Trump wants to limit U.S. history to the shiny parts. It won't work.
Developers reshape reality. They dress up the drab and market it as the unique. Donald Trump spent about half a century hawking condos, casinos and all sorts of middling products that he sold as spectacular, with some success (and plenty of failure, too).
Now, he's taking a product with nearly 250 years' worth of blemishes and beauty spots and he's remarketing it in his usual style — as utter perfection, made possible exclusively by him. The product is the history of the United States, which earned its remarkable place in the cavalcade of nations expressly because its troubles and trials forged its strength and stability.
But in the Trump catalogue, there are only shiny objects, and so the museums of the Smithsonian — home to Dorothy's ruby slippers but also to bills of sale for human enslaved people — are now in cover-up mode, under 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History' orders to remove anything the president might consider 'improper ideology.' The nation's attic, cluttered and messy like the country it reflects, is henceforth to display only 'the remarkable achievements of the United States.'
There's a problem with Trump's impulsive orders, even beyond their legal, constitutional, moral and political flaws: They often stem from baseless assertions. Just as Trump, without having set foot in the place during his years in Washington, proposed to ransack the Kennedy Center because its programming was insufficiently middlebrow for his taste, now he's coming after the Smithsonian's presentation of U.S. history without knowing what the museums actually show.
So, let's wander through the National Museum of American History, one of my favorite branches of the Smithsonian. It's the vast repository on the National Mall of the artifacts of our common past: former president Abraham Lincoln's top hat, the original Star-Spangled Banner, a baseball signed by Babe Ruth and Hank Aaron, but also the manacles that kept Kunta Kinte chained up in 'Roots' and Ku Klux Klan hoods, posters and sheet music.
Had Trump actually visited, he might have seen that his vision of the country (to the extent that he has one) has been on view at the museum for decades.
The culture police of the Trump administration pretend they are the first to correct excesses at the nation's great institutions, removing books at the Naval Academy, canceling shows at the Kennedy Center, squelching scholarship at the Wilson Center.
But we have been here before: Every generation brings some effort to hide our misdeeds or deny our history. Under former presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, a drive to give corporate powers a louder voice changed how some museums tell the country's story. Today, the American History museum features the General Motors Hall of Transportation, the Mars (as in candy bars) Hall of American Business, a housing exhibit sponsored by the National Association of Realtors and exhibitions made possible by ExxonMobil and Monsanto.
The history museum is an unintentional display of the culture wars over how to tell our story. Its offerings range from decades-old shows that celebrate U.S. presidents and train locomotives to newer exhibits that are thoroughly bilingual, brimming with left-wing jargon and liberal takes on the American past.
An exhibit previewing the forthcoming National Museum of the American Latino — focusing 'on diverse stories of resistance' — presents Puerto Ricans' story as a tale of 'their colonial relationship with the United States,' without mentioning that Puerto Ricans have voted multiple times to endorse options including statehood or their current commonwealth status. Independence was never the top choice.
The museum is also a celebration of an idealized America, one in which it's possible to mount a show about American enterprise that barely mentions slavery. Yet one floor up, an exhibit about American democracy puts the slavery debate center stage, connecting moral questions over human bondage with contemporary struggles over voting rights and the role of women.
Text describing a Chicago Transit Authority streetcar from 1959 says nothing about racial division in that city, but a group of middle school kids from Ohio who ran into that car during my visit knew in their bones what the streetcar symbolized:
'Yo, get to the back of the bus!' one boy called out.
'You can't sit here!' another piped in.
Rancor about race is so deeply ingrained in the American psyche that we go there even when the powers that be try to muffle reality.
What Trump's culture warriors can't accept is that Americans have been fitfully but satisfyingly engaged in debate about the country's character from the very start. Even in its celebratory exhibit on American enterprise, the museum highlights the Founders' discord over how to shape the country, with Alexander Hamilton favoring a focus on manufacturing and Thomas Jefferson pushing for an agrarian society.
Parts of the museum treat visitors like thinking adults and parts dismiss them as dimwits who need to be told how great their country is. Now, Trump seeks to homogenize the place.
He has always believed that if he can control the messaging, he will shape reality. He believed it as a man who wanted to erect the tallest tower on Fifth Avenue, so he renumbered the floors in Trump Tower, turning the 58th story into the 68th floor. He has sued the authors of books about him, sacked underlings who brought him bad news, sought to strip licenses from those who broadcast chronicles of his misdeeds.
Now, at the Smithsonian, he intends to rewrite history. To an extent, he can. Fear that he might do far worse often results in near-instant compliance.
This power grab is not the overreach that will deliver the nation from its populist spasm. It will likely take a rough economic passage to nudge the pendulum back toward a more honest and trusting society. But enough Americans instinctively resent being told what to think that the cynical manipulation of the Smithsonian will produce some backlash. Our history, warts and all, teaches us that.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.


Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
17 News' political analysts break down Trump and Musk feud
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — Some Democrats are calling the online feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk a messy breakup…coining it, 'the Real Housewives of Pennsylvania Ave.' 17 News political analysts, Neel Sannappa and Cathy Abernathy, joined 17 News at 5 to discuss the jabber between Musk and Trump. Watch the full interview in the player above for the full 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.