
Forced Adoption: ‘I was abducted and my baby kidnapped' under British-Irish scheme
ITV News Social Affairs Correspondent Sarah Corker travelled to Dublin to speak to victims of a 'horror' forced repatriation scheme run by British and Irish Catholic and state organisations for decades
In 1973, Terri Harrison was 18, pregnant and unmarried. The ultimate taboo in Catholic Ireland.
She decided to flee Dublin and travel to London to start a new life, hopeful that she could get a job and safely raise her son there.
Instead Terri was "abducted by a priest" whilst heavily pregnant and forcibly returned to Ireland to live in a notorious mother and baby institution, where her son was later "kidnapped" and put up for adoption aged five-weeks-old.
Terri, now 70, was among thousands of young women who fled from the country to avoid the brutal Irish institutions, where unmarried mothers were often incarcerated for a minimum of two years.
From 1930 to the late 1970s the numbers making a similar journey were so high, officials in London called them PFIs – 'pregnant from Ireland'.
The British authorities saw them as a burden on the taxpayer and put pressure on the Irish state to address the situation, while the Catholic Church in Ireland feared the children would grow up in non-Catholic families.
The result was a repatriation scheme – it was supposed to be voluntary – but women have told ITV News they were effectively deported from Britain and their journeys were organised and paid for by the state and the Church.
The children, now adults, often only found out they were British citizens decades later.
"It was a form of people trafficking," Patricia Carey, Ireland's Special Advocate for Survivors, told ITV News.
'Because they were trafficked from one country to another against their will, we have the added complication that files and documents was lost between the two states. They have lost part of their identity."
Terri Harrison: 'We were given a number, we weren't human anymore'
Terri recalls the "day of horror" when she came home to find a priest and two nuns waiting for her in London.
They told her she'd "committed a crime" because she was pregnant outside of wedlock and what happened next still haunts her.
'I was no match for this man, and he just threw me into the car and pushed me down into the back seat ... I started to become invisible from the minute he got me," she told ITV News.
Terri was flown from Heathrow Airport to Cork, in southern Ireland, and was one of thousands of women "imprisoned" in Bessborough mother and baby home.
Once there she was "processed" and given a new name and number. "I became Tracey 1735, we weren't human anymore,' she said.
'I was abducted from one country and brought back to this one, and my son was sleeping peacefully in his cot and a stranger in a black habit, stripped him and walked out of that institution.
"That's kidnapping. That's what happened to me. We must speak the truth."
Documentation from the time shows a religious organisation called the Crusade of Rescue, now known as the Catholic Children's Society, based in London, was involved in the adoption and repatriation of Irish women and children from Britain from the 1930s to the 1970s.
Terri believes the charity was responsible for her "abduction".
Dr Lorraine Grimes from Maynooth University has spent a decade investigating these institutions and said that "Catholic Church viewed it as a battle for catholic souls".
'They preferred to see Catholic Irish children grow up in institutions long term, rather than placed with Protestant families or another faith,' she told ITV News.
Dr Grimes, who has written a book about her research, describes the repatriations as "in essence deportations" despite the fact that "the British Home Office nor any welfare organisation had the legal authority to deport a child that was born in Britain".
Paul Cullen: 'They were playing god and creating families'
Paul Cullen was four-months-old when he made the journey by boat from Holyhead, in Wales, to Dublin.
'My mother and I were met at the docks by an official from the adoption agency,' he told ITV News.
He'd always vaguely known that he had been born in London and adopted in Dublin, but only it was only recently found out the whole truth about his birth and his early years.
'I went half a century without knowing," Paul said. 'When the law was changed in 2021, I was eventually allowed access to my files.
"I began to realise that I was part of something much bigger, and the moment the penny dropped and I saw the acronym 'PFI', pregnant from Ireland.'
Paul was born at Whittington Hospital in north London in 1963, and then spent a month at St Pelagia's home for unmarried mothers in Highgate, north London, which was run by catholic nuns.
His mother, who was in her 20s and working as a nurse in the capital, was unmarried and pressured to return to Ireland where Paul was placed for adoption, a journey organised through the Crusade of Rescue.
Obsessive secrecy around adoptions at that time meant he was issued a second Irish birth certificate which falsely states that he was born in Dublin, when in fact he is a British citizen.
Paul, now 62, said of how he spent years in foster care where his health deteriorated: "I was in bad condition, my health was poor, my teeth were rotting."
He wasn't adopted until he was three-years-old and believes the church put his spiritual wellbeing before his physical health.
