South Korea faces high-stakes election; fears over China, North Korea and US ties shape voter concerns
Early South Korean voters reportedly turned out in record numbers this week as the nation awaits the June 3 presidential election in what has been described as a pivotal race amid ongoing threats posed by China and recent rocky relations with the U.S. due to President Donald Trump's tariffs.
The leader of the progressive Democratic Party of South Korea, Lee Jae-myung, is reported to be leading the race as the frontrunner, but he has raised some eyebrows after he vowed to take a "pragmatic" approach to geopolitics, chiefly by easing previously hawkish positions on China and lessening dependence on the U.S.
"The alliance with the U.S. is the foundation of South Korea's diplomacy," Lee said during a debate earlier this month, Bloomberg reported.
Kim Jong Un Left Fuming After North Korea's New Destroyer Damaged In Failed Launch
Lee said the U.S.-South Korea-Japan partnership should be expanded, but he also said Seoul can't be "unilaterally bound" to relations with Washington, particularly when it comes to U.S. geopolitical rivalries.
"We should not neglect ties with China or Russia. We need to manage them appropriately, and there's no need to have an unnecessarily hostile approach like now," Lee also said during the debate, the South China Morning Post reported.
Read On The Fox News App
Former California GOP Congresswoman Michelle Steel, who was born in South Korea, explained that China's "bullying" behavior in the region leaves much for the global community to be concerned about.
"China [poses] the biggest threat, and they already told the whole world that they're going to take over Taiwan," she told Fox News Digital. "When they take over, where are they going to go [to] next? South Korea or Japan? The Philippines?
"China has been always fighting to expand."
Foreign policy has taken center stage in the presidential race after conservative former President Yoon Suk Yeol threw the nation into political chaos after his December 2024 impeachment.
Yoon was ardently aligned with the U.S. when it came to opposing Chinese aggression in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, where Beijing has been accused of expanding, militarizing and blocking freedom of navigation in contested territorial zones.
Lee's chief challenger, Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party (PPP), a former labor minister under Yoon, pushed back on the democratic challenger's position when it comes to China and the U.S.
But Lee has rejected the idea he is not prioritizing the U.S. alliance and reportedly said during this month's debate, "There's no need to worry. The South Korea-U.S. alliance is important and should continue to grow and strengthen."
North Korea Launches Short-range Ballistic Missiles Into Sea, South Korea Says
Though he did caution that certain steps taken by the Trump administration, including the 25% tariffs announced earlier this year and the potential withdrawal of troops has "eroded" the relationship.
"If the U.S. continues this way — eroding its soft power and the trust of other nations — it won't be sustainable. At some point, brakes will be applied," Lee said. "Until then, endurance is key."
Steel argued the "South Korean people understand the importance of a strong relationship with the United States."
"Whatever the outcome of the election, South Korean leaders should embrace President Trump and look to make an incredible trade deal that will benefit everyone," she added.
But Lee has not convinced all who are weary of his view on U.S. relations, including David Eunkoo Kim, founder and president of the Truth Forum, a conservative youth organization founded at Seoul National University.
"This election is widely seen as a pivotal moment for South Korea because the stakes — both domestically and geopolitically — are extraordinarily high," Kim said.
"Throughout his political career, (Lee) has consistently aligned himself with both pro-North Korean and pro-Chinese agendas. He has been implicated in sending funds to North Korea in violation of U.N. sanctions, and his deference to China has been nothing short of submissive," Kim said.
Kim was referring to Lee's indictment for an illegal cash transfer scheme to North Korea, though Lee denies the accusations and has argued they are politically motivated.
During this month's debate, Lee's opponents claimed Lee is also a "North Korea risk" as concerns about Pyongyang's military movements continue to escalate, Radio Free Asia reported.
Lee maintains he wants to ease tensions with North Korea by engaging in peaceful diplomacy.
But David Eunkoo Kim told Fox News Digital Lee's legal troubles are another geopolitical vulnerability.
"With multiple criminal investigations looming, he has every incentive to cling to power at all costs — even if that means aligning South Korea more closely with Beijing," he said. "And this concern is not theoretical.
