logo
Utah lawmakers turn focus on products put in food

Utah lawmakers turn focus on products put in food

Yahoo19-02-2025

Three different bills focused on what products are inside the food consumed by people in Utah were discussed in committees in the Utah Legislature on Wednesday. These bills focus on food products sold in stores and also what food is served in Utah's public schools.
These bills relate to the recent 'Make America Healthy Again,' or MAHA, movement from President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
MAHA primarily focuses on the pharmaceutical and food industries and what products are being put into food and medicines.
Last week, Trump issued an executive order to create a MAHA commission which will be chaired by Kennedy and will also include the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Education and other government officials.
The commission will be focusing on 'the childhood chronic disease crisis' and its purpose will be to study any potential contributing causes to these diseases 'including the American diet, absorption of toxic material, medical treatments, lifestyle, environmental factors, government policies, food production techniques, electromagnetic radiation, and corporate influence or cronyism,' according to the order.
Going along with the MAHA idea, these three Utah bills focus on what products are in foods in Utah, making sure this food is properly labeled and informing people of what they are putting into their bodies.
These bills haven't been specifically linked to MAHA but they follow the ideas of the movement.
The bills originated in the House and all have different sponsors.
Sponsored by Rep. Kristen Chevrier, R-Highland, HB402 would prohibit certain ingredients from being served in public schools. The bill would ban 'ultraprocessed' foods, which include the following ingredients: brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben, titanium dioxide, blue dye 1, blue dye 2, green dye 3, red dye 3, red dye 40, yellow dye 5 and yellow dye 6.
Foods containing these ingredients could not be sold or served on school grounds during normal school days. If the bill passes, the requirements would start for the 2026-2027 school year.
The bill would not prevent parents or guardians from giving their children food with these ingredients, just the schools themselves.
HB138, sponsored by Rep. Neil Walter, R-St. George, would require foods containing cultivated meat products to be labeled clearly. Cultivated meat products are food products produced by cultivating or culturing an animal cell in vitro.
The bill also requires food containing insect or plant based meat substitutes to be labeled clearly. These food products must include a notification of these products on a label that can be clearly seen by consumers.
Walter said that other states have made moves to ban or restrict these products but that is not what this bill would do. HB138 is simply about informing consumers about the product they are consuming.
The bill's sponsor compared these labels to like when you go to the store and choose between imitation crab and real crab.
Sponsored by Trevor Lee, R-Layton, HB84 has to do with vaccines, specifically vaccines that are found in certain foods.
During the committee hearing Lee shared that different pharmaceutical groups have started putting vaccines in food instead of injecting people with the vaccines. HB84 is meant to prepare for when receiving vaccines through ingesting food becomes more popular and common.
This bill clarifies that if vaccines are put in food it has to be classified as a drug and not just as food. So if this vaccine filled food was sold in grocery stores it would be placed on the pharmaceutical side and not with the food.
Lee said that other states across the country have passed similar legislation pertaining to vaccines in food.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts

CNBC

time14 minutes ago

  • CNBC

PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts

The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.

Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'

WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump says US personnel moved as Iran tensions mount
Trump says US personnel moved as Iran tensions mount

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says US personnel moved as Iran tensions mount

President Donald Trump said US personnel were being moved from the potentially "dangerous" Middle East on Wednesday as nuclear talks with Iran faltered and fears grew of a regional conflict. Trump also reiterated that he would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike Tehran's facilities. Iran threatened Wednesday to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. A US official had earlier said that staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while there were reports that personnel were also being moved from Kuwait and Bahrain. "Well they are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place," Trump told reporters in Washington when asked about the reports of personnel being moved. "We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens." Trump then added: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple. We're not going to allow that." Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The two sides were due to meet again in coming days. Trump had until recently expressed optimism about the talks, but said in an interview published Wednesday that he was "less confident" about reaching a nuclear deal. Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails. The US president says he has pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off striking Iran's nuclear facilities to give the talks a chance, but has increasingly signaled that he is losing patience. Iran however warned it would respond to any attack. "All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail. - 'Suffer more losses' - "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar. In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the US strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at the Baghdad airport. Dozens of US soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries. Amid the escalating tensions, the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, also advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution. Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington calling it a "red line." Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Western countries have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear program and that Washington "cannot have a say" on the issue. During an interview with the New York Post's podcast "Pod Force One," which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago," he said. Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years. burs-dk/jgc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store