logo
Commentary: The Blue Origin flight reminds us that there is no feminism without environmentalism

Commentary: The Blue Origin flight reminds us that there is no feminism without environmentalism

Yahoo2 days ago

The recent Blue Origin space mission, and its all-female crew, faced widespread criticism for their rocket's climate impact. Although the purported mission of Blue Origin is to 'restore and sustain Earth,' a few minutes in space is known to release more planet-warming carbon dioxide than 1 billion people will in their entire lifetime.
Experts predict an increase in space tourism over the coming decades, potentially accelerating global warming in a world already struggling to combat its effects.
The historic all-female space crew was assembled to promote female representation in space — a worthy undertaking since nearly 90% of the over 700 people who have traveled to space are men. But the Blue Origin flight also showed the world that privileged women can increasingly, thanks to space tourism, pollute Earth just as easily as wealthy men have for decades. Despite the critical need for women's equality, the effects of climate change are far from gender neutral.
I teach about the health impacts of climate change and have taken care of many women during my 15 years as a primary care physician. The unique physiology of women and social roles and societal expectations place women at disproportionately higher risk from climate-fueled disasters and warming temperatures.
Reproductive stages such as menstruation, pregnancy and nursing increase women's climate vulnerability. The heightened metabolic and/or nutritional demands during these times make women more dependent on resources such as food and water that are threatened by climate change and extreme weather events. Increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide may worsen dietary deficiencies in reproductive-age women by reducing crop levels of critical nutrients such as iron, folate and protein.
Extreme heat, increasingly a norm rather than an exception, is particularly harmful for pregnant women, raising their likelihood of preterm delivery and high blood pressure. Higher temperatures also increase preterm birth by increasing levels of the harmful air pollutant called ground-level ozone. Because pregnant women have faster breathing rates, they are also more susceptible to going into preterm labor and having babies with low birth weight from inhaling wildfire smoke.
Despite the incremental progress toward gender equality in U.S. homes, women continue to manage disproportionate amounts of caregiving and household activities. Climate change, a known 'threat multiplier,' is poised to worsen existing inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic, despite being a different type of crisis, provided a sneak preview of this exacerbation of inequities. From February 2020 to January 2022, 1.1 million women left the labor force — accounting for 63% of all jobs lost. This disparity was even greater for mothers.
Given the continued disparities of labor in the home, women face unique challenges during and after extreme weather events. In the weeks following Hurricane Maria, millions of Puerto Ricans were left without power and drinkable water. Women washed laundry by hand and collected and boiled rainwater for bathing and consumption — adding hours to their daily routines. The physical and emotional toll on Puerto Rican women during this time was immeasurable.
This is not to say that women shouldn't continue participating in important space missions. Women have made critical contributions to space science and benefited from its findings. Several environmentally beneficial inventions, including solar panels, satellite detection of wildfires and energy efficient insulation, are the result of innovations related to space travel.
Yet the Blue Origin flight is a good reminder that there is no feminism without environmentalism. When Eleanor Roosevelt said women 'cannot refuse to acknowledge' their differences from men, she also highlighted those differences as the basis of women's activism. Women certainly bear the brunt of the climate crisis, but they are also at the front line of solutions.
Successful women's activism has always been grounded in collaboration and inclusion. Time and time again, we see that when women are lifted out of poverty and given equal rights, all of society is uplifted. When women are part of decision-making, solutions are more effective and inclusive. Protecting the planet is no exception because racism, poverty and patriarchy worsen the impact of climate change for everyone on it.
Yes, wealthy women will increasingly be able to visit space as tourists, but should they, given the price paid by environmental impacts on other women? Because the reality is, most women won't be able to escape climate change on a rocket ship.
Women have changed the world before, and they can do it again, but they aren't going to do it by taking day trips into outer space. To protect our communities and save the one planet we have will take unity, empathy, collaboration and cooperation beyond class divides.
There is no better time than now to start.
____
Dr. Sheetal Khedkar Rao is an internal medicine physician and assistant professor of clinical medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She is on the board of Illinois Clinicians for Climate Action and a public voices fellow through The OpEd Project.
_____

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HBR's Best Practices for Supporting Employee Mental Health
HBR's Best Practices for Supporting Employee Mental Health

