Council to take up Market Street, election items
OTTUMWA — Plans to create the Market Street Landing are moving fast, as the Ottumwa City Council is expected to take up an agenda item during Tuesday's meeting at Bridge View Center to create the footings and signage for a gateway.
On the agenda are the plans, form of contract and estimated cost to construct two new columns and the 70-foot sign from trusses that were used at the old coliseum. The gateway will be located at the north end of the Market Street Bridge.
The estimated cost of the footings and signage is just over $461,000, paid for by the Ottumwa Regional Legacy Foundation as part of a re-imagining of the riverfront area on both sides of Market Street. The city isn't contributing funds to this facet of the project. There also will be art attached to the two pillars, but that is a separate project.
The gateway is the first of several projects to be completed. The overall scope also will include a new, inclusive play place on the east side of Market Street that will replace the skate park, as well as tearing out a majority of the municipal parking lot on the west side of Market Street and potentially build riverfront housing in that space.
The skate park will be moved and expanded into Sycamore Park near The Beach and the Southeast Iowa Sports Center. There also will be some construction done near the railroad tracks to make it safer for pedestrians to cross.
A recommendation on bids for the gateway part of the project will be presented at the council's March 18 meeting.
In other business:
— A slightly revised ordinance to eliminate the primary election process will come before the council for its first reading. The ordinance, if approved after three readings, will trigger Chapter 45 of Iowa Code, which does away with primary and runoff elections. In short, those who receive the most votes get the seats.
This year, three council seats and mayor's seat will be on the ballot. When a similar ordinance was before council last year, it failed on a 3-2 vote, though one of the "no" votes, council member Bill Hoffman Jr., signaled two weeks ago he will change his vote this time around.
The primary process has been costly to the city over the years, with the city often paying over $10,000 for an election in which there has been low turnout. It is not uncommon to see 1,000 voters or less vote in the primary, which brings into question the importance of the primary at all.
— The city will explore installing a wayfinding sign on the east end of Ottumwa, near the Roemer and Walnut avenue intersection. It is the only entrance into the city without wayfinding signage.
The meeting begins at 5:30 p.m.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
A modern-day version of ‘Pride and Prejudice' surfaces over city's LGBTQ+ recognition
The rainbow flag of the gay pride movement and the flag of the United States. (Photo by Getty Images) Jane Austen's novel 'Pride and Prejudice' focused on manners and goodness, two virtues sometimes forgotten today. Shortly before the novel was published, our Founding Fathers settled on the free exchange of ideas as one of the fundamental concepts they wanted to guarantee in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. But in 2025, there is an uncomfortable tug-of-war occurring over pride and prejudice, expression and oppression. That tug-of-war was on display during the Ottumwa City Council meeting last week. A similar debate is happening elsewhere around Iowa and across the nation over a variety of civic issues where opinions vary widely. The subject of the Ottumwa discourse was a proposed proclamation designating June as Pride Month there. The city made similar designations in each of the past five years with nary a peep of protest. But a couple of residents objected to the new proclamation when it came to a vote last week. What ensued was a refreshing, and polite, discussion among those residents, Mayor Rick Johnson and members of the council. No one called anyone a moron, lunatic, scum, loser, traitor or crook. Manners AND free expression prevailed. The Ottumwa discussion comes