logo
U.S. attorney in L.A. moves to 'neutralize' California's sanctuary rules

U.S. attorney in L.A. moves to 'neutralize' California's sanctuary rules

Yahoo25-05-2025

The top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles is ratcheting up immigration enforcement in jails as the Trump administration looks for more ways to remove more immigrants from sanctuary cities.
U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli announced this week a pilot program dubbed "Operation Guardian Angel" intended to "neutralize" sanctuary state laws. The office identifies individuals with criminal records who have been deported and charges them with illegally reentering the United States, a federal crime.
The tactic focuses federal resources at the main place sanctuary rules have impeded the work of immigration agents — county jails and state prisons.
"Under the Trump Administration we will not allow sanctuary jurisdictions to stand in the way of keeping the American People safe," Essayli posted on X in announcing the program.
State officials say they already cooperate with federal officials in regards to immigrants who have committed crimes.
"While the Trump Administration may seek to blame California as it grows desperate to deliver on its misguided, inhumane mass deportation agenda, immigration enforcement is and always has been the federal government's job," said a spokesperson for California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta.
The practice of prosecuting individuals for illegal entry was widely employed under the Obama and second Bush administrations, but fell out of use in recent years. The resumption of it could increase the number of immigration arrests in the region, experts say.
Essayli, former state assemblyman and the son of Lebanese immigrants, was appointed last month. He told Fox News he created a dedicated group of federal officials to comb through databases to identify jailed immigrants who had been deported. The new effort could yield dozens of charges every week.
The administration has been frustrated with California's policy that prohibits local law enforcement from arresting someone solely for a deportation order or holding someone in jail for extra time so immigration agents can detain them.
Immigration officials in the past relied on local police to help them with enforcement, but over the last decade California and other states have increased protections for immigrants. The state scaled back its involvement in immigration enforcement on the streets and in jails, culminating in a 2018 law that ended the use of 287(g) agreements, which allowed local jailers to screen suspects for immigration violations.
Immigration activists argued those agreements eroded trust with the community and punished immigrants with minor infractions.
The Trump administration has aggressively pushed to revive such programs across the country as it attempts to make good on its promise of mass deportation.
'The days of giving criminal illegal aliens a free pass are over," Essayli said in a statement. "While California may be presently disregarding detainers, it cannot ignore federal arrest warrants."
There still is plenty of collaboration between state and federal immigration authorities.
Under the state law, California prison officials can transfer any inmate to immigration custody, but they do have to give the person a written notice. And police can notify immigration agents of someone's release if they have certain convictions. Those include any felony that resulted in state prison, most other felonies on their record in the previous 15 years, and some high-level misdemeanors within the last five years.
President Trump has painted sanctuary cities as more dangerous, and much of his immigration agenda is framed around removing criminals. Experts say the rhetoric doesn't match with reality.
"The foundational assumption is widespread immigrant criminality," said Charis Kubrin, a criminology professor at UC Irvine. Her research and others show no connection between sanctuary status and crime.
"Immigrants do not commit crime at a higher rate than the native born, and immigration to an area does not cause crime rates to rise," she said.
Essayli's office stated that his office will file charges and seek arrest warrants so federal agents can "take as many defendants as possible into custody from state jails."
In 2023 and 2024, federal prosecutors in the California's Central District — covering seven counties including Los Angeles — charged a total of 17 individuals with illegal reentry following removal, according to the office.
Between Jan. 20 and May 1, the office charged 347 people with illegal reentry. In the first five days of the program that began May 10, 13 people have been arrested, which is actually a slower rate than the three previous months.
But even if the numbers ramp up, the program could run into a roadblock created by its own success, as the number of prosecutions mount.
"At the end of the day they will, they will run into ... issues of capacity," said Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute.
Staff Writer Andrea Castillo contributed to this story.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release

time41 minutes ago

Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release

NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .

Peruvian migrant acquitted in the first trial over the new militarized zone at US-Mexico border

time41 minutes ago

Peruvian migrant acquitted in the first trial over the new militarized zone at US-Mexico border

EL PASO, Texas -- A Peruvian woman who crossed the U.S. border illegally was acquitted Thursday of unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone in the first trial under the Trump administration's efforts to prosecute immigrants who cross in certain parts of New Mexico and western Texas. Adely Vanessa De La Cruz-Alvarez, 21, was arrested last month near the West Texas town of Tornillo after she entered the U.S. from Mexico by walking across the riverbed of the Rio Grande, court documents show. In addition to being charged with entering the country illegally, she was charged with accessing a military zone. She is among several other immigrants who have been charged under the law since President Donald Trump's administration transferred oversight of a strip of land along the border to the military. It is as part of a new approach the Department of Justice is taking to crack down on illegal immigration. The Associated Press left messages Thursday with De La Cruz-Alvarez's attorney, Veronica Teresa Lerma. The lawyer told The Texas Tribune the acquittal is significant. 'Hopefully, this sets the tone for the federal government,' Lerma said, 'so they know what the El Paso community will do with these charges.' Even before the woman's case went to trial, federal magistrate judges in neighboring New Mexico had dismissed similar cases, finding little evidence that immigrants knew about the zones. Lerma was convicted of entering the country illegally and was already facing deportation, but could have faced up to 18 months in prison for entering the militarized zone. Despite the verdict, U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons of the Western District of Texas said his office will continue to aggressively prosecute National Defense Area violations. 'At the end of the day, another illegal alien has been found guilty of illegally entering the country in violation of the improper entry statute and will be removed from the United States,' Simmons said in a statement. "That's a win for America." The administration wants to sharply increase the removal of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally as Trump seeks to make good on his pledge of mass deportations. The administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border, while arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store