Oar and Explore: All-women boat club using London's oldest canal
"When you actually get out on the water, it's amazing, it's really calm, it just gives you a sense of joy."Ruhana Ali is one of the members of Oar and Explore, an all-woman boat club which operates on the Limehouse Cut, London's oldest canal.More than 120 women, mostly Muslim or global majority, are part of the east London club, which started as a pilot two years ago."What's really amazing about this boat club is we've got women in all shapes and sizes dressed however they want to dress as comfortably as they can and they're out on the water and they're enjoying it," Ms Ali adds.
She added: "I think that's what's really wonderful about our community and that's what's really wonderful about London, actually, that you can try new things as crazy as they are and really have a good time."We get waves, we get funny looks when we're on the water like 'what are those strange group of ladies doing?' But we wave, we say hello."It makes your mood even happier when we're on the water so it's just a really nice thing to be able to do and share."Babu Bhattacherjee, director of communities and neighbourhoods at the Poplar HARCA housing association, said the women were "reclaiming the water".He said: "In east London we have these lovely spaces but over time they've become a bit unsafe and people are bit worried about them so it's really great to work with local women to create something that is fun, brings people together and enjoy these great blue spaces that we have in London."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Express
31 minutes ago
- Auto Express
The car is still king! Ridiculous train fares make them look like absolute bargains
When I'm not happily driving cars, I'm a grudging train passenger who's regularly ripped off, let down or disillusioned by this much-hyped strike-prone public transport. The customer experience is so underwhelming that my confidence in, and respect for, Britain's heavily subsidised rail industry has rarely – if ever – been lower. Advertisement - Article continues below I'm not sure if it's me giving up on the train or the train giving up on me. Either way, the 'alternative to the car' is as implausible now as it was in the nineties, when notoriously hypocritical Transport Secretary John Prescott (a user of two Jaguars) told me to tell you, dear reader, that the train would soon take over as the preferred mode of transport for the average Brit. This was as blatantly untrue then as it is now, not least because the cost of rail travel is exorbitant. Travel from, say, Cardiff to Aberdeen and the standard single/one-way fare is from £285.50 – more than many flights from the UK to the Far East. People in central London doing short journeys can pay up to £15 per mile. In the Stratford quarter of the capital, passengers can pay up to £2.21 per minute on the fastest trains. A standard annual season ticket from Ebbsfleet, Kent, to St Pancras, 20 miles and minutes up the line, costs £6,000-plus. Add £1,815 for a yearly parking pass and an extra £2,000 for tube or taxi fares and we're talking £10,000 or more per annum. That's enough to buy a used car, refuel petrol tanks for several years, or charge an electric car at home for well over a decade. If tickets weren't so prohibitively expensive and responsible for preventing freedom of movement among low-paid workers, students, shoppers, holidaymakers and cash-strapped folk seeking jobs, social lives or both, they'd be comical. But current Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander can still deliver some rail-related hilarity – as she proved with her performance on 25 May, when her Government began renationalising rail services. 'Today marks a new dawn for our railways,' she enthused during her away-day on the first renationalised train from London's Waterloo station. Further promises included 'moving away from 30 years of failing passengers', who now get 'higher standards'. She has to be the funniest Transport Sec cum stand-up comedian since Two Jags Prescott. How so? Because her highly symbolic train ride couldn't be completed by, er, train. It took her four times longer than scheduled. And it was completed only after passengers were embarrassingly turfed off and ordered to complete their journeys in dreaded rail-replacement buses which, in my experience, are even more unpleasant (if that's possible) than iffy trains or railway lines. If Britain's highest-ranking transport politician believes that this latest fiasco and wallet-busting fares represent 'higher standards', she's more out of her depth than I feared. Trains too expensive in your area? We can help you find a great deal on a new car instead ...
