logo
Sadiq Khan wants to legalise cannabis. It killed my son

Sadiq Khan wants to legalise cannabis. It killed my son

Telegraph30-05-2025

Whenever plans to decriminalise cannabis are mooted, 'my heart sinks,' says Janie Hamilton. So it was again this week when Sir Sadiq Khan backed calls for the partial decriminalisation of the Class B drug, stating that the way it is policed 'cannot be justified given its relative harm'.
This kind of logic is touted only by those who 'really don't know what they're talking about,' believes Hamilton, 73, whose son died in his mid-30s after battling with cannabis addiction for more than two decades.
She recalls spending years visiting locked wards as his health deteriorated and schizophrenia took hold. 'They were filled with people either off their heads or shuffling around like zombies,' says Hamilton. 'The common denominator between them all? Cannabis.'
Hamilton's son, James, first became her window into the drug's harms when he was 14. At the time, the family was living at a prestigious Surrey boarding school where both she and her husband taught.
But as he began to dabble in drugs, she says, James morphed from an adventurous boy who had dreams of becoming a journalist into a 'very rude, arrogant and unpredictable' individual.
'I'd never had a teenager before and, at first, believed the unpleasant things I was witnessing were the result of normal adolescent behaviour,' Hamilton recalls. 'I just thought, 'I love my son, but I don't like him.''
Schoolfriends had given James cannabis, which began having a marked effect both on his mind and his grades. He had been predicted three A-stars at A-Level, but eventually received an A, B and D, losing a place at Durham University. Then 18, instead of trying to secure a new course via clearing, he went on holiday with 'cannabis-smoking friends' while his mother scrabbled to enrol him elsewhere. Just a few months later, she says, 'he came home looking completely lost; he was barely holding it together.'
James then took on a string of low-commitment odd-jobs while his behaviour became increasingly erratic. He would stay in his room all day, often until midnight, when 'he'd come out and go down to the kitchen, turn the light on, turn the grill on, come up to the bathroom and start showering.' He also stripped his room of all possessions – even the bed – until there was just a mattress and sheet on the floor.
James was 20 when, on finishing work on a building site, he returned home one day 'turning in circles saying 'I'm free, I'm free.'' When Hamilton asked him to stop, 'he told me he'd spent all his wages on cannabis.'
The next day, Hamilton called a doctor, who quickly returned with a psychiatrist and a social worker. 'Within minutes they gave each other the nod, and he was sectioned,' Hamilton says.
'And that was the beginning of 16 years of being sectioned, then getting a little bit better, being well enough to come out of hospital and eventually coming off his medication.' But each cycle would only make the next fall yet harder, and James 'became more and more ill'.
What she hadn't understood during his teens was that 'the cannabis was changing his brain, and changing his thinking'. But by the time he turned 20, its impact was clear, as James began to develop paranoid schizophrenia. This was not a genetic condition, Hamilton says. 'It was the cannabis that changed him,' she adds.
Hamilton had been hopeful that his being sectioned would mark a turning point. After his first three-month stint he appeared to improve, moving back in with his family and securing a job as a porter 'in the kitchens of the school where he'd once been a star pupil'. When he decided that his medication had left him 'deadened', however, the progress came to a shuddering halt. He told his mother that he was abandoning the treatment, slamming the door as she pleaded with him to continue.
More erratic behaviour ensued: an ambulance was called after he 'finished up everybody's dregs' during a visit to the pub, and fell off his bike. He blasted music across the grounds of the school they lived at – James's attempt 'to drown out the voices in his head because you can't get away from them,' she knows now. 'We warned and warned and warned him that he'd be re-sectioned, and he took no notice.'
Between inpatient stints, where he would flit between prescribed medication and cannabis, James's paranoia flourished. He had a small scar from a mole removal that he became convinced people were unduly whispering about; he developed body dysmorphic disorder, getting the tip of one ear – which scarcely differed from the other – pinned back on Harley Street.
Of his 16 years in and out of institutions, there was just one spell where 'he got insight, actual insight into what he had done to himself,' says Hamilton. 'He knew it was the cannabis; he suddenly saw what he had put us through, and he apologised.' But then, again, he came off his medication, and the problems began anew.
'Nobody could do anything, that was the tragic part of it,' Hamilton says. She becomes emotional recalling another incident where after more strange behaviour on school grounds aged 21, they moved him to a nearby hostel, his belongings stuffed into a black plastic bag.
He would eat only when his parents brought food over and at one stage, he went missing. 'I remember thinking: he's off his head, nobody's looking after him, he could die… and then I thought to myself, if he dies, he dies. From that moment on I felt there was nowhere else to go but up, because I had faced the worst in my head.'
There were glimpses of the old James at times, Hamilton reflects. She calculates that they went to National Trust properties over 1,000 times; even in his ill state he could fashion a witty one-liner. It all could have been so easily avoided, Hamilton thinks, had he not 'got in with the wrong crowd'.
But in 2015, when James was 36, the psychological issues wrought by his cannabis-taking would become fatal. He had been diagnosed with early stage testicular cancer – something he initially kept from his parents – and refused to accept treatment. There were hospital meetings and even a court case to try and make him see reason. But 'you cannot fight psychosis. It is impossible,' Hamilton says of her son's mental state. 'What they hear in their head and what they see in their delusions are so strong that they believe those, rather than what's said to them.'
It devastates Hamilton that her son's eminently treatable cancer produced the most awful of outcomes in July 2015, when he passed away. 'Cannabis stole his life three times over,' she says: first robbing him of his potential, then potentially triggering the disease (several studies have shown a link between heavy use of the drug and testicular cancer), before finally denying him the 'ability to make a right-minded decision to have life-saving treatment'.
'So in every way it got him, and he did not have to die. He could still be here,' Hamilton adds.
It is for this reason that she fears the dangers of cannabis being downplayed. (In response to Khan's comments, David Sidwick, Dorset's police and crime commissioner, urged that cannabis be considered on par with crack cocaine and heroin.) 'Some people will have done exactly what James did and got away with it – but many don't,' Hamilton says.
Through activism since his death, she has met numerous parents of addicts who have become shadows of their former selves, disinterested in the world beyond their bedrooms and unrecognisable from the promise-filled people they were before. They don't factor into official statistics because they are not in treatment, Hamilton explains, but their distorted lives are proof of the drug's potentially devastating effects.
Hamilton continues to campaign, so that other families don't suffer the same fate she has. 'The fight against cannabis just makes some sense out of James's death,' she says. 'Because I know what it does.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform-led councils in ‘shambles' since local elections, opponents claim
Reform-led councils in ‘shambles' since local elections, opponents claim

