Regional National Civics Bee competition held in Colorado Springs
(COLORADO SPRINGS) — El Paso County hosted the Regional Competition for the annual National Civics Bee on Saturday, March 29. Out of 20 finalists, three advanced to the State Competition in May.
On Saturday, middle school students from all over the area showcased their knowledge and spirit for the region when they were tasked with writing an essay on how they would improve their community. The goal of the competition is to get students involved in Civics and their community.
'I think this is important because it helps me realize and learn about my country and how I can become an active member in it and how I can change laws for the better,' said Camilla Balser, who scored first place.
Balser emerged as the regional champion with her 'thoughtful and compelling' essay.
'I think it's great getting our kids involved in our community,' said Michael Lordino, President of the Eastern Plains Chamber of Commerce. 'I'm always amazed in the depth of knowledge these students have of their community and how they want to better it, so it is always just very impressive to hear them talk about it.'
The winners will have the chance to compete on May 30 at the State level in Denver. Those who win will then pass on to the National Civics Bee in Washington D.C. in the fall.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wife of Colorado firebombing suspect brought Jewish neighbors welcome gift weeks prior to attack
An observant Jewish couple described the horror of finding out that their neighbor, whose wife recently knocked on their door with a housewarming gift, was suspected of firebombing a peaceful pro-Israel demonstration in the heart of Boulder. The Costello family had barely begun unpacking boxes in their new Colorado Springs home when the FBI showed up at their doorstep and explained a neighbor, illegal Egyptian immigrant Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, was arrested for allegedly injuring 12 people in front of the Boulder County courthouse. "I come home, and the FBI is waiting at my door. That's a scary moment," David Costello shared with Fox News Digital. "They told us, 'You're not in trouble,' but then they asked if we knew what happened in Boulder." The Costellos said they knew of the Solimans, having met Soliman's wife when she showed up on their front steps offering cupcakes to welcome them to the neighborhood. Rise In Antisemitic Extremism Fuels Wave Of Terror Plots In The United States Since 2020 "The wife came over and gave us some cupcakes," David said. "We keep kosher, so we couldn't eat them, but we accepted them and then we just sort of threw them away." Read On The Fox News App Unaware of the prior interaction, FBI agents told the Costellos it was important they were aware of the terror attack due to their visible Jewish identity, the couple said, with the family proudly displaying a mezuzah on the door. "He had to have driven right past our house to get to Boulder," David said. "He surely saw us moving in [wearing a] tzitzit and a kippah, and my wife's head being covered. It is really by the grace of Hashem, that we weren't attacked.… It's pretty obvious that we're Jewish, like he could have easily just thrown a Molotov cocktail at our door—we don't have an exit through the back—that would have been absolutely disastrous for us." Rise In Antisemitic Extremism Fuels Wave Of Terror Plots In The United States Since 2020 Because the Costellos do not use phones or electronic devices during religious holidays, they had no access to news due to their observance of Shavuot. Their only awareness of the incident came through people knocking on their door asking for interviews and eventually the FBI sharing what had happened. "I didn't realize how big the story was until I turned on my phone after the holiday," David's wife, Rivkah, said. "We moved here to lie low, but suddenly we were in the headlines." The couple had left their former neighborhood due to what they described as persistent anti-Israel activism and discomfort in a Muslim-majority area. David said they were seeking "a place to go and be under the radar." Boulder Terror Attack Latest In Antisemitic Incidents Rising Across Us In 2025 Soliman is currently being held on a $10 million bond and faces multiple charges, including attempted murder and federal hate crimes. According to authorities, he admitted to planning the attack for over a year and expressed a desire to harm "Zionist people." "It's unnerving," Rivkah said. "They said bail was set at $10 million, but that still means there's a possibility he could be released—and we live right across the street. We have five young children. This is terrifying." "I hope people understand what that means for a Jewish family living across the street from someone accused of terrorism," she said. WATCH: Boulder suspect attacks pro-Israel supporters David said the holiday of Shavuot, which celebrates Jewish unity, made the timing of the FBI visit especially meaningful. "We really felt like it was a miracle. While symbols like a mezuzah might make you a target, they also offer spiritual protection," he said. The couple and their family shared that their hope is that antisemitic sentiment does not continue to escalate. "We really don't want to move again," David said. "But if it becomes dangerous, we may not have a choice." Despite the fear, they say the experience has only strengthened their commitment to staying visible and vocal about their faith. "When you're pushed, you can either disappear or stand your ground," David said. "We're choosing to stand."Original article source: Wife of Colorado firebombing suspect brought Jewish neighbors welcome gift weeks prior to attack
