countries around the world, it is abandoning a long-standing US policy of not sending people to places where they would be at risk of torture and other persecution. The principle emerged in international human rights law after World War II and is also embedded in US domestic law. It is called "non-refoulement," derived from a French word for return. The issue came into sharp relief in the past month as the Trump administration has tried to deport migrants with criminal records to Libya and South Sudan, countries considered so dangerous that they are on the State Department 's "do not travel" list. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Birla Evara 3 and 4 BHK from ₹ 1.68 Crore* Birla Estates Learn More Undo "What the US is doing runs afoul of the bedrock prohibition in US and international law of non-refoulement," said Robert K. Goldman, faculty director of the War Crimes Research Office at American University's law school. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) In a recent affidavit, Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the Trump administration's efforts to send migrants to those two countries as part of a diplomatic push to improve relations. He acknowledged that the Libyan capital, Tripoli, was wracked by violence and instability. Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump administration proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visas: memo To critics of the administration, the sworn statement shows that the United States is no longer considering whether a deportee is more likely than not to be at risk of abuse through repatriation or transfer to a third country. State Department employees were also recently told to stop noting in annual human rights reports whether a nation had violated its obligations not to send anyone "to a country where they would face torture or persecution." The State Department said in a statement that it dropped that requirement to focus the reports on "human rights issues themselves rather than a laundry list of politically biased demands and assertions." "Enforcing US immigration law, including removing those without a legal basis to remain in the United States, is critical to upholding the rule of law and protecting Americans," the statement said. You Might Also Like: Trump's ban on Harvard international students blocked by US judge A judge blocked the transfer of migrants to South Sudan, which is teetering on the brink of civil war, and the men were being held at a US military outpost in Djibouti pending more court action. The Trump administration is also in a showdown in another court over its transfer of Venezuelan deportees described as dangerous gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador without due process. "If they were sending them to Sweden, that would be a different thing than sending them to South Sudan, which is one of the most dangerous places on the planet," said Michael H. Posner, director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University's Stern School of Business. Posner, who was the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor from 2009 to 2013, said the United States could send someone from Cuba or Venezuela to another country if it had been determined at a hearing that the place was safe. "We should not be deporting people to third countries where they have no connections and where their lives will be in serious jeopardy," he said. You Might Also Like: Trump travel ban: Why is Trump banning millions from entering the US again? The White House likens its crackdown on illegal migration to combating a national security threat from a hostile enemy. It has pressed military troops into service at the southwestern border and at a small detention operation for migrants at Guantánamo Bay. But even after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States abided by its non-refoulement obligation for prisoners it was holding at Guantánamo Bay, during a period when it flouted international law by torturing other detainees in secret overseas prisons called black sites. In 2004, Secretary of State Colin Powell concluded that the United States would not repatriate Chinese citizens from the Uyghur Muslim minority who had been rounded up in the war against terrorism in 2001 and held at the military base at Guantánamo. The United States believed that the men would be at risk if they were sent to China. Eventually, in 2013, the State Department found other countries to take in all of the Uyghurs. In the past, State Department officials have essentially asked two questions to determine where a detainee could be sent: Would the destination be safe for the individual? Would the United States and its allies be safe if the person was sent there? US officials had to assess whether the receiving country could monitor the activities of the detainees to prevent them from endangering the United States or an ally. Officials were also required to assess whether a deportee would be subjected to torture or other inhumane treatment. The United States adopted the same approach to its efforts to send home Islamic State group members or their relatives who were being housed in camps in northern Syria. "Consistent with both long-standing policy and its legal obligations, the US government cannot send people to a country where there are substantial grounds to believe that they will be mistreated," said Ian Moss, a lawyer and a former senior counterterrorism official at the State Department. In his affidavit, Rubio accused the courts that were reviewing deportation challenges of undermining US foreign policy. He also said that plans to announce "expanded activities of a US energy company in Libya" had been postponed. Rubio did not mention whether any diplomatic agreements surrounding the proposed resettlement included guarantees about how the migrants would be treated. "If these individuals are as dangerous as the administration represents them to be," Moss said, "sending them to a conflict area or country where there is a lack of capacity to manage them undermines the national security justification," Moss said. The State Department statement referred questions about "the removals process, including screening for credible or reasonable fear," to the Department of Homeland Security . The eight men who were to be sent to South Sudan were at a holding site in Texas when they were informed of their destination. An immigration division official, Garrett J. Ripa, said in a sworn statement May 23 that none of the men declared himself afraid to go. Court records showed that an immigration officer gave the men a form that listed their intended place of deportation. None signed the document. "By not signing, people are protesting being sent to a third country in the only way they know how," said Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants in the case. Administration officials had previously planned to deport one of the men to Libya, which has been so unstable that Congress has since 2015 not allowed detainees who are cleared for release from Guantánamo Bay to be sent there.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian diaspora to benefit as Canada proposes expansion of citizenship by descent
