Gauteng High Court to review OCJ tender amid procurement irregularities
The Gauteng High Court, Pretoria will this week hear an application by the Office of the Chief Justice for a self review regarding a tender issued for its online court system.
Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers
While the Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) will on Tuesday turn to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria for the self-review of a tender awarded by its office relating to procurement irregularities in the CaseLine project, three senior OCJ officials who had meanwhile resigned asked to intervene in the application.
The matter involved the award of a departmental tender to a company - Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Ltd (TR) - which had subcontracted to a local company whose shareholders were the three senior OCJ officials.
The court online system - where all matters before court are filed electronically - is currently in use in Gauteng and it is due to be rolled out to other provinces.
A procurement process was initiated during 2021 for the evidence management part of the court online system. Following a sole source procurement process, the OCJ awarded a contract to Thomson Reuters to provide software, licences, resources, and support and maintenance for a period of 60 months, commencing in April 2022.
The OCJ later noted that the three directors involved in the tender were its employees. By then, the three directors had already served their resignation letters to the OCJ and were serving their notice period.
Their subcontract between their company ZA Square Consulting and TR has meanwhile been cancelled.
The OCJ initiated an application for self-review of the tender awarded to TR. The OCJ, through its then Secretary General, also filed an affidavit in which certain allegations and concerns about the role of the now three former employees - Nicolaas Coetzer, Nkosikhona Mncube, and Yvonne van Niekerk - were raised.
The three now asked to be joined in this week's application. They do not oppose the setting aside of the main tender, but they say there are allegations being made in the OCJ's court papers regarding them stemming from the time when they still worked for this office.
They maintained that these allegations are defamatory of them and done purely to bring them into disrepute and to harm their future commercial prospects. Thus, they argued, they should be part of the main application so that they could defend themselves.
Judge Anthony Millar, however, said to his mind, the main review proceedings will be decided based on the record of the proceedings which are under review.
'Their position is no different from any past employee of any institution whose conduct while employed is to be considered. The right to dignity is not in issue. Either the grounds of review premised on the conduct of the applicants have merit or they do not. The application to intervene lacks any merit and must be refused.'
But this is not the end of the matter, the judge said, as Coetzer in his affidavit called into question the honesty and integrity of the Secretary General of the OCJ, who had deposed to the affidavits on its behalf in the review proceedings. The OCJ called these allegations 'scandalous and vexatious,' and Judge Millar chose not to repeat the allegations in his judgment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
2 days ago
- The South African
Two Oceans Marathon organisers respond to High Court ruling
The Two Oceans Marathon NPC has responded to the ruling handed down by the Gauteng High Court on Thursday. The social media post read: 'The Two Oceans Marathon NPC acknowledges the recent High Court judgment concerning public commentary made about the organisation and its leadership. 'While the matter was dismissed, we note that the judgement was based on procedural grounds – 𝙣𝙤𝙩 on the factual correctness, ethical appropriateness or moral acceptability of the statements made. It therefore cannot be said that the statements made were found to be truthful, justified, or ethically appropriate. 'As an organisation, we welcome constructive criticism and learn profoundly from it. However, we believe that such engagement must be 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘧𝘶𝘭, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘴, including runners, those who serve the organisation, suppliers and stakeholders. 'As one of Africa's most iconic running events, we value fair criticism and a spirit of public engagement that falls within the boundaries of what can be considered fundamentally decent and respectful.' In the Gauteng High Court case between Two Oceans chairperson Toni Cavanagh (first applicant) and the Two Oceans Marathon NPC (second applicant) and Stuart Mann (respondent), the Honourable Judge Yacoob ruled emphatically against Cavanagh and the TOM NPC granting a costs order on scale C (the most severe possible outcome). This will reportedly cost Cavanagh and the TOM NPC around R400 000. Whether Cavanagh will cough up the cash herself or turn to the NPC for help remains to be seen. The full 15-page judgement can be found HERE This developing news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. The future of the Two Oceans Marathon is in serious doubt after the City of Cape Town pulled its sponsorship of the event following a number of flagrant contraventions of conditions by the organisers of this year's race. Organisers were on the receiving end of more criticism this year – as is seemingly the case every year – as runners took to social media in their droves to vent their unhappiness and frustration. Runners lashed out at the organisers for – among many other things – shocking (read: no) communication pre-race, a lack of sufficient markings on the trail race, goodie bags hardly worth taking home, a lack of water tables during the race and running out of medals for finishers. Race director Hilton Kearns is on record as saying they 'overcompensated in predicting the number of silver medallists they expected and did not have enough bronze medals'. This was proven to be a lie by well-known South African runner