South Korea turns off propaganda loudspeakers to North Korea
South Korea's military says it has suspended its loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts across the border to North Korea, as part of a bid to "restore trust" between both countries. The move comes a week after the country elected its new president Lee Jae-myung, who had campaigned on improving inter-Korean ties. Pyongyang considers the loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts an act of war and has threatened to blow them up in the past.They were previously been paused for six years but resumed in June last year in response to Pyongyang's campaign of sending rubbish-filled balloons across the border to the South.
In recent years, the broadcasts have included news from both Koreas and abroad as well as information on democracy and life in the South.Ties between North and South Korea had deteriorated under previous president Yoon Suk Yeol, who was more hawkish towards Pyongyang. Yoon was impeached and removed from his post for briefly placing South Korea under martial law in December, citing supposed threats from anti-state forces and North Korea sympathisers.His successor, Lee, had campaigned on a series of pledges, including one to restart dialogue with Pyongyang and to reduce tensions between both countries. The move aims to "restore trust in inter-Korean relations and achieve peace on the Korean Peninsula", the military said in a statement.According to a report by the Yonhap news agency, the military's decision also took into account the fact that the North has no longer been sending rubbish-filled balloons across the border.However, by suspending instead of terminating the broadcasts, the military is signalling that the speakers could be fired up again if needed, adds Yonhap.Seoul claims the broadcasts can be heard as much as 10km (6.2 miles) across the border in the day and up to 24km (15 miles) at night.The suspension comes almost exactly a year after they were first resumed in June 2024 - when both countries had engaged in various retaliatory campaigns involving rubbish and propaganda balloons. Reuniting with the South had always been a key, if increasingly unrealistic, part of the North's ideology since the inception of the state - until Kim abandoned the idea earlier last year.Both countries are technically still at war since the Korean War ended in 1953 without a peace treaty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Japan hits out at China over close-call with fighter jets
Japan has condemned China 's 'close approaches' after Chinese J-15 fighters flew dangerously near to a Japanese P-3C patrol plane monitoring the Shandong aircraft carrier over the Pacific. The Japanese defence ministry stated that the J-15 fighters tailed the surveillance aircraft for 40 and 80 minutes, respectively, with one instance of a jet crossing 900 metres in front of the P-3C's flight path. Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Japan raised serious concerns with China, urging them to prevent such incidents. Japan delayed disclosing the encounters to interview the P-3C's crew and assess flight data, while also reporting that two Chinese aircraft carriers, Liaoning and Shandong, were conducting simultaneous operations in the Pacific. China confirmed its carriers were training to test capabilities in far seas defence and joint operations, stating the exercises were routine and not targeting any specific country.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Former CIA director says Donald Trump's plan for war in Ukraine is ‘naive and unsophisticated'
Donald Trump's plan for peace in Ukraine has been branded 'naive' and 'unsophisticated' by former director of the CIA John Brennan. In the first five months of his second term, the U.S. president has aggressively pushed for peace but refused to offer unconditional support to Kyiv in its defence against Russian aggression. Mr Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine on the first day of his presidency while on the campaign trail, but diplomatic efforts have stalled and Russia has recently launched some of its largest attacks of the war so far. The US President recently suggested it might be better to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a while' in a sign of his waning interest in ending the three-year conflict. Speaking on Sky News, Mr Brennan said the U.S. president's approach to forcing through a quick peace deal in Ukraine was 'naive' and 'unsophisticated'. "I think that Donald Trump doesn't know what he will do,' said Brennan when asked what the President will do next to secure peace in Ukraine. Delegations from Russia and Ukraine have met for talks multiple times within the past month. But beyond agreements to exchange of prisoners of war, no major breakthrough has been made towards peace. Mr Brennan and Mr Trump have a tense history, and the former has previously been critical of the U.S. president's foreign policy. During his first term in office, Mr Trump described him as the 'worst' CIA chief in history - and in January he revoked Mr Brennan's security clearance. The former intelligence official was involved in Ukraine during his time in Langley and first visited the country in 2014 - the same year Russian forces invaded and annexed the Crimean peninsula. Asked about the strength of the Ukrainian military, Mr Brennan told Sky News: "Pound for pound, [it] punches above the weight of virtually every other military on the globe, I would say including the United States, given the tremendous experience that they've gained on the battlefield". He also suggested that Ukraine's allies were likely aware - at least in part - of the drone attack on Russian airfields deep inside its territory. "I don't doubt for a moment that they were given some additional assistance from Western intelligence and military authorities and capabilities,' Brennan said. "The Ukrainians have done a lot on their own, but I think a lot of this is initially enabled by some ideas that come from their Western allies."