Harvard Business Review

time9 minutes ago

  • Harvard Business Review

HBR's Best Practices for Supporting Employee Mental Health

When the Covid-19 pandemic hit, people across the globe faced new anxieties about their health, families, income, and stability. For company leaders, all that upheaval put worker mental health into the can't-ignore category of issues affecting their organizations. External forces affecting employee mental health have continued to proliferate since: The fast pace of AI implementation is changing the shape of many careers, geopolitical tumult brings worry about stability, and murky and shifting economic outlooks can lead to cost-cutting measures like layoffs. In short, your people have a lot to worry about right now. A new survey from the workplace wellness consultancy Mind Share Partners in partnership with Qualtrics of over 1,100 U.S. employees found that 90% of participants reported 'at least minor levels of one mental health challenge,' with the top three stressors being U.S. politics, global events, and personal finances. As a leader, you're likely feeling it, too: A 2024 Businessolver survey of 3,000 CEOs, HR professionals, and employees found that 55% of CEOs reported experiencing a mental health issue (such as anxiety, depression, loneliness, burnout, and obsessive compulsive disorder) in the past year. It's time for leaders to recommit to supporting their employees' mental health—and their own. HBR's archive has plenty of strategies for how to do it right. Change Systems, Not Individuals Companies are making larger investments in employee wellness programs than ever; however, data suggests those programs aren't actually resulting in better well-being outcomes for employees. According to a trio of authors drawing on a wide body of workplace wellness research, individual-level interventions like well-being apps and employee assistance programs are likely to be ineffective unless paired with systemic interventions. To take a more holistic approach to workplace well-being, the authors suggest leaders become 'behavioral architects' by embedding well-being strategies—and support—into all levels of the organization. Consider changes like increasing flexibility (even trying a four-day workweek) to give employees more control over their work-life balance, putting together volunteer-led 'well-being champion networks' to provide them with peer support, and training managers to support their team members' mental health. Consider Identity Workplace mental health expert Morra Aarons-Mele points out that 'work is about people, and people are messy and difficult.' That may appear obvious at first glance, but identity —the interrelated elements that make up our concept of ourselves—is a critical dimension of how people experience and talk about mental health challenges. Employees from younger generations may be more comfortable discussing mental health than their older counterparts, for example, and men may feel more stigma around mental health than women do. Aarons-Mele has a few suggestions for how to counter these differing perspectives: Create an organization-wide shared language and baseline of knowledge about mental health. Ensure men are visible in mental health conversations. Create opportunities for people who share lived experiences and dimensions of identity to connect with one another. Look to Your Own Leadership Behaviors As a leader, your day-to-day behaviors can inadvertently cause your employees undue stress and anxiety. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic put together a list of five common behaviors to watch out for. For example, are you adding unnecessary complexity by making employees guess at what you'll do next? Are you telegraphing pessimism, leading them to assume a situation is worse than it is? Being more aware of how your actions affect your employees can help you 'bring out the best in people even in the worst of times,' according to Chamorro-Premuzic. And while many conversations about mental health have moved out of the shadows and into the open over the past few years, both stigma and concerns about repercussions persist. As a leader, you have influence, and discussing your own mental health can make your employees feel more comfortable discussing theirs. As Kelly Greenwood, founder and former CEO of Mind Share Partners, puts it, telling your own story 'reduces stigma and normalizes the ups and downs of being human—especially as a high-performing professional' and 'positions vulnerability as a strength instead of a weakness and shows it's possible to succeed and thrive with a mental health challenge.' Greenwood offers a guide to crafting an authentic, compelling story for employees in a way that's both inclusive and protective of your own boundaries. Improve Uptake of Programs Storytelling may also help increase employee participation in the mental health programs you've invested in. A team of behavioral scientists and organizational behavior scholars recently conducted a study of 2,400 employees at the Swiss pharma company Novartis to test their participation in the company's peer-to-peer Mental Health First Aid support program. While plenty of employees had volunteered to be mental health first aiders (i.e., a source of support for colleagues), overall uptake in the program remained low. The authors presented participants with various anonymous stories of their colleagues accessing the program, varying in severity from work-related stress and anxiety to depression and panic attacks caused by external factors. Their initial findings showed that 'simply hearing about colleagues' struggles [could] normalize access to mental health support at work and increase uptake of an existing peer-to-peer support mental health program by as much as 8%.' That might not sound significant, but the authors note that at a large corporation like Novartis (comprising approximately 78,000 employees), the increased uptake could translate to 2,000 employees making use of the resource. Don't Neglect Your Own Mental Health To be effective at leading others, it's critical that you take care of yourself. If today's roller coaster of uncertainty is (understandably) making you anxious, Morra Aarons-Mele emphasizes how important it is that you address it: 'If you don't look your anxiety in the face at some point, it will take you down.' Instead of ignoring it or trying to push through it, she offers a four-stage process for managing your anxiety. First, you'll do some reflecting, looking inward to better understand what you're feeling and why. Then, you'll start developing tactics for managing your anxiety, including (healthy) compartmentalizing and connecting with others. Next, you'll learn how to be vulnerable with peers and employees—without oversharing or letting the conversation go off the rails. Finally, you'll put together a support system outside the organization to help gut-check your decision-making and advise you on more sensitive situations. Doing this, Aarons-Mele notes, 'means you'll have better workdays, both when things are status quo and during transitions and tough times.' . . . The past few years have taught us a couple things: It's not reasonable to expect employees (or yourself) to check their emotions at the door when they come into work, and simply spending money on interventions like wellness apps isn't sufficient on its own to support them. As a leader, taking a more holistic view of your employees' mental health—and working through and sharing your own experiences—can make them feel more engaged and improve the health of your organization. More Resources

