Once-Struggling Seafood Restaurant Chains Making A Comeback
In the world of American fast food, it's safe to say that seafood restaurants are nowhere near as popular as more familiar establishments that specialize in mainstays like burgers or chicken. Smithsonian Ocean has highlighted a certain American squeamishness surrounding sea-based protein. This lack of popularity may be part of why seafood restaurants like Bubba Gump and Kona Grill are disappearing across the country, with many once-beloved chains declaring bankruptcy to combat the effects of inflation and changing consumer habits. But all is not lost for lovers of fish in all its forms. Certain seafood chains are making a comeback, and they're hopefully here to stay.
Restaurants like Red Lobster, Long John Silver's, and Arthur Treacher's are emerging from years-long slumps with new locations, updated menu offerings, and even refreshed aesthetics that may just reinvigorate their popularity with a new generation of patrons. Let's explore what these seafood establishments once were, how they lost their way, and how each brand is successfully chasing a fresh start.
Read more: Popular Panda Express Menu Items, Ranked Worst To Best
Starting in the 1970s, Red Lobster was many Americans' go-to for casual, affordable seafood. Thanks to offerings like its popcorn shrimp and eventually its beloved Cheddar Bay biscuits (which you can recreate at home with our recipe), this chain spread across the U.S. and brought coastal flavors inland. As decades passed, however, consumer habits changed along with the economy, and casual sit-down chains suffered from the rapid disappearance of the middle class. A May 2024 bankruptcy filing (often blamed on Red Lobster's overzealous endless shrimp promotion, at least in part) signaled to many that the seafood chain was going under, but in September 2024, the tides turned.
This was thanks to Fortress Investment Group, which acquired the Red Lobster brand through a newly created entity, RL Investor Holdings LLC, and provided $60 million to help the struggling chain get back on its proverbial feet. The month prior, Red Lobster also welcomed a new CEO — Damola Adamolekun, formerly the CEO of P.F. Chang's — and began closing restaurants to streamline operations.
Red Lobster officially exited bankruptcy on September 16, 2024 and has taken steps to revitalize its brand. One of these was trimming down the menu while reintroducing old favorites, like hush puppies, lobster pappardelle pasta, and even Lobsterfest, an annual menu promotion that wrapped up its initial return on April 20, 2025. The company also updated its tartar sauce recipe and notably discontinued its infamous endless shrimp promotion, which was made a permanent menu fixture prior to the bankruptcy filing. To attract millennial and Gen Z diners, the chain will also start "offering premium ingredients and a more vibrant dining atmosphere," per Food Chain Magazine.
Long John Silver's, now known for its fried pollock and hush puppies, opened its first location in 1969 in Lexington, Kentucky. Over the following 10 years, its footprint grew to over 1,000 restaurants. CNN Money wrote that the chain "popularized the idea of seafood as fast food," but that popularity apparently waned not long after the article's 1998 publishing. In fact, Long John Silver's filed for bankruptcy that same year (likely due to the immense debt it acquired after going private in 1989), and as recently as 2017, the brand came under fire for selling low-quality food. So, what has changed to enable a Long John Silver's resurgence?
The first sign of a revival came in 2016 when the brand revealed an updated, more mature logo at a convention in Louisville, Kentucky (which also came with a uniform fashion show). Seven years later, the company brought on a new CEO, Nate Fowler — who brought experience from major companies like Nike and US Bank — and the change in leadership may have inspired yet another brand refresh.
Long John Silver's also made some menu improvements in 2023, like using thicker fish and updating the marination process for its chicken. As revealed in a June 2024 report from QSR, the chain additionally plans to focus on "improving assets, upgrading technology, and transforming unit economics for franchisees" moving forward. The report also highlighted the restaurant's app and loyalty program, known as the "Seacret Society," through which customers can gain points and earn rewards. Self-service kiosks and digital menu boards are also on the docket, as are plans to move away from the restaurant's familiar (but arguably outdated) "fish shack" aesthetic.
Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, founded in 1969 in Columbus, Ohio, was named after a British actor, likely to signal to American diners that the seafood chain aimed to provide an authentic English experience. (This is particularly evident on an archived version of its website, which makes reference to its "oversized french fries known as 'Chips.'") Its specialties included battered shrimp, fish, and chicken, and at its peak in the '70s, it operated just about 800 locations. So, whatever happened to Arthur Treacher's?
