
US defence chief warns of China threat as Beijing's top brass skip summit
Singapore – Of the many military officials darting across the lobby of Singapore's Shangri-La Hotel this weekend, there has been one significant absence.
China's Defence Minister Dong Jun skipped the annual Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security forum, with Beijing sending a delegation of lower-ranking representatives instead.
It was the first time since 2019 that China has not dispatched its defence minister to the high-level dialogue on regional defence, except when the event was cancelled in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Beijing's decision raised eyebrows in Singapore, coming at a time of heightened tensions between China and the United States – the world's two biggest superpowers.
Dong's absence meant there was no face-to-face meeting with his US counterpart, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who had the floor to himself on Saturday when he told the defence forum that the military threat posed by China was potentially imminent.
'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific,' Hegseth told delegates in Singapore.
Pointing to China's regular military drills around Taiwan as well as increasingly frequent skirmishes in the South China Sea, Hegseth said Beijing was proactively harassing its neighbours.
'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' Hegseth said.
He also pointed to China's growing military assertiveness as a reason for Asian nations to boost their defence spending, pointing to Germany, which has pledged to move towards spending 5 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence.
'It doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat,' Hegseth said.
The defence chief also looked to reassure Asian allies that Washington was committed to Asia Pacific security despite strained ties in recent months as US President Donald Trump targeted some close allies with hefty trade tariffs.
'America is proud to be back in the Indo-Pacific, and we're here to stay,' he said, opening his speech.
Some analysts were quick to play down the severity of Hegseth's warnings about China.
'Short of a very few countries, not many in this part of the world see China as an imminent threat and would up their [defence] spending,' said Dylan Loh, assistant professor in the public policy and global affairs programme at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University.
In previous years, the Shangri-La Dialogue had provided a rare platform for meetings between Chinese and US officials in the more informal surroundings that the summit could offer.
The structure of the schedule also allowed Beijing's military chiefs to directly respond to the keynote speech from the US defence secretary and to present their narrative to other members of the Asia Pacific.
Beijing has remained tight-lipped on the reason for Defence Minister Dong's absence from the forum, fuelling an information void that has been filled by speculation.
One theory is that China did not want to send a high-profile delegate to the event at such a sensitive time as Beijing navigates the tariff war with the Trump administration.
'Any sort of faux pas or comments that may go off script can be picked up and picked apart or misconstrued,' said Loh, of Singapore's Nanyang Technological University.
'So the question is why take the risk when US-China relations are at a very delicate point at this moment,' Loh told Al Jazeera.
The Shangri-La Dialogue weekend has not always been the easiest occasion for Chinese defence ministers. In recent years, they have faced difficult questions from their counterparts in other countries, who are unhappy with Beijing's increasing assertiveness in the Asia Pacific region.
Loh said this could be another factor in Dong's absence from the high-profile event.
'Any Chinese defence minister coming to Singapore now will be exposing himself and the country to political risk,' he said. 'Themes like the South China Sea and possibly Taiwan will emerge, which makes China a convenient target,' Loh added.
Dong was appointed as China's defence minister in late 2023, after his predecessor, Li Shangfu, was removed from office.
Less than a year into the job, there was speculation surrounding Dong's new position following media reports that he was under investigation as part of a wider investigation into corruption in the Chinese military. Beijing denied the reports, with the minister continuing to maintain a public profile despite the allegations.
There has also been intense scrutiny of China's military, following reports of an apparent purge of top-level officials by President Xi Jinping.
One of Beijing's most senior generals, He Weidong, was missing from a high-profile political meeting in April, adding to rumours surrounding a possible restructuring in the People's Liberation Army (PLA).
Ian Chong, a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie China research centre, said such speculation could be a factor in Dong's no-show in Singapore.
'Because of the domestic turmoil with China's senior military, they perhaps don't want to, or the PLA itself feels that it's not in a position to send somebody senior,' Chong told Al Jazeera.
Announcing Dong's absence at a news conference before the summit, Chinese military spokesperson Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang maintained that communication channels were still open between defence officials in Washington and Beijing.