The baffling B.S. of U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson
The baffling B.S. of U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The baffling B.S. of U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson

Sen. Ron Johnson at the Newsroom Pub on Wednesday, May 28, 2025 | Photo by Ruth Conniff/Wisconsin Examiner You have to hand it to Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson. As Republicans across the country run in fear from their constituents, refusing to hold town halls lest they be asked to answer for brutal federal budget cuts and threats to health care, nutrition assistance and Social Security, Johnson showed up at a Milwaukee Press Club event Wednesday and appeared cheerfully unperturbed as he took questions from journalists and a skeptical crowd. Not that his answers made sense. People sitting in front of the podium at the Newsroom Pub luncheon crossed their arms and furrowed their brows as Johnson explained his alternative views on everything from global warming to COVID-19 to the benefits of bringing the federal budget more in line with the spending levels of 1930 — i.e. the beginning of the Great Depression, before FDR instituted New Deal programs Johnson described as 'outside [the president's] constitutionally enumerated powers.' A handful of protesters chanted in the rain outside the Newsroom Pub, but overall, the event was cordial and reactions muted. In part, this was attributable to Johnson's Teflon cockiness and the barrage of misinformation he happily unleashed, which had a numbing effect on his audience. Johnson fancies himself a 'numbers guy.' In that way he's a little like former House Speaker Paul Ryan, his fellow Wisconsin Republican who was once considered the boy genius of the GOP. Ryan made it safe to talk about privatizing Medicare by touring the country with a PowerPoint presentation full of charts and graphs, selling optimistic projections of the benefits of trickle-down economics, corporate tax cuts and the magic of the private market. But Ryan couldn't stomach Trump and he's been exiled from the party. Johnson is the MAGA version. While he doesn't dazzle anyone with his brilliance, he does a good job of baffling his opponents with a barrage of B.S. that leaves even seasoned journalists scrambling to figure out what question to ask. Where do you begin? Back in 2021, YouTube removed a video of Johnson's Milwaukee Press Club appearance because he violated the platform's community standards by spreading dangerous lies about COVID, the alleged harm caused by vaccines and the supposed benefits of dubious remedies. But this week he was back, proudly endorsing DHS Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr.'s decision to eliminate federal COVID vaccine recommendations for pregnant women and healthy children. While he hopes Kennedy goes further in rolling back vaccinations, he said, 'at least we're not going to subject our children to them anymore.' A woman in the audience who identified herself as a local business owner seeking 'common ground' thanked Johnson for saying 'we don't want to mortgage our children's future,' but expressed her concern that besides the deficit spending Johnson rails against, there's also the risk that we're mortgaging the future by destroying the planet. Johnson heartily agreed that everyone wants a 'pristine environment.' 'I mean, I love the outdoors,' he declared. But then he added, 'We shouldn't spend a dime on climate change. We'll adapt. We're very adaptable.' He claimed that 'something like 1,800 different scientists and business leaders' have signed a statement saying there is no climate crisis. (The overwhelming consensus among scientists is that climate change is real and caused by people and the statement he referred to has been debunked.) 'So if it's climate change you're talking about, we're just at cross-purposes,' he added. 'I completely disagree.' Most of Johnson's talk consisted of a fusillade of hard-to-follow budget numbers and nostrums like 'the more the government spends the less free we are.' Charles Benson of TMJ4 News tried to get the senator to focus on what it would take to get him to go along with Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill. 'So, a lot of numbers out there,' Benson said. 'Can you give me a bottom line? Do you want 2 trillion? 3 trillion?' 