"China is already aggressively asserting influence in the region."Original article source: South Korea faces high-stakes election; fears over China, North Korea and US ties shape voter concerns
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
J.D. Scholten launches run after U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst's statement on Medicaid
Democratic state Rep. J.D. Scholten launched his campaign for U.S. Senate June 2, 2025 following U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst's comments on Medicaid cuts. (Photos via Robin Opsahl/Iowa Capital Dispatch and Iowa PBS livestream) Iowa Rep. J.D. Scholten, D-Sioux City, launched a run to challenge U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst Monday in the wake of her remarks at a town hall that garnered national backlash from Democrats and health care advocates. Ernst made her controversial remark, 'we are all going to die,' at a Parkersburg town hall Friday after a person in the crowd shouted 'people will die' as she was discussing funding cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The cuts are included in the 'big, beautiful' budget reconciliation bill passed by the U.S. House in May. Though Ernst told the crowd there would likely be changes to the bill from the Senate, she supported the cuts that 'make sure that those that are not eligible by the federal standard for Medicaid are not receiving Medicaid.' Ernst posted an 'apology' video Saturday after she drew national criticism for her response. Filmed in a cemetery, Ernst posted a video on Instagram where she sarcastically said she wanted to 'sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall.' 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth,' Ernst said in the video. 'So I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.' She recommended 'for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.' The comments prompted Scholten, a professional baseball pitcher for the Sioux City Explorers and state legislator, to launch his campaign for U.S. Senate. In a video posted Monday, Scholten said he 'wasn't planning on doing this right now, but I just can't sit on the sidelines' following Ernst's comments. 'Cutting vital services to give bigger tax breaks to billionaires isn't just bad policy, it's theft from people like you and me,' Scholten said. 'Maybe it sounds crazy to run against an insider with enough arrogance to laugh at her constituents, but I've ran hard races before.' Scholten ran twice for Iowa's 4th Congressional District seat, in 2018 and 2020. Though he lost both elections, he was short by an unexpectedly tight margin — losing 47% to 50% to former U.S. Rep. Steve King in 2018 in the longtime conservative stronghold. In 2020, backlash against King for inflammatory comments made on issues like abortion exemptions and white nationalism led to his primary defeat by U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra, who currently holds the seat. The Democratic state lawmaker said he is running to tackle wealth inequality and improve America's health care systems. 'I fundamentally believe that we deserve more than a GoFundMe broken healthcare system, a JBS food system and Dollar General economy,' Scholten said. 'Ultimately, this race is not about Joni Ernst, and it's not about me. It's about the people in Iowa who deserve better: Better representatives who fight against the billionaire elites and special interests who hurt us.' Nathan Sage, a Mason City Democrat, and Scholten are currently the only Democrats who have announced their bids for the seat. However, more Democratic challengers are expected to join the field, including Iowa Sen. Zach Wahls, D-Coralville. Wahls released a statement Friday criticizing Ernst's comments, saying Iowa 'need leaders who will fight for us, not gut health care funding that over 700,000 Iowans rely on.' 'It is of course true that we are all going to die, but our Senators shouldn't be the ones killing us,' Wahls said. National Democrats were quick to respond to Ernst's comments, saying it further proved that Republicans are aware the Medicaid cuts will lead to preventable deaths. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin made a statement denouncing Ernst's video Saturday. 'Thoughts and prayers have a new meaning for the Republican Party with Joni Ernst doubling down on her cruel words,' Martin said. 'It is immoral and un-Christian to do nothing to prevent people from dying but unfortunately, Trump, Ernst, and the Republican Party are hellbent on putting their own constituents at risk.' Iowa's junior U.S. senator is far from the only Republican facing backlash for their support of the budget reconciliation bill that includes substantial federal funding cuts to public assistance programs. GOP members of Congress nationwide have faced fiery crowds at public events for months, met by shouts and jeers from constituents upset about actions taken by Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service and potential cuts to public assistance programs including Medicaid as well as veterans' benefits and Social Security. Several Iowans who depend on Medicaid for themselves or their family also decried Ernst's comments. Patrick Kearns, a registered nurse at the Iowa City VA Medical Center who has two adult children with disabilities on Medicaid, said he wished he was surprised by Ernst's comments, but that he was not. Kearns said he believes Ernst's comments reflect how many Republicans view people on Medicaid, pointing to Elon Musk, a former special government employee in the Trump administration, making social media posts referring to people on federal aid programs as a 'parasite class.' 'She accidentally said the quiet part out loud … People are going to die, and why are we bothering to keep these folks alive?' Kearns said. 'And I mean, (t0 say) that I'm horrified by it is pretty mild, but I guess the worst part of it is that I'm not surprised.' Ernst and other Republicans have presented the changes to Medicaid as a means to stop waste, fraud and abuse in the system, and limit the public health coverage to people in need through restrictions like work requirements. At the Friday town hall, Ernst pointed to 'illegals that are receiving Medicaid benefits' and unemployed adults who do not have disabilities as the people being removed from Medicaid through the GOP tax and spending bill. 'What we do need to do is make sure that those that are part of a vulnerable population have access to Medicaid and receive those full benefits,' Ernst said. 