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Civics in the time of MAGA: Junior high kids get right what we adults have gotten wrong
So, I'm sitting here on a Thursday afternoon, watching a bunch of junior-high-school kids answering questions about American government and constitutional rights. And the sad irony is they know more about it than at least 90% of the politicians and elected officials I cover on a daily basis. It's called the National Civics Bee. It's like a spelling bee, but with civics. And Thursday was the state finals, held at the downtown Wichita headquarters of the Kansas Leadership Center. What made this a lot more fun than the usual 'bee' format was it was set up to allow for audience participation. Attendees (in a separate group) could play along with the competitors and test their own knowledge. I talked with Chris Green of the Leadership Center and we both agreed it would be fun to invite some of our elected officials next year to see see how they stack up against the sixth-, seventh- and eighth graders in the contest. I wonder how many would accept the challenge. The questions ranged from fairly easy, like . . . Q: A new education reform bill was introduced in Congress and successfully passed through both the House of Representatives and the Senate. What is the next step before the bill can become law? A: The president must sign the bill into law or take no action for 10 days, after which it will automatically become law. . . . to the detailed and difficult, for example. . . Q: In Federalist number 39, how does Madison distinguish between a federal and national government, and what does this distinction suggest about the nature of the Constitution as a product of the convention? A: Madison claims that the Constitution is both federal and national, with the House of Representatives representing the national and the Senate representing the federal, suggesting that the constitution will balance power between the state and national. (I got that one wrong. I picked the answer with the House representing the federal and Senate national). In addition to the multiple choice, the five finalists had to read from and answer judges' questions on an essay they wrote on a current issue, ranging from saving rural hospitals to reforming state policy on driver's license revocation. When all was said and done, Tanya Ramesh of Wichita won the competition, a $1,000 giant check, and a ticket to Washington for the national finals. Madeline Stewart of Overland Park took second and $500, while Zane Hoff of Salina got third and $250. I thought the Civics Bee was one of the coolest events I've been to in a while, so I hesitate to even bring this up, but some of the questions probably need updating in this era of MAGA. For instance: Q: How did Afroyim versus Rusk in 1967 affect the government's power regarding citizenship revocation? A: It limited the government's ability to to revoke citizenship. Afroyim v. Rusk was a landmark case that ruled: 'Congress has no power under the Constitution to divest a person of his United States citizenship absent his voluntary renunciation thereof. ' The court's revised that stance since, to allow citizenship to be revoked (called denaturalization) if it was granted on false pretenses that would have prevented it in the first place, for example, terrorists or Nazi war criminals living under false identities. Now, denaturalization has become a key part of President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to deport as many non-white immigrants as possible, whom he accuses (echoing a former world leader named Adolf) of 'poisoning the blood of our country.' During his first term, Trump created 'Operation Second Look,' a program to comb immigrant citizens' paperwork for misstatements or errors that would allow them to be denaturalized. This term, his top immigration advisor, Stephen Miller, has vowed to 'turbocharge' Operation Second Look, which could also lead to denaturalization and deportation of American-born children of immigrants, under Trump's executive order that purports to end birthright citizenship. Another Civics Bee question that caught my attention was this one: Q: Which statement best reflects the application of federalism in the Clean Air Act, considering the following quotation, 'the Clean Air Act represents a partnership between federal and state governments to improve air quality and to protect public health.' A: The federal government sets national standards, while states can implement stricter regulations based on local needs. That's the way it's supposed to work. But it brought to mind a recent press release I got from Kansas 1st District Rep. Tracey Mann, taking a victory lap over Congress rolling back California anti-pollution regulations. At the time, I remember thinking, 'What business is this of Tracey Mann's?' given that he represents a district that sprawls from Colorado to one county away