The (kind of) short answer is that conflicts between England and Iceland in the mid 20th century made English-imported cod — the preferred fish in classic fish and chips — unsustainably expensive for the American chain, leading to its acquisition by Mrs. Paul's Kitchen Inc., a frozen fish and veggie manufacturer, in 1979. This marked the beginning of the brand's gradual decline (which included a 1980 bankruptcy filing), and by 2021, only one Arthur Treacher's remained, located in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio. Fortunately, this '70s throwback is angling for a return.
Thus far, this comeback is characterized by the opening of several new locations. How the chain expanded from its one remaining location to two isn't entirely clear, but on March 30, 2025, the Arthur Treacher's Facebook page announced that its third location would be opening in Cleveland Heights, Ohio on April 1 (an event Cleveland.com clarified was "no April Fool's joke"). Additionally, hot dog mainstay Nathan's Famous has owned the Arthur Treacher's brand since 2021, resulting in a couple of hybrid locations, as well as plans to implement ghost kitchens. As James Walker, Nathan's SVP of restaurants, told QSR around the time of acquisition, "We're making sure all of the food is memorable, craveable, and Instagrammable."
Read the original article on Mashed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
17 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Bank of America predicts major housing market changes are coming soon
Homebuyers have faced an unpredictable housing market over the past few years. Rising home prices and stubborn mortgage rates have prompted many Americans to delay their plans for homeownership as they wait for housing conditions to improve. Broad economic uncertainty and the ongoing housing market gridlock have dampened buyer confidence, leaving the outlook for 2025 up in the air. Although housing inventory is finally increasing, weak demand could suppress housing sales. Don't miss the move: SIGN UP for TheStreet's FREE daily newsletter Sticky mortgage rates have shattered expectations for a strong housing rebound this year, but the overall market outlook is on the upswing from increased inventory and price deceleration. Though the second half of the year remains uncertain, many experts believe housing conditions will improve, potentially bringing an end to years of stagnation. Bank of America anticipates a few crucial shifts to watch this year. Image source: Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images Following years of stagnation in the housing market, 2025 was anticipated to bring notable improvements. However, persistent inflation, trade tensions, recession concerns, and financial instability have kept mortgage rates elevated, constraining home sales. Housing affordability is one of the biggest barriers to homeownership, and elevated mortgage rates and inflated home prices have made saving for a down payment and finding a home within budget more difficult. Bank of America recently released its 2025 Homebuyer Insights Report, and it found that buyers are softening on the housing market outlook, but still holding out for better conditions. More than half of prospective homebuyers believe the housing market is in a better position than it was a year ago. And while 75% of buyers expect mortgage rates and housing prices to improve in the next year, they are also holding off on purchasing a home until then. More on homebuying: The White House will take surprising approach to curb mortgage ratesHousing expert reveals surprising ways to reduce your mortgage rateDave Ramsey predicts major mortgage rate changes are coming soonWarren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sounds the alarm on the 2025 housing market Younger generations in particularly would be encouraged to buy a home if mortgage rates fell below 6%. Head of Consumer Lending Matt Vernon notes that despite a challenging market, most buyers are planning to purchase a home in the future. "The uncertainty among homebuyers is real, but so is their resilience," he said. "Buyers are navigating a complex environment with rising costs, fluctuating rates, and mixed signals, but many are still planning ahead." First-time homeowners - predominantly Gen Z and Millennials - have struggled to buy a home amid rising prices and heightened competition. The average first-time homeowner age skyrocketed to 38 in 2024 as younger buyers were increasingly priced out of the housing market. In order to afford a home, younger buyers have been encouraged to lower their expectations and make concessions on their homeownership plans. Related: Fannie Mae predicts major mortgage rate changes are coming soon Over 90% of Gen Z and Millennial buyers noted that they purchased a home outside of their ideal neighborhood, and 30% of Gen Z buyers had to get a second job to help save for their down payment. "Even with the challenges they face, younger generations still understand the long-term value owning a home offers them, and many are doing what it takes to get there," Vernon continued. "They are finding creative ways to afford down payments and working hard to improve their financial futures." Though the housing market has been difficult for younger homebuyers to navigate, many remain hopeful that the market will turn around soon - and are finding innovative ways to tackle homeownership in the meantime. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?