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reform-led councils in ‘shambles' since local elections, opponents claim

Reform UK gained control of nine councils and minority control in three more in May's local elections, but opposition councillors claim the party's organisation and productivity have been a "shambles" since. Across the 12 Reform-controlled councils, 33 meetings have been cancelled or postponed in the first nine weeks since the election, and at least 21 Reform councillors have missed their first meetings. In Kent, nine out of 22 scheduled meetings have been cancelled since the election, including legally required meetings like the governance and audit committee. Kent County Council said some meetings, such as planning committees, were scheduled on an 'if required' basis, and were cancelled because there were no applications requiring an immediate decision. Nottinghamshire Council's new Reform leader Mick Barton dismissed the criticisms as "political rhetoric from the opposition."

Brighton GP practice investigated for prescribing trans hormones to children
Brighton GP practice investigated for prescribing trans hormones to children

Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Brighton GP practice investigated for prescribing trans hormones to children

An investigation into a GP clinic in Brighton that prescribed transgender hormones to children has been launched by the NHS. The WellBN GP practice, which runs three clinics in Sussex, was ordered by health service leaders to stop prescribing cross-sex hormones to under 18s and the NHS has now launched a 'rapid investigation'. The NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board, which oversees the region's health services, said that the actions of GPs at WellBN 'may fall outside of national clinical policy and guidance'. 'Following concerns raised about some prescribing for children and young people by WellBN in Brighton and Hove, that may fall outside of national clinical policy and guidance, we are working with NHS England and have launched a rapid investigation into this activity to determine the most appropriate care and treatment for these patients,' it said. The administration of cross-sex drugs, also known as gender-affirming hormones, involves giving hormones such as testosterone to help someone change their physical appearance. They are different to puberty blockers, which stop the onset of puberty by suppressing the release of hormones. The Cass review, led by the paediatrician Baroness Hilary Cass, said all under 18s questioning their gender should be seen by a team of experts for a range of conditions, including mental health issues and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, before any treatment is considered. 'Extreme caution' recommended The independent review concluded that medical pathways to change genders had been 'built on shaky foundations' and called for puberty blockers to be banned, citing the 'weak evidence' to support their use in this group of patients. It urged 'extreme caution' in relation to cross-sex hormones in under 18s. But WellBN continued to prescribe the drugs, claiming on its website that it would prescribe the hormones to patients with a referral to a gender identity clinic while they waited for an appointment, and that it would also arrange a referral for any patients who did not have one. The GP practice is already the subject of a legal challenge by the parents of Child O, an anonymous 16-year-old boy, who claimed their child was prescribed cross-sex hormones without having been properly assessed by a gender-identity clinic and without their knowledge. The clinic previously said it had 'fully considered and responded back to the correspondence received from the family's representatives and will engage fully on any next steps'. It also said it is 'confident that any young patients under the age of 18 are assessed in accordance with good medical practice', adding: 'Gillick competence and bodily autonomy are at the heart of all care we offer and this framework is consistently applied.' 'Trans health hub' The practice operates a 'trans health hub' and patients - of which it says around 2,000 are trans or non-binary - can receive annual check-ups with 'a supportive and affirming clinician'. It has defended its prescribing of hormones to under 18s based on an 'informed consent pathway', which it says 'sets out the risks, potential side effects and reversible and irreversible intended effects of hormone therapy'. It comes after Wes Streeting last month ordered a review into the use of cross-sex hormones in children, which could join puberty blockers in being banned for use in under 18s to treat gender dysphoria. NHS Sussex said the majority, but not all, of the children being prescribed cross-sex hormones by the clinic lived in the region and that it would be reviewing each case to consider next steps for their treatment and care. 