at a time when American colleges and universities are not so lucky. Whether assailed by the federal or state governments, these schools face pressure, if not coercion, to abandon policies and programs that encourage consideration of a wider cross-section of students, job applicants and voices. The discussion in Ottumwa came amid continuing controversy over rallies around the United States, where Israel's treatment of law-abiding Palestinians in Gaza has been loudly criticized — with the Trump administration drawing no distinction between peaceful events and events advocating violence toward Israel and Jews. The Ottumwa discussion also coincided with the decision by the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa to send warning letters to five cities — Carroll, Harlan, Mount Pleasant, Polk City and Webster City. In those letters, the ACLU said the cities must change their ordinances classifying performances by 'female impersonators' and 'male impersonators' as prohibited forms of adults-only entertainment. The ACLU said the ordinances are unconstitutional because they try to stop non-obscene forms of free expression that are protected by the First Amendment. That free expression is on display in popular movies like 'Mrs. Doubtfire,' when female comedians with short hair perform while wearing a suit and tie, or when men wear gowns and wigs in a Pride parade. 'These outdated ordinances go far beyond prohibiting objectionable or obscene conduct,' ACLU attorney Shefali Aurora wrote in the letters. 'To be clear, drag is not a synonym for obscenity.' Back in Ottumwa, Councilman Bill Hoffman Jr. spoke eloquently about retaining the Pride Month proclamation. His reasoning provides important insight for other situations where some disagree with the message espoused by others. 'If you don't like Pride Month, don't celebrate it. If you don't want to go to a Pride event, don't go,' Hoffman said, the Ottumwa Courier reported. 'When I ran for council, I promised to protect 25,579 people and their legal rights, and to take a proclamation off that celebrates people, to me is absolutely appalling.' Katie Howard, one of the opponents to the proclamation, urged the council to reject Pride Month. She said the council should follow the lead of the federal government's efforts to end diversity, equity and inclusion practices. 'Being gay may not be a choice, but being trans is, and you're celebrating everything,' Howard said. 'I'd also like to point out that mental health is not a choice. Colon cancer is not a choice. Being Black is not a choice. You're equating apples and oranges.' Councilman Dan Reid, the only person voting against the 2025 Pride proclamation, added: 'It's always my desire to try to treat everybody with respect, kindness and dignity. That's just my policy. That's why I felt like this proclamation is giving a specific select group of people a special month. It's just more honor than average.' Councilwoman Cara Galloway responded: 'Trying to remove this one after years of support doesn't really feel like a principled stand. It almost looks like discomfort with the LGBTQ+ community and inclusion. We can't ignore that LGBTQ+ youth are among the most at risk for mental health and suicide.' Mayor Johnson weighed in: 'If we don't continue to recognize and celebrate everybody that's part of the community, we're not living up to the goals and pillars' of the city's mission. Councilman Hoffman added, 'We're a diverse town and we should be proud of that. And anybody who stands at that podium should be celebrated. That's what we want. Differences of opinion are what make the town great.' Talk about sense and sensibility: The right to peacefully express one's opinions, whether those are shared by many or by a few, regardless of how government officials stand on an issue, lies at the heart of what makes the United States a nation of rights and freedoms. Randy Evans is a member of the Iowa Writers' Collaborative and his columns may be found on his blog, Stray Thoughts. Editor's note: Please consider subscribing to the collaborative and the authors' blogs to support their work.