'In London I was in the hands of the Crusade of Rescue and they were rescuing Catholic babies from non-catholic families, that was the priority,' he said.
'There was a certain amount of playing god here, because they were creating families. The PFIs, the women who were shunted between two countries, have fallen between the cracks and were forgotten about.
"I was one of 130 PFI children in 1963 alone. It's clear the women weren't welcome in Ireland, they weren't welcome in London, and everything was done in secret.'
Paul, a retired journalist and the former health editor of The Irish Times, has now reunited with his birth mother, but the man he thought was his father died just weeks before they were due to meet.
His first project in retirement has been writing his memoir and researching his own "fractured" history.
'I think redress has to start with saying sorry. I think we have heard prominent people in Ireland do that, but that's not the case in England."
Survivors are now campaigning for compensation from both Irish and British governments – who they say were directly involved in the "brutal" repatriation scheme from 1930 to the late 1970s.
Like the Cahill family, in Doncaster, South Yorkshire, who have had three generations deeply affected by what happened decades earlier.
Fiona Cahill's mother, Maria, was born in London in 1954, but as a baby was sent to one of Ireland's most notorious mother and baby institutions with her mother Philomena, who was unmarried.
The family is now calling for all archives from religious and state run mother and baby institutions in the UK to be preserved and accessible. Fiona wants a special site to house documents, objects and oral history, so that this dreadful period of history cannot be forgotten.
The Crusade of Rescue, now known as the Catholic Children's Society, said: "Many young mothers in the past felt they had no choice but to place their child for adoption due to the stigma of being unmarried and the lack of support available to them from the government, their families and wider society at the time. This is deeply regrettable and a tragedy for all involved."
In 2021 the Irish Taoiseach delivered a formal apology for historic forced adoption and the suffering caused.
That apology was "accompanied by a Government Action Plan for Survivors providing for actions under eight themes including redress, access to records and memorialisation," a spokesperson for the Irish government said.
In response to our investigation, the UK government said: 'This abhorrent practice should never have taken place, and our deepest sympathies are with all those affected.
'We take this issue extremely seriously and continue to engage with those impacted to provide support.'
In 2016 the head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales apologised 'for the hurt caused by agencies acting in the name of the Catholic Church'.
Cardinal Vincent Nichols acknowledged 'the grief and pain caused by the giving up of a child through adoption", and added that "the practices of all adoption agencies reflected the social values at the time".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
38 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Benn defends collaboration with Irish Government over legacy issues
Mr Benn was responding after Gavin Robinson branded the UK Government minister as 'foolish and hapless' in relation to his handling of efforts to deal with the legacy of the Troubles. Mr Robinson claimed Mr Benn's actions amounted to a 'disgraceful' attempt to 'satisfy the Irish Government'. The Northern Ireland Secretary was asked about the remarks as he attended a meeting of the British Irish Council in Newcastle, Co Down on Friday. 'I make no apology at all for trying to work with the Irish Government, because the lesson, indeed exemplified by the Good Friday Agreement, is we make most progress when we work together,' he said. 'And that is what I'm determined to do in the interests of truth and reconciliation and, finally, giving answers to families who have suffered so much.' Mr Robinson's hard-hitting statement on Friday morning came amid mounting expectation that the two governments will soon set out an agreed framework for addressing legacy issues related to the Northern Ireland conflict. Also responding to the DUP leader's criticism, Irish premier Micheal Martin and deputy premier Simon Harris both moved to defend Mr Benn as they praised his efforts to work with their Government to try to resolve outstanding issues around unsolved murder cases and families who continue to seek truth and justice for lost loved ones. They also rejected Mr Robinson's assertion that the Dublin government has adopted a 'scandalous approach to legacy' in failing to rigorously investigate and provide answers on atrocities with a cross-border dimension. The DUP leader made his statement after Mr Benn announced the appointment of a chair to lead a public inquiry into the 1989 loyalist murder of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane. Mr Robinson believes the Finucane case is indicative of a government approach that sees the 'distasteful elevation' of some high-profile cases while countless other victims still await answers with no prospect of public inquiries. The DUP leader claimed 'Hapless Hilary' was pursing this stance while continuing to keep private any details on what he was negotiating with the Irish Government. 