Dutch government falls as far-right leader Wilders quits coalition
Far-right Dutch leader Geert Wilders withdrew his party from the government Tuesday in a row over immigration, bringing down a shaky coalition and likely ushering in snap elections.
Wilders has been frustrated with what he saw as the slow pace of introducing the "strictest-ever immigration policy", agreed with coalition partners after his shock election win in November 2023.
"No signature for our asylum plans... PVV leaves the coalition," said Wilders on X, formerly Twitter, referring to his far-right Freedom Party.
The withdrawal opens up a period of political uncertainty in the European Union's fifth-largest economy and major exporter, as far-right parties make gains across the continent.
The latest government crisis also comes just weeks before the Netherlands is due to host world leaders for a NATO summit.
Last-ditch crisis talks on Tuesday morning lasted barely half an hour before the leaders of the four coalition parties came out in a testy mood.
"I have just informed the prime minister that I will withdraw the PVV ministers from the cabinet and that we can no longer bear responsibility for this," said Wilders.
"I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands and that our responsibility for this cabinet therefore ends at this moment," he added.
Eighteen months after his surprise election win sent shockwaves through Europe, polls suggest his PVV is still the strongest.
However, the gap to his nearest rivals has narrowed, with the left-wing Green/Left party of former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans following close behind.
The liberal VVD party, a traditional powerhouse in Dutch politics, are also running near the top two, meaning any election would likely be closely fought.
VVD leader Dilan Yesilgoz, visibly angry, described Wilders' move as "super irresponsible", adding she was afraid it would open the door to left-wing parties.
"How can you do this to the Netherlands?" she told reporters.
- 'Patience was up' -
In late May, Wilders called an impromptu press conference to announce his "patience was up" with the government of Prime Minister Dick Schoof.
He threatened to torpedo the coalition if a new 10-point plan to crimp immigration was not implemented within a few weeks.
His plan included border closures for asylum seekers, tougher border controls and deporting dual nationals convicted of a crime.
Summarising his demands, he said: "Close the borders for asylum seekers and family reunifications. No more asylum centres opened. Close them."
Political and legal experts criticised the plans as unworkable or illegal, with some suggesting Wilders was creating a crisis to collapse the government.
The far-right leader has often been called the "Dutch Trump" for his anti-immigrant views -- and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle.
His ambitions to lead his country were frustrated after his election win, as his coalition partners blocked his premiership bid, settling instead on Schoof as a compromise candidate.
The leaders of the four coalition partners agreed not to take up cabinet positions, instead running their parties as parliamentary chiefs.
Wilders has been an uncompromising figure in parliament, his quick-witted jousting with Timmermans being a highlight of debates.
He has frequently said that the only way to implement his anti-immigrant policies is for him to become prime minister.
However, in the fractured Dutch political system, no party can win an absolute majority in the 150-seat parliament and Wilders will need partners.
He can count on the support of the BBB farmers' party. The backing of the VVD -- currently an uneasy coalition partner -- is less certain.
The fourth party in the current coalition -- the anti-corruption New Social Contract -- has seen support collapse since charismatic leader Pieter Omtzigt stepped down.
Far-right parties have been on the rise across Europe. In May, the far-right Chega ("Enough") party took second place in Portuguese elections.
In Germany, the anti-immigration far-right AfD doubled its score in legislative elections in February, reaching 20.8 percent.
And in Britain, polls show the anti-immigration, hard-right Reform UK party of Nigel Farage is making significant gains following a breakthrough in local elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
24 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
'Grossly unfair': Coalition digs in against super tax as Albanese government and Greens to pass legislation
Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien has confirmed the Coalition will oppose Labor's tax on superannuation balances above $3 million 'every step of the way'. Mr O'Brien officially confirmed the opposition's position on the 'grossly unfair' policy following potential negotiations on key aspects of the legislation. He told Sky News on Thursday that the Coalition had completed its internal processes and was now united in its decision to reject the legislation outright. 'We will definitely, as a Coalition, oppose this unfair super tax of Labor's every step of the way,' Mr O'Brien said. 'This is grossly unfair and it flies in the face of everything we believe in as a Coalition.' The Albanese government plans to double the tax rate on superannuation earnings for balances above $3 million, from 15 to 30 per cent. The proposal controversially includes unrealised capital gains and will not been indexed – two aspects the opposition previously said it may be willing to negotiate. Mr O'Brien has argued the government's decision to tax unrealised gains was unprecedented and dangerous. 'To think that a person can make a theoretical profit—no money has hit the bank account—and they get taxed every single year, that's not fair,' he said. 'Labor's super tax, it's super big, it's super bad. It flies in the face of what we believe as a Coalition. 'We believe in lower, simpler, fairer taxes. And Labor's tax on superannuation is none of those things.' He also warned that the refusal to index the threshold would expand the tax's reach over time, affecting millions of middle-income workers, such as teachers and nurses. AMP Deputy Chief Economist Diana Mousina conducted modelling that showed the average 22-year-old will be hit by the tax by the time they retire. CPA Australia's Superannuation Lead, Richard Webb, called on policymakers to ensure the policy will be indexed to inflation. 'Bracket creep is already having a silent eroding effect on personal finances,' Mr Webb said in a statement. 'Allowing this further erosion of superannuation savings is contrary to the fundamental principles of our tax system.' There has also been criticism about the fact politicians under the defined benefit pension scheme will not have to pay the tax until after they retire. Sky News also revealed recently that state officials on the old pension schemes are not expected to be taxed at all due to constitutional protections. Labor has argued the tax is a necessary reform to ensure the superannuation system is used for its intended purpose—funding retirements. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has said the measure is modest, fiscally responsible, and affects only a small proportion of high-balance accounts. The policy appears set to pass the senate with support from the Greens, who have pledged in-principle backing and are negotiating final details. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim has called for the threshold to be lowered to $2 million and indexed.