In a significant move expected to benefit the Indian diaspora and other immigrant communities, the Canadian government has introduced a new bill to remove the existing limit on citizenship by descent. The legislation, titled Bill C-3, was presented in Parliament on Thursday by Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab, as per a report by Lubna Kably in the Times of India. The current rule, introduced in 2009, restricts Canadian citizenship by descent to only the first generation born outside Canada. This means that a Canadian citizen who was themselves born outside Canada could not pass on their citizenship to a child born abroad. Similarly, they could not apply for direct citizenship for a child adopted overseas. The proposed bill aims to change this. According to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada ( IRCC ), 'As a result of the first-generation limit to citizenship by descent for individuals born abroad, most Canadian citizens who are citizens by descent cannot pass on citizenship to their child born or adopted outside Canada. The current first-generation limit to citizenship no longer reflects how Canadian families live today—here at home and around the world—and the values that define our country.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Infertile Man Visits Orphanage And Hears, 'Hi Daddy.' Then He Realizes His Late Wife's Cruel Lies Crowdy Fan Undo As per Lubna's report in TOI, the issue has drawn legal scrutiny in recent years. In January 2024, a Canadian court ruled the first-generation limit unconstitutional. The government chose not to appeal the ruling. Although similar legislation was proposed in March 2024 by then-Immigration Minister Marc Miller, it did not pass, prompting its reintroduction this week. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) If passed, Bill C-3 would automatically grant citizenship to individuals who would have been eligible if not for the earlier restrictions. It also proposes a new system under which Canadian parents born abroad can pass on citizenship to their foreign-born children—provided the parent has lived in Canada for at least 1,095 days (or three years) before the child's birth or adoption. Live Events You Might Also Like: Canada's new bill to grant citizenship to thousands of people Ken Nickel-Lane, managing director of an immigration services firm, said to The Times of India, 'While Bill C-3 certainly addresses and rectifies a fault, or faults in the current Citizenship Act which certainly is warranted and just, it may face challenges given current public opinion towards immigration.' He added that the bill might put pressure on immigration quotas, potentially affecting temporary foreign workers critical to infrastructure and housing development. The IRCC has confirmed that, 'If the bill passes both Houses of Parliament and receives Royal Assent, we will work as quickly as possible to bring the changes into effect.' For many Indian-origin Canadians with children or adopted children born outside Canada, the bill—if passed—will mark a major shift in access to citizenship and legal status. You Might Also Like: Canada's first Express Entry draw under new Immigration Minister invites 277 applications
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gold medalist CA Akshata Pai, not a cricket fan, took leave out of curiosity, dies in RCB celebration stampede in Bengaluru
Akshata Pai, a 26-year-old chartered accountant from Mulki, died in a crowd surge during the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) IPL victory celebration held in Bengaluru on Wednesday. She and her husband, Ashay Amballi, had taken a half-day leave from work to attend the event, which saw thousands gather near Chinnaswamy Stadium. The couple became separated in the crowd, and Akshata was later found dead at Bowring Hospital. Married recently, settled in Bengaluru Akshata, who had completed her CA in her first attempt, married Ashay Ranjan Amballi from Siddapur in Uttara Kannada about one and a half years ago. The couple had settled in Bengaluru, where Ashay works as a software engineer. They had returned home to attend the Bappanadu fair and decided to witness the RCB celebration, although Akshata was not an active cricket follower. 'We don't know how or why she went there,' says uncle The shocked family shared the family's disbelief with Udayavani. 'She was not the kind of girl to attend victory rallies or public events like this. We don't understand how or why she ended up there,' Akshata's uncle told a local news site. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Container Houses Indonesia (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo The family found Akshata's body after searching hospitals for nearly four hours. She had reportedly fallen in the crowd, and her husband lost sight of her. Husband recounts the horrific incident from the stadium As per the local report Akshata and her husband took a half-day leave to attend the IPL victory celebration at Chinnaswamy Stadium. As the crowd surged toward the gate, husband recounted that people started falling over each other. I was holding my wife's hand and took support from a barricade beside me, but the stampede caused both of us to fall to the ground. I shouted for help. Someone pulled me aside, but I lost sight of my wife. I looked everywhere, called the police and even checked hospitals nearby. Finally, I found her body at Bowring Hospital. By then, it was too late,' husband told a local news site. Live Events You Might Also Like: Chinnaswamy Stadium Stampede: What triggered the deadly chaos at RCB's victory celebration in Bengaluru? Karnataka High Court steps in Taking serious note of the stampede that occurred outside Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium, the Karnataka High Court on 5 June issued a notice to the state government. The court has asked for a detailed report on the incident, which led to the death of 11 people and injuries to many others. Court initiates suo motu petition The High Court took up the matter through a suo motu writ petition after seeing media reports on the tragedy that unfolded during the RCB victory celebrations on Wednesday. A bench led by Acting Chief Justice VK Rao and Justice CM Joshi scheduled the next hearing for 10 June. Details emerge during hearing During the hearing, Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty submitted a preliminary report and assured the court that all necessary steps were being taken. He stated that the state was not treating the issue in an adversarial manner and welcomed public suggestions for future safety. CM orders magisterial inquiry, announces compensation Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had earlier ordered a magisterial inquiry and expressed sorrow over the deaths. He said that the crowd had swelled to over two lakh people, far beyond the expected turnout of 40,000. The state government announced an ex gratia of Rs 10 lakh each to the families of those who died. You Might Also Like: Bengaluru stampede: Scary visuals show RCB fans climbing over M Chinnaswamy Stadium walls, fences to attend event; Watch video RCB matches government relief On Thursday, Royal Challengers Bengaluru also announced Rs 10 lakh as financial support for each of the bereaved families. The victims included several young people, with names confirmed by hospitals including Bowring, Manipal, and Vaidehi.