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Furious neighbours of King Charles's Highgrove say they have nowhere to leave their cars due to hordes of tourists - despite paying for one of Britain's most expensive parking permits
Furious neighbours of King Charles 's country home say they have nowhere to park because of hordes of tourists visiting the estate. Residents living in Tetbury, Gloucestershire, near Highgrove House, pay for one of Britain's most expensive parking permits. But despite the hefty fee of £640 they can't park their vehicles outside their homes and claim the town is used as a 'car park'. 'They're about £600 a year, a hell of a lot, and there's no allocated spots for residents so it's just a free for all,' explained resident Steve Tayler, 72. Another resident, Kenneth Ford, 68, added: 'Personally I think it's a lot of money to be paying. 'If you go somewhere with your car you have nothing to say that you had that space. 'So every time you go somewhere and come back you could not have a space, so you could be paying the £600 a year for nothing. 'At the end of the day, like in all these towns, it's set up more for people coming into the town rather than the residents.' Despite the hefty fee of £640 residents can't park their vehicles outside their homes and claim the town is used as a 'car park' The price of the permits are double the cost of some of London's most expensive boroughs. And only half of the spaces in West Street are allocated to locals, meaning they struggle to find a place to park. John Evans, 87, said: 'I was looking out my kitchen window one day and there was a coach full of tourists that had come from Germany, parked in West Street. 'And because there's a real need for large vehicles to have places to park, I've seen coaches in the car park here. It happens all the time. It's crazy.' Dee Buss, 78, added: 'It has really been bad. 'I have no choice but to buy a permit because parking in the street is nigh on impossible. 'This my eighth year with the parking permit and the price has just gone up and up and up. 'We have a situation where because we have so many Airbnb's and second homes, people literally park where they see a space without thinking. 'In the house across, there's an elderly disabled lady who had a hospital appointment on Saturday but couldn't get her car out because another had been parked over her entry. 'Obviously we're happy to have King Charles over at Highgrove, but there's so many tourists and it seems to leave Tetbury as the car park.' However, the council does provide free parking for all at the Old Railway Yard car park in the town. Councillor Paul Hodgkinson, portfolio holder for parking at Cotswold District Council, said: 'With officers from the council, I have spent time in Tetbury talking to residents, local businesses and other stakeholders so have a good understanding of the issues they are facing. 'In recognition of the needs of season ticket holders, half of the standard parking bays in the West Street Car Park on Old Brewery Lane are allocated to them. 'While we understand that holding a season ticket does not guarantee a parking space and that these tickets are not exclusively for residents, opportunities to expand off-street parking in the town are unfortunately limited. 'In addition, we also provide the old rail yard carpark in Tetbury which is free of charge. We remain committed to ongoing dialogue with local residents and businesses.' The estate, bought in 1980, is the private residence of King Charles and Queen Camilla. The house runs public tours for charity from April to October. And the gardens are managed by The King's Foundation, the charitable organisation which oversees all of Charles' philanthropic initiatives. They attract more than 40,000 visitors a year with proceeds being ploughed back into the Foundation's work promoting traditions heritage skills and building sustainable communities.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Skipsea abandoned Norman castle site wows archaeologists
Thousands of visitors flock to UK castles each year, some with links to Harry Potter, others with a long history of sieges, but for two archaeologists from the University of York, the site of what was a remote Norman castle in East Yorkshire is just as castle near the village of Skipsea was built in about 1086, according to English Heritage, and was the residence and administrative centre of the Lords of evidence of it remains today, but recent research has revealed that the motte - or mound - previously thought to have been created by the Normans, actually dates from the Iron Dr Elaine Jamieson, fieldwork project manager, said the site had a fascinating history. "I probably see it with completely different eyes to the tourists who are looking for a stone castle, but I see the castle in all the earthworks," she said."Our work up here on this ridge suggests it might have had two baileys - one on the ridge - and one on the other side of the motte," she said. The castle would have likely originally have been built from timber, before being rebuilt in stone, she the castle was abandoned, Dr Jamieson said it was possible local villagers took the stone to use area was controlled by the last Anglo-Saxon King of England, Harald Godwinson, and, after the Norman Conquest of 1066, became the estate centre of the Lords of Holderness."After the Norman Conquest, this land was given by William the Conqueror to Drogo de la Beuvrière, who was a Norman, and a knight who fought with him at the Battle of Hastings," Dr Jamieson said."He [Drogo de la Beuvrière] was also married to William the Conqueror's niece, who he allegedly murdered before fleeing back to France."The land was then given to Odo, Count of Champagne - and it was more likely than not that it was him that built the castle," she added. Dr Jim Leary, from the University of York's archaeology department, said interest at the site went way back beyond Norman times."We know that the earlier stages of the mound are Iron Age - probably a burial mound - and then later on that was adapted as a medieval motte," he said."The surrounding area would have once been very different," he said."This was one huge lake and Holderness was a really watery area, with a whole series of lakes - sort of like beads on a necklace."He said it would have been a lush, rich area - wonderful for fishing and fowling and would have drawn people to it."We know from the archaeology that we have been finding there were hunter gatherers in the Mesolithic period, and then in the Neolithic and Bronze Age [and] right the way through to the Iron Age," he said."This would have once been an island protruding out of the lake," he told the BBC's Hidden East Yorkshire to English Heritage, the castle declined from about 1200 when the lords of Holderness moved their administrative residence to Burstwick, east of was ordered to be destroyed in 1221 when Count William de Forz II rebelled against the king. By 1350, the castle was being leased for pasture and the borough was to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