'China places great importance on US-China military ties, and is open to communication at different levels,' Zhang said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off
It all boils down to one thing – Yoon Suk-yeol's botched martial law decree. The former president, who narrowly won the last presidential election in 2022, was supposed to serve for five years. But his declaration of martial law on December 3 – which brought armed soldiers onto Seoul's streets, evoking traumatic memories of past military rule – prompted the opposition-controlled National Assembly to impeach him that same month. The Constitutional Court upheld the decision on April 4 in a move that obliged the country's caretaker leaders to call a presidential election within 60 days. Yoon has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing. He has described his decree as a legitimate act of governance meant to raise public awareness of the danger of the opposition-controlled National Assembly, which obstructed his agenda and impeached top officials. The decree lasted only six hours as enough legislators, including from Yoon's party, managed to enter the parliament house and vote it down. It unleashed political chaos, however, including mass protests, a riot at a courthouse and three caretaker leaders in six months.


Al Jazeera
19 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
South Korea's presidential election aims to restore democratic credentials
Seoul, South Korea – After six hours of emergency martial law, hundreds of days of protests, violence at a Seoul court and the eventual impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol, South Korea is now hours away from choosing a new leader in the hope of restoring stability to an unsettled nation. From 6am to 8pm on Tuesday (21:00 to 11:00 GMT), South Koreans will vote for one of five presidential candidates in a race led largely by the opposition Democratic Party's Lee Jae-myung. He is followed in the polls by the governing People Power Party candidate Kim Moon-soo. The election – involving 44.39 million eligible voters – is expected to see either of these two top contenders replace Yoon. The expelled former president last week attended his fifth court hearing where he faces charges of leading an insurrection and abusing power due to his failed imposition of martial law on December 3. If convicted, Yoon could face a maximum penalty of life in prison or even the death sentence. Participation in the election is predicted to be at an all-time high amid the political turmoil resulting from the brief imposition of military rule, which still resonates in every corner of society and has sharply divided the country along political lines. There are those who still support Yoon and those who vehemently oppose his martial law decision. The Democratic Party's Lee is currently the clear frontrunner, with Gallup Korea's latest poll on May 28 placing his support at 49 percent, compared with People Power Party Kim's 36 percent, as the favourite to win. Early voting, which ended on Friday, had the second-highest voter turnout in the country's history, at 34.74 percent, while overseas voting from 118 countries reached a record high of 79.5 percent. In the last presidential election in 2022, Yoon narrowly edged out Lee in the closest presidential contest in South Korea's history. After his crushing defeat in 2022 to a voting margin of just 0.73 percentage points, Lee now has another chance at the top office, and to redeem his political reputation. About a month ago, South Korea's Supreme Court determined that Lee had spread falsehoods during his 2022 presidential bid in violation of election law. In addition to surviving a series of bribery charges during his tenure as mayor of Seongnam and governor of Gyeonggi Province, which he claimed were politically motivated, Lee also survived a stabbing attack to his neck during a news conference in Busan last year. Fortunately for Lee, the courts have agreed to postpone further hearings of his ongoing trials until after the election. On the campaign trail this time around, Lee addressed his supporters from behind bulletproof glass, with snipers positioned on rooftops, scanning the crowds for potential threats, as counterterrorism units patrolled on foot. Lee has also been joined on his campaign by conservative lawmakers, his former opponents, who have publicly supported his run for office numerous times during the past month, seeing him as a path back to political stability. People Power Party candidate Kim was served an especially hard blow when his parliamentary colleague, Kim Sang-wook, defected from the party in early May to join Lee's Democratic Party. According to polling data from South Korea's leading media outlet Hankyoreh, only 55 percent of conservative voters who supported Yoon in the 2022 election said they would back the People Power Party's Kim this time around. While such shifts represent the crisis that the mainstream conservative party is facing after the political fallout from Yoon's botched martial law plan and removal from office, it also testifies to Lee's appeal to both moderate and conservative voters. 'The events of the martial law, insurrection attempt and impeachment process have dealt a heavy blow to our democracy,' said Lim Woon-taek, a sociology professor at Keimyung University and a former member of the Presidential Commission on Policy Planning. 