'So what we're trying to do is strengthen Medicaid by directing the dollars to the people that actually meet the requirements of the program.' Kearns said he doesn't believe the people Ernst says are abusing the Medicaid system exist, though he does think there is major fraud and misuse of Medicaid funds happening through large health provider and insurance companies. The Medicaid cuts will not target entities or individuals actually abusing the system, Kearns said, but instead push people in need to drop out of the system by adding new barriers in getting coverage. Kearns said he and his wife are 'relatively savvy' through education and years of working in the Medicaid system — but that 'every time one of those quarter-inch thick envelopes arrives from from the state, we're like, 'oh my God.'' Receiving Medicaid is already an arduous process for the people it is intended to serve — and adding new requirements will only make getting care more difficult for these populations, he said. 'The idea that somebody that's able-bodied and able to work would put themselves through the process to enroll in Medicaid, I think it's laughable,' Kearns said. '… Folks that have disabilities or that have severe medical problems that necessitate them going into long-term care or whatever else — they need social workers to help marshal them through that system. This is not something that you know the general person off the street can do.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors don't think the safest bonds of all are a sure thing anymore
With deficit concerns swirling, the market for the safest government bonds has been volatile. Bloomberg reported on Monday that top fixed income firms are staging a "buyers' strike." Investors are hesitant to buy bonds with long maturities amid doubts about the US fiscal position. A corner of the ultra-safe US Treasury market is losing its shine amid concerns about America's long-term fiscal health. It's an increasingly worrisome situation given the importance of Treasurys as a component of long-term portfolios for millions of Americans, as well as their role as an investment safe haven during times of turbulence. The market for US bonds with the longest maturities has seen a pronounced slowdown in the last few weeks. Bloomberg wrote on Monday that top fixed income firms, including Pimco and Jeffrey Gundlach's DoubleLine Capital, have been staging a "buyers' strike" of 30-year debt in favor of shorter-dated bonds. It continues a trend of investors balking at the idea of essentially lending the US government money for decades. A weak auction of 20-year bonds last month saw tepid demand, resulting in the highest yield on the bond since 2020. Pimco was already whittling its exposure to longer-dated bonds, it wrote at the end of 2024. "We have been reducing allocations to longer-dated bonds, which we find relatively less attractive. Over time, and at scale, that's the kind of investor behavior that can fulfill the bond vigilante role of disciplining governments by demanding more compensation," the bond firm wrote at the time, adding it was seeing better risk-reward in bonds with shorter maturities. Indeed, the bond vigilantes that Pimco hinted at have been credited with sending yields higher this year amid trade war and deficit angst. And more recently, KKR warned that investors shouldn't count on government debt to be the "shock absorbers" that they've relied on to shield them from volatility in the past. In fact, the market for the debt has been so volatile that it's possible the US Treasury could reduce or even cancel future sales of 30-year bonds to stabilize yields, JPMorgan Asset Management's fixed income head, Bob Michele, said in a TV interview last week. Michele added that the 10-year and 30-year bonds are trading more like risk assets. "I'm concerned it's going to get worse before it gets better," Michele said of the bond market volatility. The next auction of 30-year bonds is scheduled for June 12. The 30-year yield is back below 5% this week after climbing above that threshold to the highest level since 2008 in May. However, the concerns that drove yields up haven't abated. America's fiscal position is still an issue, and the GOP budget bill that passed through the House of Representatives in May could add trillions to the national deficit. Meanwhile, the US is now without a top-tier credit rating after Moody's downgraded its government debt in May. "We have witnessed what can happen with interest rates if investors are concerned about the fiscal health of an economy," Verdence Capital Advisors CIO, Megan Horneman, said in a recent note. "It is important to remember that long-term rates are tied to net interest costs and many loans, especially mortgages." She added that the coming 30-year auction would be highly important. But it's not just the US that's seeing investors demand more compensation to hold long-term debt. Governments around the world are seeing yields spiral higher while investors protest heavy government spending and a rapid pace of borrowing. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNBC
26 minutes ago
- CNBC
Cramer says 'be ready for disappointment' as the White House continues to shape market action
CNBC's Jim Cramer reviewed Monday's market action, chalking up the day's performance to expectations about the White House's next move. He advised that investors prepare for turbulence, even as some on Wall Street continue to have optimism about President Donald Trump's impact on big business. "We have to be ready for disappointment, because we've seen it over and over and over again," he said. "This administration is perfectly willing to disappoint the stock market…to advance their agenda, and it's foolish that you should believe otherwise." According to Cramer, the past two sessions have been shaped by changing notions of trade relations between the U.S. and China. After opening lower on Monday, stocks managed to finish in the green by close. Cramer said Wall Street was encouraged after a senior White House official told CNBC that Trump is set to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping very soon. Cramer remarked that with one report, "the market did an entire 180." He speculated about whether the president is content to have "a genuine trade peace with China," even as investors are largely hopeful Trump will change course and loosen restrictions on semiconductor exports to the country. But Cramer noted that there are still broader fears pushing a number of stocks down. Dell reported a strong quarter last week. According to Cramer, shares later dipped in part because investors worried about the administration's push to squeeze federal contractors — many of whom buy equipment from the company. Government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton has also seen its stock get crushed, he continued. New tariffs have also spurred the declines of many U.S. outfits with major suppliers abroad, including Gap and Apple, Cramer added. "We're always one posting, one whisper away from rallying or declining," Cramer said. "As long as we recognize that the President's in control of the stock market — at least, when he wants to be — we can make sense of this tape." The White House did not immediately respond to request for comment. Click here to download Jim Cramer's Guide to Investing at no cost to help you build long-term wealth and invest