Hong Kong man, 22, arrested under new security law for allegedly publishing ‘seditious' online posts
Hong Kong national security police have arrested and charged a 22-year-old man under Article 23, the city's homegrown national security law, after he allegedly published online posts with 'seditious intentions.'
The man was arrested on Monday in the Kowloon district, the force said in a statement released Wednesday.
He was charged with one count of 'knowingly publishing publications that had a seditious intention.'
He will appear before the West Kowloon Magistrates' Courts on Wednesday afternoon.
The police statement said that 'the arrested man was suspected of repeatedly publishing posts with seditious intentions on online social platforms, with content provoking hatred, contempt or disaffection against the fundamental system of the state.'
Earlier this month, Chow Kim-ho – a former member of the League of Social Democrats, a pro-democracy party – was jailed for one year over posting 145 seditious comments on three social media platforms under the city's homegrown security law.
Separate to the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects' access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city's opposition-free legislature.
The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and 'regressive.' Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to 'close loopholes' after the 2019 protests and unrest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
‘US 8964' car owner ships vehicle abroad ahead of Tiananmen crackdown anniversary following harassment
The owner of a sports car with the licence plate 'US 8964' has said that he shipped his vehicle abroad ahead of the 36th anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown after receiving harassment. Anthony Chiu, whose Porsche bears the licence plate 'US 8964,' told HKFP on Wednesday that his vehicle was sent out of Hong Kong in recent weeks after he and his family members faced harassment since last year's Tiananmen crackdown anniversary. Letters from unknown individuals were sent to his residence, workplace, and family members, Chiu said. The letters, seen by HKFP, contained his personal information, photos of his sports car, and accusations that he may have breached the Beijing-imposed national security law. He refused to disclose publicly where he sent his car. The 39-year-old car owner said that the first year he took his car out for a spin on 4 June, the national security law was already in place, and he had no intention of doing anything to 'incite others.' 'I was just driving a car on the street legally. That's it. I didn't think this would eventually lead to the harassment I faced over the past year,' he said in Cantonese. The harassment became more serious over the past few weeks as the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown approached, he added. The situation in Hong Kong 'changed so rapidly that it reached a point where it became unacceptable to me and my family,' he said. 'This is why I chose to send my car away.' Wednesday marked 36 years since the Chinese military clamped down on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 4, 1989. The bloody crackdown ended months of student-led demonstrations across the country, and it is estimated that hundreds, possibly thousands, died in the event. Chiu's car was impounded by police on June 4 last year on the Eastern Corridor. He said in a social media post shared at the time that he had been followed while driving his sports car from Kowloon to Hong Kong Island and that it might be the last time his car would make an appearance on June 4. It was not the first time Chiu's car had been stopped by the police before being towed away. On June 4, 2023, Chiu's car was impounded by the police in Causeway Bay, citing his embossed licence plate and brakes as the reasons. On June 4, 2022, Chiu drove his car in Causeway Bay and was stopped by police outside Windsor House on Great George Street. When asked by HKFP, a traffic cop said at the time that he did not know why the car had been stopped. Victoria Park in Causeway Bay was the former site of annual vigils attended by tens of thousands of residents commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown. Authorities banned the Tiananmen vigil gathering at Victoria Park for the first time in 2020, citing Covid-19 restrictions, and imposed the ban again in 2021, nearly a year after a national security law imposed by Beijing came into effect. On Wednesday, the 'Sabertooth' armoured vehicle was spotted on Great George Street in Causeway Bay, as groups of uniformed officers patrolled areas near Victoria Park. Hundreds of police officers have also been deployed in Causeway Bay. Officers – both in uniform and plainclothes – are stationed in the Causeway Bay MTR station, outside the Sogo department store, as well as in and around Victoria Park. More than a dozen individuals have been brought into police vans, though it is unclear whether they were under arrest. Some of the individuals were holding electric candles or flowers, while one of the men questioned by police was wearing a white T-shirt featuring a drawing of the Goddess of Democracy and a Chinese slogan that read, 'Vindication of June 4 comes closer and closer.'
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China and EU schedule crunch talks to resolve economic deadlock
China and the European Union have agreed to hold a new round of trade talks to pave the way for a high-level leaders' summit next month, but analysts said it remained to be seen whether the two sides could resolve the impasse in their bilateral economic relations. The talks were announced by the European Commission following a meeting between China's commerce minister, Wang Wentao, and EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic on the sidelines of a World Trade Organization event in Paris on Tuesday. They are expected to lay the groundwork for a high-level summit slated for late July in Beijing, where European leaders will meet with President Xi Jinping. 'The two sides held focused, candid and in-depth discussions on pressing and important issues related to China-EU economic and trade cooperation,' China's Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Wednesday. 'They also tasked their respective working teams to intensify efforts in preparing for this year's key bilateral agenda on the economic and trade front,' it added. Meanwhile, an EU spokesperson said on Tuesday that the bloc's 'overall objective remains to rebalance our trade and investment relationship with China and level the playing field'.