'Your reaction is the exact same reaction I get from the White House and from my colleagues,' Johnson chided, 'too many numbers. It's a budget process. We're talking about numbers. We're talking about mortgaging our kids' future.' Like his alternative beliefs about vaccination and climate science, Johnson's budget math is extremely fuzzy. He asserted, repeatedly, that Medicaid is rife with 'waste, fraud and abuse.' But the Georgetown University School of Public Policy has published a policy analysis dismantling claims that there is rampant waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid that concluded, 'This premise is false, and the thinking is dangerously wrong.' More broadly, Johnson claims that balancing the budget and reducing the federal deficit is his No. 1 concern. But he's committed to maintaining historic tax cuts for the super rich. The only way to reduce deficits, in his view, is to enact even deeper cuts than House Republicans passed, increasing hunger, undermining education and rolling back health care — because he's totally unwilling to increase revenue with even modest tax increases on corporations and the very wealthy. Those cuts, not a deficit that could be resolved by making the rich pay their share of taxes, are the real threat to our children's future. 'I'm just a guy from Oshkosh who's trying to save America,' Johnson said at the Press Club event. He recapped, in heroic terms, his lone stand against the 2017 tax cut for America's top earners, which he blocked until he was able to work in a special loophole that benefitted him personally. He told the panel of Wisconsin journalists he will also block Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill unless he sees deeper cuts, which he insisted would be easy to make. The 40 states that have taken the federal Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (which Johnson still calls 'Obamacare') are 'stealing money from federal taxpayers,' he declared. Slashing Medicaid will be easy, he suggested, since 'nobody would be harmed other than the grifters who are sucking down the waste, fraud and abuse.' Grifters? Wisconsin has 1.3 million Medicaid recipients. One in three children are on BadgerCare, as Medicaid is called here, along with 45% of adults with disabilities and 55% of seniors living in nursing homes. Our state program faces a $16.8 billion cut over 10 years under the House plan. During the Q&A session, I asked Johnson about this — not just the numbers, but the human cost. I brought up Shaniya Cooper, a college student from Milwaukee and a BadgerCare recipient living with lupus, who spoke at a press conference in the Capitol this week about how scary it was to realize she could lose her Medicaid coverage under congressional Republicans' budget plan. 'To me, this is life or death,' she said. She simply cannot afford to pay for her medicine out of pocket. When she first learned about proposed Medicaid cuts, 'I cried,' she said. 'I felt fear and dread.' What does Johnson have to say to Cooper and other BadgerCare recipients who are terrified of losing their coverage? 'I'll go back to my basic point,' Johnson replied. He quoted Elon Musk, whom he said he greatly admires for his DOGE work slashing federal agencies. 'If we don't fix this, we won't have money for any of this [government in general],' he said Musk told him. 'Nobody wants the truly vulnerable to lose those benefits of Medicaid,' Johnson added. 'But again, Obamacare expanded the waste, fraud and abuse of Medicaid, you know, expanding the people on it when, you know, when a lot of these people ought to be really getting a job.' Some of Johnson's Republican colleagues are worried about withdrawing health care coverage from millions of their constituents. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri called it immoral and 'political suicide.' He said he won't vote for the Medicaid cuts that passed the House because they will put rural hospitals out of business, and because too many hard-working, low-income people rely on the program for health coverage and simply cannot afford to buy insurance on the private market. But Johnson remains untroubled. He's pushing for bigger and more damaging cuts. And when asked what he can tell his constituents who are afraid they're about to lose life-saving health care, his answer is simple and unapologetic: Get a job. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Trump rejects a court ruling that could've saved him from himself
Trump rejects a court ruling that could've saved him from himself