'The Irish Government have knowledge of and influence upon UK legacy plans, yet Northern Ireland victims, veterans and Parliamentarians are kept in the dark by the Secretary of State without so much as a blush on his face,' he said. 'Not for the first time, he advances a one-sided, partisan approach to the politics of Northern Ireland.' Since taking office last year, the Labour Government has pledged to repeal and replace some of the provisions of the contentious Legacy Act that was introduced by the last Conservative government, and bring forward a revised framework for dealing with cases linked to the Troubles. The Irish Government has been involved in the process, and political leaders in Dublin have said intensive engagement is ongoing to see if a 'landing zone' can be arrived at. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 halted scores of civil cases and inquests into Troubles deaths and also offered conditional immunity to perpetrators of conflict-related crimes in exchange for their co-operation with a new investigatory and truth recovery body. The Act was opposed by all the main political parties in Northern Ireland, the Irish government and many victims' representative groups. In 2023, the Irish government initiated an interstate legal case against the UK in the European Court of Human Rights, claiming the Legacy Act breached the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The case remains active, with ministers in Dublin wanting to see how Labour resolves its concerns over the legislation before any decision is taken to withdraw the action. Mr Benn told reporters in Newcastle that it was incumbent on all political leaders to finally secure agreement on legacy. 'Legacy is the unfinished business of the Good Friday Agreement,' he said. 'It was the issue which the Good Friday Agreement, which achieved so much, was unable to take forward. 'And I would simply say we, all of us, as politicians, as leaders, have a responsibility to try and find a way forward so that we can bring truth and justice for everyone, in particular for the families who, after decades, are still waiting for answers as to what happened to their loved ones when they were murdered.' At the press conference after the BIC, Mr Martin made a point of backing Mr Benn's stance. 'I firstly want to pay tribute to the Secretary of State for his honesty, his determination in the way he has pursued this issue of legacy, and indeed many other issues since he became Secretary of State,' he said. 'And we have welcomed his very open and determined approach. I would never question his bona fides in doing the very best for the people of Northern Ireland, and in terms of ensuring a very strong relationship between British and Irish Governments.' Mr Harris, who also attended the BIC summit, said the Governments were 'close to a way forward on legacy'. The Tanaiste added: 'And what I would say to Gavin, respectfully, and I said this to him when I met him, the country that I represent will play our part as well in relation to legacy, and we've shown that already on a number of occasions, and we will absolutely in any legacy framework want to make sure that all victims, all families, regardless of where on the island of Ireland an atrocity occurs, can get answers, can get truth, and can, of course, get justice where possible.' DUP deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly echoed the sentiments expressed by her party leader as she answered questions on the controversy following the BIC. 'I think there's a lot to be critical about in terms of the approach to legacy by the Secretary of State,' she said. Ms Little-Pengelly said many of the issues Mr Benn was considering related to matters that were devolved to Stormont. She added: 'For our part, we are absolutely clear that all victims should get access to justice. All victims should feel very clearly in our system that their loved ones mattered equally. 'Unfortunately, we've had a number of announcements on part of legacy, but not on the rest, and that leaves many victims and survivors concerned about what's happening in relation to that.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Ex-UK intelligence worker jailed for taking top secret data home
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - A former British intelligence worker who endangered national security by taking top secret data home was on Friday jailed for seven and a half years. Hasaan Arshad, 25, pleaded guilty, opens new tab in March to one charge under the Computer Misuse Act, committed between August and September 2022 while working at British signals intelligence agency GCHQ. Prosecutor Duncan Atkinson said the top secret material Arshad had downloaded contained the names of 17 GCHQ employees and that removing it from a secure environment brought the risk of it "falling into the wrong hands". "His actions damaged confidence in the UK's security," Atkinson told London's Old Bailey court. Judge Maura McGowan sentenced Arshad to six years in prison for the Computer Misuse Act offence and a further 18 months for two offences of making indecent images of children, to which he had pleaded guilty in 2023. His lawyer Nina Grahame said Arshad had taken the data due to his "perfectionism" at the end of a year-long placement with GCHQ because he had not completed his work on a particular project. She said Arshad accepted he had caused a risk to national security but added: "He did not intend to cause such a risk."