Yahoo
22-05-2025
- Yahoo
Davenport city leaders testify in Scott County lawsuit about 3 settlements
City of Davenport leaders testified Wednesday in a Scott County Court trial after allegations that the City of Davenport violated state law. Mayor Mike Matson and other city leaders, including Alderperson Marion Meginnis, took the stand Wednesday. Scott County Court records show that, although deputies tried to make contact with retired assistant city attorney Brian Heyer, attempts to serve him a subpoena have been unsuccessful. In January 2024, Dr. Allen L. Diercks, who lives in Bettendorf and owns property in Davenport, filed a petition about the open meetings act and settlements of nearly $2 million with three city employees. In the civil suit, he is represented by attorneys Michael J. Meloy, and John T. Flynn, Scott County Court documents show, A judge is presiding over the trial, which began Tuesday and is scheduled to continue for four days. (In a bench trial, the judge makes the decisions, whereas jurors make the decisions in a jury trial.) Read the lawsuit below: Dierks-lawsuitDownload Details of the lawsuit The lawsuit names as defendants the City of Davenport, the Davenport City Council, and City Attorney Tom Warner. The suit challenges the execution of three 'settlement' contracts by Warner of about $2 million with three city employees, and says the contracts were signed without prior city council approval in violation of the Iowa Code. Warner was the corporation counsel for the City of Davenport and was a full-time in-house legal employee of the city, the suit says. The suit says Corrin Spiegel was the city administrator in 2023 and was hired in 2016 as city administrator, and that Spiegel was Warner's immediate job and operational supervisor. Tiffany Thorndike and Samantha Torres were at-will employees who were supervised by Spiegel and who both worked as executive assistants for the office of the mayor and the city council, according to the suit. On Sept. 8, 2023, 'without prior council approval voted upon by the Council in an open meeting,' Warner signed two separate settlement agreements with Thorndike and Torres for $157,000 and $140,500 dollars, respectively, the suit claims, saying the council did not vote to approve nor was provided the actual Thorndike and Torres agreements 'prior to its execution on September 8, 2023.' On Oct. 2023, 'without prior Council approval voted upon by the Council in an open meeting,' the suit accuses Warner of signing a third settlement agreement with Spiegel, for $1,600,000, including $600,000 dollars for lost wages and $1 million for emotional pain and suffering. The Council did not vote to approve and was not provided the actual Spiegel settlement agreement prior to its execution on Oct. 6, 2023, the suit says. Each of these three settlement agreements was a Chapter 22 public record upon the dates of their execution, according to the suit. The lawsuit claims each of the three executed settlement agreements constitutes a void contract between the parties signing the agreements. The council did not approve any of these three settlement agreements, by a recorded vote in an open meeting, with Thorndike, Torres and Spiegel, prior to the date Warner signed said agreements with the three employees, the suit says. On Nov. 10, 2023, according to the suit, the city disbursed settlement funds to Thorndike and Torres for $157,000 and $140,500. On or about Nov. 20, 2023, the suit says, the city announced that Warner was retiring effective Jan. 2, 2024. On Nov. 22, 2023, the city first publicly disclosed the settlement agreement executed with Spiegel, 'keeping the contract, which was a public record, secret from public knowledge and inspection' for a period of 47 days, after the date Warner executed the settlement agreement with Spiegel on Oct. 6, 2023. On Nov. 29, 2023, the city first publicly disclosed the Thorndike and Torres settlements, 'keeping these contracts, which were public records, secret from public knowledge and inspection for 83 days' after Warner executed the agreements on Sept. 8, 2023, the suit says. On or about Dec. 4, 2023, Warner was placed on administrative leave by the city, 'without the City disclosing the reason for Warner's administrative leave,' the suit says, adding the three large monetary settlements 'were purposely kept secret, by Warner and Mayor Matson, from the public until after the November 7, 2023 municipal election for Mayor, to protect the incumbent Mayor from public criticism and potential loss of electoral office, in his re-election bid for a third term in office.' The suit alleges the settlement agreements were 'purposely kept secret' by Warner and the council from the public until after the municipal elections for alderpersons 'to protect incumbent alderpersons from public criticism and potential loss of electoral office, in their reelection bids.' On Dec. 13, 2023, the council held an executive session 'to discuss strategy with counsel in matters involving litigation,' according to the lawsuit, which says a 'a secret (executive) session' was held after the mayor adjourned the regular council meeting in a session 'involving litigation.' According to the suit, 'At the conclusion of the secret (executive) session' held on Dec. 