'The cohort of patients whose cases are being reviewed are all aged under 18, and for whom WellBN is prescribing or arranging the supply of medication for gender dysphoria,' it said. 'There will be a process to review their notes, and consider next steps in their treatment, in line with national guidance and clinical advice.' Temporary pause It said there would be 'different outcomes for different patients', with some referred to specialist NHS gender services, others seen by local mental health services, while some would have their hormone treatment reviewed. WellBN revealed last week that the NHS had 'forced us to temporarily pause initiating new NHS prescriptions for gender-affirming care to anyone under the age of 18', including a ban on taking on prescriptions from private sector providers. It vowed to try to 'turn this decision around' and said it would be meeting with NHS Sussex. Rachel Cashman, co-founder of community group PSHE Brighton, said she welcomed the investigation, adding that parents she had spoken with had been 'concerned' about WellBN's approach to treating under 18s with gender issues for some time. ' Gender distressed children deserve the most clinically efficacious treatment,' she said. 'PSHE Brighton welcomes an investigation by NHS England into the care provided by this service'.

Police officers played ‘snog, marry, avoid' with images of sex workers
Police officers played ‘snog, marry, avoid' with images of sex workers

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Police officers played ‘snog, marry, avoid' with images of sex workers

Police in Derbyshire played a game of 'snog, marry, avoid' while using images of suspected sex workers, a tribunal was told. Shafarat Mohammed sued the force for racial discrimination and harassment after a female colleague involved him in the game, which involves naming three people and asking someone to pick which one you would like to kiss, marry and avoid. At the hearing in Nottingham, the woman officer admitted she had 'jokingly' played the game with co-workers and included PC Mohammed in their discussion. In the tribunal's ruling, the judge said that playing the game at work could breach equality legislation. Employment Judge Stephen Shore suggested that the officers may have referred to the game, which has several names, by a cruder version. PC Mohammed claimed that during the discussion in May or June 2022, he was shown images of black women and was asked what he liked about one of them. He said he was 'embarrassed' and 'offended' by the questioning and felt it was inappropriate. 'Crass and inappropriate' PC Kate Northridge, another officer at Pear Tree Station in Derby, admitted to the hearing that a group of officers played the game with photos of suspect. She said she had been the one to include PC Mohammed in the game but she had not asked him specific questions about any of the images. Speaking about snog, marry, avoid, Judge Shore said: ' The game was crass and inappropriate. It casts no one who participated in it in a good light.' The judge added that playing the game 'could constitute harassment of a sexual nature', although he acknowledged that Mohammed had not made that claim. 'We agree with [him] that the questions were inappropriate,' he said. Racial discrimination and harassment claims The tribunal heard that PC Mohammed joined the force in November 2021 and completed his training in March the next year. He resigned less than a year later, in September 2022, and then made an employment tribunal claim for racial discrimination and harassment. The tribunal found there was no racial or religious element to it as the sex workers were of varying ethnicities. They also concluded that he was not asked questions about a specific black sex worker and that his credibility was undermined by a lack of consistency between his different accounts. PC Mohammed made several allegations including that a colleague called him a 'road man', he was 'humiliated' for eating home-made food, and told he was 'sh*t'. The officer also claimed that another PC said the custody team was 'all black and ethnics', he was asked about his familiarity with alcohol, and that he had been ostracised from team events. However, the tribunal found these allegations were either entirely fabricated by PC Mohammed or were given 'a retrospective gloss of alleged discrimination' in his witness statements which often contradicted each other. PC Mohammed, a Pakistani heritage Muslim, lost his case for racial and religious discrimination and harassment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store