Myammar's military government chief has first meeting with China's leader since taking power in 2021
The chief of Myanmar's military government, Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, has for the first time since seizing power four years ago met with President Xi Jinping of China, a top ally of his military government, state-run media in the Southeast Asian nation reported Saturday.
The Global New Light of Myanmar newspaper reported that Xi pledged to provide assistance for recovery after Myanmar's devastating earthquake in March and aid in efforts to end the country's civil war. The two leaders met Friday in Moscow on the sidelines of the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
Its report said they also discussed 'bilateral relations, enhancing cooperation in all sectors, and cooperating in regional stability and peace.'
Cooperation discussed as Beijing seeks to shore up military government
China has been using its influence with ethnic rebel organizations to ease their pressure on the military government in an apparent effort to stabilize it.
China, along with Russia, is a major arms supplier to Myanmar's military in its war against pro-democracy and ethnic minority resistance forces. Beijing is also Myanmar's biggest trading partner and has invested billions of dollars in mines, oil and gas pipelines, and other infrastructure. Its interests in security in Myanmar are especially strong because the two nations share an 890-mile (1,440-kilometer) border
China's government has maintained good working relations with Myanmar's ruling military, which is shunned and sanctioned by many Western nations for the army's February 2021 takeover from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi and for major human rights violations.
It is also one of the countries providing major relief and reconstruction assistance after the 7.7-magnitude March 28 earthquake that killed more than 3,700 people in Myanmar and injured more than 5,100.
The quake worsened an already dire humanitarian crisis, with more than 3 million people displaced from their homes and nearly 20 million in need due to the war, according to the United Nations.
Beijing has been concerned about instability that threatens its interests in Myanmar since Myanmar's army suffered unprecedented battlefield defeats over the past few years, especially in areas near the Chinese border.
An offensive began in October 2023, by the ' Three Brotherhood Alliance, ' comprising the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, the Arakan Army and the Ta'ang National Liberation Army, was able to quickly capture towns and overrun military bases and command centers and strategic cities along the Chinese border in northeastern Shan state.
It was widely seen at the time as having Beijing's tacit support to help stamp out rampant organized crime activities in areas controlled by ethnic Chinese.
In early 2024, Beijing helped broker a ceasefire, but that quickly fell apart when the alliance launched new attacks. Myanmar's ruling generals and China's government showed concern as pro-democracy guerrillas and armed ethnic minority groups, sometimes working hand in hand, gained the initiative in fighting.
Beijing put pressure on rebel groups to yield key captured town
The alliance's offensive lost momentum after China shut down border crossings, cut electricity to Myanmar towns and took other measures to discourage the fighting.
Under increasing pressure from Beijing, the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, or MNDAA, withdrew its forces and administration authorities last month from the strategically important town of Lashio in northeastern Myanmar, which hosts a major regional military headquarters but which the rebel group seized in August last year.
A member of the MNDAA told The Associated Press on Saturday that the army's soldiers had already re-entered and and reestablished themselves in bases inside the town at the end of April. He spoke on the condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to release information.
Tar Pan La and Lway Yay Oo, spokespersons for the Ta'ang National Liberation Army, or TNLA, said during an online press conference on May 4 that local residents had been facing difficulties as China and Myanmar's military government blocked trade into areas it controlled.
Tar Pan La said China had continuously urged the group both in person and through messages to avoid clashes along the border and areas of Chinese investments.