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Rogue state Iran plans terrifying response to Israel blitz from immediate counterstrikes to secret NUKE as tensions boil
IRAN could be spurred on to rush the creation of a nuclear weapon if Israel unleashes an attack, an ex-military intelligence agent warns. Israel 's top brass are understood to be poised to blitz the rogue nation within days without the backing of the US. 7 7 7 It comes as Donald Trump 's 60-day deadline to thrash out a deal with Tehran over its nuclear programme last night expired. Senior military and political sources in Tel Aviv told The Sun back in April how Israel was plotting to strike Iran's nuke sites within weeks. A senior diplomatic insider, speaking in Jerusalem, said Tehran's nuclear programme should have been dealt with "a long time ago". Israel hoped to coordinate an attack with the US, but Benjamin Netanyahu 's ex-advisor last week told The Sun how the prime minister was mapping out a plan to bomb Iran without Trump. And now US officials have been warned Israel is ready to unleash strikes on the rogue nation, sources have revealed. In a telling sign, the US has scaled down its presence in the Middle East and removed non-essential staff from its embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Trump alluded to potential conflict last night as he said: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens. "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." Netanyahu has been making preparations behind the scenes to swiftly blitz Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities as he deems the country "enemy number one". Trump, however, had firmly insisted Israel take no action that could jeopardise his administration's efforts to thrash out a deal with Iran. But Netanyahu appears on the brink of giving the green light to strike as a sixth round of talks tentatively set for Sunday in Oman looms. Iran's furious Revolutionary Guard commander vowed Tehran would respond in a "more forceful and destructive way" to Israel than in past offensives. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog found Iran is not complying with its nuke obligations amid alarming reports that the Islamist state has stepped up secret plans to build nuclear weapons Raz Zimmt, who spent more than two decades in the IDF's military intelligence, said Iran is likely to immediately retaliate with a huge missile blitz if Israel launches missiles as its turf. But the veteran Iran-watcher warned it could spur Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to continue his warped nuke scheme with no oversight - or even break out a nuclear weapon. He told The Sun: "We have to make a distinction between two concerning scenarios in the day after an attack whether it's an Israeli or an American attack. "The immediate retaliation would probably be the launching of long-range missiles from Iran against Israel if that's an Israeli attack. "I assume that if it's just an Israeli attack Iran will not take the risk of engaging the United States into a military confrontation with Iran by targeting US forces or US bases in the region. Iran's breaching nuclear rules IRAN has been declared as in breach of its nuclear rules for the first time in two decades. The UN 's atomic watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, passed a resolution on Wednesday condemning Tehran's"lack of co-operation". It is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the US out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. Tehran said it "has no choice but to respond to this political resolution", and said it would launch a new enrichment site "in a secure location". The state said: "Other measures are also being planned and will be announced subsequently." An IAEA official said Iran had given no further details such as the location of the site. It comes as US and Iranian officials are due to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday. The Trump administration has been trying to secure a deal with Tehran aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme. Donald Trump is said to be in advanced talks with Iran over a preliminary agreement that could include provisions on uranium enrichment - terms Israel finds unacceptable. "In that case, we'll probably see more or less what we saw in early October. "Perhaps more than that Iran is still equipped with thousands of ballistic missiles it can use against Israel. "Those can certainly inflict significant damage to Israel but this is only the immediate kind of retaliation. Israel of course can try to defend itself. "Israel can carry out strikes which could in a way limit the missiles capabilities in Iran." An Iron Dome operator previously told The Sun how the IDF was ready for any possible air assault from Iran. Tsgt Y said: "Fearful [of an attack from Iran]? No. We're prepared for anything that might come." Dr Zimmt warned Israel blitzing Iran could spark weeks of military confrontation between the two nations. But he argued it could prompt a far more sinister outcome. Insiders say Iran right now has the capacity to create three to five nuclear bombs - but does not have the ability to make them explode. 7 7 7 "[It is possible] after an Israeli strike Iran will try to take the remnants of what is being left of its nuclear capabilities, the fissile material, the centrifuges, what will be left out of the two main enrichment facilities and try to reconstitute its nuclear programme this time without any IEA inspections," Dr Zimmt said. "And so Iran can certainly use this opportunity to make a decision to break out a weapon which will require continuous efforts by both the United States and Israel to avoid that scenario. "So the immediate retaliation would probably be some kind of missile attack against Israel if it's only Israel. "The second kind of retaliation would be concerning Iran's efforts to rehabilitate its nuclear program and perhaps also breaking out weapons." A French government insider close to Israel said it will be imperative other countries form a deterrence coalition if Israel strikes to fend off retaliation from Iran. The source, speaking to The Sun in Paris, warned Iran "know how to fight" and are "used to long wars". "You must have a kind of coalition against the reaction of Iran," they said. "And you have seen this small coalition immediately before, US, UK and France, and some Arab countries. "But somebody like Trump would not support that, I mean an attack from Iran. "So it must be a kind of deterrence, saying to Iran, OK, you have this strike from Israel, but you can't reply, because we are there now. So if you reply, this is an attack against us. "That's deterrence. "If Iran tries to strike back, you will see immediately a kind of coalition against Iran. "And you will have a huge, huge political issue, because the best ally of Israel, the United States, the best ally of Iran is Russia. "So if you have a strike between Israel and Iran, the problem is between the United States and Russia." IDF sources, speaking to The Sun at a base in Israel in April, revealed the military had been working for months to clear the path for a major strike on Iran. Three air campaigns eliminated strategic aerial defences which were 'the main obstacle' protecting Iran's nuke facilities, the insider confirmed. Vitally, this would allow Israeli aircraft to get to Iran's borders with diminished fear of being blasted. Iran's secret nuke site 'Rainbow' Exclusive by Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) CHILLING satellite pictures reveal Iran's sprawling secret nuclear site codenamed "Rainbow". Sources in the country have uncovered how the base is being used to develop nuclear-capable missiles with a 2,000-mile range - able to strike US bases in the Middle East. Tehran's tyrannical regime is using oil and chemical facilities as a cover for nuclear bases, bombshell docs shared with The Sun by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) reveal. Haunting aerial images expose a network of clandestine sites - including "Rainbow" - used by iron-fist leaders to create terrifying nuclear weapons. A powerful nuclear blast from Iran could have disastrous consequences for the Middle East - and beyond - thanks to the capability of the warheads. Now sources inside Iran have revealed the regime's nuclear weaponisation entity, Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research's (SPND) secret project to accelerate nuclear ability. Hidden under the guise of a chemical production facility, the crowning jewel of the operation is a base known internally as the 'Rangin Kaman (Rainbow) Site". It is some distance from Iran's already known nuke bases, and is masked as a chemical production company known as Diba Energy Siba.