from Missouri, where there are about four times as many cows as people and the largest city, Lawrence, would be a minor suburb of Los Angeles. What he knows of the pollution challenges facing California I'm guessing would fit on a microscope slide, but he couldn't care less as long as he can own some libs and send out a press release titled: 'Rep. Mann Reverses Biden Green New Deal Policies.' When I was growing up, we didn't have civics bees. We barely had any civics education. Truth be told, most of what we ever knew about the workings of government came from 'Schoolhouse Rock,' three-minute educational cartoons sandwiched between Jonny Quest and Scooby-Doo on Saturday mornings. Cue the music: 'I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill, and I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill.' I can't help thinking if we'd had civics bees back then, we wouldn't be in this mess we're in today. So it lifts my heart to see these earnest young kids competing over who knows the most about the people and ideals that built America. It gives me great hope that their future will be better than the present that my generation has handed them.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
The ‘Highly Unusual' Case Of The Midwife Arrested For Violating Texas' Abortion Law
Maria Rojas, a Houston-area midwife, was arrested in March for allegedly violating Texas' near-total abortion ban. She was held for 10 days in the samejail where Sandra Bland died after a routine traffic stop in 2015. Rojas was able to post the exorbitant $1.4 million bail, but her phone was seized and her license was stripped — and with it her ability to make an income. She was court-ordered to wear a tracking device. 'In Texas, life is sacred. I will always do everything in my power to protect the unborn,' Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a leading anti-abortion advocate who recently announced his bid for a U.S. Senate seat, proudly boasted about the arrest. But three months later, Rojas has not been formally charged with a crime — putting her in an excruciating limbo where she's unable to make money, but forced to pay for a costly legal defense with little public evidence against her. It's standard practice for a criminal complaint to be filed shortly after someone is arrested. But in an unusual move, Rojas was held on an arrest warrant. Without a formal indictment or any criminal discovery from the state, Rojas can't begin preparing her defense. 'Mrs. Rojas remains unindicted for any crime. Meanwhile, she remains under exceedingly restrictive bond conditions, and she is prohibited from doing the lawful work as a midwife she was doing before these specious allegations against her were made,' Nicole Hochglaube, Rojas' defense attorney, told HuffPost. Reproductive rights are under attack. HuffPost is committed to reporting the truth, amplifying voices, and covering this fight with depth and care. Support our work by today. It's 'really unusual' to be arrested but not indicted, C. Melissa Owen, first vice president at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, told HuffPost. 'It was highly unusual 10 days after she had been arrested, and it is exceptionally unusual now,' said Owen, who is also the co-chair of the NACDL's task force on policing and overcriminalization of pregnancy. The Texas Office of the Attorney General did not respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Attorneys representing Paxton's office also did not respond to a request for comment. This has not only been a difficult time for Rojas and her family, but also the primarily Spanish-speaking, low-income community Rojas once served, Hochglaube said. The midwife owned and operated several health clinics in the Houston area, all of which have been temporarily closed by a court order in a civil case brought by Paxton's office. 'We look forward to clearing her of these allegations but remain in a damaging holding pattern waiting for any specifics about these claims from the State of Texas,' Hochglaube said. Without an indictment, Rojas is left in a sort of no man's land where due process has been put on hold. 'There is no possibility of due process for her in this current state,' Owen said. 'Rights only become meaningful through due process. You can't do anything about an arrest unless you can challenge it.' The 30-page arrest affidavit filed by Paxton's office is currently the only evidence from the state outlining Rojas' alleged crimes. The investigation into Rojas' clinics began with an anonymous complaint to Texas Health and Human Services in January. The attorney general's office investigated and arrested Rojas and another worker on charges of practicing medicine without a license. Weeks later, they were arrested again on charges of performing an illegal abortion. State investigators surveilled the clinics for a little over a month earlier this year after the anonymous complaint alleged that two women received illegal abortions from Rojas in September 2023 and January 2025. One of the two women later confirmed to investigators that she received an abortion from Rojas, according to the arrest warrant. A third woman told investigators that Rojas presented herself as a gynecologist and may have provided a medication abortion to the woman after Rojas said she would not be able to carry the pregnancy to term. The arrest affidavit stated that investigators seized a bottle of misoprostol and $2,900 in cash from Rojas' car. The main investigator wrote that he knew, 'based on training and experience, that misoprostol is an abortifacient commonly used to induce medical abortions.' Last month, Rojas was able to tell her side of the story in an appeal brief in the civil suit. Her attorneys painted a very different picture, accusing Paxton's office of conjecture and a politically motivated investigation that proves nothing. 