logo
Bill bans cooperation with federal health care investigations

Bill bans cooperation with federal health care investigations

Yahoo14-04-2025

BOSTON (SHNS) – Senate Democrats announced a bill Monday morning intended to shield reproductive and transgender care in Massachusetts from out-of-state threats, saying it was part of the response effort to the Trump administration.
The bill aims to protect health care professionals and lawyers who represent people who seek reproductive or gender-identity care, by restricting state agencies from cooperating with, or providing information for, federal or out-of-state investigations.
Sen. Cindy Friedman of Arlington filed the bill last week. As chair of the Senate Committee on Steering and Policy, Friedman is leading the Senate's response to measures spinning out of President Donald Trump's first few months in office alongside a Republican-led Congress. The Senate has dubbed the effort 'Response 2025.'
'In Massachusetts, we do not discriminate against you depending on the type of health care you need, and this bill builds on our actions in 2022 and further strengthens protections for transgender people and those who have the ability to get pregnant,' Senate President Karen Spilka said in a statement.
In a press release, Spilka and Friedman said the bill, which the Senate on Monday referred to the Health Care Financing Committee for review, was designed to 'protect, defend, and lead Massachusetts through oncoming threats from the federal government.'
Massachusetts made abortion protected by law in 2020, in anticipation of threats to Roe v. Wade on the federal level. The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the court precedent protecting abortion in 2022.
In response to that ruling, the Legislature and Gov. Charlie Baker agreed to a 2022 law to protect people in Massachusetts from out-of-state civil or criminal investigations, lawsuits and prosecutions for legally-protected health care, such as abortions.
'We did the first version of this in 2022, and so as we're watching this unfold at the federal level now, we said let's check our laws and make sure we have protections and have no loopholes,' Friedman told the News Service.
This is the first bill her committee has filed as part of 'Response 2025.' Friedman said they targeted this for their first action because 'it was something we had done and could start from a very solid base' and was something she and other Senate Democrats 'were concerned about, and knew was coming if Trump won.'
The Senate committee worked with Attorney General Andrea Campbell and Department of Public Health Commissioner Robbie Goldstein, as well as advocates at the ACLU, Planned Parenthood and GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders to craft the legislation.
The bill would make it illegal for insurance companies to discriminate against nonprofit organizations that offer reproductive or gender-identity care to people in Massachusetts. It would also require that companies protect patient electronic medical records to limit out-of-state entities' access to these records.
'Data sharing to the federal government and other entities could put patients and Massachusetts providers at risk—especially those accessing, prescribing, or dispensing medications related to reproductive or gender-affirming care,' the bill's supporters said.
'Gender-affirming care is a legal type of care in Massachusetts,' Friedman said. 'This says, 'You as the federal government and other states cannot determine what is legal health care in Massachusetts. You seem to be so focused on the whole issues around gender, we're not going to allow that because Massachusetts has decided that this is a legal form of health care.' They love to talk about gender-affirming care and women's reproductive health, but we the state get to decide what kind of care is legal and can be delivered in Massachusetts.'
Trump has issued executive orders saying the government would only recognize two genders, including on documents like passports; stopping the Bureau of Prisons from reporting the number of incarcerated transgender individuals and moving transgender women into men's prisons; moving to ban transgender people from serving in the military; and attempting to pull funding from institutions providing gender-identity care for trans youth. A number of these executive orders have been paused by court orders.
The Friedman bill also seeks to protect access to emergency abortions, by requiring any hospital licensed in Massachusetts to provide this emergency procedure if determined necessary by the patient and provider.
Friedman told the News Service this protects people who miscarry, or if a pregnancy becomes dangerous.
'They can't turn anyone away. They have to provide the care that's going to save your life,' she said.
The bill's supporters said the Trump administration 'has signaled it may allow hospitals to choose to decline giving emergency abortions, even in life-threatening cases.'
She added that she hopes by closing these loopholes, Bay Staters feel safe seeking this care.
'We want to make sure that people in our commonwealth are safe and can get the care they need without fear of being harmed or targeted or sent to prison,' she said. 'It's outrageous. And we want to make sure that people who provide or support people seeking that care are also protected.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greg Abbott To Sign Texas Property Tax Bill: What To Know
Greg Abbott To Sign Texas Property Tax Bill: What To Know