The TNLA said in a statement released on its Telegram channel on Saturday that the military carries out daily airstrikes in areas it controls, although it extended until the end of May a ceasefire it declared in the wake of the earthquake.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Countries agree 10% increase for UN climate budget
BONN, June 26 (Reuters) - Countries agreed on Thursday to increase the U.N. climate body's budget by 10% for the next two years, a move the body welcomed as a commitment by governments to work together to address on climate change, with China's contribution rising. The deal, agreed by nearly 200 countries - from Japan to Saudi Arabia, to small island nations like Fiji - at U.N. climate negotiations in Bonn, comes despite major funding cuts at other U.N. agencies, triggered in part by the U.S. slashing its contributions, and political pushback on ambitious climate policies in European countries. Countries agreed to a core budget of 81.5 million euros for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) over 2026-2027, up 10% from 2024-2025. The core budget is funded by government contributions. The deal includes an increase in China's contribution, reflecting the country's economic growth. China, the world's second-biggest economy, would cover 20% of the new budget, up from 15% previously. Only the United States, the world's biggest economy, was allocated a bigger share, of 22%. However, President Donald Trump quit the U.N. Paris climate agreement and halted international climate funding. Bloomberg Philanthropies has pledged to cover the U.S. contribution to the UNFCCC budget. The U.S. did not attend the U.N. climate talks this week in Bonn, Germany where the budget was approved. UN climate chief Simon Stiell welcomed the increase as "a clear signal that governments continue to see U.N.-convened climate cooperation as essential, even in difficult times." The UNFCCC runs annual climate negotiations among countries and helps implement deals that are made - including the 2015 Paris Agreement, which commits nearly all nations to limit global warming. The body has faced a severe budget shortfall in recent years, as major donors including China and the U.S. had not paid on time, prompting the body to cut costs including by cancelling some events. The UNFCC's running costs and headcount - its core budget funded 181 staff in 2025 - are smaller than some other U.N. bodies facing sharp funding cuts, such as the U.N. trade and development agency's roughly 400 staff. Meanwhile, the U.N. Secretariat, the global body's executive arm, is preparing to slash its $3.7 billion budget by 20%, according to an internal memo.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Why payments to pregnant schoolgirls is dividing Putin's pronatalists
President Putin is determined to reverse Russia's 'disastrous' population slump but the country's latest counter measure may be the most controversial yet — cash payments for schoolgirl pregnancies. Rules introduced in at least ten regions since March mean teenage mothers who are still at school will be given one-off payments of 100,000 roubles (£900) for their first birth. There is no minimum age requirement of the mother to receive the payments. The legal age of consent in Russia is 16. Critics are outraged at the promotion of risky and socially challenging births, while defenders of the initiative claim it is genuine aid to vulnerable young mothers. The measure is part of a package pushed forward under Putin, who is concerned by a new decline in the populace, which experts blame in part on his invasion of Ukraine. In recent years, Russia has increased financial incentives for new mothers, banned 'child-free propaganda' and placed restrictions on abortion and divorce as it battles to avert a demographic crisis. In tune with this pronatalist spirit, a popular reality show on Russian television recently changed its name from 'Pregnant at 16' to 'Mama at 16'. The payments are granted before birth, in some regions as early as the 12th week of pregnancy, in others after 22 weeks. The extension of payments to school-age mothers has angered some pro-Kremlin politicians and activists. 'When a child gives birth to another child it's not something to be encouraged; it's not a reason for pride or heroism,' Kseniya Goryachova, a Russian MP, told colleagues in parliament. If girls were made to think 'it doesn't matter how old you are, give birth, we'll pay' then, 'This is not care. This is very harmful propaganda,' Goryachova added. Experts warned the measure may simply be ineffective. John Ermisch, an emeritus professor of family demography at Oxford University, said that financial incentives to give birth usually did not have a long-term effect. 'You get a short spike, then a decline,' he told BBC News Russian. But Andrei Klychkov, the governor of Orel, one of the regions taking part in the trial, defended the payments, saying they should be seen not as rewards but as 'social support' for teenage girls 'in a difficult real-life situation' after getting pregnant. Political commentators say the Kremlin is pushing such policies because a falling population undermines Putin's muscular rhetoric about the country 'getting off its knees' and rising to meet its enemies. 'Putin understands that, in the world of tomorrow, Russia will be a territorial giant and population dwarf,' the analysts Ivan Krastev and Stephen Holmes concluded in a recent report. Russia's population plummeted from 148.6 million in 1993 to 142.7 million in 2009 as mortality rose and fertility rates dipped. Poverty, alcoholism, poor diet and accidents took their toll in the post-Soviet collapse, while many young Russians were financially unable to support raising a family. From 2009, the trend was bucked as relative prosperity increased with Russia's oil and gas boom, and by 2022 the population was back to 147 million. However, it has since fallen again, to an estimated 146.1 million this year. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers dying in Ukraine, an exodus of young people opposed to the war — or not keen to fight in it — and cuts to inward migration are thought to have added to the latest drop in population. Those factors seem to have offset the number of 'citizens' that Russia says it acquired when it annexed Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine. • Janice Turner: Pronatalism will bring votes but not babies Meanwhile, birth rates are on the slide again. According to data released by Rosstat, the state statistics agency, 195,400 children were born in Russia during January and February 2025 — a 3 per cent drop compared to the same period in 2024. Last year, Russia recorded 1.2 million births, the lowest annual total since 1999. Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, has called the situation 'disastrous' and such statistics have prompted unusual suggestions from Russian officials desperate to stop the rot. In March, Yevgeny Rudenko, a councillor from the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia in Kaluga region, urged women to wear skimpy clothes in hot weather, and said that in the Seventies 'everyone wore mini-skirts, marriages were strong, and families were being created'. 'Because of modesty, women are getting married less often,' Rudenko added. 'Only gay men don't like women in mini-skirts.' In September, Yevgeny Shestopalov, a regional health minister, urged Russians to have sex during the working day. 'Being very busy at work is not a valid reason, but a lame excuse,' he said. 'You can engage in procreation during breaks, because life flies by too quickly.'