Sky News AU
39 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Coalition vows to oppose Labor's ‘grossly unfair' super tax
Deputy Opposition Leader Ted O'Brien officially announces the Coalition will oppose the Albanese government's proposed tax on superannuation balances over $3 million. 'What I can confirm with you today … we will definitely oppose this unfair super tax of Labor's every step of the way,' Mr O'Brien said. 'This is grossly unfair and flies in the face of everything we believe as a Coalition.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Modern day Robin Hood': Treasurer Jim Chalmers set to get backing from Greens on super tax as Coalition rip the reforms as ‘immoral'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers is set to negotiate superannuation tax reforms with the Greens for a Senate victory as the Coalition continue to rip into the "immoral" overhaul, labelling the Treasurer a 'modern day Robin Hood'. Mr Chalmers argued that proponents of abstract tax reforms 'very rarely' support it in reality. The Treasurer has suggested the government will push on with its tax reforms regardless of the Coalition's concerns with aspects of the proposal. On Thursday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese suggested a compromise with Coalition was still on the cards. 'The Greens usually don't have good points, and I will allow them to put forward whatever they want to do, as the Liberal Party will, as will other senators, no doubt,' Mr Albanese told journalists in Melbourne. 'We'll put forward our position. That was before the senate for some time. 'It did not receive support prior to the election, but then again, the Greens and the Liberals joined to form the 'No-alition', and to vote against public housing, to vote against a whole range of projects, we'll wait and see." Deputy Liberal Leader Ted O'Brien said the Labor government was not indexing the super tax for balances over $3 million which would lead to younger Australians and 'everyday Aussies' getting 'caught in the net over time'. 'Every aspect of this is looking awful, and it certainly does not align with our values as a Liberal Party or indeed a Liberal-National Coalition,' Mr O'Brien told the ABC on Thursday. 'The Treasurer is not being upfront about that and the reason he's not is he's wanting to pretend he's sort of some modern-day Robin Hood, taking from the fat cats with multi-million dollar portfolios to fund the good deeds of government.' On Wednesday evening, the Treasurer said he was 'not convinced' the opposition were 'fair dinkum' about making superannuation tax concessions fairer. 'We'll obviously have discussions with other parties in the Senate to do what we can to pass that legislation. It's a change that we announced almost two and a half years ago. It is modest, it is methodical, but it makes a meaningful difference to the budget,' he said. 'In a world where the budget is not sustainable enough when it comes to the pressures that the ageing of our population, pressures on the health system, the NDIS and all the rest of it. It's an important budget repair measure and we intend to proceed with it.' Mr Chalmers explained the tax concession before the change on balances over $3 million was about $14 thousand, with the new reform still offering a tax saving, but a more 'modest' one of $13 thousand. The Treasurer said his political opponents have 'latched onto' the earning method proposed by the Treasury for earning more than $3 million. 'I'm obviously aware of the campaign that some of our political opponents and others have been running, but nobody's come forward with a better way to do it. And so we're proposing to go with what the Treasury has recommended to us,' he said. Mr O'Brien said it was 'not right' because the measure lacked an indexing framework which meant a young person today, earning an average salary, would hit the threshold at some point. 'The Australian workforce today is around 14 million, so for the Treasurer to say it only takes a few Australians on with this, no, it's not. That's not the truth at all. If it were true, he would have indexed this but he hasn't indexed it because he wants it to grow,' Mr O'Brien said. 'He wants more Australians to be taxed. We are against Australians having to cop higher taxes … if he wants to hurt Australians with higher taxes at this stage, well, that's on him.' Speaking to Sky News First Edition host Pete Stefanovic on Thursday morning, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said her party had not talked with the government about the super reforms but wanted to see reform to the system to make it 'fairer and stronger'. Ms Hanson-Young said the Greens wanted to see the threshold lowered to $2 million, and indexed. 'The ball is in the government's court. We're not going to negotiate through the media with all due respect, Peter, but it's quite clear that the Coalition are in an absolute mess on this,' she said. 'Only a day or so ago we saw Ted O'Brien putting out the feelers saying he wanted to deal with Jim Chalmers and government. He's clearly been pulled back into line, you know, whipped back in place… someone's told him to pull his head in.' Ms Hanson-Young continued to chide the Coalition and said the opposition was 'all over the place' and 'desperate for a scare campaign' rather than a real critique of Labor's new tax proposal. 'It's going to be a circus going forward,' she said. Joining the conversation, Nationals MP Kevin Hogan said there was never going to be a negotiation on taxing unrealised gains, labelling the proposal 'immoral'. 'Obviously non-indexing that is not okay either because obviously the amount of people that would get affected by that would be enormous,' he said.