Newsweek

time17 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Greg Abbott To Sign Texas Property Tax Bill: What To Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is expected to sign new legislation offering property tax relief to homeowners in the state struggling with rising bills, on Monday. If endorsed by voters in November, the measures pushed forward by the GOP-led Texas legislature would significantly lower the cost of homeownership for millions of Lone Star State residents, including seniors and disabled owners, at a cost of over $3 billion. It would also dramatically slash revenues for local governments funding crucial public services, which the state would have to make up for. Why Do Texas Lawmakers And Abbott Want To Cut Property Taxes? While the Lone Star State is known for its relatively low tax environment, homeowners actually pay some of the highest property taxes in the country. These are levied by local governments and used for funding schools, streets, roads, police and fire protection. The governing body of each of these local governments sets its own tax rate based on a property's appraised value. But property taxes all across the U.S. have surged in step with home values since the pandemic, when historically low mortgage rates sparked a homebuying frenzy which had its epicenter in some of the country's most affordable states, including Texas. Between 2019 and 2023 alone, median property taxes in the Lone Star State rose by 26 percent, according to data by Cotality, formerly CoreLogic. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, of 2025, Texas homeowners are paying the seventh-highest property taxes in the nation, according to SmartAsset, at an effective rate of 1.63 percent. That is a lot higher than the national average, which stands at 0.90 percent, with the typical Texas homeowner paying $3,872 annually in property taxes. Abbott has long been trying to lower the property tax burden on Texas homeowners, signing in 2023 what was then the largest property tax cut in the state's history at $18 billion. But that intervention barely helped the many homeowners struggling with rising bills, and the Republican governor called for lowering property taxes as a priority during this year's legislative session. What Is In The New Package Of Property Tax Cuts? The package of property tax cuts that Abbott is expected to sign on Monday at the Robson Ranch clubhouse in Denton includes two bills recently passed by the Texas House and Senate that would back two constitutional amendments. One bill, SB 4, would raise the existing homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000 for all homeowners, while the other, SB 23, would raise it to $200,000 for those with disabilities or those aged 65 and above. "You've always heard that mantra, 'I don't want to rent my home—after it's paid for — from my school district,' " Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said after the two bills passed the Texas legislature. "Well, seniors, to the average senior out there, you're never going to have to do that again." SB includes a provision guaranteeing school districts would not lose funding due to the lower property taxes, trying to answer criticism that the cuts would harm public services. It would be up to the state to raise the difference—which is estimated at $3.5 billion. What Happens After Abbott Signs The Legislation? In order to implement the constitutional amendments approved by the legislation, voters would have to back the homestead exemption hikes in November. Texas Senator Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, who introduced the legislation, will be attending the signing ceremony on Monday. He said that he hopes there will be a "record turnout by the public" to get these tax cuts "enshrined" in the Texas constitution. Newsweek contacted Abbott's office and Bettencourt's office for comment by email on Monday morning.

Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers

Hamilton Spectator

time17 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump, Paramount Global Are in 'Active Settlement Discussions' Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit
Trump, Paramount Global Are in 'Active Settlement Discussions' Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump, Paramount Global Are in 'Active Settlement Discussions' Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit

President Trump and Paramount Global are in 'active settlement discussions' amid a lawsuit that Trump filed against the company over an interview that CBS' 60 Minutes aired last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The revelation came in a motion filed Friday by Trump's attorneys asking for an extension in the deadlines in his lawsuit against Paramount Global, parent company of CBS. More from The Hollywood Reporter Mark Ruffalo, Jimmy Kimmel, Gracie Abrams, Kerry Washington and More Stars Participating in "No Kings" Protests Paramount to Cut Another 3.5 Percent of U.S. Staff As It Awaits Word On Skydance Deal Close Naveen Chopra Exits as Paramount Global CFO The motion states that both sides 'respectively submit that good cause to extend the deadlines set forth in the table below exists because the Parties are engaged in active settlement discussions, including continued mediation.' Trump alleges in the lawsuit that CBS News aired a 'heavily tampered interview' with Harris to help her in the election by editing certain answers in a way that misled viewers. Trump's team alleges that this constitutes a violation of Texas' consumer protection law covering deceptive advertising and the unfair competition prong of the Lanham Act, a trademark law. As previously reported, the two sides are currently in mediation talks to try and resolve the suit. Paramount reportedly previously offered $15 million to resolve the suit, which it also sought to dismiss earlier this year. Meanwhile, the FCC is reviewing the interview via its 'news distortion' filing comes two weeks after Paramount Global added three new board directors as it deals not only with the lawsuit, but also the proposed merger of Skydance Media and Paramount Global. Earlier this month, Paramount chair Shari Redstone revealed she had been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store