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: White House wants deep cut in US funding for war crimes investigations, sources say
WASHINGTON/THE HAGUE, June 26 (Reuters) - The White House on Wednesday recommended terminating U.S. funding for nearly two dozen programs that conduct war crimes and accountability work globally, including in Myanmar, Syria and on alleged Russian atrocities in Ukraine, according to two U.S. sources familiar with the matter and internal government documents reviewed by Reuters. The recommendation from the Office of Management and Budget, which has not been previously reported, is not the final decision to end the programs since it gives the State Department the option to appeal. But it sets up a potential back-and-forth between the OMB and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his aides, who will reply to OMB with their suggestions on which programs deserve to continue. The programs also include work in Iraq, Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Gambia. The State Department and OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The expectation that Rubio would argue for many of the programs to be continued is slim, according to two U.S. officials. However, the top U.S. diplomat could make a case to keep crucial programs, such as aiding potential war crimes prosecutions in Ukraine, according to one source familiar with the matter. Several of the programs earmarked for termination operate war crimes accountability projects in Ukraine, three sources familiar with the matter said, including Global Rights Compliance, which is helping to collect evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity across Ukraine, such as sexual violence and torture. Another is the Legal Action Network, a legal aid group which supports local efforts to bring cases against Russian suspects of war crimes in Ukraine, the sources said. Requests seeking comment from the groups were not immediately answered. State Department bureaus that would like to preserve any war crimes and accountability programs should send their justifications by close of business day on July 11, said an internal State Department email seen by Reuters. The administration of President Donald Trump has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office on January 20 to ensure American-taxpayer money funds programs that are aligned with his "America First" policies. The unprecedented cutbacks have effectively shut down its premier aid arm U.S. Agency for International Development, jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos. The OMB recommendation is yet another sign that the administration is increasingly de-prioritizing advocacy for human rights and rule of law globally, an objective that previous U.S. administrations have pursued. While U.S. foreign aid freezes had already started hampering an international effort to hold Russia responsible for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Wednesday's recommendations raise the risk of U.S. completely abandoning those efforts. Among the programs that are recommended for termination is a $18 million State Department grant for Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office that is implemented by Georgetown University's International Criminal Justice Initiative, two sources said. While the programs do not directly impact Ukraine's frontline efforts to fend off Russia's invasion, supporters say they represent the best chance of extensively documenting reported battlefield atrocities in Europe's biggest conflict since World War Two, now grinding toward a fourth year. Ukraine has opened more than 140,000 war crime cases since Moscow's February 2022 invasion, which has killed tens of thousands, ravaged vast swathes of the country and left behind mental and physical scars from occupation. Russia consistently denies war crimes have been committed by its forces in the conflict. Other programs include one that does accountability work on Myanmar army's atrocities against Rohingya minorities as well as on the persecution of Christians and other minorities by Syria's ousted former president Bashar al-Assad, two sources said. While the OMB recommendations could face State Department push-back, the criteria to appeal are set very strictly. In an internal State Department email, the administration cautioned that any effort to preserve programs that were recommended to be terminated should be thoroughly argued and directly aligned with Washington's priorities. "Bureaus must clearly and succinctly identify direct alignment to administration priorities," the email, reviewed by Reuters said.