and blogger, Stuart Mann, who, writing on his blog ' The Running Mann ' this week exposed the latest untruth. Mann ran the numbers and the percentage of silver medallists in the Two Oceans Half Marathon has been the same for the last three years: 1.3%. A mere 234 runners earned silver medals, while 17 443 runners earned bronze this year. The real reason the race ran out of thousands of bronze medals was the fact they accepted – and took payment for – more entries than they were allowed by the City of Cape Town. Meanwhile, according to Two Oceans chairperson Toni Cavanagh, the race has struggled to rope in enough sponsors since emerging from the Covid pandemic a few years ago. While they appreciated the support from current headline sponsor Totalsports – and the runners who paid entry fees – they are falling short of the claimed nearly R27 million required to organise the event. RELATED | Tributes pour in for runner after tragic death at Two Oceans Marathon In the irony of all ironies, just two short years ago prior to taking over as Two Oceans chairperson, Cavanagh took to social media to slate the race organisers following her 'fudging ridiculous' experience at race collection back in 2023. The South African website has in its possession a letter of demand to cease and desist from the Two Oceans Marathon NPC and Toni Cavanagh sent to Mann on Wednesday. The South African website also has it on good authority that Mann plans to neither cease nor desist from exposing the truth. It appears clear that the City of Cape Town is siding with Mann – and the truth. In a response sent to The South African website on Thursday, the City confirmed: 'Following the Two Oceans Half Marathon on Sunday, 6 April 2025, the City of Cape Town's Events Permitting Office discovered that the Two Oceans Marathon race management allowed more participants to take part in the half marathon than what was approved in the official permit. 'The Two Oceans Marathon race management contravened conditions of its permit and subsequently the Events By-Law by allowing more than the permitted number of runners to take part. 'This is a complete disregard of the months of work behind the scenes to plan the logistics and safety measures in place around the event. 'The contravention of stipulated permit conditions places at risk the safety of people taking part in events. 'The sponsorship agreement between the City of Cape Town and the agreement between the City and the Two Oceans Marathon NPC is clear that any breach of permit will result in the municipality pulling sponsorship of the event. 'The Two Oceans Marathon NPC was notified of the City's decision withdraw support on 10 April 2025. 'The City provides support in kind in the form of municipal services which assist in the event safety and logistics planning for the Two Oceans Marathon. 'The City's actions pertain specifically to its sponsorship of the Two Oceans Marathon – the Event Organiser can continue to apply for permits through the normal channels, as they are required to do in any event – irrespective of City sponsorship.' Quite how the Two Oceans Marathon plans on holding an event without the sponsorship of the City of Cape Town remains to be seen, considering the lack of funding alluded to by the organisers themselves. Whether any other sponsors wish to come on board and be associated with the race and its current Board remains to be seen. In addition, race founder Celtic Harriers (a club which still receives royalties from the Two Oceans brand, but is no longer involved in the organisation) has said it wants to meet with the Two Oceans board out of concern for the future of the race. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Arrest of former City of Tshwane official marks a breakthrough in R11 million fraud investigation
A former City of Tshwane senior official, wanted for allegedly defrauding the municipality of R11 million, has been apprehended and appeared in court this week. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers A former senior City of Tshwane official, Tienka Abbort, has been arrested and appeared in court in connection with a R11 million municipal funds fraud case. The city has hailed the arrest as a significant breakthrough in the ongoing investigation into the theft. This comes three months after the city reported the suspension of a finance department employee amid internal investigations linking him and two colleagues to a R10 million-plus fraud scheme that allegedly occurred between May 2021 and January 2022. Two of the employees were arrested and appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court, where they were each granted R10,000 bail. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ At the time, the city said the third employee had evaded arrest by hospitalising himself after learning of the impending police action. The alleged scheme involved collusion between city officials and the public to manipulate user debit balances by transferring funds into municipal accounts controlled by the syndicate. 'The employees would collect what the user had intended to pay and, instead of paying that amount into the city's account, the user's account would be credited through the fraudulent transfer of the debit balance into the ghost account. They would then pocket the amount that the user had intended to pay,' the city said. This week, municipal spokesperson, Lindela Mashigo, said Abbort, a former director and accountant, who had been evading arrest, was finally apprehended after an intensive tracing operation led by the city's Forensic Services Division, in collaboration with Lyttleton SAPS. During her court appearance, Abbort applied for bail of R5,000, which was opposed by the National Prosecuting Authority, who requested bail be set at R200,000. The court ultimately granted Abbort bail of R50,000 with strict conditions, which include surrendering her travel documents, reporting twice weekly to her nearest police station, and residing at her current address unless she notifies the investigating officer. The investigation is ongoing, and the city said it will now probe potential collusion between Abbort and the