Operation City Clean Up program to target litter in Augusta
AUGUSTA, Ga. (WJBF) – Litter is unsightly, and Mayor Garnett Johnson says leaving it on the ground can be costly to Augusta.
'It's important to economic development, you know, when people are riding around should they invest their dollars either from a business standpoint from an industrial standpoint. It's important that we show that we care enough about this community to keep it clean,' said Mayor Johnson.
That's why Augusta is preparing to launch a new approach to clean up litter, called Operation City Cleanup.The plan is to work with the courts and law enforcement to use those sentenced to community service hours to boost city forces picking up litter.
'A more focused effort on cleaning up the city with more attention to our right of ways. You're going to see a focused effort on enforcement through our Marshal's Department and we so glad not only is the Sheriff's Office helping us the state court, as well as the solicitor General. We can't wait to present it to the general public tomorrow,' said Mayor Garnett Johnson.
'It's been the Marshal's Office mission the whole time. It's great that the mayor sees we need it too and to have his support and have the city's support to just make Augusta cleaner and better,' said Marshal Ramone Lamkin.
The mayor says the target areas will be highly visible areas, like tourists spots, parks and community centers.
'High traffic areas throughout the city, it will not only be focused downtown, it's going to be out in South Richmond County – it's going to be all over the county areas that really need help,' said Mayor Johnson.
Operation city cleanup plan goes to commissioners Tuesday, with the mayor saying this anti-litter effort will come with no extra cost to taxpayers.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge Orders J&J Subsidiary to Pay $442 Million in Antitrust Lawsuit
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) is one of the best Dow stocks to invest in. Recently, a federal judge ruled that a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary must pay $442 million in damages after a jury concluded last month that the company had broken antitrust laws by withholding support from hospitals that used reprocessed catheters. U.S. District Judge James Selna ordered the company to pay three times the $147 million in damages awarded by the jury, as permitted under antitrust regulations. This sum does not include legal fees or other related costs. Daniel Vukelich, CEO of the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors, described the decision as 'a seismic result.' In response, a Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) spokesperson said the company intends to appeal the verdict but will comply with the court's decision and any required relief for now. The spokesperson added, 'We strongly disagree with the jury's verdict and believe it will not withstand appellate review.' Innovative Health sued Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)'s Biosense Webster in 2019, claiming the company used its market power to block hospitals from using reprocessed heart-mapping catheters by tying support for its Carto 3 system to purchases of its own products. A jury found Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) violated antitrust laws by withholding support for the reprocessed devices. AMDR's CEO said the ruling signals that anti-competitive tactics against reprocessing won't be tolerated. The case was heard in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. While we acknowledge the potential of JNJ as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts
Aldermen took a step Wednesday toward giving themselves the power to ban Airbnb's and other short-term rentals from opening in their wards. The City Council's License and Consumer Protection Committee advanced the ordinance that would allow aldermen to unilaterally block new short-term rentals one precinct at a time. It could now face a final vote by all aldermen as soon as next week. Sponsor Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, called the city's current ordinance made a decade ago 'extremely sloppy.' The existing law allows short-term rentals to be blocked only when 25% of a precinct's registered voters sign a petition calling for it. 'This is the only ordinance written in the city of Chicago where, when there is a problem in the industry, the onus is put on residents to fix it,' Napolitano said. The Far Northwest Side alderman's ordinance seeks to reverse that, allowing aldermen to block short-term rentals in a precinct on their own. It would then give companies the chance to overturn the ban by collecting signatures from 10% of the precinct's voters. Most aldermen in attendance backed the ordinance in a voice vote. Several cited issues in their ward with disruptive parties at short-term rentals, a problem Ald. Brendan Reilly, 42nd, said is 'on steroids' in dense downtown high rises. 'The guests are taking over common areas, pool decks, lobbies, fitness rooms,' he said. 'With the late night parties and noise complaints, et cetera, God help you if you own a condo next to one of these nightly rental units.' Napolitano argued the ordinance will not hurt short-term rental companies, but instead simply gives aldermen a tool to advocate for residents when issues arise. But Airbnb is strongly opposed to the proposal. 'Alderman Napolitano's ordinance amendment is an over-broad and misguided violation of Chicagoans' property rights, which would punish responsible homeowners and local businesses who rely on the income from travel on short-term rentals — especially in neighborhoods outside of Chicago's traditional tourism hubs,' Airbnb spokesperson Jonathan Buckner said in a statement Wednesday. Mayor Brandon Johnson is continuing to not take a side on the issue. Asked where he stood on the ordinance at a Wednesday morning news conference, he said he wanted to 'continue to ensure that we are building a safe, affordable city.' 