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump rejects a court ruling that could've saved him from himself

When news broke that the White House had appealed the U.S. Court of International Trade's ruling that most of President Donald Trump's tariffs are illegal, I thought of the old familiar story of the man who lived by the river. Upon hearing a weather report that the river will flood, he resolves to stay. 'God will save me,' he says. After being swept into the river, he's carried past a branch he doesn't reach for. 'God will save me,' he says. He doesn't take the hand of a fisherman in his boat because, again, 'God will save me.' When the drowned man gets to heaven, he asks why God let him drown, and God replies, 'I sent you a weather report, a branch and a boat. What are you doing here?' Over the four months that Trump has blundered ahead with sweeping tariffs, he has been offered chance after chance to change course— and rejected them all. But unlike the man in the story, Trump isn't by himself in the river. We all are. The earliest warning to the president came from the markets. They tumbled as he imposed and pulled back on tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico — and then things got worse. When Trump revealed his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, he promised, 'The markets are going to boom.' In fact, they plunged in their worst day since the beginning of the Covid pandemic. After a week of promising the tariffs would be imposed as scheduled, Trump announced a 90-day delay for all countries other than China. At this point, the pattern is so predictable — stocks drop when Trump threatens tariffs and rise when he delays those threats — that traders have a new strategy: 'TACO' or 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Informed of the TACO acronym by CNBC's Megan Casella at a media availability Wednesday, the president lashed out at the 'nasty question' and told Casella, 'Don't ever say what you said.' Voters were the next to warn Trump he was headed the wrong direction. The president's polling decline accelerated after the 'Liberation Day' announcement and stabilized only after he paused those tariffs. The Court of International Trade's decision — and a similar ruling from a federal district court judge Thursday — provided Trump with the perfect excuse to make the tariff 'pause' permanent. The trade court's three-judge panel (one Democratic and two Republican appointees) ruled unanimously, and the reasoning was straightforward: A decades-old emergency powers law didn't 'delegate an unbounded tariff authority' to the president, and both the reciprocal tariffs of 'Liberation Day' and the levies on Canada and Mexico exceeded the president's authorities under that law. A sane administration, facing voters, markets and courts throwing up their hands and shouting 'stop!' would heed those calls. But even as Trump delays and delays most of the blanket tariffs, he hasn't abandoned them (and his 25% tariffs on steel, cars and aluminum remain in place). There is no reason to think court rulings will change his mind. The president's advisers reacted to the trade court's decision with both rage ('a judicial coup,' said Stephen Miller) and dismissal ('a hiccup,' said National Economic Council Chair Kevin Hassett). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already temporarily paused the ruling. And even if the trade court's decision survives, there are multiple other statutes Trump could use to reimpose tariffs, albeit in a more deliberative and limited fashion. No wonder, then, that, though stock futures jumped ahead of markets' opening Thursday, those gains disappeared almost entirely. Investors quickly realized that Trump is still Trump and chaos still reigns. Other than the investors winning TACO trades, the country is hurting from the chaos. The U.S. economy shrank in the first quarter, even without the worst effects of sweeping tariffs. Consumer spending grew 1.2%, less than half the average from 2022 to 2024. A Reuters analysis of disclosures from America, Europe and Japan's largest companies finds 'an overwhelming majority say the erratic nature of Trump's trade policies has made it impossible to accurately estimate costs' and that Trump's on-again, off-again trade war has already hit those companies with $34 billion in higher costs. Meanwhile, small businesses, lacking the financial resources and the political influence of the largest companies, face even stronger headwinds. Duties on materials for everything from water bottles to cowboy boots have raised costs — and many, if not all, of those costs will be passed on to us. And those are just the most tangible effects. 'What we're really not seeing is the businesses that aren't being started,' economics professor Justin Wolfers told MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Wednesday. 'There's a factory that could be built,' but the cost of imports 'either just went up 50% or went up 10%, but no one can be sure.' The markets, the voters and two courts have all offered Trump a hand to rescue him from this river of madness. But he has rejected every entreaty. As is so often the case with Trump, though, it'll be others who drown. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store