Israel accepts a US proposal for a temporary Gaza ceasefire and Hamas gives a cool response
A new U.S. proposal for a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been accepted by Israel, while Hamas is considering the draft. The proposal suggests a 60-day pause in fighting in exchange for hostages and the release of Palestinian prisoners.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Israel has accepted a new U.S. proposal for a temporary ceasefire with Hamas , the White House said Thursday.U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, expressed optimism earlier this week about brokering an agreement to halt the Israel-Hamas war and return more of the hostages captured in the attack that ignited it.White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Israel "backed and supported" the new proposal.Hamas officials gave the Israeli-approved draft a cool response, but said they wanted to study the proposal more closely before giving a formal answer."The Zionist response, in essence, means perpetuating the occupation and continuing the killing and famine," Bassem Naim, a top Hamas official, told The Associated Press. He said it "does not respond to any of our people's demands, foremost among which is stopping the war and famine."Nonetheless, he said the group would study the proposal "with all national responsibility."Hamas had previously said it had agreed with Witkoff on a "general framework" of an agreement that would lead to a lasting ceasefire, a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, an influx of aid, and a transfer of power from the militant group to a politically independent committee of Palestinians.Here's what's known about the emerging negotiations that aim to bring about an extended truce in the war in exchange for hostages that remain in captivity:What do Israel and Hamas want? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has refused to end the war until all the hostages are released and Hamas is either destroyed or disarmed and sent into exile. He has said Israel will control Gaza indefinitely and facilitate what he refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of its population.Palestinians and most of the international community have rejected plans to resettle Gaza's population, a move experts say would likely violate international law.Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages - its only bargaining chip - in return for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and a full Israeli withdrawal. It has offered to give up power to a committee of politically independent Palestinians that could oversee reconstruction.Hamas is still holding 58 hostages. Around a third are believed to be alive, though many fear they are in grave danger the longer the war goes on. Thousands of Palestinians have been killed since Israel renewed its airstrikes and ground operations after ending a ceasefire in March.The dispute over whether there should be a temporary ceasefire to release more hostages - as Israel has called for - or a permanent one - as Hamas wants - has bedeviled talks brokered by the U.S., Egypt and Qatar for more than a year and a half, and there's no indication it has been resolved.What is the latest ceasefire proposal? Witkoff has not publicized his latest proposal, but a Hamas official and an Egyptian official independently confirmed some of the details. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks.They say it calls for a 60-day pause in fighting, guarantees of serious negotiations leading to a long-term truce and assurances that Israel will not resume hostilities after the release of hostages, as it did in March. Israeli forces would pull back to the positions they held during the ceasefire Israel ended that month.Hamas would release 10 living hostages and a number of bodies during the 60-day pause in exchange for more than 1,100 Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, including 100 serving long sentences after being convicted of deadly attacks.Each day, hundreds of trucks carrying food and humanitarian aid would be allowed to enter Gaza, where experts say a nearly three-month Israeli blockade - slightly eased in recent days - has pushed the population to the brink of famine.Why is it so hard to end the war? Hamas-led militants stormed southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251 hostages. More than half the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel has rescued eight and recovered dozens of bodies.Israel's ensuing military campaign has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants.The offensive has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population of roughly 2 million Palestinians, with hundreds of thousands living in squalid tent camps and unused schools.Hamas has been vastly depleted militarily and lost nearly all of its top leaders in Gaza. It most likely fears that releasing all the hostages without securing a permanent ceasefire would allow Israel to launch an even more devastating campaign to ultimately destroy the group.Israel fears that a lasting ceasefire and withdrawal now would leave Hamas with significant influence in Gaza, even if it surrenders formal power. With time, Hamas might be able to rebuild its military might and eventually launch more Oct. 7-style attacks.Netanyahu also faces political constraints: His far-right coalition partners have threatened to bring down his government if he ends the war too soon. That would leave him more vulnerable to prosecution on longstanding corruption charges and to investigations into the failures surrounding the Oct. 7 attack.A broader resolution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict appears more distant than ever.The Palestinians are weak and divided, and Israel's current government - the most nationalist and religious in its history - is opposed to Palestinian demands for a state in Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories Israel occupied in the 1967 Mideast war.The last serious peace talks broke down more than 15 years ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Biographer Explains Why US President Hates Harvard: 'He Didn't Get Into It'