We've seen the headlines that reveal how rich the world's top billionaires are — but it's hard to comprehend just how rich they are. Consider this: Let's say you had $1 billion in your bank account and had to spend $100,000 every day, for an entire year. After 365 days, you would still have $963,500,000 (nine hundred sixty-three million five hundred thousand). Discover More: Find Out: Over the last two decades, billionaires have ballooned their wealth to unparalleled levels. In 2005, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates ranked as the world's richest person, with a net worth of $46.5 billion, as reported by CNN. Today, that title belongs to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whose net worth stands at $368 billion as of June 5, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Even when adjusted for inflation, Gates' former net worth would be equivalent to roughly $76 billion in today's dollars. It is worth noting that other billionaires have also increased their wealth during the same time. For instance, tech billionaires Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos are worth $229 billion and $227 billion, ranking second and third globally. For many Americans, this trend is not sitting well. The sky-high cost of living has catalyzed support for redistributive tax policies, especially among younger voters and the progressive base of the Democratic Party. While higher taxation may or may not happen in the years to come, here's hypothetically how much you'd get if the world's richest man gives a check to every American. The United States Census Bureau estimates the current population to be around 341 million people, ranking only behind India and China. If Musk's enormous $368 billion were equally divided in the U.S., each person would receive $1,079 (rounded to the nearest dollar). A couple would receive $2,158, while a family of four would get $4,316. Despite the enormous wealth of billionaires, much of their fortune is tied up in stocks, real estate, and other holdings. Only a small percentage of their assets is held in cash. Based on data from Forbes, Musk has a 12% ownership stake in Tesla and to date, he remains the largest shareholder in the $1.15 trillion electric vehicle company. This is in addition to a 42% slice in SpaceX and a 54% interest in xAI, among many other businesses. Interestingly, Bloomberg reported that Musk's financial holdings appreciated by 77% after joining the campaign trail with President Donald Trump late last year, as reported by Bloomberg. Investors became bullish on Tesla and Musk became the first person to ever reach a net worth exceeding $400 billion. Since then, Tesla's market value has fluctuated as a result of volatile market conditions, macroeconomic factors and the threat of a global trade war. Editor's note: Data is accurate as of June 5 and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.
But while Trump still dominates the short-term politics of the Republican Party, Musk holds a very different kind of power, one that may ultimately outlast Trumpism. He's younger. He's vastly wealthier. And unlike most political rivals, Musk doesn't need a seat in Congress or a friendly Fox News hit to wield influence. He owns the platforms. He runs the systems. And his companies are increasingly intertwined with the United States' future — from space exploration to battlefield communications. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up This feud didn't erupt out of nowhere. Musk had reasons to be angry. First, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Advertisement This isn't just a policy spat, it's a power struggle. Trump is playing to win the moment. Musk is building for the long haul. Advertisement Let's start with the obvious: Trump tuns 79 next week. Musk turns 54 at the end of June. Trump is focused on one last political chapter. Musk is laying groundwork for the next several decades. That generational difference shapes everything else. Trump's power is political. Musk's is infrastructural. The president can rally public opinion, bend Congress to his will, and weaponize regulatory agencies. But Musk operates on another level — embedding his companies into the very systems the government depends on. SpaceX is now central to NASA and Pentagon operations. Starlink powers military communications in Ukraine and is quietly becoming indispensable for disaster zones and geopolitical hotspots. Even Tesla, for all its recent volatility, helped create the EV market and still shapes infrastructure policy. If Trump wants to punish Musk, he has tools — the SEC, federal contracts, and regulatory pressure. Heck, one Trump ally believes Trump has reason to deport Musk back to his native South Africa. But the irony is that Trump's own administration might need Musk more than Musk needs Trump, particularly in the next moment of crisis. Then there's media. Beyond the powers of the presidency, Trump's strength is performative — rallies, TV hits, the occasional viral clip. Sure, he also has Truth Social, but that is a niche network. Musk, by contrast, owns the algorithm. As the proprietor of the much more mainstream X (formerly Twitter), he doesn't just post. He shapes the feed. He bans journalists, elevates allies, and controls what trends. But their falling-out signals a deeper shift on the American right — a movement once held together by Trump's gravitational pull is now already fragmenting. One can see that just in the fights over the Big Beautiful Bill. Musk represents a rising faction: tech-aligned, anti-woke, post-party, and less interested in governing than in redesigning systems altogether. Advertisement Of course, Musk is no model of discipline. His erratic tweets and ideological zig-zags make him an unreliable political force. But that's precisely what makes him dangerous. He's not a senator. He claims he is not a donor anymore. He's not trying to be president and, well, he is constitutionally ineligible anyway. Instead, he's trying to shape what the presidency needs. Trump still knows how to land a punch. But Musk might is laying claim to the terrain on which the next generation of political power will be fought. So yes, Trump can still win this fight over a tax bill. But Musk is playing a different game. He's not trying to win a news cycle. He's trying to build the operating system for what comes next. James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.