Mahmoud Khalil, detained Columbia grad, set for critical immigration hearing
Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University graduate student and lawful permanent resident who has been detained by immigration authorities since March, is scheduled to appear at a pivotal immigration hearing Thursday that could determine his future in the United States.
Khalil, who had been involved in negotiations on behalf of pro-Palestinian student protesters on the campus of Columbia last year, hasn't been charged with a crime but is one of several foreign national the Trump administration has accused of posing a natural security threat due to alleged ties to terrorist organizations - a claim his attorneys strongly dispute.
His attorneys are expected to renew their motion to terminate the deportation proceedings on Thursday, arguing the government has engaged in egregious misconduct. The attorneys have challenged the legality of Khalil's warrantless arrest and say he was targeted for his pro-Palestinian views.
In the 75 days since Khalil's arrest, at least three other international college students have been detained and later released from detention after weeks of legal action by their attorneys
Rümeysa Öztürk, Mohsen Mahdawi and Badar Khan Suri – who were all targeted for deportation by the Trump administration - challenged the legality of their detentions by filing a flurry of motions and legal briefs with federal district courts. In every case, a judge heard their cases and agreed to release them while the immigration cases play out in immigration court.
Khalil's case, in contrast, has dragged on for months as two separate venues – a federal district court in New Jersey and an administrative immigration court in Jena, Louisiana –consider next steps.
'This court has exhibited a worrying lack of independence and fairness towards the important questions regarding the unlawful detention and removal of Mr. Khalil,' Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and one of Khalil's attorneys, told CNN Wednesday.
Khalil's legal team said Wednesday the government's strategy seems focused on delaying Khalil's habeas proceedings – a basic legal process meant to play out in federal court in which a judge has the power to order his release.
At the same time, Khalil's attorneys say the government is working to speed up the immigration proceedings being handled by an immigration court within the Department of Justice where judges have limited independence.
'There has been no reason that they're rushing so fast except to try to get this case over before the federal court judge can do anything. It's been truly obvious,' Marc Van Der Hout, an immigration attorney for Khalil told reporters Wednesday.
During Thursday's immigration hearing, Khalil's attorneys will renew their motion to terminate the deportation proceedings arguing there has been 'egregious government misconduct,' - including with Khalil's unlawful arrest without a warrant, his attorneys said Wednesday.
The renewed motion to terminate the case will include new video evidence his lawyers say contradicts the government's claim that officers did not need to obtain a warrant for Khalil's arrest because they believed he was a flight risk.
CNN exclusively reported on the never-before-seen video of the arrest this week. The footage shows Khalil made no apparent attempt to flee and that he did not refuse to cooperate with immigration officers who arrested him in the lobby of his building – a claim attorneys for the Department of Justice have previously made in court.
'We have now caught the government in three direct lies, some of them to the court,' Van Der Hout said.
CNN has reached out to ICE and the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
The Trump administration is relying on a rarely used portion of US immigration law to argue that Khalil should be deported because his presence in the United States threatens the administration's foreign policy goal of combatting antisemitism.
So far, his legal team has filed an application for asylum to prevent Khalil's removal, but attorneys for the Department of Justice have already signaled their intention to block the application, citing concerns that Khalil is a national security threat.
Ahead of Thursday's immigration hearing, Khalil's legal team also filed hundreds of pages of new evidence against his removal.
The filings, which were obtained and reviewed by CNN, include declarations from Khalil's professors and classmates – including Jewish students and academics all attesting to his character. The filings also include expert declarations telling the court that Khalil is likely to be a target of foreign government or be subject to dangerous persecution if he is deported from the US.
'We're going to get through as much testimony as we can in the morning and we're feeling quite confident that the evidence shows there is a likelihood that Mahmoud would be subjected to egregious harm,' Johnny Sinodis, an immigration attorney for Khalil told reporters Wednesday.
Regardless of Thursday's outcome, Khalil's attorneys say they will appeal any decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Separately, a restraining order issued by a federal judge in New Jersey remains in effect and would prevent his removal from the country until the federal case is resolved.