'So, the new president will receive a heavy burden when assuming the president's seat,' Lim told Al Jazeera. Youth unemployment, social inequality and climate change have also become pressing issues that Yoon's administration failed to tackle. According to recent research, South Korea's non-regular workers, including contract employees and part-timers, accounted for 38 percent of all wage and salary workers last year. Lee has promised to champion business-friendly policies, and concentrate on investment in research and development and artificial intelligence, while refraining from focusing on divisive social issues such as the gender wars. His stance has shifted considerably from his time moving up the political ranks when he promoted left-wing ideas, such as a universal basic income. Events on the night of the declaration of martial law on December 3, also helped cement Lee's image as a political freedom fighter. A former human rights lawyer, Lee was livestreamed scaling the walls of the National Assembly as the military surrounded the compound, where he rallied fellow legislators to vote and strike down Yoon's decision to mobilise the military. Among Lee's most central campaign pledges has been his promise to bring to justice those involved in Yoon's martial law scheme and tighten controls on a future president's ability to do the same. Lee also wants to see a constitutional amendment that would allow presidents to serve two four-year terms, a change from the current single-term five years. While Lee's closest challenger, Kim, has agreed on such policies and made sure to distance himself from Yoon, the former labour-activist-turned-hardline-conservative has also said the former president's impeachment went too far. The election also unfolds as United States President Donald Trump has proposed a series of tariffs on key South Korean exports such as steel, semiconductors and automobiles. In the face of those threats, Lee has promised to stimulate demand and growth, while Kim has promised to ease business regulations. Kim also emphasised his plan to hold an immediate summit meeting with Trump to discuss the tariffs. Lee, on the other hand, has promised a more pragmatic foreign policy agenda which would maintain relations with the US administration but also prioritise 'national interests', such as bridging closer relations with neighbouring China and Russia. On North Korea, Lee is determined to ease tensions that have risen to unprecedented heights in recent years, while Kim has pledged to build up the country's military capability to counter Pyongyang, and wants stronger security support from the US. Lee has also promised to relocate the National Assembly and the presidential office from Seoul to Sejong City, which would be designated as the country's new administrative capital, continuing a process of city-planning rebalancing that has met a series of setbacks in recent years. Another major issue that Keimyung University's Lim hopes the future leader will focus more on is the climate situation. 'Our country is considered a climate villain, and we will face future restrictions in our exports if we don't address the immediate effects of not keeping limits on the amount of our hazardous outputs,' Lim said. 'The future of our country will really rest on this one question: whether the next president will draw out such issues like the previous administration or face the public sphere and head straight into the main issues that are deteriorating our society.' The results of Tuesday's vote are expected to emerge either late on Tuesday or in the early hours of Wednesday morning. In the 2022 election, Yoon was proclaimed the winner at 4:40am the morning after election day. With Lee the clear frontrunner in this election, the outcome could be evident as early as Tuesday night. But enhanced surveillance at polling stations this year due to concerns raised about counting errors may be a factor in slowing down any early announcement of the country's next president.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
China warns US not to ‘play with fire' over Taiwan
BeijingcTypeface:> China has warned the United States against 'playing with fire' over Taiwan in response to US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling the Asian power a 'threat to the region' at a high-profile summit in Singapore. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue on Saturday, Hegseth said China was 'credibly preparing' for military action to shift Asia's power balance, accusing Beijing of rehearsing a potential invasion of Taiwan. China considers Taiwan, a separately governed island, to be a part of its territory and has vowed reunification by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future. Hegseth's remarks provoked a swift rebuke from China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which stressed that Taiwan remains a domestic matter, warning foreign powers against using the issue as leverage. It described US actions in Asia Pacific as turning the region into a 'powder keg'. 'The US should not entertain illusions about using the Taiwan question as a bargaining chip to contain China, nor should it play with fire,' it said. Hegseth had called on allies in the Asia Pacific region, including key security ally Australia, to spend more on defence after warning of the 'real and potentially imminent' threat from China. Calling the US a 'true destabilising' force in the Asia Pacific, Beijing accused Washington of deploying offensive weapons in the South China Sea and aggravating regional tensions. Beijing accused Hegseth of 'vilifying China with defamatory allegations' and promoting a 'Cold War mentality'. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a threat,' the ministry said. (Agencies)