Last Updated: Michael Wolff said, 'So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy League.' As Donald Trump ramped up his campaign against Harvard University, his longtime biographer Michael Wolff offered a striking personal theory on US President's animosity toward the Ivy League school. In a recent episode of The Daily Beast's podcast, Michael Wolff- author of Fire and Fury, Siege, and All or Nothing- dismissed the internet speculation that Donald Trump's anger toward Harvard is due to his son Barron being denied admission. Instead, he pointed to Trump's own past. 'He didn't get into Harvard," Michael Wolff claimed, adding, 'So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy League." While podcast host Joanna Coles noted that several of Donald Trump's allies have Harvard connections, Michael Wolff argued that personal resentment and Donald Trump's instinct for confrontation were far more central to his current attacks. 'It's important not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does," he said, explaining, 'Harvard just fits perfectly into the kind of elite enemy Trump loves to take down." All of this is part of 'the Trump show", the biographer said, adding, 'He needs an enemy. Harvard, for all it represents, fits right into that narrative. It's drama. It's domination of the headlines. And that's what Trump lives for." There is no official record confirming that Donald Trump ever applied to Harvard as he attended Fordham University before transferring to the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania where he earned a bachelor's degree in economics. Donald Trump accused the university of antisemitism, frozen $2.2 billion in federal funding, and barred it from enrolling new international students unless it complies with a set of White House demands. Harvard has refused to yield, calling the restrictions unlawful. The Donald Trump administration has also ordered consular officers to apply enhanced scrutiny to visa applicants headed to Harvard. Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published:
News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Stumps Old Allies: POTUS Looks To Bridge The 'Gulf' As Ties With Musk, Putin & India Suffer
Last Updated: Under Trump, 'closest allies' are often defined less by diplomatic traditions and more by ideological alignment, economic benefits, and willingness to serve US strategic interests In the ever-evolving landscape of global politics, US President Donald Trump's alliances have been as fluid as the tides. Once seen as a key player with powerful figures like Elon Musk and Vladimir Putin, a closer look reveals a narrative of shifting relationships, with some former allies drifting away while new partnerships, such as with Qatar, emerge. This dynamic highlights Trump's transactional approach to diplomacy, prioritising national interests and economic benefits over traditional ideological alignments. Musk The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, initially marked by camaraderie and shared populist appeals, has shown signs of strain. While Musk served in an advisory capacity in Trump's administration through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), recent reports suggest a cooling of their political bond. Musk's departure from his government cost-cutting initiative, coupled with his public criticisms of certain Trump administration policies—such as the 'massive spending bill"—indicate a growing divergence. Though Trump has publicly stated that Musk is 'not really leaving" and will remain an adviser, the billionaire's focus appears to be shifting back to his business empire, particularly as Tesla navigates challenging market conditions. The initial alignment, perhaps fuelled by a mutual disruptive ethos, has given way to a more pragmatic distance. While still emphasising his ability to broker a peace deal and threatening further sanctions, this rhetoric marks a departure from the largely deferential tone of his earlier interactions. The ongoing war has forced a recalibration of Trump's public stance, even as his underlying 'America First" philosophy continues to shape his approach to international conflicts. Netanyahu The relationship between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, once famously close and ideologically aligned, has experienced significant strain and, in some key areas, a noticeable deterioration. While both leaders shared a strong conservative and nationalist bent, and Trump's administration delivered several major policy wins for Israel (e.g., moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, recognising Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, and brokering the Abraham Accords), a transactional approach and personal grievances have led to friction. A significant and deeply personal rift for Trump came in 2020 when Netanyahu publicly congratulated Joe Biden on his election victory. Trump, who continues to dispute the election results, viewed this as a profound betrayal, reportedly stating, 'The first person that congratulated [Biden] was Bibi Netanyahu, the man that I did more for than any other person I dealt with. He has made a terrible mistake." Since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza, Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Netanyahu's handling of the conflict. While initially supportive, Trump has reportedly grown 'fed up" with Netanyahu's resistance to American directives and the prolonged nature of the war. Trump appears to desire a quick, decisive win that he can claim as his own, which clashes with Netanyahu's stated goal of completely dismantling Hamas and his government's maximalist war aims. Trump has pushed for humanitarian access and de-escalation in Gaza, backing new aid delivery systems. Netanyahu, on the other hand, has remained primarily committed to a hardline military campaign, often downplaying humanitarian concerns and the need for immediate ceasefires, which creates a divergence from Trump's desire for a swift resolution. A clear symbol of the fraying relationship was Trump's recent Middle East tour, which included visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE but conspicuously omitted Israel, despite Israeli lobbying. This is a stark contrast to his past visits and underscores a shift in priorities. India While the India-US relationship has generally strengthened over the past two decades, characterised by growing strategic convergence, Donald Trump's 'America