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Benn defends collaboration with Irish Government over legacy issues
Mr Benn was responding after Gavin Robinson branded the UK Government minister as 'foolish and hapless' in relation to his handling of efforts to deal with the legacy of the Troubles. Mr Robinson claimed Mr Benn's actions amounted to a 'disgraceful' attempt to 'satisfy the Irish Government'. The Northern Ireland Secretary was asked about the remarks as he attended a meeting of the British Irish Council in Newcastle, Co Down on Friday. 'I make no apology at all for trying to work with the Irish Government, because the lesson, indeed exemplified by the Good Friday Agreement, is we make most progress when we work together,' he said. 'And that is what I'm determined to do in the interests of truth and reconciliation and, finally, giving answers to families who have suffered so much.' Mr Robinson's hard-hitting statement on Friday morning came amid mounting expectation that the two governments will soon set out an agreed framework for addressing legacy issues related to the Northern Ireland conflict. Also responding to the DUP leader's criticism, Irish premier Micheal Martin and deputy premier Simon Harris both moved to defend Mr Benn as they praised his efforts to work with their Government to try to resolve outstanding issues around unsolved murder cases and families who continue to seek truth and justice for lost loved ones. They also rejected Mr Robinson's assertion that the Dublin government has adopted a 'scandalous approach to legacy' in failing to rigorously investigate and provide answers on atrocities with a cross-border dimension. The DUP leader made his statement after Mr Benn announced the appointment of a chair to lead a public inquiry into the 1989 loyalist murder of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane. Mr Robinson believes the Finucane case is indicative of a government approach that sees the 'distasteful elevation' of some high-profile cases while countless other victims still await answers with no prospect of public inquiries. The DUP's Gavin Robinson claimed Hilary Benn's actions amounted to a 'disgraceful' attempt to 'satisfy the Irish Government' (Liam McBurney/PA) The DUP leader claimed 'Hapless Hilary' was pursing this stance while continuing to keep private any details on what he was negotiating with the Irish Government. 'The Irish Government have knowledge of and influence upon UK legacy plans, yet Northern Ireland victims, veterans and Parliamentarians are kept in the dark by the Secretary of State without so much as a blush on his face,' he said. 'Not for the first time, he advances a one-sided, partisan approach to the politics of Northern Ireland.' Since taking office last year, the Labour Government has pledged to repeal and replace some of the provisions of the contentious Legacy Act that was introduced by the last Conservative government, and bring forward a revised framework for dealing with cases linked to the Troubles. The Irish Government has been involved in the process, and political leaders in Dublin have said intensive engagement is ongoing to see if a 'landing zone' can be arrived at. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 halted scores of civil cases and inquests into Troubles deaths and also offered conditional immunity to perpetrators of conflict-related crimes in exchange for their co-operation with a new investigatory and truth recovery body. The Act was opposed by all the main political parties in Northern Ireland, the Irish government and many victims' representative groups. In 2023, the Irish government initiated an interstate legal case against the UK in the European Court of Human Rights, claiming the Legacy Act breached the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Irish premier Micheal Martin and deputy premier Simon Harris both moved to defend Mr Benn (Brian Lawless/PA) The case remains active, with ministers in Dublin wanting to see how Labour resolves its concerns over the legislation before any decision is taken to withdraw the action. Mr Benn told reporters in Newcastle that it was incumbent on all political leaders to finally secure agreement on legacy. 'Legacy is the unfinished business of the Good Friday Agreement,' he said. 'It was the issue which the Good Friday Agreement, which achieved so much, was unable to take forward. 'And I would simply say we, all of us, as politicians, as leaders, have a responsibility to try and find a way forward so that we can bring truth and justice for everyone, in particular for the families who, after decades, are still waiting for answers as to what happened to their loved ones when they were murdered.' At the press conference after the BIC, Mr Martin made a point of backing Mr Benn's stance. 'I firstly want to pay tribute to the Secretary of State for his honesty, his determination in the way he has pursued this issue of legacy, and indeed many other issues since he became Secretary of State,' he said. 'And we have welcomed his very open and determined approach. I would never question his bona fides in doing the very best for the people of Northern Ireland, and in terms of ensuring a very strong relationship between British and Irish Governments.' Mr Harris, who also attended the BIC summit, said the Governments were 'close to a way forward on legacy'. The Tanaiste added: 'And what I would say to Gavin, respectfully, and I said this to him when I met him, the country that I represent will play our part as well in relation to legacy, and we've shown that already on a number of occasions, and we will absolutely in any legacy framework want to make sure that all victims, all families, regardless of where on the island of Ireland an atrocity occurs, can get answers, can get truth, and can, of course, get justice where possible.' DUP deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly echoed the sentiments expressed by her party leader as she answered questions on the controversy following the BIC. 'I think there's a lot to be critical about in terms of the approach to legacy by the Secretary of State,' she said. Ms Little-Pengelly said many of the issues Mr Benn was considering related to matters that were devolved to Stormont. She added: 'For our part, we are absolutely clear that all victims should get access to justice. All victims should feel very clearly in our system that their loved ones mattered equally. 'Unfortunately, we've had a number of announcements on part of legacy, but not on the rest, and that leaves many victims and survivors concerned about what's happening in relation to that.'