13, 2023, the council, by vote of 6 to 1 (3 council persons not voting), voted to 'ratify' the three settlements. In the suit, Diercks requests that the court: Declare these three employee settlement agreements were void and could not be ratified by the council on Dec. 13, 2023, after they were executed. Schedule an oral hearing on this matter before the court and, after the hearing, 'declare that the Council's December 13, 2023 'ratification' was erroneous, illegal, arbitrary and capricious and was void.' Schedule a trial on the Declaratory Judgment action, the Open Meetings count and the Certiorari count. Declare that Warner's actions in signing the three contracts and the Council's actions to 'ratify' these three contracts on Dec. 13, 2023 were each 'illegal, … erroneous and void.' Find that Warner, the City of Davenport and the Council failed to follow statutes. Find that Warner, the City of Davenport and the Council violated the Iowa Code. Find that the City of Davenport and Warner violated the Davenport City Code on the stipulated settlement amounts that are allowed by Warner to sign. Find that Warner is personally liable for unlawfully signing the three contracts and causing the 'three extravagant monetary payments' made to Spiegel, Thorndike and Torres. 'Declare that the City shall take legal action to clawback all monetary payments made to Spiegel, Thorndike and Torres.' (A 'clawback' is a contractual provision by which money already paid to an employee must be returned to an employer, sometimes with a penalty.) Award Dr. Allen L. Diercks attorney fees for the council's violations of the Iowa Open Meetings Act. Enter other relief to Diercks that is just and equitable, including court costs and attorney fees. The suit refers to Chapter 21 of the Official Meetings Open to the Public (see the Iowa Code here) that regulates public meetings. Read Chapter 21 of the Iowa Code here. Read Chapter 22 about open records here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Yahoo
Council to discuss letter regarding Amtrak funding
OTTUMWA — The Ottumwa City Council during Tuesday's meeting at Bridge View Center is anticipated to authorize a letter from mayor Rick Johnson to several of Iowa's congressional delegation regarding funding from Amtrak service next year. The letter, addressed to Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, as well as Reps. Marianette Miller-Meeks and Zach Nunn, discusses concerns about the potential lack of funding as part of the next federal budget. Amtrak, which is subsidized by the government, operates the California Zephyr, one of two long-distance trains that runs through Iowa. Ottumwa is one of the stops on the route, which stretches from Chicago to Emeryville, California, near San Francisco. However, without financial support, the route could be discontinued under U.S. Code if Congress fails to provide funding for train service. So far, the Trump Administration has not indicated if there will be funding available. "Amtrak has not submitted a grant request for FY 2026 yet and has signaled it may not submit one at all," Johnson said in his letter. "It is critical that Amtrak be funded in 2026 so they can continue to operate their passenger trains across southern Iowa. "Amtrak is a key component of economic vitality in southern Iowa and the number of travelers using Amtrak continues to increase every year as airplane travel becomes more restricted and more expensive." Ottumwa was the third-most popular stop in Iowa according to Amtrak's most recent figures from fiscal year 2024. The Ottumwa stop featured 8,719 riders, and the only two stops with higher ridership were Osceola (13,194) and Mount Pleasant (9,128), which bracket the Ottumwa stop to the west and east, respectively, on the California Zephyr. Also, Amtrak has been reconstructing the depot's platform and other making other improvements to the station since 2022, which initially cost about $14 million. "Without Amtrak service to and from Ottumwa, the results would be catastrophic to both our local economy as well as reduced tourism travel across southern Iowa," Johnson said in the letter. Also, the council is expected to establish fees for various permits, which will be effective July 1. The meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. Wapello County Board of Supervisors The supervisors will meet in regular session Tuesday at the courthouse to discuss minor items, but will later enter a work session to discuss the makeup of the EMS advisory council, which was tabled two weeks ago amid frustration over favoritism from City of Ottumwa officials, who were concerned the council wasn't constructed to meet the community's needs. The regular meeting begins at 9:30 a.m. in the third-floor courtroom/board room, but the work session will be at 10 a.m. in the supervisors' office on North Court Street. Two weeks ago, the supervisors adopted a resolution to declare EMS as an essential county service, which was also intended to kickstart the creation of the advisory council and the work to begin assessing the county's needs. However, the creation of the list was tabled for more discussion over concerns regarding the representation, specifically the lack of law enforcement officials among the 14 council members.