First" approach and transactional diplomacy have introduced points of friction, particularly concerning trade. Trump has consistently criticised India for its high tariffs on American goods, even famously calling India the 'tariff king" and a 'big abuser" in global trade. This rhetoric is a direct consequence of his focus on trade deficits and what he perceives as unfair trade practices. Trump has advocated for and, in some cases, imposed 'reciprocal tariffs," meaning the US would charge the same tariff rates on imports from other countries as those nations impose on US exports. This has led to specific tariffs on Indian goods, even if temporarily paused for negotiations. The Trump administration is also likely to continue pushing India to reduce trade barriers and tariffs in various sectors, including agriculture, automobiles, and alcoholic beverages. Also, Trump's repeated public statements about mediating the 'ceasefire" between India and Pakistan this month have been a significant source of diplomatic friction. Indian officials have consistently maintained that this was a bilateral issue and rejected any third-party intervention. These claims have been seen in India as an attempt to undermine its diplomatic position. Trump's stricter immigration policies, including threats of higher tariffs on BRICS nations and increased deportations, can impact the Indian diaspora in the US and create friction in people-to-people ties. Europe and NATO Trump's relationship with Europe has been marked by significant tension and a clear divergence from decades of established transatlantic cooperation. His 'America First" policy directly challenges the bedrock principles of the post-World War II international order, leading to a palpable sense of unease and, at times, open frustration among European leaders. Trump has consistently and vociferously criticised European NATO members for not meeting their defence spending commitments (2% of GDP). He has threatened to withdraw US troops from Europe or even pull the United States out of NATO altogether if allies didn't increase their contributions, questioning the very mutual defence clause (Article 5) of the alliance. Beyond spending, Trump's overall disdain for multilateral institutions and his sometimes admiring tone towards Vladimir Putin have caused deep concern in Europe, particularly among Eastern European states bordering Russia. His approach has been seen as weakening the collective security framework that has protected Europe for decades. Trump has viewed the European Union as a protectionist entity that unfairly took advantage of the US. He imposed tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from the EU, citing national security concerns, which was met with retaliatory tariffs from the EU on American goods. He has also threatened significant tariffs on European automobiles, a major concern for Germany's powerful auto industry. Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement on climate change was met with widespread condemnation and disappointment across Europe, where climate action is a high priority. European leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the accord and intensified their own climate policies. The US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, despite European efforts to salvage it, also created a major rift. European nations largely viewed the deal as crucial for preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons and saw the US withdrawal as destabilising. Trump's administration actively undermined the World Trade Organization (WTO) by blocking appointments to its appellate body, effectively paralysing its dispute settlement mechanism. Members of Trump's administration have sometimes publicly weighed in on European elections and policies, breaking diplomatic norms and further irritating European governments. Trump openly supported Brexit and even suggested other countries should leave the EU. Finding new friends, particularly in Middle East As certain old alliances have waned or become more nuanced, Trump has actively sought and cultivated new partnerships, often driven by economic opportunities and strategic interests. Qatar stands out as a prime example of such an emerging alliance. During a recent Middle East tour, Trump underscored a significant pivot in US strategy, prioritising economic deals and investments with wealthy Gulf states. Pentagon also announced on May 21 that it had officially accepted the luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, a gift announced ahead of Trump's visit to the Middle East. From May 13 to 16, Trump undertook his first major international trip of his second term, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. He was joined by a Republican delegation and several business chief executives, including senior adviser Elon Musk. The four-day tour primarily focused on securing business deals and investments in the United States, which Trump claimed could reach as high as $4 trillion, as well as lifting sanctions on the transitional government of Syria. Trump met with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, the first time that the leaders had met since a meeting was convened between Bill Clinton and Hafez al-Assad in Geneva in 2000, and urged him to join the Abraham Accords. The United States announced over US$243 billion in deals with Qatar, including a US$1 billion defence agreement with Raytheon for Qatari counter-drone capabilities, a US$2 billion contract with General Atomics for MQ-9B unmanned aerial vehicles, and US$38 billion for Al Udeid Air Base. Trump later attended a state dinner at Lusail Palace, where he appealed to Qatar to improve Iran–United States relations. When Trump arrived in Abu Dhabi on May 15, he became the second serving US president to visit the country. He toured the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque with Khaled bin Mohamed Al Nahyan. The United Arab Emirates awarded Trump the Order of Zayed, the country's highest civil decoration. During the visit, the United States Department of Commerce announced a deal with the Emirates and Emirati artificial intelligence firm G42 to establish the largest data centre for artificial intelligence outside of the United States in Abu Dhabi. This burgeoning relationship with Gulf nations highlights several key aspects of Trump's foreign policy. It demonstrates his clear preference for 'the art of the deal" over traditional diplomatic engagements. The focus on massive economic commitments, job creation in the US, and strategic investments aligns perfectly with his 'America First" agenda. It signals a recalibration of US policy in the Middle East, moving away from an exclusive focus on long-standing security alliances towards a more transactional approach that seeks immediate and tangible benefits. Qatar, in particular, seems to have skillfully leveraged its position as a regional mediator and financial powerhouse, aligning its interests with Trump's transactional diplomacy to secure strategic partnerships and enhance its global standing. The deepening ties with Qatar reflect a foreign policy where economic incentives and pragmatic gains are increasingly at the forefront of US engagement. Trump has emphasised large economic agreements and investments with wealthy Gulf states, viewing them as key partners for trade and stability in the region. The Abraham Accords, brokered during his first term, also highlight this transactional approach to regional diplomacy. top videos View all Under the Trump administration, 'closest allies" are often defined less by long-standing diplomatic traditions and more by shared ideological alignment, economic benefits, and a willingness to align with US strategic interests on a transactional basis. (With agency inputs) About the Author News Desk The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk More Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump elon musk Middle East pakistan Vladimir Putin Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: May 31, 2025, 08:30 IST News world Trump Stumps Old Allies: POTUS Looks To Bridge The 'Gulf' As Ties With Musk, Putin & India Suffer
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Global universities step in as US cracks down on foreign students
Amidst policy shifts in the US targeting academic institutions, universities worldwide are actively attracting international students with incentives like tuition waivers and research grants. This comes as the US faces criticism for policies impacting international student enrolment, leading students to explore alternatives in Europe and Asia-Pacific, potentially affecting the US's reputation and economy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Also Read: Federal judge extends order blocking Trump administration ban on foreign students at Harvard Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Universities around the world are stepping in to attract international students affected by US President Donald Trump's recent policies targeting academic institutions. These policies include cutting research funding, tightening visa rules—especially for Chinese students—and increasing taxes on elite Osaka University is offering tuition waivers, travel support, and research grants to students and scholars looking to transfer from US institutions. Kyoto University and Tokyo University are also considering similar initiatives. Hong Kong has instructed its universities to actively attract top talent from the US China's Xi'an Jiaotong University has issued an appeal to students from Harvard, offering fast-tracked admissions and full move follows actions by the Trump administration that critics say undermine US higher education. Last week, Harvard's ability to enrol international students was temporarily revoked, although a federal judge later blocked the Ishii, dean of Osaka University's graduate school of medicine, told Reuters, 'This is a loss for all of humanity.'Japan has set a target to increase its foreign student population from 337,000 to 400,000 over the next Turner, CEO of Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), which ranks universities globally, said to Reuters institutions in Europe and Asia-Pacific are seeing more interest from students who are rethinking plans to study in the US Countries like Germany, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and mainland China are gaining visibility as crackdown on Chinese students has drawn particular attention. On Wednesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would 'aggressively' restrict Chinese student over 275,000 Chinese students study in the US, contributing significantly to both the revenue of educational institutions and the talent pool of tech companies. According to the US Department of Commerce, international students—more than half from India and China—added over $50 billion to the US economy in policy shift comes during the international application season. Many students are planning to arrive in the US by August to begin their studies. But some are now a 24-year-old Chinese student from Chengdu, had intended to complete her master's degree in the US but is now exploring options in the UK. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.'The impact isn't limited to Chinese students. Tom Moon, deputy head at Oxbridge Applications, said students from Britain and the EU are now more cautious about applying to US universities In contrast, British universities are seeing more interest from students currently in the US, according to Universities UK, though it is too early to confirm enrolment Rickets, an 18-year-old Canadian student at Harvard, said her financial aid package may not be matched by other universities if she is forced to transfer. 'Around the time I was applying to schools, the only university across the Atlantic I considered was Oxford... However, I realised that I would not be able to afford the international tuition and there was no sufficient scholarship or financial aid available,' she Harvard's enrolment rights are revoked, she plans to apply to the University of reported that traffic to its 'Study in America' guide dropped 17.6% in the past year. Interest from India fell by more than 50%.'Measurable impacts on enrolment typically emerge within six to 18 months. Reputational effects, however, often linger far longer, particularly where visa uncertainty and shifting work rights play into perceptions of risk versus return,' Turner Thompson, a 20-year-old American student at Harvard, lives with eight international scholars. He said, 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study.'(With inputs from Reuters)