'The Attorney General boasts that he has caught a 'Houston-Area Abortionist' and has shut down 'Clinics Providing Illegal Abortions.' But there's a snag: it isn't true,' Rojas' attorneys wrote in the brief. 'In the Attorney General Office's rush to find and prosecute someone for violating the State's total abortion ban, it conducted a shoddy investigation and leapt to wild conclusions.' Witness statements in the arrest warrant 'do not show that an abortion was knowingly provided or attempted,' Rojas' attorneys wrote in the civil appeal. They argue that investigators' main witness — the third woman who alleges Rojas may have provided a medication abortion — was given one misoprostol tablet, which is one-fourth of the dose needed for a full medication abortion. Rojas likely believed the woman was experiencing a miscarriage and gave her misoprostol, the standard protocol for miscarriage care. The main investigator, who is a Medicaid fraud investigator, seized a small number of misoprostol pills from Rojas' car, but didn't note that misoprostol is commonly used for other medical issues, most notably during labor and delivery of a baby. The affidavit states several times that Rojas had $2,900 in cash and the clinics accepted cash payment. The investigator noted that he knows 'cash-based and digital peer-to-peer transactions are frequently used in unlicensed medical operations to avoid financial scrutiny and regulatory oversight,' but he did not note that people who are uninsured or have immigration concerns are more likely to use cash. Marc Hearron, the lead lawyer on Rojas' civil case and an attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights, said he's stunned by what's happening to Rojas. 'If the state can do this shoddy investigation, get an arrest warrant and throw you in jail, just by saying the word 'abortion,' without even actually having the evidence to back it up — any health care provider is at risk in the state of Texas,' he told HuffPost. Owen, from NACDL, speculated that there are likely two main reasons for the state's delay in indicting Rojas. The first is that the evidence Paxton's office has gathered wouldn't survive the test of probable cause. The second is that they do have probable cause but there is something suspect about the evidence they've gathered or how they obtained it. The lack of formal criminal charges isn't the only exceptional thing about this case. It's also unusual that Paxton's office is directly responsible for investigating Rojas. The attorney general's office in Texas doesn't have the power to prosecute someone on criminal charges; the office needs to be invited by a local district attorney. Rojas was arrested in Waller County, where Sean Whittmore, the local district attorney, is a former employee of Paxton's. Rafa Kidvai, an attorney with the Repro Legal Defense Fund, pointed to Paxton's involvement in the case, a general lack of evidence against Rojas and the bail amount as reasons that they believe this is a political prosecution. Abortion criminalization cases often do set higher bail amounts, said Kidvai, because abortion is a politically charged issue. For example, women who miscarry into a toilet and flush fetal remains have been charged with abuse of a corpse. But even within that context, Rojas' bail amount for allegedly performing an illegal abortion, a second-degree felony in Texas, was 'inordinately high,' Kidvai said. The average bail amount for a second-degree felony in Waller County is around $36,000, according to 2024 public records. Rojas' bail was set at $1.4 million. 'This sort of cruelty by procedure that happens is exactly what we need to be talking about,' Kidvai said. 'If you lose all your financial support or your income, how do you fight the case? Attorneys cost money, going to court costs money, childcare costs money, therapy costs money. Criminal cases are inordinately expensive for people to take on themselves.' Kidvai has worked on many pregnancy and abortion criminalization cases including several in Texas. When someone is accused of these types of crimes, often because of pregnancy loss, their community turns on them. They lose employment, they're at risk of losing custody of their children, and sometimes there are immigration consequences. Rojas spent 10 days in jail before she paid her $1.4 million bail. She was able to pay the bond with the help of bail funds, organizations that provide financial assistance so people can be released from jail before trial. The $1.4 million bail amount signals 'that they want to punish somebody and never actually give this person the opportunity to defend themselves,' Owen said. 'Absent that bail fund, she would be serving a sentence and having no chance to test whether or not there is even a crime here.'