account holders who benefited from the unauthorised transfers. Mashigo said the city's Revenue Management Division is reviewing the affected accounts and will initiate reversals where necessary. He warned residents to be vigilant against individuals or groups posing as agents claiming to 'clear' municipal debt, stating that these schemes are fraudulent and may result in criminal charges and financial loss. Residents in debt are encouraged to visit one of the city's customer care walk-in centres to make legitimate and sustainable arrangements. City Manager Johann Mettler praised the Forensic Services Division team for their outstanding work in combating corruption within the city, highlighting their commitment to identifying and reporting criminal conduct and ensuring accountability. He also called for forensic investigators to be designated as peace officers under the Criminal Procedure Act, stating that this would enhance the city's capacity to act decisively and in real-time against financial crime. 'We believe the city's fight against financial crime would be significantly strengthened by designating forensic investigators as peace officers under the Criminal Procedure Act, a move that could enhance our capacity to act decisively and in real time,' he said.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
‘This is what happens in a SA run by blacks': Senzo Meyiwa trial judge fires off explosive rant
Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng addressed what he perceived as a lack of decorum in court. Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng during the Senzo Meyiwa murder trial at Pretoria High Court on 17 July 2023. Picture: Gallo Images/Phill Magakoe Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng is facing criticism over 'racially charged' comments made during the Senzo Meyiwa murder trial on Thursday. The trial resumed at the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, with the cross-examination of lead investigator Brigadier Bongani Gininda by Advocate Charles Mnisi on behalf of accused one, Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya. His line of questioning drew sharp criticism from Mokgoatlheng following Mnisi's comment during Wednesday's proceedings, in which he referred to Gininda's former colleague, retired Colonel Mhlanganyelwa Moses Mbotho, as the 'dumbest cop in South Africa'. The judge reprimanded Mnisi, calling the remark an 'insult'. Tensions rise in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial On Thursday, Mokgoatlheng addressed what he perceived as a lack of decorum in how defence lawyers refer to witnesses without using official titles. 'Somebody made a comment that if Mandela comes here and gives evidence, he is Mr Mandela or something like that. 'This is what happens in this court, people telling the judge you are mad,' he said. ALSO READ: 'No proper investigation was done': Defence frustrated over missing evidence in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial The judge contended that his previous ruling on how to address witnesses was disregarded. 'I was told to go jump into the sea.' He further commented on the conduct of black legal professionals. 'When I make remarks about our black counsels, attorneys and maybe even judges, I'm told 'you are crazy, you think you are better than other people'.' Judge rants about Senzo Meyiwa murder trial delays Mokgoatlheng also expressed frustration that Mnisi had communicated his unavailability for Monday's sitting to the judge's registrar. Mnisi will be participating in the Comrades Marathon in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) over the weekend and is expected to drive back to Gauteng on Monday. Attorney Sipho Ramosepele defended Mnisi's method of communication, saying it is standard practice for the defence to correspond through the registrar. This view was supported by state prosecutor George Baloyi. 'If Mr Mnisi doesn't want to come to court on Monday, that's his business. I will be in court,' Mokgoatlheng responded. READ MORE: Will Senzo Meyiwa murder trial finally end in 2025? The judge referenced the public's growing frustration with the drawn-out trial, citing sentiments such as 'justice delayed is justice denied', '10 years no justice', and the ongoing distress of the Meyiwa family. 'Even the accused themselves have been in custody for two to three years. And here's this stupid judge called Ratha Mokgoatlheng allowing a person who is representing two of the accused here to go and run a marathon.' He said he would need to justify the lack of proceedings on Monday to Gauteng High Court Judge President Dunstan Mlambo. Mokgoatlheng added: 'This is what happens in a South Africa run by blacks. I can tell you now, even if you call Uncle Tom, I don't think a white advocate will ever have the gall to ask me that. Never.' Judge criticised over remarks The Good party has strongly condemned Mokgoatlheng's comments, calling them 'racially charged' and 'deeply concerning.' The party emphasised the need for the trial to be handled with 'utmost seriousness and integrity.' 'While the judge's frustration over delays in this long-running and emotionally charged trial may be understandable, resorting to racially divisive language is entirely unacceptable. 'It undermines the integrity of the judiciary and risks inflaming already fragile race relations in South Africa,' Good secretary-general Brett Herron said in a statement on Thursday. 'Decorum in court is not just about the behaviour of lawyers and attendees, it begins with the conduct of the bench. Judges must embody the fairness and dignity they expect from others. These comments fall far short of that standard.' Herron has called on the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) to investigate the judge's remarks. This is not the first time Judge Mokgoatlheng has faced criticism over his remarks. He previously issued an apology following comments about black lawyers, made while criticising the late defence lawyer Thulani Mngomezulu for his absence. NOW READ: 'That is the law': Judge intervenes as lawyers squabble in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial
