Top brass of NEU teaching union meets to draw up plans for strike action
Plans for strike action will be drawn up by the largest teaching union when its executive meets this evening, Sky News has learnt.
The special executive of the National Education Union (NEU) will map out a number of scenarios in a full ballot for industrial action while it waits for a final pay offer from the government.
The Department for Education (DfE) has proposed a 2.8% pay rise for the 2025/26 financial year, saying it was an "appropriate" offer that would "maintain the competitiveness" of teachers' pay despite a "challenging financial backdrop".
It comes on top of the 5.5% pay rise accepted by teachers last year for 2024/25, which followed eight days of strikes in England in 2023.
However, the NEU, led by general secretary Daniel Kebede, has rejected the 2.8% offer as "unacceptable" and "unfunded".
Instead, the union is calling for a fully funded, above-inflation pay rise - although it has not put a figure on the proposal it would like to receive.
Mr Kebede has also criticised the government for suggesting schools could pay for it by making "efficiencies" in their budgets, saying schools have already faced years of cuts.
'Anger and fear about what is happening in education'
The government will only finalise its offer once it has received the recommendations of the School Teachers' Review Body (STRB), which makes recommendations on the pay of school teachers in England.
The DfE has not yet published the STRB recommendations or its decision on whether to accept them - but it is expected that this will happen imminently.
A source on the executive told Sky News there was "real clarity about the impact of an unfunded pay award", adding: "There is a lot of anger and fear about what is happening in education."
They said any potential strike action, if approved, would be targeted at the first half of the autumn term and so would be unlikely to affect student exams.
In an indicative electronic ballot that was launched at the beginning of March, 93.7% of NEU respondents turned down the proposed 2.8% pay rise, while 83% of teachers said they would be willing to take industrial action to secure a better deal.
However, the result was achieved on a turnout of 47.2% - lower than what would be needed if the union's formal ballot is to be successful.
Under trade union legislation, the NEU must achieve a turnout of 50% in both the teacher and support staff ballots. Some 40% of those eligible to vote must back strike action for it to go ahead.
The government has promised to repeal the 2016 Trade Union Act but has delayed the process until after electronic balloting has been introduced.
The source on the NEU executive said: "The decision of the NEU conference was that schools can't afford an unfunded pay rise - we are already seeing redundancies in London and that situation is going to be dire next year.
"Schools are suffering an improvement and retention crisis, morale is bad and teaching is not high on the list of well-paid graduate jobs."
They said that as well as pay, teachers were also concerned about the new Ofsted inspection system and the impact AI could have on de-skilling the profession and job losses.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: "With school staff, parents and young people working so hard to turn the tide on school attendance, any move towards industrial action by teaching unions would be indefensible.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
New details emerge about Anthony Albanese's super tax and the bold move to win over supporters
Labor's new plan to tax superannuation balances above $3million will reportedly allow people to pay the charge from their super funds, rather than having to sell assets to cover the costs. The federal government wants to impose an extra 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances above $3 million, bringing the total tax rate to 30 per cent for those in that bracket. The proposal has sparked criticism for including unrealised capital gains, meaning that assets that have increased in value, such as property or shares, could also be taxed even before they're accessed. There were fears this could force self-managed super funds to sell assets like properties and shares to avoid being slugged. But Sky News Australia reports that individuals in that tax bracket could pay the levy out of their super balances, rather than being forced to sell assets. This mirrors existing arrangements for people who are already taxed more on earnings above $250,000. Treasurer Jim Chalmers reportedly believes the fact that people can pay the tax out of their super should quieten critics who claim people will be forced to offload assets to pay for it. The Coalition confirmed last week it would consider voting in favour of Labor's policy to raise taxes if it scrapped the unrealised gains element and indexed the $3million threshold. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers dropped a major hint that he will not negotiate with the Opposition as the government does not need the Opposition's approval as it has the numbers to get any bill through the Senate with the help of the Greens. Dr Chalmers told 7.30 host Sarah Ferguson the government would prefer to deal with the Greens than the Coalition. 'I'm not convinced that they're fair dinkum when it comes to making superannuation tax concessions a little bit fairer, and I think my opposite number has made that clear that they're not interested in that,' he said. 'We'll obviously have discussions with other parties in the Senate to do what we can to pass that legislation.' This refusal to negotiate with the Opposition was made despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week saying the government would negotiate with the Coalition over super policy. 'We do not have a majority in the Senate; we obviously work with different parties,' the Albanese said. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it needs the support of 10 other senators to get any legislation passed through the upper house. The Greens are enthusiastic about the proposed tax, and in fact want it to kick it on balances of $2million and above, not $3million. Crossbencher senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie last year refused to support Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains, meaning the government could only rely on the Greens in the Senate. Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien this week said the Coalition would be open to negotiating with the government on super provided it dropped plans to tax unrealised gains and indexed the $3million threshold. 'When it comes to all policies, including this one, the Coalition will always be open however that doesn't mean a blank cheque,' he told Sky News. 'If indeed, Jim Chalmers wants to come and have a discussion with the Coalition about his super tax, he would have to firstly walk away from the unrealised capital gains component, at least. 'He should be compromising on indexation. Now, if he caves in on all of those things and wants to talk about super reform, let's have a chat about super reform.' Accountants argue taxing unrealised gains would stop self-managed super funds from investing in assets that can quickly appreciate in value, such as technology start-ups; starving that sector of funds. Concerns have also been raised about Labor's decision no to index the proposed $3 million tax threshold to inflation. This means that far more people will be pushed into that tax bracket in future. , even if compulsory employer super contributions stayed constant. They are rising to 12 per cent on July 1, up from 11.5 per cent.
North Wales Chronicle
21 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.
Rhyl Journal
21 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.