'This particular measure, quite frankly, I'll have to look into a little bit deeper,' Johnson said. 'But I know that there are a number of alders who mean well and are trying to show up for their particular pocket of the city.' Several aldermen noted the absence of staff from Johnson's Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, adding that they wished someone could answer questions about how bans could affect tax revenue. Alds. Matt O'Shea, 19th, and Bill Conway, 34th, voted against the measure, with O'Shea noting taxes on the rentals sent around $4 million to fight domestic violence. 'Have we thought of how we are going to replace that?' O'Shea asked. 'It's been my experience working with Airbnb that when a problem is identified, it's addressed.' Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, used the city's current process requiring residents' signatures to ban short-term rentals from every precinct in his Southwest Side ward. The whole-ward ban took 12,000 signatures and seven years to complete, he said. The ward is '95% single family dwellings,' and short-term rentals 'would have an adverse impact on our quality of life,' Quinn said. Asked what he thinks of Airbnb's argument that the ban is similar to historic racist efforts to keep Black and Latino people out of certain neighborhoods, Quinn called it a 'desperate statement from a company who got exactly what they wanted' when the original ordinance passed. 'I'm not saying that Airbnb isn't good in some parts of the city,' he said. 'It's just not good in the Bungalow Belt, and I have 12,000 signatures that would suggest that.' Aldermen also Wednesday advanced a measure to crack down on illegal pedicabs with potential impoundments.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Megabill timeline in flux as House and Senate spar over changes
Republicans' ambitious July 4 target for their sweeping domestic policy legislation is facing new doubts this week as GOP leaders in the House and Senate push and pull over changes to the complex megabill. Speaker Mike Johnson said in an interview Wednesday that while he believed Republicans were 'on track' for final passage by the self-imposed deadline, that depended on the Senate approving a bill that hews close to the version that passed the House last month. 'We'll see what they produce,' Johnson said, adding: 'I just need them to come to their final decisions on everything. So we'll see how it shapes up.' Privately, top leadership aides believe that while the Senate could still finish its work by July 4, the process might take several more weeks — or months — if the Senate departs dramatically from the House product. Among the open questions leaders are working through is the endgame for final passage of the bill. Top officials in the House, Senate and White House all want to avoid another big fight over the bill in the House and another round of 'pingpong' where the bill goes back and forth between the two chambers. The hope is to incorporate any final negotiations into the Senate version so the House can take a vote on final approval only without making any changes. But to do that, the two chambers would have to resolve key fights — including over the level of spending cuts, business tax cut extensions and the cap on the state and local tax deduction — in advance. In an ideal scenario, Senate Republicans would offer a 'wraparound' amendment reflecting a bicameral agreement at the end of the long series of amendment votes known as vote-a-rama — allowing for a relatively fast up-or-down vote in the House. The alternative would be entering into a much lengthier conference between the two chambers after Senate passage — negotiations that leaders fear could add weeks, if not months, to the process. While several GOP senators have floated a conference, leaders have repeatedly tamped down the idea. Johnson declined to weigh in on the procedural questions Wednesday: 'I'm in constant communication with [Senate GOP leaders], but there's still a lot of question marks over it.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune said in an interview that his team, as well as key Senate committee chairs, are working with Johnson to avoid a scenario where the House makes changes to the bill that passes the Senate. That includes weekly meetings, and more frequent phone calls, with the speaker and his team. 'There's just a lot of coordination to hopefully avoid some of the potential snafus that could happen with something that's this complicated,' Thune said. For example, Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) is meeting with Senate GOP leadership staff Wednesday to discuss the House's proposed increase to the SALT cap ahead of the Senate vote. Meanwhile, House GOP rebels Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Scott Perry (R-Pa.) met with Senate GOP fiscal hawks Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) on Tuesday night as they push the Senate to carve out deeper spending cuts and maintain the House's rollback of clean energy tax credits. The White House is keeping pressure on, as well. Trump border czar Tom Homan attended a Senate GOP lunch Wednesday, underscoring the need for the additional immigration enforcement funding in the bill. Senate committees chairs continue to roll out pieces of the bill this week, with all eyes on Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), whose panel is handling the thorniest parts of the legislation and might not release text until next week. Thune and other GOP leaders are already planning to use next week to negotiate additional changes to the bill in the lead-up to floor action the following week. Both Johnson and Thune met separately with President Donald Trump on Monday. Afterward, even the president acknowledged during a White House event that the July 4 timeline could slip. 'If it takes a little longer, that's OK,' Trump said.