Khalil, the first person to be arrested as part of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown and executive order to target student activism on college campuses has been detained since March despite not being charged with a crime. As the legal process plays out, Khalil has missed his graduation from Columbia University and the birth of his first son.
During Wednesday's commencement ceremony, Columbia's acting president, Claire Shipman, mentioned Khalil in a speech that followed a wave of boos from the graduates as she walked onto the stage.
'I know many in our community today, are mourning the absence of our graduate Mahmoud Khalil,' Shipman said.
Earlier this week, Khalil's legal team and his wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla requested permission from ICE officials in Jena, Louisiana, for a contact visit with Khalil, Abdalla and his newborn son ahead of the hearing. The request was denied by facility officials who cited a blanket policy against contact visits, his attorneys said.
Abdalla – who has not seen Khalil since his arrest in March – gave birth to their son, Deen, last month.
'After flying over a thousand miles to Louisiana with our newborn son, his very first flight, all so his father could finally hold him in his arms, ICE has denied us even this most basic human right,' Abdalla said in a statement. 'This is not just heartless. It is deliberate violence, the calculated cruelty of a government that tears families apart without remorse.'
New Jersey Federal District Court Judge Michael Farbiarz ordered immigration authorities to allow an in-person meeting between Khalil, his lawyers and his wife on Thursday. The order, which does not specifically mention Khalil's visit with his son, says the meeting is to happen before 10:30 a.m., and instructs immigration officials to 'take reasonably necessary security measures.'
'The meeting shall take place in-person, and under conditions (including as to length of time and confidentiality) that are appropriate for a substantial attorney-client meeting,' Farbiarz wrote.
Abdalla and their son are expected to attend Thursday's hearing.
Khalil's detention has sparked protests across the country from supporters who believe his detention is a flagrant violation of core American values – including the protection of free speech.
At a prior hearing in April, Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Jamee Comans ruled that Khalil could be deported, after the United States government argued his presence posed 'potentially serious foreign policy consequences.'
Khalil's attorneys argue that the government's evidence is insufficient and based solely on a letter from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which does not allege any criminal activity. They contend that Khalil is being targeted for his political speech in violation of his First Amendment rights.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'
President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire after Musk repeatedly blasted the president's sweeping domestic agenda bill in recent days. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day as a special government employee. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said, adding that while Musk has not yet personally attacked him, the president expected that could be next. Trump repeatedly claimed that Musk's concerns with the bill were centered on the repeal of electric vehicle subsidies that benefitted Tesla. Musk has admitted his company has struggled in the wake of his political involvement. Musk didn't wait to respond, posting his reactions in real time on his social media platform X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the bill ahead of time, and countered that the elimination of EV tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill' Musk in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' One Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed the idea that Musk's opposition is only about the EV subsidies, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation passed by the House would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. During Thursday's Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump reminisced about his campaign bromance with Musk, who contributed at least a quarter-billion dollars to efforts supporting Trump's 2024 presidential bid and once called himself Trump's 'first buddy.' 'Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won – Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump said, referring to his chief of staff Susie Wiles, appearing to hint at tensions between Wiles and Musk. Trump appeared to moderate his tone at times, saying he 'always liked Elon' – before implicitly accusing him of so-called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'He's not the first – people leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of 'Trump derangement syndrome,' I guess they call it, but we have it with others too,' he said. 'They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone,' he continued. 'The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is.' Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Tells German Chancellor D-Day Was 'Not A Pleasant Day For You'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump told German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that D-Day—the day Allied forces invaded Normandy, France, during World War II—was "not a great day" for Germany. What To Know Trump made his comments while he and Merz spoke to reporters during Merz's White House visit on Thursday. Merz pointed out that the anniversary of D-Day is on Friday, saying it was when "the Americans ... ended the war in Europe." "That was not a pleasant day for you," Trump responded. "No, that was not a pleasant—well—" Merz began before Trump interjected. "This was not a great day," Trump said. Merz cut in: "In the long run, Mr. President, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship." "That's true," Trump said. Merz went on to say that "we know what we owe you," adding that the U.S. can play a similarly crucial role in bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. "America is, again, in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war, so let's talk about what we can do jointly," the German chancellor said. "We are ready to do what we can and you know that we gave support to Ukraine and that we are looking for more pressure on Russia ... we should talk about that." MERZ: Tomorrow is the D Day anniversary, when the Americans ended a war in Europe TRUMP: That was not a pleasant day for you? This is not a great day MERZ: This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 5, 2025 President Donald Trump, right, meets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump, right, meets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. Evan Vucci/AP This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Hedge fund titan Ken Griffin rips White House over tax bill
Hedge fund titan Ken Griffin ramped up his war of words with the Trump White House on Wednesday, blasting the president's so-called 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill for adding to Uncle Sam's eye-popping $36 trillion debt pile. The 56-year-old CEO of Citadel, who is worth $42 billion according to Forbes, told the business magazine's annual Iconoclast summit in New York City that if the bill passed, the country would 'unquestionably add several trillion dollars' to the US debt. 'There are a lot of question marks as to why we are continuing to restart tax cuts when we have a fiscal deficit that is this big,' Griffin said at the business magazine's annual Iconoclast summit in lower Manhattan Advertisement 4 Griffin warned that the Trump tax bill will only add to America's debt pile. REUTERS 'The United States' fiscal house is not in order,' Griffin added. 'You cannot run deficits of 6 or 7% at full employment after years of growth. That is just fiscally irresponsible.' Analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office forecasts that there is a $2.4 trillion black hole in the president's flagship tax bill. Griffin, who moved his firm from Chicago to Miami in 2022, likewise warned that the administration should rein in spending and that investors are already worried about America's finances — posing major risks in the bond markets. Advertisement 'US default prices are probably the same as Italy or Greece,' he said, referring to the so-called credit default swap markets where investors can bet on whether someone will fail to pay their bills. The GOP megadonor also took aim at Trump for criticizing Walmart CEO Doug McMillon after he warned of needing to raise prices in response to higher import costs. 'We should not criticize CEOs for being honest, right? And that's all the CEO of Walmart was doing,' he told the audience in lower Manhattan. 'Shame on the administration.' Advertisement The Post has approached the White House for comment. 4 Elon Musk, who has only recently left the Trump administration, has been repeatedly griping about the bill on his social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. REUTERS More broadly, Griffin lamented the 'uncertainty' that now clouds investment decisions in the US as a result of policies that have 'called into question American exceptionalism.' 'The administration's attempts to use tariffs come at a dear price for the US economy and come at a dear price for the US consumers, who will undoubtedly pay higher prices,' Griffin told the audience at the upmarket Cipriani ballroom on Broadway in lower Manhattan. Advertisement 'Why do we aspire to bring back to the United States jobs that are actually moving out of China into lower-cost jurisdictions? Why are we aspiring to be the nation of the lowest cost and the lowest-paid workforce in the world? That makes no sense to me.' 4 The tariff tiff blew up at the Beverly Hills Hilton where Trump's allies organized a rival VIP welcome party to go up against Griffin's traditional Milken opener. Bloomberg via Getty Images Griffin, who voted for Trump in November's presidential election, has been a staunch critic of his administration's tariff and trade policies since the real estate mogul's second inauguration earlier this year. The row between the two men spilled over at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills last month, where allies of President Trump organized a rival VIP welcome bash to go up against the Citadel supremo's traditional opening reception. Trump unveiled his tariff plans on April 2, which he dubbed Liberation Day, as he sought to renegotiate new trade deals with countries he believed were treating the United States unfairly. 4 Griffin used a Forbes summit to launch a string of broadsides at the Trump administration over its trade and tariff policies. AP The move has since faced a string of legal challenges, with negotiations failing to bear any fruit until now, apart from an agreement with post-Brexit Britain that was announced on May 8. But discussions with the European Union, one of America's largest trading partners, have faltered, as The Post exclusively reported on May 7.