Asia Times
5 hours ago
- Asia Times
Ukraine shows it knows wars are never won in the past
The iconoclastic American general Douglas MacArthur once said that 'wars are never won in the past.' That sentiment certainly seemed to ring true following Ukraine's recent audacious attack on Russia's strategic bomber fleet, using small, cheap drones housed in wooden pods and transported near Russian airfields in trucks. The synchronized operation targeted Russian Air Force planes as far away as Irkutsk – more than 5,000 kilometers from Ukraine. Early reports suggest around a third of Russia's long-range bombers were either destroyed or badly damaged. Russian military bloggers have put the estimated losses lower, but agree the attack was catastrophic for the Russian Air Force, which has struggled to adapt to Ukrainian tactics. This particular attack was reportedly 18 months in the making. To keep it secret was an extraordinary feat. Notably, Kyiv reportedly did not inform the United States that the attack was in the offing. The Ukrainians judged – perhaps understandably – that sharing intelligence on their plans could have alerted the Kremlin in relatively short order. Ukraine's success once again demonstrates that its armed forces and intelligence services are the modern masters of battlefield innovation and operational security. Western military planners have been carefully studying Ukraine's successes ever since its forces managed to blunt Russia's initial onslaught deep into its territory in early 2022, and then launched a stunning counteroffensive that drove the Russian invaders back towards their original starting positions. There have been other lessons, too, about how the apparently weak can stand up to the strong. These include: attacks on Russian President Vladimir Putin's vanity project, the Kerch Bridge, linking the Russian mainland to occupied Crimea (the last assault occurred just days ago) the relentless targeting of Russia's oil and gas infrastructure with drones attacks against targets in Moscow to remind the Russian populace about the war, and its incursion into the Kursk region, which saw Ukrainian forces capture around 1,000 square kilometres of Russian territory. On each occasion, Western defense analysts have questioned the wisdom of Kyiv's moves. Why invade Russia using your best troops when Moscow's forces continue laying waste to cities in Ukraine? Why hit Russia's energy infrastructure if it doesn't markedly impede the battlefield mobility of Russian forces? And why attack symbolic targets like bridges when it could provoke Putin into dangerous 'escalation'? The answer to this is the key to effective innovation during wartime. Ukraine's defense and security planners have interpreted their missions – and their best possible outcomes – far more accurately than conventional wisdom would have thought. Above all, they have focused on winning the war they are in, rather than those of the past. This means: using technological advancements to force the Russians to change their tactics shaping the information environment to promote their narratives and keep vital Western aid flowing, and deploying surprise attacks not just as ways to boost public morale, but also to impose disproportionate costs on the Russian state. In doing so, Ukraine has had an eye for strategic effects. As the smaller nation reliant on international support, this has been the only logical choice. Putin has been prepared to commit a virtually inexhaustible supply of expendable cannon fodder to continue his country's war ad infinitum. Russia has typically won its wars this way – by attrition – albeit at a tremendous human and material cost. That said, Ukraine's most recent surprise attack does not change the overall contours of the war. The only person with the ability to end it is Putin himself. That's why Ukraine is putting as much pressure as possible on his regime, as well as domestic and international perceptions of it. It is key to Ukraine's theory of victory. This is also why the latest drone attack is so significant. Russia needs its long-range bomber fleet, not just to fire conventional cruise missiles at Ukrainian civilian and infrastructure targets, but as aerial delivery systems for its strategic nuclear arsenal. The destruction of even a small portion of Russia's deterrence capability has the potential to affect its nuclear strategy. It has increasingly relied on this strategy to threaten the West. A second impact of the attack is psychological. The drone attacks are more likely to enrage Putin than bring him to the bargaining table. However, they reinforce to the Russian military that there are few places – even on its own soil – that its air force can act with operational impunity. The surprise attacks also provide a shot in the arm domestically, reminding Ukrainians they remain very much in the fight. Finally, the drone attacks send a signal to Western leaders. US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, for instance, have gone to great lengths to tell the world that Ukraine is weak and has 'no cards'. This action shows Kyiv does indeed have some powerful cards to play. That may, of course, backfire: after all, Trump is acutely sensitive to being made to look a fool. He may look unkindly at resuming military aid to Ukraine after being shown up for saying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would be forced to capitulate without US support. But Trump's own hubris has already done that for him. His regular claims that a peace deal is just weeks away have gone beyond wishful thinking and are now monotonous. Unsurprisingly, Trump's reluctance to put anything approaching serious pressure on Putin has merely incentivised the Russian leader to string the process along. Indeed, Putin's insistence on a maximalist victory, requiring Ukrainian demobilisation and disarmament without any security guarantees for Kyiv, is not diplomacy at all. It is merely the reiteration of the same unworkable demands he has made since even before Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. However, Ukraine's ability to smuggle drones undetected onto an opponent's territory, and then unleash them all together, will pose headaches for Ukraine's friends, as well as its enemies. That's because it makes domestic intelligence and policing part of any effective defence posture. It is a contingency that democracies will have to plan for, just as much as authoritarian regimes, who are also learning from Ukraine's lessons. In other words, while the attack has shown up Russia's domestic security services for failing to uncover the plan, Western security elites, as well as authoritarian ones, will now be wondering whether their own security apparatuses would be up to the job. The drone strikes will also likely lead to questions about how useful it is to invest in high-end and extraordinarily expensive weapons systems when they can be vulnerable. The Security Service of Ukraine estimates the damage cost Russia US$7 billion. Ukraine's drones, by comparison, cost a couple of thousand dollars each. At the very least, coming up with a suitable response to those challenges will require significant thought and effort. But as Ukraine has repeatedly shown us, you can't win wars in the past. Matthew Sussex is associate professor (Adj), Griffith Asia Institute; and fellow, Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Australian National University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
